m (moved Build talk:R/any BA Rapid Turret to Archive talk:R/any BA Rapid Turret: archived.) |
|||
(16 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:Having to be in your target's face ruins spikes. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 21:09, May 11, 2010 (UTC) |
:Having to be in your target's face ruins spikes. --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 21:09, May 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
::^thats why warriors suck. [[User:Gringo|Gringo]] 21:52, May 11, 2010 (UTC) |
::^thats why warriors suck. [[User:Gringo|Gringo]] 21:52, May 11, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::How about this: {{Mini skill bar |Screaming Shot|Penetrating Attack|Savage Shot|Distracting Shot|Mending Touch|Escape|Rapid Fire|Resurrection Signet}} It offers better blocking over time while maintaining about the same spikability. Thoughts? --[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 03:12, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Nop. --[[User:Steamy Igloo|<font color="black">Steamy</font>]]..[[User Talk:Steamy Igloo|<font color="gold">x</font>]] 08:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::Why not? The advantage I see with this build over BA is that you get more spikability with three attacks(Screaming->Penetrating->Savage) instead of just two from the BA variant(BA->Savage). It's similar damage, and you have a more reliable block stance with better recharge than 45/60 from LR and Whirling. I don't mind you disagreeing with me, but at least back it up with some facts so that I might understand why. --[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 18:54, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :Aftercast delay, Penetrating Nerf...?--[[User:GWPirate|GWPirate]] 19:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::I don't find the aftercast to be as bad as it was depicted out to be [personally]. Have you actually tested Penetrating Attack for yourself to come to that conclusion? Or did you just assume the nerf was bad that you just never touched/looked into it? --[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 23:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::Probably assumed it was bad since no one uses it--[[User:Relyk|<font color="darkblue">'''Relyk'''</font>]] [[User talk:Relyk|<font color="blue"><sub>talk</sub></font>]] 03:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::Have ''you'' tested it in gvg for yourself?? --[[User:Lemming|Lemming]] 04:40, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::Ive used it, an even better build with BA, Sundering and Penetrating. +9 DMG SUCKS--[[User:GWPirate|GWPirate]] 09:15, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::Lemming and GWPirate, hes the most retarded player on this site, dont bother trying to change his mind, it wont work.. --[[User:Steamy Igloo|<font color="black">Steamy</font>]]..[[User Talk:Steamy Igloo|<font color="gold">x</font>]] 09:29, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::::Get under a bridge, troll! --[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 22:53, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | ::::::Stop trolling burdy--[[User:Relyk|<font color="darkblue">'''Relyk'''</font>]] [[User talk:Relyk|<font color="blue"><sub>talk</sub></font>]] 22:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | :::::::Wow. Somebody calls me a retard (a troll remark) and I get told not to troll for calling him out? I guess that's how your logic works, huh? [backwards].--[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 22:57, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | {{Troll}} |
||
+ | |||
+ | (reset Indent) Wow! LOL Whoever put that: epic WIN! --[[User:BlazingBurdy|BlazingBurdy]] 23:18, May 20, 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 19:46, 1 September 2010
Enjoy my fresh ranger build. Works very well. Shinko 11:09, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- You didn't get a single section right :> --Chaos? -- 11:18, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- You mind i put back the old template?
Excuse me?
The hell man, this is SPECIFICALLY NOT A INTERUPT RANGER. So don't compare it with one either. This is a A PURE DAMAGE, and there is ONE OPTIONAL SLOT WITH A SKILL OF YOUR CHOICE.Remove that tag now. Shinko 12:47, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I could make a warrior that is specifically not a damage warrior. That would be terrible and eligible for WELL too. Misery 13:42, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Option 1: We vett a used GvG bar with a similar concept, and you read PvX:OWN.
