bash me pl0x /FrosTalk\ 06:56, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Evis + Shock, imo. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 06:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Swords >>>> Axes on coward. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 06:58, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Why is that, anyway? ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 06:59, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Because swords have better non-elite deep wound in the form of Gash. ¬ Klumpeet 11:00{GMT}21-06-MMVIII
Which needs sever artery to actually work. /FrosTalk\ 07:00, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
And steelfang slash fucking ownz. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 07:03, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
NERFED! ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 07:14, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Not for this bar; really. It just prevented to be used in a backbreaker chain. Now you can still use steelfang sword to pump up your other adr skills, tbh. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 11:25, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Coward AND bull's strike, owow <3 I already love this build. Brandnew. 07:13, 21 June 2008 (EDT)

Imo, coward + bulls is redundant. I might do what the other build did and bring FGJ instead of bulls. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 08:46, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Shock. -StarSeeker | My talk 09:32, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Nowai. You're not taking shock when you still can take b-strike. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 11:25, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
^ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 11:26, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
why take bull's? coward is like an elite bull's that actually works. steelfang = recharge coward neway. (Kiron 11:51, 21 June 2008 (EDT))
Steelfang = nerfed, why take Bull's and Coward? just because you can. /FrosTalk\ 11:54, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Bull's doesn't require adrenaline, doesn't cause exhaustion and it's Bull's Strike. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 12:03, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
And I do believe Bull's are brave, meaning it is a Bull versus a Coward. /FrosTalk\ 12:07, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Anyone that's used to Bull's should take it. Shock is a bad idea, and 2 sources of KD is fun.--Fallen (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Shock isnt a bad idea, theres no room--Relyk Purifying Veil SigRELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 16:04, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
I meant Bulls + Coward + Shock, actually 8D -StarSeeker | My talk 17:40, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
No room tbh /FrosTalk\ 17:50, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Could take out Agonizing. Would be ultimate harrassment. -StarSeeker | My talk 20:57, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Would it be worth it?/FrosTalk\ 21:08, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
As a professional axeinyoface'r, I must say this looks good on paper. But I agree, drop Agonizing for FGJ. moar kd pls. Big~PEW~tymer 22:01, 21 June 2008 (EDT)
Don't know, probably not. But at least it's something different, might get vetted. Other idea and stuff. -StarSeeker | My talk 05:42, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
I personally wouldn't run coward after steelfang nerf, that said never use rush and coward. Also executioners is better.I Heal If U Shutup 13:01, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
Comment ignored. Less crap talk plzzz. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 04:53, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
^--Relyk Purifying Veil SigRELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 19:52, 24 June 2008 (EDT)

why sword > axe for coward

TBH it just looks like you can charge coward faster with sun and moon. The deepwound + bleed is better than the deepwound found here, its just kind of inferior to it. Shock Axe>this.--UnderImage- (PvP)Gunned 13:03, 22 June 2008 (EDT)

Shock axe kindof owns everything, so thats a lousy argument. Yes, it even owns anti-melee. Brandnew. 13:06, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
If people were to say Shock Axe is better than this to almost every warrior build around, we woul;d have about 8 at the most for PvP... /FrosTalk\ 13:07, 22 June 2008 (EDT)
Any more the eviscerate executioners strike spike dont work that much but its fairly effective. Very weak against :::any type of anti-melee and shock is a costly interrupt skill. Art de rue 02:17, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
good thing this doesn't use eviscerate or your comment might actually be funny and relevant... OmNomNomNom sigOɱɳoɱɳoɱɳoɱ(nom)(nom) 02:23, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Axes suck without eviscerate in general. Swords don't need a elite(sever+gash+f-thrust/SaMS). That's why coward @ sword > axe, cos dismember ain't that gud. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 04:52, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
Without eviscerate axes lose their incredible spiking power. minispiking with dismember>bb is good and all but swords (like everyone has already said) excel at lacking an elite, whereas axes just dont.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 18:25, 23 June 2008 (EDT)
criplash owns evisc imo .. moar fun ;o .. i never rly played shock axe much( cuz spamming shock is something i cannot stop myself from doing ) CloseCloseImpactSWImpactToo Muh Bruh 06:13, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Stop making bad comments. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 10:56, 24 June 2008 (EDT)
Shock Axe chain can be stopped with shield bash. The preceding unsigned comment was added by (talk • contribs) 11:38, June 26, 2008 (CDT).
^Heeeeerrrrrrp Deeeerrrrrrrp.-- 20:51, 27 May 2009 (UTC)
year too late ip--Relyk 22:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)


Where?-- 04:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Like...everywhere. LifeWikiLOD7 04:57, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Nice lie.-- 04:59, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
^olol~WaffleZWafflesigLOL(contribs) 07:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
I use this a lot as one of my war options.--Ikimono"My beard is thick."Monk-Paragon-icon 08:47, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.