m ({{Build|E/Rt Water Prism Runner}})
m (General Issues)
Line 35: Line 35:
=== {{IP|Anonimous.}} ===
=== {{IP|Anonimous.}} ===
RV1 on [[Build:Team - Discord Spam]] is becoming boring. --<small>&mdash;''The preceding trolling attempt was made by'' [[User:Chaos Messenger|Chaos]] ([[User talk:Chaos Messenger|talk]]) .</small> 12:46, 18 February 2009 (EST)
RV1 on [[Build:Team - Discord Spam]] is becoming boring. --<small>&mdash;''The preceding trolling attempt was made by'' [[User:Chaos Messenger|Chaos]] ([[User talk:Chaos Messenger|talk]]) .</small> 12:46, 18 February 2009 (EST)
:Resolved. &mdash; [[User:Rapta|Rapta]] <small>([[User_talk:Rapta|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Rapta|contribs]])</small> 22:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
=== NPA ===
=== NPA ===
NPA, check this [[Image talk:50ZKEYS.JPG|here]][[image:Unreal_sig_1.png‎ ]] 18:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
NPA, check this [[Image talk:50ZKEYS.JPG|here]][[image:Unreal_sig_1.png‎ ]] 18:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
:Resolved. &mdash; [[User:Rapta|Rapta]] <small>([[User_talk:Rapta|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Rapta|contribs]])</small> 22:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
== Build-Specific Issues ==
== Build-Specific Issues ==

Revision as of 22:01, March 11, 2009

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

Note that this is not a talk page and that the respective moderators of each section reserve the right to remove non-administrative comments without discussion.

Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.

General Issues

General problems, such as user conduct, vandalism, and bans. Also, suggestions can be posted here. All can be resolved by an Administrator. See resolved General Issues here.

If you're having troubles with your Authenticication E-Mail see here and here

Thc (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Same as Anon. PvX:1RV. Adorably shocked mcmonkey sig (12:55, 18 February 2009 - )

I have undone my revert (thc). I would like to see some resolution on discussion page. --Zaney 18:47, 20 February 2009 (UTC) (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeated vandalism of my page --Tai Sig 12:54, 18 February 2009

and (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log) --Tai Sig 12:57, 18 February 2009
Misery got 'em ~ PheNaxKian Sysop (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism on build pages. ---Chaos- 21:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

I wouldn't say that's the proper way to warn an Anon, but resolved anyways. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 19:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)‎ (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeated vandalism on Build:A/D Critical Wounder, after having been told to stop. --Drah Drah-Sig1 02:50, 28 February 2009 (UTC) (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism ZefirsigGod Zefir 18:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. Big sadface sigBiggles Strongfist™ Sysop 18:25, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Maddog23456789 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

this user looks suspicious not only because he keeps moving Build:Me/Rt Burden Flagger but his behaviour in general. --Anonimous. D: 13:40, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

What he said. ---Chaos- 13:44, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
He's simply a new user and means no vandalism. GuildWiki:Assume good faith --☭Guild*talk* 13:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Anonimous. (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

RV1 on Build:Team - Discord Spam is becoming boring. --The preceding trolling attempt was made by Chaos (talk) . 12:46, 18 February 2009 (EST)

Resolved. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)


NPA, check this hereUnreal sig 1 18:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 22:01, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by a Build Master or Administrator. See resolved issues here.

If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins or Build Masters of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.

Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.

E/any Erf Quaker (talk · rate)

Pretty much all the votes are retarded. "Its earth in PvE, so it cant be that good". It supports fire nukers, and does it well. "Little damage". 210 earth damage every 8 seconds or so is still decent. Plus the KDs, which is the main feature of this. Plus buttloads of optional utility. Jebuspachi-1-1.jpgMcPachirisu 14:07, 8 February 2009 (EST)

A/E Permastorm (talk · rate)

Canderouss obviously doesn't know how to avoid scatter by dropping Shadow Form in UW. Selket Shadowdancer 07:16, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Team - Singers of Woe (talk · rate)

