No edit summary |
|||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
:Ehm...no [[User:Tyraelxy|<font color="Black" face="Comic Sans" size="3">'''Tyrael'''</font>]] [[Image:Life Sheath.jpg|19px]] [[User talk:Tyraelxy|<font color="Red"><small>I'm santa!</small></font>]] 19:51, December 22, 2009 (UTC) |
:Ehm...no [[User:Tyraelxy|<font color="Black" face="Comic Sans" size="3">'''Tyrael'''</font>]] [[Image:Life Sheath.jpg|19px]] [[User talk:Tyraelxy|<font color="Red"><small>I'm santa!</small></font>]] 19:51, December 22, 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I don't know, that with something Like Death's Charge or Signet of Malice might be nice for a split. However, I'm fairly certain this is not a split build. <span style="border-right:dotted 2px #AAAAAA;border-left:dotted 2px #AAAAAA;font-family:serif;font-size:8pt;"> [[User:Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">Thomas</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">So</span>]] [[User_talk:Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">Dutch</span>]] </span> 20:31, December 22, 2009 (UTC) |
:I don't know, that with something Like Death's Charge or Signet of Malice might be nice for a split. However, I'm fairly certain this is not a split build. <span style="border-right:dotted 2px #AAAAAA;border-left:dotted 2px #AAAAAA;font-family:serif;font-size:8pt;"> [[User:Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">Thomas</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">So</span>]] [[User_talk:Brandnew|<span style="font-weight:100;color:#666666;">Dutch</span>]] </span> 20:31, December 22, 2009 (UTC) |
||
+ | :You're serious about even considering mainbarring Shadow Refuge on an axe bar? And why the hell would you need a regenerative self-heal for an in this case terrible secondary? --'''<span style="font-family:Segoe Script;">[[User:Chaos|<font color="deeppink">-Chaos-]] ([[User_talk:Chaos|moo]]) </font></span>'''-- 20:41, December 22, 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:41, 22 December 2009
bash me pl0x /FrosTalk\ 06:56, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Evis + Shock, imo. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 06:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Swords >>>> Axes on coward. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 06:58, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Why is that, anyway? ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 06:59, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Swords >>>> Axes on coward. —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 06:58, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Coward AND bull's strike, owow <3 I already love this build. Brandnew. 07:13, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Imo, coward + bulls is redundant. I might do what the other build did and bring FGJ instead of bulls. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 08:46, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock. -StarSeeker | My talk 09:32, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Nowai. You're not taking shock when you still can take b-strike. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 11:25, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- ^ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 11:26, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- why take bull's? coward is like an elite bull's that actually works. steelfang = recharge coward neway. (Kiron 11:51, 21 June 2008 (EDT))
- Steelfang = nerfed, why take Bull's and Coward? just because you can. /FrosTalk\ 11:54, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Bull's doesn't require adrenaline, doesn't cause exhaustion and it's Bull's Strike. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 12:03, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- And I do believe Bull's are brave, meaning it is a Bull versus a Coward. /FrosTalk\ 12:07, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Anyone that's used to Bull's should take it. Shock is a bad idea, and 2 sources of KD is fun.--Fallen (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock isnt a bad idea, theres no room--RELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 16:04, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I meant Bulls + Coward + Shock, actually 8D -StarSeeker | My talk 17:40, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- No room tbh /FrosTalk\ 17:50, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Could take out Agonizing. Would be ultimate harrassment. -StarSeeker | My talk 20:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Would it be worth it?/FrosTalk\ 21:08, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- As a professional axeinyoface'r, I must say this looks good on paper. But I agree, drop Agonizing for FGJ. moar kd pls. Big~PEW~tymer 22:01, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Don't know, probably not. But at least it's something different, might get vetted. Other idea and stuff. -StarSeeker | My talk 05:42, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- I personally wouldn't run coward after steelfang nerf, that said never use rush and coward. Also executioners is better.I Heal If U Shutup 13:01, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Would it be worth it?/FrosTalk\ 21:08, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Could take out Agonizing. Would be ultimate harrassment. -StarSeeker | My talk 20:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- No room tbh /FrosTalk\ 17:50, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- I meant Bulls + Coward + Shock, actually 8D -StarSeeker | My talk 17:40, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock isnt a bad idea, theres no room--RELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 16:04, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Anyone that's used to Bull's should take it. Shock is a bad idea, and 2 sources of KD is fun.--Fallen (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- And I do believe Bull's are brave, meaning it is a Bull versus a Coward. /FrosTalk\ 12:07, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Bull's doesn't require adrenaline, doesn't cause exhaustion and it's Bull's Strike. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 12:03, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Steelfang = nerfed, why take Bull's and Coward? just because you can. /FrosTalk\ 11:54, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- why take bull's? coward is like an elite bull's that actually works. steelfang = recharge coward neway. (Kiron 11:51, 21 June 2008 (EDT))
- ^ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 11:26, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Nowai. You're not taking shock when you still can take b-strike. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 11:25, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock. -StarSeeker | My talk 09:32, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
why sword > axe for coward
TBH it just looks like you can charge coward faster with sun and moon. The deepwound + bleed is better than the deepwound found here, its just kind of inferior to it. Shock Axe>this.--UnderGunned 13:03, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock axe kindof owns everything, so thats a lousy argument. Yes, it even owns anti-melee. Brandnew. 13:06, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
- Any more the eviscerate executioners strike spike dont work that much but its fairly effective. Very weak against :::any type of anti-melee and shock is a costly interrupt skill. Art de rue 02:17, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- good thing this doesn't use eviscerate or your comment might actually be funny and relevant... Oɱɳoɱɳoɱɳoɱ(nom)(nom) 02:23, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Axes suck without eviscerate in general. Swords don't need a elite(sever+gash+f-thrust/SaMS). That's why coward @ sword > axe, cos dismember ain't that gud. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 04:52, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Without eviscerate axes lose their incredible spiking power. minispiking with dismember>bb is good and all but swords (like everyone has already said) excel at lacking an elite, whereas axes just dont.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 18:25, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- criplash owns evisc imo .. moar fun ;o .. i never rly played shock axe much( cuz spamming shock is something i cannot stop myself from doing ) CloseImpactToo Muh Bruh 06:13, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Stop making bad comments. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 10:56, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Shock Axe chain can be stopped with shield bash. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.127.55.122 (talk • contribs) 11:38, June 26, 2008 (CDT).
