Skakid9090 (talk | contribs) |
PVX-Krowman (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
=== {{Build|Mo/any Light of Deliverance Hybrid}} === |
=== {{Build|Mo/any Light of Deliverance Hybrid}} === |
||
Kenzo says the build works great, but rates good. Sy's vote says it has no energy management, but it has LoD and SoR. Coleneh's vote, since the sup rune is gone and guardian is in variants. Thc's vote gives universitility 1 for no reason and says it doesn't work well on heroes, even though ~4 other votes say it does. Leeroy's, since the sup has been removed from the build. — [[User:Skakid9090|Skakid9090]] 18:51, 28 October 2007 (CET) |
Kenzo says the build works great, but rates good. Sy's vote says it has no energy management, but it has LoD and SoR. Coleneh's vote, since the sup rune is gone and guardian is in variants. Thc's vote gives universitility 1 for no reason and says it doesn't work well on heroes, even though ~4 other votes say it does. Leeroy's, since the sup has been removed from the build. — [[User:Skakid9090|Skakid9090]] 18:51, 28 October 2007 (CET) |
||
+ | :Yeah. - [[Image:Kowal.jpg|15px]] '''[[User:Krowman|<font face="dauphin" color="maroon">Krowman</font>]] <small><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[PvXwiki:Administrators|sysop]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></small>''' 18:58, 28 October 2007 (CET) |
||
== General Coding Issues == |
== General Coding Issues == |
Revision as of 17:58, 28 October 2007
The Admin noticeboard
There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).
There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).
Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).
(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)
To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.
General Issues
General issues include (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, banning vandals, and moderating serious disputes. This section may also be used for miscellaneous issues as well as Administrative announcements. See resolved issues here.
What is your profession? (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Minor vandalism, changing the categories of builds to trash and good when they should be in great or testing, ect. Also, NPA: calling people idiots and retards :\ ۷ïεד • t/c 06:22, 28 October 2007 (CET)
Licensing version
See this. Page is protected, so one of you guys needs to fix it. --Wizardboy777 23:48, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
- I've been talking to Gcardinal, and we're unsure which is correct, and obviously, we can't fix it until we know which is the problem, so no fix, for the moment. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:04, 22 September 2007 (CEST)
- I think we have to use version 2.0. We took over quite some content from Guild Wiki, and they use 2.0 with no note on the possibility of silent upgrades. So we have to put at least the pages which originated there under 2.0. Anyway, we should put up a consistent statement asap. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
PvXwiki:General disclaimer
Link which is located at the very bottom of every page leads to a blank page. Peter 14:18, 28 October 2007 (CET)
Build-Specific Issues
Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes. See resolved issues here
A/any Golden Daze (talk · rate)
Schi's vote. "its just a 1337 build" is not a good reason. Lord Belar 02:37, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
- Not like it changed the build's rating at all, but you can still remove it :p ۷ïεד • t/c 02:48, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
- I know it doesn't matter to the rating, but letting someone get away with this gives them a wrong impression. Lord Belar 02:53, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
Resolved by frvwfr2 --Wizardboy777(T/C/Sysop) 02:00, 28 October 2007 (CET)
D/W AoM Dervish (talk · rate)
This is the dervish build. — Skakid9090 02:58, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
- User:Shadowsin doesn't really understand the build, nor the vetting procedure. again. Punjab 05:32, 28 October 2007 (CET)
R/D VoS Archer (talk · rate)
Socks, see Special:Recentratings — Skakid9090 02:04, 28 October 2007 (CET)
Resolved, probably. Three don't have contribs, so I can't checkuser them, but that also gives me a different reason to remove their votes. --Wizardboy777(T/C/Sysop) 02:15, 28 October 2007 (CET)
Mo/any Light of Deliverance Hybrid (talk · rate)
Kenzo says the build works great, but rates good. Sy's vote says it has no energy management, but it has LoD and SoR. Coleneh's vote, since the sup rune is gone and guardian is in variants. Thc's vote gives universitility 1 for no reason and says it doesn't work well on heroes, even though ~4 other votes say it does. Leeroy's, since the sup has been removed from the build. — Skakid9090 18:51, 28 October 2007 (CET)
General Coding Issues
Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.
