Talk: Team - TA Dual Warrior

This team-build would be demolished by any reasonable team. a diversion mes to shut down your monk. then you have no healin. no eviserate axe!!! you dont need KD if you are crippled. is this in testing or trial? sao

Isn't Cripshot good for the Ranger to add some defence for the poor lil' monk? I'll go back into my corner if I'm wrong. Sorry for bothering you Tab. - isery -TALK 08:35, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

It is, but c-slash that linebacks is better def. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 10:36, 10 June 2008 (EDT)

if hes running this cripslash should be only needed. if a enchant remover is present. if you go W/-, W/-, R/mo, Mo/w: you will have no enchant removal unless you varient it. but.... then any good prot could cancel you warriors damage with a good guardian or block stance. sao

If your fucking magebane can't hit a diversion then leave him along side the road to die. You also have holy Veil to take off crap like diversion. You also don't need evis here. Cripslash pressures and your HAMMAR makes shit die. - PANIC! sexiness! 08:40, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Is this a joke? Hardly anyone runs Diversion in TA, and it's easily countered by not being bad. Eviscerate isn't all that good in TA. The variants are there for a reason - you're supposed to make an intelligent decision on what to take in regard to that choices made elsewhere in the build. Funnily enough, Diversion has been in almost every GvG build for the last year, yet their healing still survives? Oh, that's right. You only get a skill diverted if you cast through Diversion. --Tab Moo 08:41, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Oh and Tab, is Enfeeble still good at double the recharge? I liked it for it's spaminess. I know weakness isn't a priority condition but ten seconds always feels looooooong. I suppose most teams you face will only have one frontliner except for covenantway which it won't affect anyway. - isery -TALK 09:50, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

I'm not sure yet, haven't had a chance to try it, but I'd suspect it's a bit too weak now. Insidious Parasite is optional there for now. --Tab Moo 09:51, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Test it tonight! Panic on HAMMAR! gogogo. - PANIC! sexiness! 09:52, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

This was so last TA meta ago.

This can be run with a Me/N as well. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 13:25, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

It should be, imo. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 13:28, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Me/N isn't as good as ranger/necro. --Tab Moo 13:31, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

You're right; It's even better :P ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 13:33, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Its about the same i think. Its alot more defence than the other 2, if thats your kind of thing. Also, diversions get pretty nice with 2 wars beating your ass. Its just a more defensive version. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 13:37, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Diversion and Sig of D + keeping two opponents constantly Blinded = pwn. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 13:43, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

No idea why you'd run the most defensive midline option in a dual war build. --Tab Moo 14:02, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

That's cuz u suck m8 D: But srsly, why not? ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 14:03, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Because it's an offensive build. It's dumb to make it less offensive in order to take more defence. --Tab Moo 14:04, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Also, WoD>Diversion for shutdown with 2 wars by a long way. --Tab Moo 14:05, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

^Agree, but it's less defensive. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 14:06, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

Read again. It's an offensive build. There's no reason whatsoever to take more defence than necesarry, if you want to do that, run something else. --Tab Moo 14:07, 23 May 2008 (EDT)

better version

Def stance? Readem you're a fucking girl. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 19:03, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Only way to survive in a meta with two constantly disabling RaO's and smites. Otherwise, I would just run shield bash. --Readem 19:05, 10 August 2008 (EDT)