I just dislike orizon, orizon spam! nooo :( but else it seems quite okay..... orizon... sorry for getting stuck on orizon >.<. Fish is baed 10:54, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Drop some DF for prot on the lod imo, go rof. –Ichigo724Ichigo-signature 11:18, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

This build seems good, except for one thing. The letters 'H' and 'A'. Tycn 12:21, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Orison of healing... Rawrawr 17:15, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

iz gud in ha, use it.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 23:58, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

yeah... rof is used in gvg but for HA orison is gooder --Healing HandsBim (talk|contribs) 00:13, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

especially when you have 2 other monks to do the protting for you :D.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 00:51, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Orison is never good. DK is spammable enough already, the two prot monks can heal you after infuse. And by the way, a three monk backline is kinda pointless. Tycn 02:55, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
That statement was fail Tycn :/. I don't even HA... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:57, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Clarify please? Tycn 02:58, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Anyway, three monks is kinda pointless considering a) you should be rolling them, and b), the extra monk isn't worth a few extra prots. Tycn 03:04, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
You don't auto-roll teams. You have to put up with a lot of shit gimmicks HA, some with plenty of heals (2 monks, 2 N/Rt icy veins with full bars of heals) - you don't just roll those. You have to be able to survive a minute or two, and two monks just can't (unless they're phoenix-emote-skill-level, at which point they aren't reading PvX). -Auron 03:07, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
You might as well bring 3 A/Mo, 3 SH then. 3 spikes capable of killing things going on at the same time is nice. Tycn 03:21, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Except 3 sh is dumb because you only need 2 to run relics. If anything, 2 sh and a snare ele, but definitely not 3 sh. -Auron 06:52, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
A snare then. Which is both offensive and defensive, more useful than the third monk. Tycn 07:10, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Well, except for altar maps mostly, but that's about it. Tycn 07:13, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
You need three monks when you have a team full of squishes. Any questions? -Auron 07:25, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
What is a squish? Edible? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:30, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
lol i hadn't checked the page til now, look how much arguing there was while i was away!—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 07:50, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Meh, I guess KD spam > snares. You win this round Auron >.< Tycn 07:57, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

3 RoF = orison is good. — Skakid9090 03:09, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

/agree --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 03:29, 4 October 2007 (CEST)


rate moar gogogogogo.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 06:34, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

3 times Augury is pointless IMO. furthermore, you can't pressure with those recharges I think. spike would be alot more effective. Bas koopman 15:51, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Rather have less d-dagger :Q. - Weapon of FuryUnexist 16:37, 11 October 2007 (CEST)


"# Spam Augury of Death, Dancing Daggers, Entangling Asp, Signet of Toxic Shock, and Signet of Judgement on a target untill dead. " I don't know, but this sounds really.. wrong to me. lol. Railin 19:49, 1 November 2007 (CET)

How come? I try this with my friends and it worked great. - Jope16 05:16, 23 November 2007 (CET)
I meant that maybe you shouldn't spam the skills on recharge but time your skill usage a bit. lol Railin-WoH Railin 08:37, 23 November 2007 (CET)

Hard Res?

its just a thought but.. would it be possible to incorporate a hard res into the build? Perhaps sig of return on the ele/Para. Of course a Rit res would always be nice but... Where? A spike team needs 5 successfull spikes for the group to be out of res. And if its a long battle, and your infuser isn't quite doing the job.. or if its just to short a spike to catch, then your done for. Expecially sence they probably have a few hard res's. I'd like to see it in there.. but still work of course. anybody see a possible way to get them in there without compensating anything too much?--Chris 08:15, 27 November 2007 (CET)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.