PvXwiki:Admin noticeboard

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

Note that this is not a talk page and that the respective moderators of each section reserve the right to remove non-administrative comments without discussion.

Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.

General Issues

General problems, such as user conduct, vandalism, and bans. Also, suggestions can be posted here. All can be resolved by an Administrator. See resolved General Issues here.

If you're having troubles with your Authenticication E-Mail see here and here

65.7.225.144 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Continually blanking Talk pages despite numerous warnings. --☭Guild*talk* 01:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Done, but I'm in a Kanthrax run, sooo MSN if any other troubles. ~ Big sysop 01:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

76.253.92.189 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeataly submitting Build: A/E Unsuspecting Flash as an aritcle page. Also things it's a good build. 04:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Trial Build Tag

Im not sure if this is the right spot to say this but, It says on the bottom of the tag, Do not remove this tag until the build has been vetted by the community, doesn't that mean that it needs to be voted upon? Because earlier on the tag it says Do not vote on this build. Just confusing imo, or do I have a misunderstanding of the word vetted. Drah McNinja 18:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

changed. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 18:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Unikatil (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism on Build:Team - Racway. I'm guessing that the IP that was fucking with it is him as well. See history. Life 23:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by a Build Master or Administrator. See resolved issues here.

If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins or Build Masters of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.

Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.

E/any Erf Quaker (talk · rate)

Pretty much all the votes are retarded. "Its earth in PvE, so it cant be that good". It supports fire nukers, and does it well. "Little damage". 210 earth damage every 8 seconds or so is still decent. Plus the KDs, which is the main feature of this. Plus buttloads of optional utility. JebusMcPachirisu 14:07, 8 February 2009 (EST)

I can deal 210 damage in about 3 seconds using DB/MS. And then I can HotO repeatedly if I like. Your point is invalid. 128.255.216.144 21:33, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Removed Builds

One of the ratings isn't 5-5-5. Halp. Snakes on a Wii 02:08, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

A/E Permastorm (talk · rate)

Canderouss obviously doesn't know how to avoid scatter by dropping Shadow Form in UW. Selket Shadowdancer 07:16, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Rt/P Spear of Remedy (talk · rate)

Bim's vote -- 10:22, 4 March 2009

Rt/E Renewal Warmonger's (talk · rate)

People 5-5'ing this crappy build for no apparent reason. Rickyvantof 05:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

A/R Critical Barrager (talk · rate)

Almost every single one of these votes makes me sad inside. Life 06:10, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

N/P_AB_Knees (talk · rate)

Rikon, GoD's, Jebus and JK. only works on noobs/inexperienced players is lolwut. it supports the team with IMS, causes high degen and it hinders foes with WK since it does big degen and causes even more dmg while moving aka death=points and not moving is more time to prevent them from capping. this build is definitly not worthy enough for to trash InfestedHydralisk 18:39, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/Me Blessed Light Monk (talk · rate)

dot, dot, dot I think this has too much bias on its rating page. --Anonimous. D: 18:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

D/any Signet of the Mystic Runner (talk · rate)

Chao's Vote is baed... everything he listed is in optionals. →BERKS _deedle... dum... 00:41, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Not true. Also, Berk's vote should be removed ;o discuss on build talk. ---Chaos- 17:52, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

R/E Blinding Raptor Killer (talk · rate)

I know its a raptor build in PvE but its had a WELL tag on it for awhile. I put it in testing and it belongs either there or in archive. The current R/E raptor farmer (which was written over the build in testing and was rated Great) relies on same concept/bar as the Any/E with the exception that it uses whirling defense instead of Mind Block. Sorry if this is wrong place but I didn't want build getting deleted do to someone scanning well category.--UnderGunned 04:59, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Team_-_Balanced_QQway (talk · rate)

lots of 1-1's. lots of 5-5's. perhaps some mediation is in order to sort out which side is smoking crack.--Reason.decrystallized 10:57, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

W/R NRA Rage War (talk · rate)

Some pretty bad other votes. should be great worthy →BERKS _deedle... dum... 03:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

To be more specific:

Treesbyty's vote assumes rly bad players. rly bad.