Remove Skakid and Klomi's votes please. The team now has Mark of Pain which speed up the killing a shitload (making Skakid's vote too low), and now has an imbagon so Klomi's vote is not viable anymore. -- lyssan 15:41, 16 February 2009 (EST)

Almost every single freaking vote on there is wrong, not just those two. LifeLife Guardian-AoF 23:37, 16 February 2009 (EST)
Votes wiped. Resolved. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 20:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Any/Me Cryer (talk · rate)

Ironboot says Res Sig is bad in PvE and is just plain wrong. --Guild of Deals talk 10:21, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Rest of the vote is fair but prehaps a bit low. You lot cry about a shit pve section and rfbm people like Anon, and then vote bollocks builds 5-5 and 5-4. (See here for another example of this) Andy 13:05, 17 February 2009 (EST)
Leave your bitching off the AN. --Guild of Deals talk 15:18, 17 February 2009 (EST)
Res sig is infact bad and useless in pve. --Anonimous. D: 00:00, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
Resolved. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 20:05, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

A/Mo RoJ Assacaster (talk · rate)

RoJ is for killing NPCs only, if people could read. And wut's energy management in CM?--Relyk 12:39, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Why would you use an Assacaster to kill shrines? But I'll remove the energy votes. ~~ Frvwfr2 00:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

E/Me Ether Crier (talk · rate)

Pretty much every vote apart from Athrun's and Life's are biased, needs wipe. --Anonimous. D: 11:35, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 20:04, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Any/Me Cryer (talk · rate)

Chill's vote, chaos's vote, GoD's vote, Jebus's vote ect. none of them understand pve needs to be removed but not the ones by people who are actually good (Athrun, Andy, Life, Ironboot) no need to make them apply exact same vote again. --Anonimous. D: 20:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

The above, also the removal of Ironboots vote seems somewhat unfair, considering much better builds exist that function pretty similarly (where is the 'discussion' in this comment?) Athrun Feya 18:16, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
qq in the discussion page. Big sadface sigBiggles Strongfist™ Sysop 18:43, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Resolved (only viable way was a vote wipe sorry anon) Frostysig9000FrostytheAdmin 23:35, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/P Spear of Remedy (talk · rate)

Bim's vote --Tai Sig 10:22, 4 March 2009

Rt/E Renewal Warmonger's (talk · rate)

People 5-5'ing this crappy build for no apparent reason. RickyRicksawsmfacevantof 05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

A/R Critical Barrager (talk · rate)

Almost every single one of these votes makes me sad inside. LifeWikiLOD7 06:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

N/P_AB_Knees (talk · rate)

Rikon, GoD's, Jebus and JK. only works on noobs/inexperienced players is lolwut. it supports the team with IMS, causes high degen and it hinders foes with WK since it does big degen and causes even more dmg while moving aka death=points and not moving is more time to prevent them from capping. this build is definitly not worthy enough for to trash InfestedHydralisk 18:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Me/any_PvE_Visions_of_Regret_Mesmer (talk · rate)

PvE elites are running wild on it. It's the only hero VoR build we have had and I'm sure people used VoR on their heroes and would like to continue to know what skills would be useful. I think the PvE skills should stay in the variants and leave the hero tag. KJ needed a new sig....sig 22:20, 5 March 2009

Or someone could make a Hero VoR page for PvE. PVX-Zyke 22:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
Or suggest hero bar, pve isnt about heroes anyway so why make so much fuss out of them? --Anonimous. D: 22:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
This isn't a discussion page. Please discuss on the builds page. KJ needed a new sig....sig 22:29, 5 March 2009
Make a new page hero only if you want a hero build KJ, it would be drastically different from what is currently on the build page and would only have two skills in common. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 11:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/Me Blessed Light Monk (talk · rate)

dot, dot, dot I think this has too much bias on its rating page. --Anonimous. D: 18:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/Mo Zeal of the Heal (talk · rate)

Remove wrong votes pl0x. Jebus 05:09, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 14:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

E/Rt Ether Prism Healer (talk · rate)

