Digitalfear (talk | contribs) (→WTF...) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
:::::Lolol. Sorry, indenting made me lolwut. --[[User talk:The Short One|<font color="black"><b>''Short''</b></font>]] 17:47, June 17, 2010 (UTC) |
:::::Lolol. Sorry, indenting made me lolwut. --[[User talk:The Short One|<font color="black"><b>''Short''</b></font>]] 17:47, June 17, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:ubad. cba to make this comment more constructive, not worth my time. --[[User:Digitalfear|<b><font color="MidnightBlue">Digit0l</font></b>]][[File:Digitalfear_Sig.jpg|19px]][[User_talk:Digitalfear|<b><font color="SteelBlue">Qu33r</font></b>]] 18:25, June 17, 2010 (UTC) |
:ubad. cba to make this comment more constructive, not worth my time. --[[User:Digitalfear|<b><font color="MidnightBlue">Digit0l</font></b>]][[File:Digitalfear_Sig.jpg|19px]][[User_talk:Digitalfear|<b><font color="SteelBlue">Qu33r</font></b>]] 18:25, June 17, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | |||
| + | :Yeah as was kind of pointed out already, the build with the best possible Efficiency/Skill (Effort) rate becomes meta, not the one with the highest efficiency rate. In English, 123 + bonds + orders is pretty PUG-friendly, so it's an easy meta choice. Compare to Sway meta, if you know any PvP. --'''<span style="font-family:Lithos Pro Regular;">[[User:Chaos Messenger|<font color="goldenrod">DANDY]] [[User_talk:Chaos|^_^]]''' </font></span>-- 18:45, June 17, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 18:45, 17 June 2010
Srsly menz.
Wtf with the silly SoS Rit? Terrible bar is terrible. =/ --Iggy 's other account 11:08, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- And now terrible runes? You can't give anything two major + superior rune=dead soon kk.Minion
Excluded 11:48, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't add them. Juze did. I fixed them to minors and you reverted back to double majors so I thought you wanted double majors Zzz. Anyway, what sense does it make to take a lvl7 offensive spirit? It will die in one hit from anything. --Iggy 's other account 12:23, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Higher spawning is prefered because it gives the spirits more health - so they can be hit + remain alive [ and more chance of being under 50% for BuH! buff ] rather than spirit damage.. which is pitiful compared to the physicals. --Chieftain Alex "talk" 13:37, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Fixed again. xD Juze
14:43, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and terrible template usage: You made the build use 201/200 attribute points. You're terrible yourself. Good game. Juze
14:44, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- lvl13 spirit at 11 spawning > lvl12 spirit at 12 spawning. You are clueless. Also, don't go calling people terrible when you are a [KISS] shitter. :S --Iggy 's other account 14:46, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with igor. Docta Jenkins 20:56, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- lvl13 spirit at 11 spawning > lvl12 spirit at 12 spawning. You are clueless. Also, don't go calling people terrible when you are a [KISS] shitter. :S --Iggy 's other account 14:46, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and terrible template usage: You made the build use 201/200 attribute points. You're terrible yourself. Good game. Juze
- Fixed again. xD Juze
- Higher spawning is prefered because it gives the spirits more health - so they can be hit + remain alive [ and more chance of being under 50% for BuH! buff ] rather than spirit damage.. which is pitiful compared to the physicals. --Chieftain Alex "talk" 13:37, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
- I didn't add them. Juze did. I fixed them to minors and you reverted back to double majors so I thought you wanted double majors Zzz. Anyway, what sense does it make to take a lvl7 offensive spirit? It will die in one hit from anything. --Iggy 's other account 12:23, June 16, 2010 (UTC)
Imbafaggotnames
I vote that the next person to change the name is banned. Following edits should have bans as well. This is retarded bullshit. Pick a name and leave it there. Docta Jenkins 01:57, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Quoted by Excluded: "Yes; I was the one who CHANGED them to being called "WotA sins" because "Imbasin" sounded fucking retarded.". So screw the imbasin name, sin without SY is no imba. Call them spikers, WotA or just sins/assassins. But really, I see Imbasin again which is like so retarded. Juze 07:24, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- What's more retarded people still keep getting into revert wars over something so irrelevant. Who cares how the build is called? --Iggy 's other account 10:18, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
Yeah I can't really see how such trivial shit even requires a section. "Imbasin(s)" isn't descriptive to the least, and there's no correlation to the automatic association of imbagons and SY. Anyone who calls Jagged-Fox-Blossom a spike should also just uninstall the game for not knowing the difference between pressure and a spike. "WotA sins" is simple and descriptive, cut the custom names shit out. --DANDY ^_^ -- 14:57, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
WTF...
How the fuck did this trash become the meta... aside from the fact that all the failer sins can now do UW. This is a fucking joke you can take any team with 2 EMo's (rofl at ER1 and ER2 they are just 2 terrible EMo bars) and finish UW you can take 4 fucking Beast Mastery rangers and finish... --Risus 17:37, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- PUG friendly is why it's meta tbh. I wouldn't get to pent up about it. --Short 17:37, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- ubad. cba to make this comment more constructive, not worth my time. --Digit0lQu33r 18:25, June 17, 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah as was kind of pointed out already, the build with the best possible Efficiency/Skill (Effort) rate becomes meta, not the one with the highest efficiency rate. In English, 123 + bonds + orders is pretty PUG-friendly, so it's an easy meta choice. Compare to Sway meta, if you know any PvP. --DANDY ^_^ -- 18:45, June 17, 2010 (UTC)