FANDOM


This is outdated. No hex removal, no self condition removal except CoP which would just complicate thigns. Swiftslash 20:24, 7 May 2007 (CEST)

Agreed. Bonder's should be SoR atm. Unexist 20:00, 7 June 2007 (CEST)
ZB works decent too. I guess RC could do it but this build just plain sucks now. Swiftslash \\ Impale 15:09, 8 June 2007 (CEST)

Viability in Question

Reasons:

  • Outdated
  • CoP on a bonder!

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:20, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Outdated all right, but the variant is not.

<pvxbig> [build name="SoR Bonder" prof=monk/warri protec=12+1+3 divine=9+1 smitin=5+1 tactic=8][reverse hex][guardian][shield of regeneration][dismiss condition][bonettis defense][blessed signet][life bond][balthazars spirit][/build] </pvxbig>

-- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 05:01, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Would we consider that a variant or a completely different build? Shireensysop 05:10, 23 June 2007 (EDT)

Umm... yeah. As soon as the Real Vetting Policy is up, I'm proposing that build as a replacement for the RC bonder, because everyone runs SoR now, and we don't have an SoR bonder up. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 12:42, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
That would imply that this build would require a lower rating, and your SoR version needs to be vetted upon. Shireensysop 14:08, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
That's what I mean. Look up, no one likes RC bonders anymore. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 01:19, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
I like them *sniff* Shireensysop 02:37, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
No doubt that this kicks butt against Tiger Stance Shadow Prisons (healing for 318 hp, not including deep wound, and removing all conditions) but that's about all that's good for now... and the build's self-defense is horrible...! -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 01:00, 2 July 2007 (CEST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.