Build talk:Team - Discordway/Archive 1
Build talk:Team - Discordway/Archive 2
Hi everyone. Can we try and keep tl;dr about shit that doesn't matter to a minimum. As long as votes are properly justified and do not break policy, people are entitled to have their own opinion. - AthrunFeya 
09:35, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, stopping my trolling for a second, get a grip people. If it is truly a great build then all the great votes will bump the average above 4.75 despite one or two below that. That is how real vetting is supposed to work yo. Also, does the page need to be updated so that people realise that you shouldn't run this on a warrior? Misery 09:45, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah it does. I think the guide reflects that already, just not this build.There's actually already a note about it, strangely, in notes. - AthrunFeya 09:51, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- "people are entitled to have their own opinion" Orly? I'd like my vote back then. Minion
Excluded 09:56, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- No, because you are dumb. Don't take a build that is bad in a specific area into that area in PvE hurr durr. Fix your vote and you can revote. Misery 10:07, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- "As long as votes are properly justified and do not break policy" Read the whole thing. But, it is almost impossible to justify a bad vote on a great build. --Iggy 's other account 10:10, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- "people are entitled to have their own opinion" Orly? I'd like my vote back then. Minion
- Misery-"I can only assume that you are assuming that I agree with Xtreme and taking things he said as things I have said. That is pretty dumb as he almost never makes sense" thanks but Arrogant reasoning is off. Like I said at the start a little change on the player build works fine for a war. But what do I know...apparently I don't make sense---XTREME 10:15, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- But this is what I'm saying, Igor. Alot of people don't think this build is Great. It has been scrutinized ever since it became mainstream, and you all fail to acknowledge what an "opinion" is. Regardless of reasons, paraphrasing something KJ said "I don't care what reason you put, as long as it isn't "lolPvE"" or "ubad"" I lowered the vote on effectiveness because it's not amazing, and has lots of counters. Universality however; every tard and their mum uses it. I really like Arrogant's metaphor of this build being a sacred cow, I second that opinion. Minion
Excluded 11:19, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Not really. Main counter is lack of DPS but you can make up for this by taking offensive hench or something. All of that affect universatility not effectiveness. Because in areas where it works (that is, pretty much every area in GW) it works awesomely. Maybe, it has been bashed. But, mainly because it is an ugly one-skill build, not because it's ineffective; countless people maxed their HM titles using it by smashing face vs. keyboard. --Iggy 's other account 11:32, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- The first statement is incorrect as far as the overall community is concerned - even taking into account the removed votes - the majority of votes are 5-4s and 5-5s.
- The problem with the removed votes is they portrayed a lack of understanding in the voting system in general and with further posts you are continuing to prove this lack of understanding. AthrunFeya 11:35, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- But this is what I'm saying, Igor. Alot of people don't think this build is Great. It has been scrutinized ever since it became mainstream, and you all fail to acknowledge what an "opinion" is. Regardless of reasons, paraphrasing something KJ said "I don't care what reason you put, as long as it isn't "lolPvE"" or "ubad"" I lowered the vote on effectiveness because it's not amazing, and has lots of counters. Universality however; every tard and their mum uses it. I really like Arrogant's metaphor of this build being a sacred cow, I second that opinion. Minion