- ^Heeeeerrrrrrp Deeeerrrrrrrp.--66.192.104.13 20:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- year too late ip--Relyk 22:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- ^Heeeeerrrrrrp Deeeerrrrrrrp.--66.192.104.13 20:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
- Shock Axe chain can be stopped with shield bash. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.127.55.122 (talk • contribs) 11:38, June 26, 2008 (CDT).
- Stop making bad comments. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 10:56, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- criplash owns evisc imo .. moar fun ;o .. i never rly played shock axe much( cuz spamming shock is something i cannot stop myself from doing ) CloseImpactToo Muh Bruh 06:13, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
- Without eviscerate axes lose their incredible spiking power. minispiking with dismember>bb is good and all but swords (like everyone has already said) excel at lacking an elite, whereas axes just dont.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 18:25, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Axes suck without eviscerate in general. Swords don't need a elite(sever+gash+f-thrust/SaMS). That's why coward @ sword > axe, cos dismember ain't that gud. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 04:52, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- good thing this doesn't use eviscerate or your comment might actually be funny and relevant... Oɱɳoɱɳoɱɳoɱ(nom)(nom) 02:23, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
- Any more the eviscerate executioners strike spike dont work that much but its fairly effective. Very weak against :::any type of anti-melee and shock is a costly interrupt skill. Art de rue 02:17, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Meta?
Where?--98.238.169.189 04:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Like...everywhere. Life 04:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nice lie.--98.238.169.189 04:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- ^olol~WaffleZLOL(contribs) 07:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- I use this a lot as one of my war options.--Ikimono"My beard is thick." 08:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mosty HA meta. --Frosty Mc Admin 11:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mostly all-of-pvp meta. --173.65.149.85 00:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Not seeing it in GvG. HA builds are all gimmicks if there is a war its hammer. Whirling Axe/Eviscerate are all I am seeing for Axe bars. Hero Battles lol. And TA builds use Whirling or gimmicks. Also, I use echo mending but that doesn't make it meta.--98.238.169.189 00:22, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mostly all-of-pvp meta. --173.65.149.85 00:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Mosty HA meta. --Frosty Mc Admin 11:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- I use this a lot as one of my war options.--Ikimono"My beard is thick." 08:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- ^olol~WaffleZLOL(contribs) 07:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Nice lie.--98.238.169.189 04:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
It's an HB/RA/HA bar mostly. Dunno about meta. Definitely used though--Goldenstar 00:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
soooo if you cant use bull strike simply dont play warrior, ty--Daniellange 14:59, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah because bulls is the same as coward in tombs where you can keep 1 guy in a full duration of 3 heats on a row. Oh, wait. Reunion 15:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Coward's like Bull's on steroids. --Frosty Mc Admin 15:10, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
- Coward's actually quite nice for knocklocking into aoe, anti-kiting, defensive and offensive play. I use this a good bit. --BlazingBurdy 18:55, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- BB. ACting like extra cool, eh? Know three words from the holy dictionary of Guild Wars, put em in a sentence and actually say something... 91.16.141.32 19:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- cool story bro~WaffleZLOL(contribs) 19:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- Come talk to me when ur signature's composed of more than just numbers and periods, scrub. BlazingBurdy 22:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- cool story bro~WaffleZLOL(contribs) 19:38, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
- BB. ACting like extra cool, eh? Know three words from the holy dictionary of Guild Wars, put em in a sentence and actually say something... 91.16.141.32 19:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
Shadow Refuge (/A)..
...should be in variants (minimum). It serves as one of the best regenerative self-heals for splitability while retaining total kd utility and rupt powahs with coward and d-chop [if used in a non-retarded manner]. --BlazingBurdy 03:16, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Ehm...no Tyrael I'm santa! 19:51, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know, that with something Like Death's Charge or Signet of Malice might be nice for a split. However, I'm fairly certain this is not a split build. Thomas So Dutch 20:31, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
- You're serious about even considering mainbarring Shadow Refuge on an axe bar? And why the hell would you need a regenerative self-heal for an in this case terrible secondary? ---Chaos- (moo) -- 20:41, December 22, 2009 (UTC)