- Option 2: We trash your build, and you read PvX:OWN. --Chaos? -- 14:18, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- LR seems pretty retarded with to the recent PvP nerf in combination with Rapid Fire on the bar, are people actually running that? Misery 14:27, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Team - Dual Ranger Balance. Let's you sit on a ledge and pewpew some lord damage.--TahiriVeila 14:31, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure about what I put on the build page? --Chaos? -- 14:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Team - Dual Ranger Balance. Let's you sit on a ledge and pewpew some lord damage.--TahiriVeila 14:31, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- LR seems pretty retarded with to the recent PvP nerf in combination with Rapid Fire on the bar, are people actually running that? Misery 14:27, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Blocks, allows for IAS without setting up preparation. --Chaos? -- 14:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I am aware of what the skill does, but 11/45 seems pretty shit. I guess a lot of the options seem pretty shit. No access to IMS (assuming you take Rend and aren't stupid enough to take Dodge), no low recharge block stance. I wonder what I used to take on my turrets. Probably Pin Down or something. I reckon you could do better but everyone is terrible these days so meh. Oh I know what I'd take, 3 spec Run as One! Misery 14:49, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- we're talking about gvg where rangers have to push through an entire team to harass monks, not RA/HA where you don't have to play out of position. LR is handy. Gringo 17:39, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Hello Saint, I know what GvG is. Defy Pain warriors are amazing BECAUSE EVERYONE IS TERRIBLE. The end. Note, that does not make them less amazing, it just makes me sadder. Misery 00:01, March 23, 2010 (UTC)
- we're talking about gvg where rangers have to push through an entire team to harass monks, not RA/HA where you don't have to play out of position. LR is handy. Gringo 17:39, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I am aware of what the skill does, but 11/45 seems pretty shit. I guess a lot of the options seem pretty shit. No access to IMS (assuming you take Rend and aren't stupid enough to take Dodge), no low recharge block stance. I wonder what I used to take on my turrets. Probably Pin Down or something. I reckon you could do better but everyone is terrible these days so meh. Oh I know what I'd take, 3 spec Run as One! Misery 14:49, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Blocks, allows for IAS without setting up preparation. --Chaos? -- 14:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
I could swear
This build was posted months ago after the nerfs. and was exactly the same. what happened to it? :S --Exo Oo 17:06, March 24, 2010 (UTC)
I came up with something similar (what do you think?):
No burning, but the bonus damage is pretty decent. The only downer is that PBS is half normal range, but with Escape you shouldn't have any issues rushing to the frontlines. --BlazingBurdy 20:40, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Having to be in your target's face ruins spikes. --Lemming 21:09, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
- ^thats why warriors suck. Gringo 21:52, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
- How about this:
- ^thats why warriors suck. Gringo 21:52, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
It offers better blocking over time while maintaining about the same spikability. Thoughts? --BlazingBurdy 03:12, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Nop. --Steamy..x 08:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Why not? The advantage I see with this build over BA is that you get more spikability with three attacks(Screaming->Penetrating->Savage) instead of just two from the BA variant(BA->Savage). It's similar damage, and you have a more reliable block stance with better recharge than 45/60 from LR and Whirling. I don't mind you disagreeing with me, but at least back it up with some facts so that I might understand why. --BlazingBurdy 18:54, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Aftercast delay, Penetrating Nerf...?--GWPirate 19:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't find the aftercast to be as bad as it was depicted out to be [personally]. Have you actually tested Penetrating Attack for yourself to come to that conclusion? Or did you just assume the nerf was bad that you just never touched/looked into it? --BlazingBurdy 23:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
- Probably assumed it was bad since no one uses it--Relyk talk 03:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Have you tested it in gvg for yourself?? --Lemming 04:40, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Ive used it, an even better build with BA, Sundering and Penetrating. +9 DMG SUCKS--GWPirate 09:15, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Lemming and GWPirate, hes the most retarded player on this site, dont bother trying to change his mind, it wont work.. --Steamy..x 09:29, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Get under a bridge, troll! --BlazingBurdy 22:53, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Stop trolling burdy--Relyk talk 22:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Wow. Somebody calls me a retard (a troll remark) and I get told not to troll for calling him out? I guess that's how your logic works, huh? [backwards].--BlazingBurdy 22:57, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Stop trolling burdy--Relyk talk 22:55, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Get under a bridge, troll! --BlazingBurdy 22:53, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- Lemming and GWPirate, hes the most retarded player on this site, dont bother trying to change his mind, it wont work.. --Steamy..x 09:29, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't find the aftercast to be as bad as it was depicted out to be [personally]. Have you actually tested Penetrating Attack for yourself to come to that conclusion? Or did you just assume the nerf was bad that you just never touched/looked into it? --BlazingBurdy 23:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
Do not feed the trolls. The thing trolls fear most is lack of attention. Make 'em starve! |
(reset Indent) Wow! LOL Whoever put that: epic WIN! --BlazingBurdy 23:18, May 20, 2010 (UTC)