PvXwiki
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
 
I've seen this build used by high ranked guilds. I've used it in AB and RA, seems to work well. Also, in some of those guilds, they use conjure flame and power attack to make it even more powerful. --[[User:Evernix|Evernix]] 22:02, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
 
I've seen this build used by high ranked guilds. I've used it in AB and RA, seems to work well. Also, in some of those guilds, they use conjure flame and power attack to make it even more powerful. --[[User:Evernix|Evernix]] 22:02, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
 
:Too bad conjure means you're attacking incredibly slow since you only have one short activation attack. --[[User:Edru_viransu|<font color="Black">'''Edru viransu'''</font>]]//[[User_talk:Edru_viransu|<font color="Red">'''QQ about me'''</font>]] 22:06, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
 
:Too bad conjure means you're attacking incredibly slow since you only have one short activation attack. --[[User:Edru_viransu|<font color="Black">'''Edru viransu'''</font>]]//[[User_talk:Edru_viransu|<font color="Red">'''QQ about me'''</font>]] 22:06, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
::Too bad that you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about - It still has 3 short activation attacks. It switches out some skills. Should think it over next time :/
+
::Too bad that you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about - It still has 3 short activation attacks. It switches out some skills. Should think it over next time :/ --[[User:Evernix|Evernix]] 00:13, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
   
 
This+Snares+Oop+Dark Fury = win-age. [[User:Swiftslash|<font color="black">'''Swiftslash \\'''</font>]] [[Image:Impale.jpg|19px]] <small> ([[Special:Contributions/Swiftslash|<font color="Black">''contributions''</font>]] *[[User:Swiftslash/Warrior_Guide|<font color="black">''warrior guide''</font>]])</small> 01:53, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
 
This+Snares+Oop+Dark Fury = win-age. [[User:Swiftslash|<font color="black">'''Swiftslash \\'''</font>]] [[Image:Impale.jpg|19px]] <small> ([[Special:Contributions/Swiftslash|<font color="Black">''contributions''</font>]] *[[User:Swiftslash/Warrior_Guide|<font color="black">''warrior guide''</font>]])</small> 01:53, 5 August 2007 (CEST)

Revision as of 22:13, 7 August 2007

assistance plz, hope this doesnt already exist. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 00:07, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

bump The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 04:46, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

These things don't work very well. Battle Rage builds are superior. Tycn 05:04, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

huh? these pwn in HA. lots of dmg. might switch to hammer for bash+crushing. The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 05:12, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
The Battle Rage build has 2 fast activation attacks as opposed to 3, but has a constant speed boost and builds adrenaline twice as quickly. I've also tried scythe and hammer variants, but Spirit Bond really destroys this kind of thing much more than normal warrior builds. Tycn 05:21, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
that's why it says use with snares =P. 3 fast activ > 2 fast activ ^^. plus, you dont lose all adren on this and you can use non-attack skills. i need suggestions for the remaining skills though =/ The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 05:25, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Bulls, wild blow, rending touch? Tycn 05:27, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

BUMP The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 07:52, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

Wouldn't you rather the Hammer Bash -> Crushing Blow -> quick-activation attacks setup? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:55, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

Even though Krowman beat me to it: Warrior's Endurance hammer is interesting, because you're hitting very fast for a hammer(faster than with 33% IAS, and that's with a probably suboptimal attack usage), and very hard, and you have leet snares. Possible hammer bar =

Warrior's Endurance Hammer Bash Crushing Blow Protector's Strike Mystic Sweep Eremite's Attack Bull's Strike Resurrection Signet

. Main weakness is that it's a bit problematic hitting people with bulls without a speed boost and other consequences of not having a speed boost. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 07:59, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

I have a very similar bar in my sandbox, and like the note reads there, you can run this with snares (as mentioned) and Crippling Anthem. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 08:02, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
well looks like my build idea ended up being another one of krowman's sanbox ideas =P put it in testing... hf The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 08:08, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Hasty Refrain looks like it might be interesting with one(or more) of these, particularly since Izzy seems to intend to buff it a bit. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 08:12, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Btw, have you resolved not to sign your posts on this talk page? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 08:40, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

I've seen this build used by high ranked guilds. I've used it in AB and RA, seems to work well. Also, in some of those guilds, they use conjure flame and power attack to make it even more powerful. --Evernix 22:02, 4 August 2007 (CEST)

Too bad conjure means you're attacking incredibly slow since you only have one short activation attack. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 22:06, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Too bad that you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about - It still has 3 short activation attacks. It switches out some skills. Should think it over next time :/ --Evernix 00:13, 8 August 2007 (CEST)

This+Snares+Oop+Dark Fury = win-age. Swiftslash \\ Impale (contributions *warrior guide) 01:53, 5 August 2007 (CEST)

Wouldn't it make sense to put in the 3 leftover points into Scythe Mastery regardless if the bonus is negligible? It's still something. Dagger Wagger 19:53, 5 August 2007 (CEST)