FANDOM


m (Reverted edits by TotalTwat (Talk); changed back to last version by Skuld)
Line 4: Line 4:
   
 
:ANet nurfed our build, the cads. — [[User:Skuld|Skuld]] 22:53, 30 November 2007 (CET)
 
:ANet nurfed our build, the cads. — [[User:Skuld|Skuld]] 22:53, 30 November 2007 (CET)
  +
  +
  +
Is theis page not a bit to full?[[Image:ShiroBox.jpg‎ |16px]] [[User:woefpoef|<font color="Black">'''Woef'''</font>]][[User_talk:woefpoef|<font color="Gray">'''Poef'''</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Woefpoef|<font color="Black"><small>$contribs$</small></font>]] 12:41, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 17:41, February 6, 2008

Can we have something like this User:Kiteeye#Great_Builds to highlight the profession combinations that havent had a great PvP build yet? Kiteeye 05:49, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

WTB DA para — Skakid9090 21:37, 30 November 2007 (CET)

ANet nurfed our build, the cads. — Skuld 22:53, 30 November 2007 (CET)


Is theis page not a bit to full?ShiroBox WoefPoef$contribs$ 12:41, 6 February 2008 (EST)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.