The description is retarded. Change it to something normal. Also, there have been many attempts at making alternatives for backbreaker assassins, all of them with hammer bash, and they all got screwed. 82.73.139.17 19:30, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
- I will here on ignore everything you say because you said that description is retarded. --Chaos? -- 19:36, March 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Truth hurts. Builds here, whining on your blog.--24.148.174.116 00:43, March 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Tbh, that is the most epic description
i've seen in a very long timeever. You are wrong. LessQQ moreQQ 00:46, March 3, 2010 (UTC) - The difference between this one and those others is that those others didn't have a retarded buffed SW to cover the damage lost from BoS. ··· Danny So Cute 04:05, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
Pl0x get frenzy out of optionals, if you are running frenzy then no cancel stance, if you are running this where u can take out res (say CM or AB) you are an idiot for having frenzy at all (lots of ppl with strange builds, you'll get wtfpwnd by their ridiculousness). Which makes flurry a must. And you can't take out res in GvG... unless you are splitting, and if you are splitting with frenzy as a sin... then that's just lolz. Good build tho :) Joan %
01:07, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
- you'd have to be pretty retarded to try to solo-split with this build. you'd be dead before you had any adrenaline if you ran into anything that wasn't an NPC. if used carefully, though, Frenzy wouldn't be that bad. it'd hardly be the first time a Sin build had used it without a cancel. ··· Danny So Cute 01:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- People will realize to bring Flurry unless for a specific cause, if they don't, then they deserve to explode. You can snare a physical, build adrenaline, and spike it, in which case Frenzy won't hurt. Then again, it will probably fail cutely, but still. ^__^ --Chaos? -- 10:32, March 4, 2010 (UTC)
Do you need zealous daggers for this? With Falling Lotus Strike you should have enough energy without zealous in which case wouldn't vamparic daggers be better? --Pinkeyflower 13:26, March 6, 2010
- Meh. Maybe. If it works with vamps, just add that in. ··· Danny So Cute 20:11, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
I especially like the line: "Resurrect allies who seem to be useful."--128.61.122.196 20:52, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
- Well, shit, you only have one sig. Make it count, eh? ··· Danny So Cute 21:08, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Ehh, I love the build! I still think frenzy isn't really an option. Joan % 22:26, March 11, 2010 (UTC)
- In most cases, it isn't. There's always a few cases where it's acceptable, though. ··· Danny So Cute 00:55, 12 March 2010 (UTC)