This Build is in danger of being removed due to "duplication" of the old build. However, the old build no longer works.
- Which is why people are supposed to suggest changes on the talk page of the other page.--Grijzeham 19:36, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- This is a completely new build, it doesn't doesn't use the same style of 600 as the other build. Now this build is faster, I believe, than any 600 build.
- What's the current best time? I've been working on a new version on the other talk page, and the "style" doesnt matter , its a build for speed clearing mount qinkai no need for more then 1 only the most efficient.--Grijzeham 19:50, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I see. Well the best time for this build is around 8 mins if done correctly. The Wallow team, with just 2 people, can go extremely fast and smoothly.
- I have mentioned on 2 other pages but why not here also , I'm fairly certain 1 spirit spammer and 1 ss necro is faster then 2 spirit spammers , builds are on the other 2 pages I don't feel like putting them here too.--Grijzeham 20:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I have left a post on the other page, about the 600 sin Tank. I saw this buid, and it looks much better then the other (wich is based on the previous build). Wouldn't it be better if you can find something in the middle? This build has a three-man Beach team. Why not mix builds and use the 600 2-man team, wich can be fast (I made some fast runs) and use a runner to kill outcast boss Kayli, like the old build? that migh actually be faster.
- I've been trying to get 600/smite to work for beach for a while but the time wont get under 9 minutes without the runner taking a very specific build.--Grijzeham 21:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- 1 Spirits and 1 SS might be better, yes. I will try it out and see how it goes. But for the wallow team, two spirits will probably be faster. I'm looking to make changes on the Beach team.
- Me and a friend tried ss / spirit on the beach the naga made it pretty impossible for us , though we where doing it 2 man , with a healer like your beach team currently has I think it could work though.--Grijzeham 23:43, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- 1 Spirits and 1 SS might be better, yes. I will try it out and see how it goes. But for the wallow team, two spirits will probably be faster. I'm looking to make changes on the Beach team.
- I've been trying to get 600/smite to work for beach for a while but the time wont get under 9 minutes without the runner taking a very specific build.--Grijzeham 21:12, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I have left a post on the other page, about the 600 sin Tank. I saw this buid, and it looks much better then the other (wich is based on the previous build). Wouldn't it be better if you can find something in the middle? This build has a three-man Beach team. Why not mix builds and use the 600 2-man team, wich can be fast (I made some fast runs) and use a runner to kill outcast boss Kayli, like the old build? that migh actually be faster.
- I have mentioned on 2 other pages but why not here also , I'm fairly certain 1 spirit spammer and 1 ss necro is faster then 2 spirit spammers , builds are on the other 2 pages I don't feel like putting them here too.--Grijzeham 20:39, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I see. Well the best time for this build is around 8 mins if done correctly. The Wallow team, with just 2 people, can go extremely fast and smoothly.
- What's the current best time? I've been working on a new version on the other talk page, and the "style" doesnt matter , its a build for speed clearing mount qinkai no need for more then 1 only the most efficient.--Grijzeham 19:50, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- This is a completely new build, it doesn't doesn't use the same style of 600 as the other build. Now this build is faster, I believe, than any 600 build.
Deletion
How is this build being considered a duplicate from that other? it has nothing o do with it. Plus, this one works in the current skill settings, while the other, well...
- Theres only need for 1 MQSC build , the best one , if this one is better then the old one (it is though still needs work) it should replace the old one not have a different page.--Grijzeham 23:38, February 27, 2010 (UTC)