Teutonic's vote says it lacks focus while it's focus is doing big fucking damage.

Eloc Jcg underrates.

Relyk is just a terrible player. WE axe doesn't get double adrenaline.

Tai is bad and never heard of +30/-2. Brandnew. 08:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hardly Great worthy. --Anonimous. D: 22:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

N/any Discordant Technobabbler (talk · rate)

The votes by Draghgal Meir, I am Jebus, Chaos Messenger and Reason.decrystallized and others are high off their asses apparently. all 1s or all 0s on a bar easily maintaing 60+ DPS is just idiotic. Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. Insert non-formatted text here 20:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The votes on this build are too high and from users who obviously have an affinity for each other (except maybe Liger). It needs some vote balancing. 5-5-X is bullshit on it, tbh. 17:26, 24 March 2009

I don't have an affinity for any user that rated the build lol. Also, while 5-5-X might be going to far, 0-0 and 1-1 votes for this are equally bad. Go test it on the Master of Damage vs some of the good and great builds and you can easily seen pretty similar numbers. (Not saying its all about dmg, and obviously Master of dmg doesn't test full functionality of a build anyway... just saying that the extremes are way too big.) Captain Bulldozer Don't TELL me that you're right... prove it. 18:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

The master of damage hardly determines anything except you can make yellow numbers appear. It's definately not an analogue to any real-game situation. And stop discussing on AN, discuss on the page instead. --☭Guild*talk* 22:34, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Reason.decrystallized and Star votes are based on the bar and didn't read the variants where it is listed on how to swap out PVE spells if need be. Vote should be removed. 23:40, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

You don't rate bars on what could be in them, only what is in them. Otherwise you could just put a billion variants and say any bad vote is invalid. --☭Guild*talk* 00:00, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

So there vote is valid? 00:07, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

I am willing to change my vote, my issue is with the bandwagon of people who follow others votes, blindly sometimes. Trawling of recent ratings shows when one of the "meta" users votes, a flurry of similar votes appear. You may disagree, thats just how it appears to me. The Brand 01:46, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

A) Those "meta" users are good users who should be blindly followed because they blindly follow you in the right direction, B) STOP MAKING FUCKING PVX CONSPIRACY THEORIES, C) Let this damn build just roll over and die, I'm sick of this edrama shit, D) Don't discuss on the AN. --☭Guild*talk* 01:48, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

D/any_Wounding_Strike_Dervish (talk · rate)

3.8 vote PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 23:29, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Team - TA RtL Spike (talk · rate)

Breit is 2-2. Wrong. Can kill two people right off the bat. If this can't beat a "team-team" you suck at RtL spike -- 02:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Team - Racway (talk · rate)

3-3 and 2-2 votes on a PvE meta build with 5-5-X ratings from BMs. 02:55, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

W/E Endurance Bursting Storm Axe (talk · rate)

Readem's vote is now wrong. gvg tag removed. good in places tagged — LukeJohnson 20:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

And now goldenstar's vote is wrong. NO fucking gvg tag... — LukeJohnson 21:27, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Wow. It's not tagged for GvG idiots. — LukeJohnson 10:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Done FrostytheAdmin 11:46, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Kaboominator fred's vote. Was based on Readem's old vote regarding GvG. 06:35, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

N/W WoD Curses (talk · rate)

BlazingBurdy's vote. --☭Guild*talk* 00:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

W/E Primal Rage Axe (talk · rate)

Still meta, vote wipe? --71.229 22:26, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

P/Rt Healer Hero (talk · rate)

Troll rating by Tab. --☭Guild*talk* 23:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

W/R Troll Sprinter (talk · rate)

Troll rating by Skakid. --☭Guild*talk* 23:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/any WoH Hybrid (talk · rate)

Armond's vote. Drah McNinja 04:41, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

A/E Perma SF Raptor Farming (talk · rate)