Xxunrealxx1s vote, can't read it and is blatantly wrong. Also Jjberks vote refers to my vote, but I changed my vote. ^_^ Brandnew. 09:41, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 14:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/any High Energy Rit Lord (talk · rate)

Votes concerning the use of the build in PvP are invalid; tags have been removed. Jebus 13:25, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 14:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/A WoR Flag Runner (talk · rate)

Unarchived due to nerf of HC, vote wipe? Jebus 17:54, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Wiped. ~~ Frvwfr2 21:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

E/Rt Water Prism Runner (talk · rate)

Vote wipe due to HC nerfs? Blash has to go though. >.> PVX-Zyke 08:38, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Wiped. Flaggers changed a lot recently... Still expecting trash though. ~~ Frvwfr2 18:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
Wow Frv, stop doing this. Stop wiping perfectly valid votes because somebody told you to when you're completely clueless. Cute McMonkeyTab 19:06, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The other flaggers got nerfed, so I figured it'd be ok. It'll just be trashed anyways... ~~ Frvwfr2 22:59, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

D/any Signet of the Mystic Runner (talk · rate)

Chao's Vote is baed... everything he listed is in optionals. →BERKS deedle... dum... 00:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Not true. Also, Berk's vote should be removed ;o discuss on build talk. ---Chaos- 17:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

General Coding Issues

Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.

Rating Page Lock

We need a way to lock rating pages from additions and removals(Like a page protection). Also useful for archived builds, to keep the rating page unchanged. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   16:53, 13 May 2008 (EDT)

I agree, but also for deleted builds. — Balistic 22:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Recent Changes

The RSS and Atom feeds don't work. ¬ Klumpeet 15:45, 14 May 2008 (EDT)

Forum links

Could possibly get some coding to link to the forums for specific builds? For example, if in the article, there is some code such as "forums=(URL)" then it would add a link to the top. Is this possible? We could just make a template and add it to these pages I guess. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   12:50, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

Display issues with Safari Browser

Well, I recently downloaded the new Safari browser and i like it a lot. However, there seems to be some kind of display issue with PvX. The navigation bar that is supposed to appear on the left hand side of each article is just a blank white area and the links from that are pushed down to the very bottom of the page below the white area. Could be something to do with my computer, but can someone else using safari confirm? Thanks Peter 02:58, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Yea, the sidebar links are getting pushed down below the article body on every page. I'll look into it and see if I can change the css or something to fix it if I have time. Hhhippo might know how to fix it. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:44, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
Nothing I've tried fixes it. It's entirely possible it's a safari bug. But if anyone else who knows some css wants to try to figure it out, here's a summary of what I tried:
  1. Reducing the width of the article body and/or sidebar just leaves a bigger gap between them.
  2. Changing the white-space:nowrap in the h4, h5, and h6's for .portlet to white-space:normal removes the big section of whitespace, and the sidebar looks normal... except that it's still shoved down below the article.
  3. Changing the border, padding, and margin for .portlet and #pBody did nothing.
I tried more than this, but I don't remember it all. Also, guildwiki, GWW, and wikipedia all look normal in Safari. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 18:26, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
Confirmed, no other wikis seem to be having this issue. Peter 07:53, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
Opera, IE, Firefox, and Chrome all load the wiki fine. I'm guessing it's a rendering issue in Safari. If you want, I could try to write up a CSS that'll fix it for just you that you can put in your monobook. Cedave bad  ツ cedave (☆contributions☆) 20:24, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
If it was a rendering issue would it not an effect on the other wikis? Its not a huge problem by an stretch of the imagination, just a bit inconvenient. I will contact apple and see what they say....Peter 04:26, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Well, all I can get out of apple is that its not a Safari browser problem.....back to using firefox i go lol. Peter 02:46, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

Display Issues with Chrome

Same problem as described above with Safari. [[1]]. Anyone got anything? Sometimes its not that far down, it depends on the page I'm looking at. - McTai Tai Sig Image 3 14:31, 2 December 2008

