FANDOM


Enjoy my fresh ranger build. Works very well. Shinko 11:09, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

You didn't get a single section right :> --Chaos? -- 11:18, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
You mind i put back the old template?

Excuse me?

The hell man, this is SPECIFICALLY NOT A INTERUPT RANGER. So don't compare it with one either. This is a A PURE DAMAGE, and there is ONE OPTIONAL SLOT WITH A SKILL OF YOUR CHOICE.Remove that tag now. Shinko 12:47, March 22, 2010 (UTC)

I could make a warrior that is specifically not a damage warrior. That would be terrible and eligible for WELL too. Misery 13:42, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Whatever, i'm not even going to go further in on this. I know it works fine and im just posting it on wiki to get nerfed. Shinko 13:49, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
El oh el. Misery 14:11, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Option 1: We vett a used GvG bar with a similar concept, and you read PvX:OWN.
Option 2: We trash your build, and you read PvX:OWN. --Chaos? -- 14:18, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
LR seems pretty retarded with to the recent PvP nerf in combination with Rapid Fire on the bar, are people actually running that? Misery 14:27, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Team - Dual Ranger Balance. Let's you sit on a ledge and pewpew some lord damage.--TahiriVeila 14:31, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
I'm not entirely sure about what I put on the build page? --Chaos? -- 14:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Blocks, allows for IAS without setting up preparation. --Chaos? -- 14:40, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I am aware of what the skill does, but 11/45 seems pretty shit. I guess a lot of the options seem pretty shit. No access to IMS (assuming you take Rend and aren't stupid enough to take Dodge), no low recharge block stance. I wonder what I used to take on my turrets. Probably Pin Down or something. I reckon you could do better but everyone is terrible these days so meh. Oh I know what I'd take, 3 spec Run as One! Misery 14:49, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
we're talking about gvg where rangers have to push through an entire team to harass monks, not RA/HA where you don't have to play out of position. LR is handy. Gringo 17:39, March 22, 2010 (UTC)
Hello Saint, I know what GvG is. Defy Pain warriors are amazing BECAUSE EVERYONE IS TERRIBLE. The end. Note, that does not make them less amazing, it just makes me sadder. Misery 00:01, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

I could swear

This build was posted months ago after the nerfs. and was exactly the same. what happened to it? :S --Exo Oo 17:06, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

I came up with something similar (what do you think?):

Point Blank Shot Hunter's Shot Savage Shot Distracting Shot Mending Touch Escape Rapid Fire Resurrection Signet

No burning, but the bonus damage is pretty decent. The only downer is that PBS is half normal range, but with Escape you shouldn't have any issues rushing to the frontlines. --BlazingBurdy 20:40, May 11, 2010 (UTC)

Having to be in your target's face ruins spikes. --Lemming 21:09, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
^thats why warriors suck. Gringo 21:52, May 11, 2010 (UTC)
How about this:
Screaming Shot Penetrating Attack Savage Shot Distracting Shot Mending Touch Escape Rapid Fire Resurrection Signet
It offers better blocking over time while maintaining about the same spikability. Thoughts? --BlazingBurdy 03:12, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
Nop. --Steamy..x 08:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
Why not? The advantage I see with this build over BA is that you get more spikability with three attacks(Screaming->Penetrating->Savage) instead of just two from the BA variant(BA->Savage). It's similar damage, and you have a more reliable block stance with better recharge than 45/60 from LR and Whirling. I don't mind you disagreeing with me, but at least back it up with some facts so that I might understand why. --BlazingBurdy 18:54, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
Aftercast delay, Penetrating Nerf...?--GWPirate 19:19, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
I don't find the aftercast to be as bad as it was depicted out to be [personally]. Have you actually tested Penetrating Attack for yourself to come to that conclusion? Or did you just assume the nerf was bad that you just never touched/looked into it? --BlazingBurdy 23:59, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
Probably assumed it was bad since no one uses it--Relyk talk 03:30, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
Have you tested it in gvg for yourself?? --Lemming 04:40, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.