5 trash votes by people who do not understand PW:VETTING policy. We have a previously archived (outdated) build of which this is much more recent work and is extremely effective in it's performance. Skie M 01:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

N/Me Shared Physical Support (talk · rate)

Luke's vote: "Sharded burden > PvE now." Shared Burden is in no way > PvE. Overstating effectiveness of elite, rest of the bar is standard. Build is good, but not great.  Star of Exile talk  17:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll ask him to lower it. You're right, it's not 5-5-X worthy. 17:29, 24 March 2009

Already lowered vote. but that's only because of recharge. It's powerful for aoe in my opinion, hence my vote — LukeJohnson 18:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Even though I'm the author, I know that it doesn't deserve anything above 4-4. 18:27, 25 March 2009

to me 5-3 is fine — LukeJohnson 18:31, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/P JQ Smiter (talk · rate)

MrMetalFlower's vote: "inferior capping to contagion bomber but still effective. problems are obviously there where there's interrupts and if you get screwed over it's a while before you can go again." It's not inferior to the contagion bomber, it's very different (except for capping ability, which it actually does just as well). Interrupts screw over most capping builds, that's nothing new. -- Star of Exile talk  19:05, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

E/Mo ZF Smiter (talk · rate)

Luke's vote is not accurate due to bar changes. -- Star of Exile talk  23:11, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

N/Mo_Defender's_Melee_Support (talk · rate)

people who give 5's to necro primaries who use Defender's Zeal and not SoLS are really, really bad.--Reason.decrystallized 00:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/any Grasping Bomber (talk · rate)

Overrated build is overrated--Relyk 09:07, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Team - Obsidian Tank/SS (talk · rate)

Loloverrate. Life 10:26, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

E/Me Rodgort's Invocation Spammer (talk · rate)

Basing an entire build on spamming one skill that is armor effected and really isnt that great? Need most votes removed. Way over ratedLife 10:43, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

E/A Prism Deadly Arts (talk · rate)

Remove unreal's vote. not 5-5-? worthy — LukeJohnson 20:37, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

ys it is.99% of those assacaster builds are 5-5 worthy, its spamable with that energy+health from estorage skills. saying it is inferior to lyssas aura is debatable, lysas aura is inturuptable/reremovaable also. its just swapping a little bit [2 atribute points] worth of damage for more defense. i can have my opinion on voteFile:Signature1.png 00:21, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Don't discuss on the AN, saying it now before you two go at it like horny monkeys. --☭Guild*talk* 00:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/R_Infused_Resilience (talk · rate)

Please Delete build already in wiki. 22:33, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Done. ~ Big sysop 23:12, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Crap the build got moved so this page should be deleted as well. Build:M/R Infused Resilience 23:21, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

P/any_Powagon (talk · rate)

PVX-Guild of Deals seems to judge the build as a stand alone build when it was designed to be run with an Imbagon (It wasn't that obvious when he voted but I made it clearer after that vote). Two votes (Life Guardian and Shazam The Assassin) judging the build that on that you don't need more than an Imbagon as if multiple paragons should run bad together, they don't judge it on how it actually functions with an Imbagon.--√iktor(contribs) 11:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

I was going to post the counterpoint. Overrating for a build that needs to be paired with an Imbagon when you really don't need a shitty ass Paragon bar with an Imbagon. --☭Guild*talk* 11:22, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Firstly. Don't rate down cause you think an imbagon is enough, you rate it down cause it's bad or useless. Secondly, keep it in the discussion. OFF OF THE NOTICEBOARD. ~ Big sysop 11:25, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

A) I was going to move to Talk but apparently it was "locked" or something with the database, and B) clarified my vote. --☭Guild*talk* 11:26, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Rt/any Clamoring Support (talk · rate)

The author vote is...yeah.--Liger414 talk 17:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

E/N SH Pain (talk · rate)

Ikimono's, Blackened's, GoD's votes, this build is terrible pve theorycraft which is not effective and has no synergy in it's skill choice, in short: it sucks. --Anonimous. D: 23:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Team - Obby 600/smite (talk · rate)

