mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
No Enraging Charge is quite surprising. It would instarecharge Backbreaker with a good TtL. --''[[User talk:Chaos|<font color="black">Chaos?]]</font>'' -- 23:51, February 26, 2010 (UTC) |
No Enraging Charge is quite surprising. It would instarecharge Backbreaker with a good TtL. --''[[User talk:Chaos|<font color="black">Chaos?]]</font>'' -- 23:51, February 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:it would be low spec and in essence, TtL replaces it and procs soldier's and gives you health! --[[User:Frosty|<b><font color="Black">Frosty</font></b>]] [[Image:Frostcharge.jpg|19px]] 23:54, February 26, 2010 (UTC) |
:it would be low spec and in essence, TtL replaces it and procs soldier's and gives you health! --[[User:Frosty|<b><font color="Black">Frosty</font></b>]] [[Image:Frostcharge.jpg|19px]] 23:54, February 26, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::I see slight energy problems on this though, rush instead of speed? [[Image:Zyke-Sig.png]] 00:04, February 27, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 00:04, 27 February 2010
No Enraging Charge is quite surprising. It would instarecharge Backbreaker with a good TtL. --Chaos? -- 23:51, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- it would be low spec and in essence, TtL replaces it and procs soldier's and gives you health! --Frosty
23:54, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
- I see slight energy problems on this though, rush instead of speed?
00:04, February 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I see slight energy problems on this though, rush instead of speed?
