PvXwiki
No edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:
 
:Splinter weapon and Weapon of Fury cancel each other out... ~~ [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] [[User:frvwfr2|'''<font color=#6e8b3d>frvwfr2</font>''']] ([[User_talk:Frvwfr2|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Frvwfr2|C]]/[[PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/frvwfr2|RFA]]) 21:18, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
 
:Splinter weapon and Weapon of Fury cancel each other out... ~~ [[Image:User Frvwfr2 signature.jpg|User:Frvwfr2]] [[User:frvwfr2|'''<font color=#6e8b3d>frvwfr2</font>''']] ([[User_talk:Frvwfr2|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Frvwfr2|C]]/[[PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/frvwfr2|RFA]]) 21:18, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
 
::You don't put them on the same person. &mdash; [[User:Rapta|<font color="silver">'''Rapta'''</font>]] [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] <small>([[User_talk:Rapta|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Rapta|contribs]])</small> 21:42, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
 
::You don't put them on the same person. &mdash; [[User:Rapta|<font color="silver">'''Rapta'''</font>]] [[image:Rapta_Icon1.gif|19px]] <small>([[User_talk:Rapta|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Rapta|contribs]])</small> 21:42, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
  +
  +
the reason I dont like weapon of fury, even though it is a great skill, is because you can't use splinter weapon on the guy with it on. splinter is just pure ownage in pvp/ha/vod(maybe not still vod after the change but eh). this is quite good though, this is exactly the kind of role rits are supposed to be playing, supporting everyone in the team somehow. &mdash; [[User:Skakid9090|<font color="#336666">'''Skakid9090'''</font>]] 05:13, 17 August 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 03:13, 17 August 2007

Old Discussion

i've been using this build for 2 months now and wanted to post it up. this tends to also work on computers with satalite internet, that special delay in actions casing bad reaction time. please tell me anything i can add or change to this despite being my first and only build post i'd very much like feed back. oh and P.S. PLEASE don't go on a rant/flame about how this doesn't use an elite. i've used plenty of builds without elites that ran perfectly fine till someone in my own team noticed and gotten bitchy and practically stopped doing his or her part. also some pve players didn't get an elite or the "required" elites for certain builds. this may help some of those players or some that want to own someone without an elite. NOTE that this is mostly under "testing" for pve general as i've never braved myself to break the line of using the same build in both pvp and pveSoul4hdwn 10:33, 18 July 2007 (CEST)

Firstly, it's "channel". Besides the disadvantages of not having an elite, the bar looks like you were confused as whether to go one way or another. Randomness, little synergy...not a good build. BattyLad 08:46, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

first, the "channal" was a typo i can't change back because it's the title of the webpage but i fixed in the build itself. second there's synergy with the weapon spells and the conditional damage/healing. spirit rift is the only "out of place" skill because of it's AoE ability thats needed to take down caps with little effort. lastly read the variances, i put a "change for any elite" thing for all those that get annoyed at no elites.Soul4hdwn 09:40, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

Everything there seconded...--Advent Mongoose Hex Breaker (talk) 12:07, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

I like the synergy between all the weaponspell related skills. If I were to change anything it would be to switch out Generous was Tsungrai with Spirit Light Weapon and have Destruction or Life be something optional to switch out with Bloodsong. Emeralddragon2 3:21, 19 July 2007

thank you :) i'll add that to the variances. though i already said elites are optional, this is a good replacement for generous. destruction only effects the area it's at not target or a spirit's range though.Soul4hdwn 09:40, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

Sorry but there is no such thing in PvP as an "Elite Optional" build imo, and if this is under testing for pve then why isnt it listed as such --jdoc 13:43, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

Build with an optional elite. Misfate Rune Elementalist Sup 06:09, 20 July 2007 (CEST)
edited the Tag for PvE too, tySoul4hdwn 09:40, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

I'm thinking that Spirit Rift and Essence Strike were just thrown in for the helluvit. Dirk150 22:06, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

sorry but spirit rift is for caps due to it's AoE ability. i'll put up in variances to change it with ancestor's rage. essence strike is so that you don't loose your damage or energy while preforming this (or any channeling) ritualist build.Soul4hdwn 09:40, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

But I seriously doubt that sprit rift, wielder's strike, and essence strike will cap a shrine alone.Dirk150 05:44, 22 July 2007 (CEST)

You say "using essence strike if low on energy" Your build has enough damage i would suggest either changing essence strike for offering of spirit or making it an optional slot for an elite prefered though offering of spirit seems ideal in this situation IMO. Also you have some spare attribute points left over, add those (few) spare points into spawning as it will increase the duration of weapon spells... (not much but still helps alittle). Also as a counter add in Daze. OblivionDanny 10:46, 1 August 2007 (CEST)

How has this been in testing for this long? lol...—Cheese Slaya's Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 04:52, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

New Discussion

Post suggestions here. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 22:13, 15 August 2007 (CEST)

Splinter weapon and Weapon of Fury cancel each other out... ~~ User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (T/C/RFA) 21:18, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
You don't put them on the same person. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 21:42, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

the reason I dont like weapon of fury, even though it is a great skill, is because you can't use splinter weapon on the guy with it on. splinter is just pure ownage in pvp/ha/vod(maybe not still vod after the change but eh). this is quite good though, this is exactly the kind of role rits are supposed to be playing, supporting everyone in the team somehow. — Skakid9090 05:13, 17 August 2007 (CEST)