Lot of overvoting and some votes like GoD's and other are bad votes in general--Relyk 07:38, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

D/any PvE Reaper's Sweep (talk · rate)

Paultjah obviously has never heard of defense in PvE. If a frontline derv cant stay alive in PvE and needs to take his own self-survival, ur doin it rong. -- 14:36, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Mo/A Shadow ZB (talk · rate)

Vagaa bond's vote. ZB cost 3 energy gross. 3 energy is too much? 07:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

W/any Bison Tournament KD Spammer (talk · rate)

Bison is way easy, just interrupt bear form. You can still kill his bear form anyways...--Relyk 11:33, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

A/E Perma SF Raptor Farming (talk · rate)

Invincible Rogue's vote. Looks a lot like vote balancing to me. 03:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Leave it be imo. It cancels out Blah10's trash vote comparing it to HB wars. --Shazzydiddles 01:25, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

I just voted based on the video I watched. I can tone it down if it needs it, but it looks like a good farm build to me. Farming isn't my area of expertise, however. Invincible Rogue 01:36, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/A Collapsing Blackout (talk · rate)

Nova, Rofl, and Unreal are all sucking each other off irl and two of the other votes are new PvXers following the bandwagon. Timmy and GoD actually have good votes, and I'm just vote balancing with something retarded. AND it's in debate that the build is dupe of something either vetted/trashed. AND it's a joke build. AND Rofl made it. --Shazzydiddles 01:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

q.q moar. i hurd being able to completely fucking rape a monk useless in RA is good while being able to still fuck their team up.File:Signature1.png 04:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Nou. Be good with good skills and get the same kind of shutdown on everyone. --Shazzydiddles 05:58, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

It's bad. If you wanna fuck a team up, VoR it. If they see you poofing around, chances are that team is gonna collapse onto you. ~ Big sysop 06:17, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

On another note, stupid overrating by people (Ikimono thinking there's coordinated spikes in RA, just general badness). --☭Guild*talk* 11:56, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Tab got it. ~ Big sysop 12:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

R/any Prepared Conc Turret (talk · rate)

Build now has LR. Votes complaining about it are now invalid. Toraen 04:09, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Team - TA RtL Spike (talk · rate)

EntropicElement's vote is just incredibly stupid. --☭Guild*talk* 22:34, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Big got it. --☭Guild*talk* 23:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Team - UW IWAY Farm (talk · rate)

I can't even describe how bad this is. Anyone voting above 1 needs to be banned. Life 05:39, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

It's in Trash, no need to post an irrelevant issue. --☭Guild*talk* 11:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

Mo/W PnH Arena Monk (talk · rate)

Railin's vote is just stupid. Rating on RA effectiveness is bad. --68.38.9.62 15:11, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

General Coding Issues

Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.

Rating Page Lock

We need a way to lock rating pages from additions and removals(Like a page protection). Also useful for archived builds, to keep the rating page unchanged. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   16:53, 13 May 2008 (EDT)

I agree, but also for deleted builds. — Balistic 22:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Forum links

Could possibly get some coding to link to the forums for specific builds? For example, if in the article, there is some code such as "forums=(URL)" then it would add a link to the top. Is this possible? We could just make a template and add it to these pages I guess. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   12:50, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

Display issues with Safari Browser

Well, I recently downloaded the new Safari browser and i like it a lot. However, there seems to be some kind of display issue with PvX. The navigation bar that is supposed to appear on the left hand side of each article is just a blank white area and the links from that are pushed down to the very bottom of the page below the white area. Could be something to do with my computer, but can someone else using safari confirm? Thanks Peter 02:58, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Yea, the sidebar links are getting pushed down below the article body on every page. I'll look into it and see if I can change the css or something to fix it if I have time. Hhhippo might know how to fix it. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:44, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Nothing I've tried fixes it. It's entirely possible it's a safari bug. But if anyone else who knows some css wants to try to figure it out, here's a summary of what I tried:

1. Reducing the width of the article body and/or sidebar just leaves a bigger gap between them.
2. Changing the white-space:nowrap in the h4, h5, and h6's for .portlet to white-space:normal removes the big section of whitespace, and the sidebar looks normal... except that it's still shoved down below the article.
3. Changing the border, padding, and margin for .portlet and #pBody did nothing.

