Talk: Me/N Fast Cast Curser

I may have missed a few skills but these are being run fairly often, nerf to fast casting coming soon! --Frosty 17:40, 16 December 2008 (EST)

I know that it's a widespread opinion here that LC+suffering is good, but is suffering really deserving of main bar? I just don't get it.

Karate Jesus 17:45, 16 December 2008 (EST)

Spammable AoE cover hex that also does pretty nice degen ftw. Rawrawr Dinosaur 17:47, 16 December 2008 (EST)

In an update a while back suffering got buffed to -3 degen at 12, back in june infact, shows how bad gwshack are. --Frosty 17:51, 16 December 2008 (EST)

I knew it was -3, I just didn't think about the fact that it's basically a cover hex. My bad.

Karate Jesus 17:53, 16 December 2008 (EST)

vett. --Frosty 11:44, 18 December 2008 (EST)

Zzz innovative--

ChristmasRelyk 12:27, 18 December 2008 (EST)

I heard pblock doesn't like fast casting. Dutchess of Roseakalukejohnson - talk 15:48, 18 December 2008 (EST)

I heard that this is true. --Frosty 15:52, 18 December 2008 (EST)

lol testing --Frosty 11:48, 19 December 2008 (EST)

Add Ra/Ta tags please. This builds rapes both arenas and is being used the most by Ta balanced teams now. (Timcago 19:36, 13 January 2009 (EST)).

Nerfed

A total of 3 degen has been lost and signet of humility disables all of your necro skills now. (Timcago 20:43, 5 February 2009 (EST)).

Seen this version being used sometimes, may bring up unarchival if it gets seen more often. Frosty po! 00:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Ups, even better version, still being used so pulling out of archive. Frosty the Admin 15:58, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I want to know what idiot stuck it in archive anyway. it was obvious it was still going to be used — LukeJohnson

16:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

You are talking to that idiot.

Frosty the Admin 16:08, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

LJ, the new LC bar hadn't come to use, and the current one was nerfed, so archival was the only option, no matter how you reason. ---Ch aos- 16:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

No, i mentioned when thsi was going nito archive that it only needed tweaking. — LukeJohnson

16:16, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Its only really seen use again in the last few days though :/

Frosty the Admin 16:19, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

dont worry about it frostels, luke is so incredibly good at gw that he sees meta builds appearing 3 weeks in advance.

Tab 16:21, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

(EC)Weird to archive an unvetted build, but then again it was/is an actually used build. ---Ch aos- 16:22, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean, it wasn't unvetted I votewiped it.

Frosty the Admin 16:23, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Oh, no wonder, because I was so sure it was vetted. I just happened to be lazy and look at the wrong revisions when finding out if it was the same build or not. And I saw no removed votes/votes whatsoever. Does a votewipe make votes show under removed votes? =/ ---Ch aos- 16:27, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Well tab. i just thought what with all of the turret rangers going around, and the occasional mesmers, that possibly a build that still uses lc but with almost immunity against it might be slightly tweaked and used. but ofc that's not why some people use this is it tab... — LukeJohnson

16:24, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

It looks like it would work - i tried it but im useless with it LoL.

zomgwhatisa40/40??????

can we

just remove this? Pblock isn't even being used. Smurf Ohai 09:51, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Attributes

Instead of 9+1 FC and 8+1+1 Insp, how about 8+1 FC and 9+1+1 Insp? 11 Insp is a breakpoint for Ausp'Inc (7 -> 6 second recharge) and Drain Enchant (14 -> 15 energy gain). -- WhiteAsIce 09:17, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

dP

Run this, and they are honourable Frenchies. 5-5 imo. --Crowels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 21:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)