Talk pages without main pages
It's pretty hard to find talk pages for deleted builds (you have to cross-reference this with this), and someone isn't very good at remembering to delete the talk pages :P. A special page that lists talks without associated main pages would be great. --Wizardboy777(T/C/Sysop) 03:51, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
Special:Statistics
There have been a total of 0 page views, and 159,288 page edits since the wiki was setup. That comes to 10.03 average edits per page, and 0.00 views per edit. <- Zero page views? Wtf? Also, the comma between 'page views, and' isn't necessary. And set up should be two words. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 00:45, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
- The Wiki engine can't see the page views since most of them are handled by Squid. We will work on that page once the more important things are done. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 21:34, 24 October 2007 (CEST)
Recent changes RSS and atom feeds
Don't seem to work. [1] [2]. Both of them tell me This feed contains code errors. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 00:45, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
Rate Tab
This is directed at gcard or anyone who has coding experience. Is there anyway for you to be able to have the rate tab available while on the discussion tab? It's kinda annoying to go to the build tab again just to rate something after adding to the discussion. --Lost 05:43, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
- I agree, it is a lil annoying... hardly priority though. Search system>this. -- frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 05:58, 24 August 2007 (CEST)
Div Frames
They don't work. Some examples of hide-able div frames are this and this. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 16:15, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
- What do you mean? Єяøהħ 16:57, 16 September 2007 (CEST)
Checkuser links
I don't know if this is possible, but a Checkuser link next to people's names in Recent Changes and Ratings. Like Scarymonsterclan (Talk | contribs | Checkuser)... that would be nice, it's not to hard to do it now, but sounds like if it's possible it'd be an easy code. ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 22:34, 22 September 2007 (CEST)
- Should be possible, but will take some work. I'm not sure I'd like to modify Recent Changes, since that's a core part of Media Wiki and changes will make it even more difficult to upgrade the wiki software. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
Yet more ratings stuff....
I was wondering (this may not be possiable at all jsut a thought though) would it be at all possiable to make a template or something where it automaticly updates the catagory it's in (e.g if something was at 4.49 in the good catagory and someone votted and it went to 4.5 or 4.51 to make it great, instead of having to manualy switch it it would automaticly do it.)PheNaxKian (T/c) 21:22, 29 September 2007 (CEST)
- ENGLISH IZ GUD. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 22:09, 2 October 2007 (CEST)
- Dynamic templates. Not too hard to understand. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:25, 3 October 2007 (CEST)
- If you're gonna get into dynamic templating... if you put, say, a {{build-stub}} tag on a build, then move the build, the build still appears in Category:Build stubs under the old title, and you have to remove and then put the stub tag in again to get it into the right place. It would be nice if it updated itself. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 04:08, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
- That's what i mean-where the template automaticly updates and changes what catagorey it's in.PheNaxKian (T/c) 17:59, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
Recent ratings and rollbacks
It would be helpful for detecting violations of 1RV with votes if it was possible to see previous rollbacked/deleted/edited votes. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 05:02, 6 October 2007 (CEST)
- Indeed. It's planned, but it includes a change of the database structure, so it might take a bit. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 21:25, 24 October 2007 (CEST)
GWW or GW? Let Preferences Decide!
I think we should put an option in preferences that lets you change where the skill links go, and also where GW: and GWW: go. Possible? ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 15:19, 27 October 2007 (CEST)
- That sounds like a great idea. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 01:04, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
- Sounds good, don't know how difficult it would be to implement. Lord Belar 01:34, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
PvXcode Issues
Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.
Cry of Pain
Cry of Pain's image isn't appearing on the new skillbars. Build:N/Me_Sunspear_Spiker — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 23:31, 10 October 2007 (CEST)
- Still missing. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 22:41, 11 October 2007 (CEST)
Saving Template Codes
Now, when you try to download a template code, the default name is {art_name}.txt
I'm assuming art_name is a variable and stands for article name, but I think you need another bracket or two to get it to work right. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 23:27, 9 October 2007 (CEST)
- I get this as well, but if you try and load the template on GW it moans it's not valid or something like that.....PheNaxKian (T/c) 22:45, 25 October 2007 (CEST)
Skill bar bug
See this image. Stone striker is too high... here's the build page. There's one bracket missing (in the pvxcode), and he has mantra of earth twice, and no attribs, but even when I fix those it still shows up wrong in the preview... Not to mention that image I linked to is bugged, at least for me. It just shows up as a white square with a shadow. Clicking on it shows the right thing, though. Edit: I linked to the actual url, so it's fine. See what I'm talking about with the image bug here --Wizardboy777(T/C) 02:25, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
- Page and image display fine for me. --Peter 21:03, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
- Weird...Probably because you're using IE. :D Lord Belar 21:05, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
- I figured out what the problem is. If you put spaces between the skills (like [Stoneflesh Aura] [Obsidian Flesh] instead of [Stoneflesh Aura][Obsidian Flesh]) the 'split' occurs wherever the first space is. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 04:22, 19 October 2007 (CEST)
- Weird...Probably because you're using IE. :D Lord Belar 21:05, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
Skill nerfs
I've noticed a number of skills that have been nerfed but not rectified to show this on PVX Wiki. Is there anyway normal users can help with making the changes needed? Or is that strictly down to Admins? Unreal Havoc 23:26, 27 October 2007 (CEST)
- It's a matter of getting BBCode updated, not of getting PvXWiki updated. So... no. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:19, 28 October 2007 (CEST)
- I gathered, lol. Unreal Havoc 02:55, 28 October 2007 (CEST)