Archive talk:W/any Pulverizing Backbreaker

Thought of something like this a while ago and tried it, but still: powerful. May want Rush though. Godbox 14:19, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

It's really easy to quarterknock off of Bull's. — Skakid 15:31, 8 July 2008 (EDT)

Doesnt bb take long enough to recharge that you just use crushing blow? Or is this in some way better.--RELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 03:30, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

Would it be better to use pulverizing before protector? As pulverize apply deep wound on knocked-down foes and protector hits harder on moving foes? Since you expect the foe to be running when using protector it should be wiser to use pulverizing while he is still knocked-down --Deathwearer 14:56, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Uses Prot Strike to be able to BB->Flail->Pulverizing quickly. — Skakid 16:01, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Prot-Strike for addrenaline is so very brave. --Readem 16:04, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

None of these seems to answer my question or I didn't get it. Skakid he wrote Backbreaker->Flail->Prot Strike->Pulverizing Smash. That's what I'm talking about --Deathwearer 16:22, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

The accepted wisdom of hammer-chaining is that you use your KD skill, followed by flail, then pound them while they're on the floor. Protector's strike is there to give you the 1 adren needed after flail for pulverising. It means you get DW in earlier, and get more hits off. Lord of all tyria 16:28, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

You mean that prot land faster than a simple hit so you get the 1 adren required faster? I tought you'd have enought time with a 4 second KD --Deathwearer 17:03, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

More importantly you can qknock off of Bull's with Pulverizing — Skakid 17:24, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Sorry my english doens't allow me to understand your last comment. Could you explain? --Deathwearer 17:53, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Quarterknocking is where you use one KD, then you KD them again immediately as they stand up, with them not having time to cast even a 1/4 second spell. So using protector's it becomes easier to do this with bull's strike->protector's->pulverising->backbreaker. I think. Lord of all tyria 17:56, 11 July 2008 (EDT)

Protector's wouldnt be necessary if you just used frenzy. Waste of bar imo -- Lann 17:18, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

Back to my question, does this have any advantage over using Crushing Blow?--RELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 23:15, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

You get more attacks in your combo and the usage of Prot Strike (amazing on hammers) — Skakid 23:30, 12 July 2008 (EDT)

This build was made by me...EXACTLY, and was said it was a copy of another build. And was then deleted...--71.67.243.230 13:17, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Also, you can fit in 4 attacks while they are on the ground. Go in this order>BB>flail>Normal hit>Pulverizing smash>Normal Hit>Protector's Strike. It makes for better damage. Also, if you stick in Mighty Blow and switched in Crushing Blow for pulverizing, and use the same tactic of BB>Flail>Crushing Blow>Mighty Smash>Normal Hit>Protector's Strike...you can kill almost any 60-70armor character in 1 chain when they have full HP 550+.--71.67.243.230 13:25, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

Quarterknocking is more effective. — Skakid 13:27, 16 July 2008 (EDT)

I like it. its a good build with powerful kd's 1/2second attks and 2 conditions. well done.Froggerton I'm a frog! 16:00, 19 July 2008 (EDT)

yes i love covering my weakness with dw -- Lann 13:20, 20 July 2008 (EDT)

What, you're going to cover it with blind? - Generic Wiki-er 00:18, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

You can still qknock with Magehunter's Smash ->(Flail) Protector's Strike -> Pulverizing Smash -> Hammer Bash, in fact, it auto does it with no steps to break timing. - isery (TALK) 10:00, 25 July 2008 (EDT)