Headline text

Discuss. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:44, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

Don't say it... don't say it...
U SMEL> — Skakid9090 02:52, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Stop failing Skakid, and discuss teh build. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:54, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

it winz pve? — Skakid9090 02:56, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

Nope. Failure. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:02, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

Its ok but both healing and the spirits are weak. Its to spread out and not that effective. I just tried it and the heals keep some people alive but lose effectiveness on any heavy pressure.Zealous Benediction MasterOfGuild's 03:16, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

whenever a play a spirit rit, i feel like i'm littering. FrenzyPunjab 03:17, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

Im not saying this is bad by any means. Just want to make that clear. Its good enough to be in the good category.Zealous Benediction MasterOfGuild's 03:18, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
 :/ plx tell me you tried it...w/ a monk O.o? Otherwise, this won't work. This imo, is one of the most capable Glad Farming Builds on this site. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:24, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
If you tried it w/ a monk, and it still isn't working, I think counter 4 is your problem ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:26, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
no, is number 1. FrenzyPunjab 03:27, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Then you fail tbh. Try running bsurge, and orbing w/ rec. You will fail my friend. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:18, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

Go offensive spirits, or go Restoration healing. But going both weakens both sides of things. - Lord Xivor 04:14, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

...I will start taking glad shots for this build. I am averaging around 1-2 per day :/. And I only play and hour, if that on School days... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:16, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Say what xivor? a rit's best at combining offense and defense. They suck as a pure healer imo. –Ichigo724Ichigo-signature 10:24, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Well unfortunately in my experience in RA, too many Rit's strain themselves between duties and they cannot do any of them right. I play a Rit, so it is not like I am not knowledgable. I play my Rit more than any other in PvP. I am not saying I am a master or anything. I am saying that I am not a fan of spreading it thin. I hate it when a Rit is stuck in a 5 second cast on a spirit when someone on my team needs a heal. This is why I play one or the other when I do competative play. Personally, if mixing it up is the way, I would prefer spirits + channeling damage. - Lord Xivor 14:56, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

I've played a lot as a monk, and i have to say that having a partially restoration ritualist helps a lot... and it's even better when he can help KILL stuff --Kyrax 09:06, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

This sure help both sides, shadowsong is 1338... untill it dies after 3 hits, but it is ra. Would use an variant of this since prot>heal, helps both offense and defense good. Fish is baed 09:35, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

'Being Bad at this Game' great counter :D The preceding unsigned comment was added by (contribs) .

yeah lol was lmao when i read it:p The preceding unsigned comment was added by (contribs) .

I run this build in RA and TA with Brutal Weapon and Union instead of Veil and Blind. I managed to heal 4 people all the way through RA and in a 7 game streak in TA, using those two heals. As long as your teamates are intelligent (which can be a lot to ask for in RA nowadays) and don't overextend, this build can heal really, really well. Wildblazex 05:07, 8 November 2007 (CET)

Looks like you're trying to do too much Wrath 18:01, 6 January 2008 (EST)

what about tsungrai instead of blind was?--Thc 18:39, 6 January 2008 (EST)

blind was is pretty good.Bob fregman 22:47, 6 January 2008 (EST)

Like the Wanderlust + Blind duality and healing support is great. Good Build. Maybe should state Res signet for RA and DPS for TA Penguin 14:04, 8 January 2008 (EST)

To the person who claims he/she got 7 games into TA with this as the only healer...TA must have been failing that day. This is decent as a support character, either with another full healer or part healer on the team, but alone it's quite vulnerable, especially while putting up those spirits. Blazeroth 16:37, 8 January 2008 (EST)

the notes about getting gladiator points with this build or two of these in an RA party is completely pointless, it all depends on the skill of the player, the skill of your team and also what team you're up against-- 11:46, 10 January 2008 (EST)

This is the Rit Premade build, with two added skills..... Rickyvantof 14:27, 10 January 2008 (EST)

point being ?? that does not stop it from working and build do not fall under ownership as far as i know ... on other note I <3 Wanderlust .. having the coolest name and also what it does paired with shadow song makes it pwnsome ... IIIIwan13 14:39, 10 January 2008 (EST)
I was just pointing it out. Rickyvantof 14:53, 10 January 2008 (EST)

Ritualists in TA without Ancestor's isn't support. Fer Oias 18:48, 11 January 2008 (EST)

How come Earthbind isn't in the variants? Doesn't it go well with Wanderlust? 23:15, 11 January 2008 (EST)Charon

What is the reason for having both an Insightful Communing Staff of Fortitude and an Insightful Restoration Staff of Fortitude? I fail to see one. Why the hell was this archived? This was originally a RA only build but is archived due to TA tag? This build is amazing in RA and I do not think anyone ran this in TA because yes without AR its fail.(Mr Pink57 20:06, 23 February 2008 (EST))


I still see this around in RA fairly often... and you can't guarantee a ranger will be there to interrupt you, so shouldn't this be restored and re-voted on? Klumpeetsignature Klumpeet.ŧ.¢. 04:41, 9 April 2008 (EDT)

It was archived because the TA meta shifted. If you want to, I guess you could dupe a version just for RA to put through vetting. -- 04:44, 9 April 2008 (EDT)

inferior to a Corrupt necro in terms of support

huh? -Jax010 15:05, 2 August 2008 (EDT)

makes no sense to me either. noone even runs corruppt in Ra, and i dont see it that often in TAFile:Signature1.png 14:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.