Same but it ends under the red window. Fox007 User Fox007 sig 14:45, 2 December 2008 (EST)
(EC)Maybe add style="vertical-align:top"? Only Hhhippo or GCardinal can test / fix it though. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 14:47, 2 December 2008 (EST)
For me the nav bar (ie, Recent Changes) starts right at the end of the article. For this page, for example, it's wayyyy down there. Tai sig Image 78 14:48, 2 December 2008
(EC)Also the white part is a huge link to the main page. I do not know if that would help though. Fox007 User Fox007 sig 14:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)
This is exactly the same problem I have with my Safari Browser, it seems to push everything down to the bottom of the articles for some reason, most likely because the advert does not fit in the navigation bar. However, as above, widening this seemed to have no effect. Any coding experts out there? Peter 14:09, 3 December 2008 (EST)

Vote Wipe Button

Could BM's/Admins possibly get a vote wipe button, where it asks you for the reason and then all the votes get removed for that reason? Helpful for vote wipes if it was a minor change etc. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   18:57, 18 December 2008 (EST)

One semi-related question: should archived builds all be votewiped? I second frv btw. -- Jebuscontests 19:18, 18 December 2008 (EST)
currently, policy suggest we should vote wipe archives, I believe Dont wants to remove that line(looking at the EB talk page). Also ()no offence meant by this) I fail to see what you seconding achieves when you lack access to said tools (or should said tools be implemented). I wouldn't mind a vote wipe button either in any case (though I can leave deleting and restoring). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 12:04, 19 December 2008 (EST)
nah im just saying its a good idea. -- Jebuscontests 12:28, 19 December 2008 (EST)
On Dont's issues with the vope wipe thing, I removed it. I kinda wrote that part and realized I was being stupid when I wrote the whole vote wipe thing. It already hurt us deeply. --GoD Hammer and Sickle Guild of Deals 22:22, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Main page

Wth happened to teh mainpage, it's all blank, was working fine but not anymore 21:57, 8 January 2009 (EST)

I'm seeing the same thing. Greevar 22:52, 8 January 2009 (EST)
Yeah, it's been like that for about 7 hours now. I'm assuming it'll be through within the next day, but we'll just have to wait and see. --ShazamTheSnake Shazam The Snake hissssssssssss 02:09, 9 January 2009 (EST)
There seems to be a mistake somewhere in {{Template:Main Page/Top}}. I've implemented a temporary soluction and notified GCardinal. I don't really have time to look into more detail now, but if any sysop can see the problem they should feel free to fix it. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 03:11, 9 January 2009 (EST)
Better temporary fix, the problem was with the game updates RSS feed. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 05:13, 9 January 2009 (EST)

Vote removals

Both me and Rawr have noticed that sometimes a vote that's shown as removed in recent ratings doesn't appear on the removed list at the bottom of the ratings page, making it impossible to check the validity of a removal/restore the vote. Cute McMonkeyTab 14:51, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Does the vote still appear in the valid vote section or has it just been nuked from the face of the earth? I'm not sure I'm understanding the problem. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 16:27, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Might they have deleted the vote b/w the time of your last refresh and the removal? ~~     Frvwfr2   Frv Boston  talk    admin   16:34, 19 January 2009 (EST)
I'm assuming not, because it sounds like they see a removed vote on recent ratings, then go to see why it was removed because they assume everyone else fails. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 16:40, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Shows as still existing on RC, but it's not in either section on the ratings page. You'd have to ask Rawr for an example, it's a week or so since I last noticed it. Cute McMonkeyTab 16:48, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Possible reason, vote removed then immediately deleted by voter. We can test this later if you like. - Miserysig (talk) 03:13, 22 January 2009 (EST)
Nope, it doesnt work. If you vote on something, it appears in recent ratings, but if you delete your vote, the fact that you ever voted on the build is deleted. Another example is if your vote gets rollbacked, it shows up in the "my ratings" page, but if you delete your vote, the fact that it was rollbacked is gone too. Although im not sure what caused tab's problem. :/ Jebuspachi-1-1.jpgMcPachirisu 15:02, 22 January 2009 (EST)

