Talk: GvG Frontline

Revision as of 02:08, 8 May 2008

Sins and Thumpers

Shall we mention them in this? Ibreaktoilets 19:35, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Yes, although we should certainly mention the rather limited usefulness of most sins as frontliners. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 19:39, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Mention their split capabilities then, or just a moebius spam build. -

Unexist 06:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Sins are never frontline. Superhex Japansin ran that crit defenses tank sin a hundred years ago, but nobody uses it anymore - seeing as that was the only one of its kind, we really shouldn't mention it. Thumpers you can mention - they aren't as common anymore, but they fill all the roles of a frontline (including possible linebacking). -Auron 06:38, 21 January 2008 (EST)

Isn't Body Blow more commonly used, rather than Executioner's Strike? ɟoʇuɐʌ ʎʞɔıɹ 22:08, 7 May 2008 (EDT)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ::Mention their split capabilities then, or just a moebius spam build. -  [[Image:Unexist sig.jpg|20px]][[User:Unexist|<font color="Black">'''Unexist'''</font>]] 06:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)
 :::Sins are never frontline. Superhex Japansin ran that crit defenses tank sin a hundred years ago, but nobody uses it anymore - seeing as that was the only one of its kind, we really shouldn't mention it. Thumpers you can mention - they aren't as common anymore, but they fill all the roles of a frontline (including possible linebacking). -[[User:Auron|<font color="black">Auron</font>]] 06:38, 21 January 2008 (EST)
+Isn't Body Blow more commonly used, rather than Executioner's Strike? <b>[[User_talk:Rickyvantof|<font color=black>ɟoʇuɐʌ</font>]][[User:Rickyvantof|<font color=black>ʎʞɔıɹ</font>]][[Image:Panic_srsbsns.gif|37px]]</b> 22:08, 7 May 2008 (EDT)