(→Ranger) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
Noone runs a ranger, and i don't know why they would. Most people run ither A SoJ signet mesmer, B SoJ/Balth Pen smite monk, C Plague sig necro. Point here is that all 3 builds are both defensive and offensive, you don't need a cripshot ranger for ganking because you have 3 warriors and the third takes care of spliting and ganking. Cripshot seems like a total waste of a slot to me, as im sure sig hum on their WoH or BS or IS is going to apply 100 times more pressure and with Strength of honor added into the mix too, well GG.[[User:I Heal If U Shutup|I Heal If U Shutup]] 23:51, 15 May 2008 (EDT) |
Noone runs a ranger, and i don't know why they would. Most people run ither A SoJ signet mesmer, B SoJ/Balth Pen smite monk, C Plague sig necro. Point here is that all 3 builds are both defensive and offensive, you don't need a cripshot ranger for ganking because you have 3 warriors and the third takes care of spliting and ganking. Cripshot seems like a total waste of a slot to me, as im sure sig hum on their WoH or BS or IS is going to apply 100 times more pressure and with Strength of honor added into the mix too, well GG.[[User:I Heal If U Shutup|I Heal If U Shutup]] 23:51, 15 May 2008 (EDT) |
||
:With 3 warriors, I would think being able to cripple on demand is pretty powerful. Also, rangers can interrupt. [[Image:mightymouse.gif|25px]][[User:moush|<font color="magenta">moush</font>]] 15:45, 18 May 2008 (EDT) |
:With 3 warriors, I would think being able to cripple on demand is pretty powerful. Also, rangers can interrupt. [[Image:mightymouse.gif|25px]][[User:moush|<font color="magenta">moush</font>]] 15:45, 18 May 2008 (EDT) |
||
| + | ::You run smiter's to roll quick on burning, not to play balanced. Sig necro has no synergy here, this isnt a condition pressure build (thats also why this has no pblock). Cripple on demand with 3 warriors ownz. And just because your warrior's can split doesnt mean you want them to. Its when they dedicate a split that you need a warrior at the hall(and since you have an e/mo flagger and cripshot you should roll the split if you're any good) but otherwise, losing 1/3 of your offense<<<<<<losing a ranger for ~3mins.[[User:Dark0805|<font color=black><b>--Dark0805</b></font>]]<small><b>(</b>[[User_talk:Dark0805|<font color=red>Rant</font>]]<b>/</b>[[Special:Contributions/Dark0805|<font color=#ff11aa>Contributions</font>]]<b>)</b></small> 09:01, 19 September 2008 (EDT) |
||
Revision as of 13:01, 19 September 2008
penispenisduck Fishels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 08:56, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- You have no blindbot and no ward of any kind to assist the backline. You also have no Splinter Weapon or Ancestor's Rage. Despite nerfs, they're still ftw. Gaze Of Balthazar 11:04, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- The entire point of the build is that you drop defensive bullshit for more offensive capability. Good luck running a rit flagger with this post-LoD nerf. --
Tab Moo 13:50, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Build:Team - GvG Triple Warrior Rusty--RfBM 17:08, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Pretty huge difference. I should know, seeing as I made both. --Tab Moo 17:14, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Defensive bullshit? I want to stay alive.
Extreme(contribs) 23:04, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- So kill them first. --71.229 23:07, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Y three warriors, y not use an aom?--Relyk 00:34, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Because warrior are DPS machines...plus they look more manly then a dervish in a dress 68.193.221.34 01:13, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Y three warriors, y not use an aom?--Relyk 00:34, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- So kill them first. --71.229 23:07, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- Defensive bullshit? I want to stay alive.
- Pretty huge difference. I should know, seeing as I made both. --
- Build:Team - GvG Triple Warrior Rusty--RfBM 17:08, 20 April 2008 (EDT)
- The entire point of the build is that you drop defensive bullshit for more offensive capability. Good luck running a rit flagger with this post-LoD nerf. --
Run a para instead of your mesmer, GoE got a nerf on it's head and mesmers are not vital anymore, especially with a raw pressure build, as well as it gives a freaking soft target, unless running disortion mesmer(which absorbs too much of your energy). Gfte and anthem is pretty good, with 5 physicals. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 06:48, 30 April 2008 (EDT) Forgot that update would revert. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 07:34, 2 May 2008 (EDT)
mes
- most times i seen this run with a SoJ smite mes.--
aesthetic
Ranger
Noone runs a ranger, and i don't know why they would. Most people run ither A SoJ signet mesmer, B SoJ/Balth Pen smite monk, C Plague sig necro. Point here is that all 3 builds are both defensive and offensive, you don't need a cripshot ranger for ganking because you have 3 warriors and the third takes care of spliting and ganking. Cripshot seems like a total waste of a slot to me, as im sure sig hum on their WoH or BS or IS is going to apply 100 times more pressure and with Strength of honor added into the mix too, well GG.I Heal If U Shutup 23:51, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- With 3 warriors, I would think being able to cripple on demand is pretty powerful. Also, rangers can interrupt. moush 15:45, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
- You run smiter's to roll quick on burning, not to play balanced. Sig necro has no synergy here, this isnt a condition pressure build (thats also why this has no pblock). Cripple on demand with 3 warriors ownz. And just because your warrior's can split doesnt mean you want them to. Its when they dedicate a split that you need a warrior at the hall(and since you have an e/mo flagger and cripshot you should roll the split if you're any good) but otherwise, losing 1/3 of your offense<<<<<<losing a ranger for ~3mins.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 09:01, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