W/any Eviscerate Warrior (talk · rate)

the rate button directs to a wrong lin (as if you people didn't noticed yet). With my crappy wiki skills i made this but the build page name has to be written with underscored instead of spaced D:

[{{SERVER}}/index.php?title=Build:{{{4|W/any_Eviscerate_Warrior}}}&action=rate rate] 

Fox007 User Fox007 sig 21:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Blocked users editing

I'm pretty sure that I've blocked Napalm, yet he is still able to edit pages. I presume it's the same for other blocked users. ĐONT*SYSOP 23:13, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Karate Jesus said he's able to edit his own user talk. ---Chaos- 23:14, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
I see. It's probably a Wikia "feature" then. ĐONT*SYSOP 23:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Sidebar issue

See this please. — TulipVorlax 20:51, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Recent Ratings

Not sure if anyone else is getting this or it's just the Opera browser being stupid, but I can't seem to see who gave the ratings, shows up as

  • 22:47 . . W/any Endurance Axe; Rating: 5 (great) . . E:5 U:5 I:5 . .

but I can see vote remove fine though.PVX-Zyke 01:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Pretty sure its like that for everyone. --Drah Drah-Sig1 02:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Build Template icon

The image is currently replaced by Build Template on the tool bar.--Relyk 09:34, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

It's still a signet of capture for me, what browser are you using? - Misery CowMisery Says Moo 09:37, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Firefox--Relyk 09:39, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Me too, no idea then. Try clearing your cache. - Misery CowMisery Says Moo 09:41, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Nope--Relyk 09:45, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
happens for me too Cute McMonkeyTab 09:46, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Mines working now--Relyk 07:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)


What the hell is going on with them? My signature, a few skill image icons, and a lot of other pics are just blanking. They haven't been deleted. Wikia error or is this third-party? Jebus 22:14, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Nvm, must have been my comp. >.> Jebus 00:36, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

PvXcode Issues

Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.

Mouse-over Attribute descriptions

Would it be possible to have mousing over an attribute display the in-game description of that attribute? ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:48, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

I agree with the idea, surely it could use the same wiki code or whatever as the ratings? When you hover over Innovation it gives you a description of it, surelt it could be done for attributes? /FrosTalk\ 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
I was thinking about that. It would be nice (especially when calculating things like Expertise and Critical Strikes). --File:GoD Wario Sig.JPG*Wah Wah Wah!* 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
When you roll the mouse over Palm Strike in a build (with points in Critical Strikes) it does not show the relevant attributes (as if you had not pointed critical strikes in the build) Xiay 08:48, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Health Sacrifice

The fact that health sacrificed doesn't show up in the skill mouseover is kind of annoying. Is there any hope that it will be added? --CJNyfalt 17:35, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

I believe that that is GWshack's task, might be wrong though. Brandnew. 17:36, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
See here. Either gwshack is not up to date or <pvxbig> is not compatible. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 19:27, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
It's a pvxcode problem. gwshack shows sacrifice costs as part of the skill cost now. ~ ZamaneeJinnSigZamanee(point out my idiocy) 19:37, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

Leadership glitch?

<pvxbig> [build prof=Para/War leadership=0+3]["Go for the Eyes!"][Watch Yourself!][Save Yourselves!][Save Yourselves! (Luxon)]["There's Nothing To Fear!"][/build] </pvxbig> Energy is shown for GftE and WY, but not SY. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) Cuz Steve said so... ツ 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

i'm inclined to think that's more a GWBBcode thing than our end (could be wrong). PheNaxKian Sysop 16:38, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Probably some Kurzick rank thingy that doesnt show up in PvX bar that affects leadership. I is *Jebus*IAmJebussig3Enter my contests! 17:54, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
nope. same with luxon. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) Cuz Steve said so... ツ 18:03, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Doesn't work with TNTF, must be something to do with pve skills. Ojamo (>.<(O=(- -Q) 18:06, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
(EC)hmm it might be linked to the PvE rank. even if you put @3 it doesn't change anything (it doesn't even show what the duration should be). Just leave it a while, Hippo or GCard will see this eventually, amd if it's our code they'll fix it. If it's GWBBcode, i've left GCard a message asking him to update to the new version (with their being a new version) hopefully it's been fixed in that version. if not then just tough I guess =p, not much we can do. PheNaxKian Sysop 18:09, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
IIRC, leadership energy bonuses don't show up with energy-based shouts. But I could be wrong. – talkInfidel sigcontribs 13:42, 6 December 2008 (EST)

