Talk: Mo/E P&H Flag Runner

Revision as of 20:44, 12 December 2008

Just a note, PnH is self targeting.----ﮎHædõ๘ یíɳ 14:59, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Do hexes or conds get removed first. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:04, 12 December 2008 (EST)

why does it matter? o_O----ﮎHædõ๘ یíɳ

15:05, 12 December 2008 (EST)

is obvious. if condis get removd furst, fragility be strongarrr. -- Jebus _contests 15:07, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Tested on Master of Healing with Hidden Calatrops, when PaH is used, she is not affected by cripple, so I supposes it's conditions first and hexes second. Banaantje 15:11, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Well for one, your neglecting that for the condition to be applied the hex has to be removed first, you probably didnt see the cripple because it lasted somewhere around .15 seconds, because of the secondary effect of PnH which makes it that much more amazing. Let me paint you a picture, VoR lasts one second if cast after pnh goes off. :3----ﮎHædõ๘ یíɳ

15:14, 12 December 2008 (EST)

And actually Banaan, based on what you said it would be hexes first... Hex gone->Cripple->Condition gone. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:16, 12 December 2008 (EST)

My bad, is there any other way of testing this? (Enchantment Removal?) Banaantje 15:18, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Fragility. Conds+Frag and if they take damage it is conds first. I am testing now. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:19, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Shit nevermind, I can't check. Can someone get a guildie to try it? ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:20, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Fragility is a no go, it's a hex, and PaH likes to eat those. Banaantje 15:22, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Thats the point, get Fragility and a condition and if it does damage on removal it removes conditions first. Me and Dejh are testing now. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:27, 12 December 2008 (EST)

At first results, we think it removes 1 condition-1 hex-1 cond-1 hex-etc till it runs out of removals. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:32, 12 December 2008 (EST)

Yep, that is what it does. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:38, 12 December 2008 (EST)

You're always a step ahead of me. But what is the above statement based on? (skills/method used?) Banaantje 15:39, 12 December 2008 (EST)

who the hell uses fragility in gvg in a non hexway, and if it was hexway your point would be irrelevant because you are already 8 v 8ing at stand because hexway is to shit to split.----ﮎHædõ๘ یíɳ

15:38, 12 December 2008 (EST)

We were just using it to test. And we based it on Fragility+Hidden Caltrops followed by PnH... Took 2 hits of condition damage due to putting on and removal of cripple. And with Just fragility, I stood in the lava and removed and I took 1 hit of damage from Frag. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 15:44, 12 December 2008 (EST)

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 ::You're always a step ahead of me. But what is the above statement based on? (skills/method used?) [[User:Banaantje|Banaantje]] 15:39, 12 December 2008 (EST)
 :::who the hell uses fragility in gvg in a non hexway, and if it was hexway your point would be irrelevant because you are already 8 v 8ing at stand because hexway is to shit to split.----[[User:Shadowsin|<font color="black">ﮎHædõ๘</font>]][[User talk:Shadowsin|<font color="darkred">یíɳ</font>]][[image:Shadowsin_sig.PNG|19px]] 15:38, 12 December 2008 (EST)
+::::We were just using it to test. And we based it on Fragility+Hidden Caltrops followed by PnH... Took 2 hits of condition damage due to putting on and removal of cripple. And with Just fragility, I stood in the lava and removed and I took 1 hit of damage from Frag. ~~ {{User:Frvwfr2/SigRedirect}} 15:44, 12 December 2008 (EST)