<pvxbig>[[theyre on fire@10]</pvxbig>

Its the energy cost is underlined like in the above link, while it isnt underlined in TNTF. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2008 (EST)
oic. – talkInfidel sigcontribs 15:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

PvXbig links

More of a suggestion than anything. Basically when you use PvXbig without the build information (so you can get a mouseover description of a skill, like this: <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig> which is <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig>) it would be nice if when you clicked on it, it linked to the GWW article. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 13:32, 6 December 2008 (EST)

It does for me. --Frosty 13:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)
thanks for tricking me phen. --Frosty 13:36, 6 December 2008 (EST)
Hello, can't you update the gwbbcode database? On gwshack forums they have a new database which is up to date, can't you just replace that with yours? see also: 2nd post Vashan 08:57, 21 December 2008 (EST)
Only GCard can do that, i left him a message a while ago, but he's busy with RL. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 09:17, 21 December 2008 (EST)

I think

Something just updated im i rite? Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:14, 19 January 2009 (EST) <pvxbig>[[Wail of Doom@12][[Foul Feast@12]
[[Ray of Judgment@12]
[[Palm Strike@12]</pvxbig> jup i was rite :3 Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:20, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Its good to look in the upper left on the mainpage. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Numbers on PS are black instead of green, is it because its unlinked? Also not all skills have been updated, such as scavenger strike. RickyRicksawsmfacevantof 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

shhh Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

non-elite version of image for Lightbringer's Gaze needs to be uploaded

1815.jpg --Mafaraxas (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2009 (EST)

also, whirlwind attack. --Mafaraxas (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2009 (EST)
onslaught has differnet skill descriptions still MuffinPWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 20:32, 26 January 2009 (EST)

PvP only skills

Skill database is hosted wikiside now, can we expect pvp only versions of skills in the near future? shouldn't be too difficult, just have to add new skill entries--GoldenGoldenstarStar 11:51, 27 January 2009 (EST)

List of not-properly updated skills.

  1. <pvxbig>[[Ether Prism@12], recharge should be at 15 Fox007 User Fox007 sig 06:01, 31 January 2009 (EST)
  2. [[Xinrae's Weapon]</pvxbig>, is now 5 energy rather then 25 energy. Brandnew. 06:13, 31 January 2009 (EST)
iirc some of the skills weren't up to date when GCard synced, so they should be fine when he next syncs. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 07:10, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Palm Strike Doesn't Scale

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=A/any crit=12+1+1][Palm Strike][/build] </pvxbig> No green number thing. Zyke 02:50, 11 February 2009 (EST)

It's been scaling for me...that's odd. Biggles 02:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)
I've noticed various skills since the pvxcode update that aren't scaling for me. firefox 3. something wrong with the code? --Mafaraxas (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2009 (EST)
The DB is wrong, notice that the skills that DO scale have only 2 .'s between the numbers. Well none of use knew that so PS is wrong =/ ~~     Frvwfr2   Frv Boston  talk    admin   06:19, 11 February 2009 (EST)
It's been like this for ages, I fixed it on the wiki Database but now thats gone (bear in mind i fixed it around the 20th of January :/) FrostrageFrosty po! 06:27, 11 February 2009 (EST)

PnH doesn't show Div Favor Bonus

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=Mo/any heal=10+1+1 div=11+1][Patient Spirit][Peace and Harmony][/build] </pvxbig> Any comments? Big sadface sigBiggles Strongfist™ Sysop 08:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.