I tried more than this, but I don't remember it all. Also, guildwiki, GWW, and wikipedia all look normal in Safari. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 18:26, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Confirmed, no other wikis seem to be having this issue. Peter 07:53, 27 September 2008 (EDT)

Opera, IE, Firefox, and Chrome all load the wiki fine. I'm guessing it's a rendering issue in Safari. If you want, I could try to write up a CSS that'll fix it for just you that you can put in your monobook.   ツ cedave (☆contributions☆) 20:24, 28 September 2008 (EDT)

If it was a rendering issue would it not an effect on the other wikis? Its not a huge problem by an stretch of the imagination, just a bit inconvenient. I will contact apple and see what they say....Peter 04:26, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Well, all I can get out of apple is that its not a Safari browser problem.....back to using firefox i go lol. Peter 02:46, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

Display Issues with Chrome

Same problem as described above with Safari. [[1]]. Anyone got anything? Sometimes its not that far down, it depends on the page I'm looking at. - McTai 14:31, 2 December 2008

Same but it ends under the red window. Fox007 14:45, 2 December 2008 (EST)

(EC)Maybe add style="vertical-align:top"? Only Hhhippo or GCardinal can test / fix it though. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 14:47, 2 December 2008 (EST)

For me the nav bar (ie, Recent Changes) starts right at the end of the article. For this page, for example, it's wayyyy down there. 14:48, 2 December 2008

(EC)Also the white part is a huge link to the main page. I do not know if that would help though. Fox007 14:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)

This is exactly the same problem I have with my Safari Browser, it seems to push everything down to the bottom of the articles for some reason, most likely because the advert does not fit in the navigation bar. However, as above, widening this seemed to have no effect. Any coding experts out there? Peter 14:09, 3 December 2008 (EST)

Keep in mind, Chrome is still beta. You'd have to wait until it was production-state for anyone to bother submitting an aesthetic fix. However, it sounds like a browser rendering issue in the way that IE renders things differently than Firefox. It might get fixed by Google, but there's a solid chance you'll have to edit your personal Monobook file. (I'm not entirely sure if this is possible, however. =/) 128.255.195.88 08:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Vote Wipe Button

Could BM's/Admins possibly get a vote wipe button, where it asks you for the reason and then all the votes get removed for that reason? Helpful for vote wipes if it was a minor change etc. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   18:57, 18 December 2008 (EST)

One semi-related question: should archived builds all be votewiped? I second frv btw. -- Jebus_contests 19:18, 18 December 2008 (EST)

currently, policy suggest we should vote wipe archives, I believe Dont wants to remove that line(looking at the EB talk page). Also ()no offence meant by this) I fail to see what you seconding achieves when you lack access to said tools (or should said tools be implemented). I wouldn't mind a vote wipe button either in any case (though I can leave deleting and restoring). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 12:04, 19 December 2008 (EST)

nah im just saying its a good idea. -- Jebus_contests 12:28, 19 December 2008 (EST)

On Dont's issues with the vope wipe thing, I removed it. I kinda wrote that part and realized I was being stupid when I wrote the whole vote wipe thing. It already hurt us deeply. -- Guild of Deals 22:22, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Vote removals

Both me and Rawr have noticed that sometimes a vote that's shown as removed in recent ratings doesn't appear on the removed list at the bottom of the ratings page, making it impossible to check the validity of a removal/restore the vote. Tab 14:51, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Does the vote still appear in the valid vote section or has it just been nuked from the face of the earth? I'm not sure I'm understanding the problem. - Misery Is Friendly 16:27, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Might they have deleted the vote b/w the time of your last refresh and the removal? ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    admin   16:34, 19 January 2009 (EST)

I'm assuming not, because it sounds like they see a removed vote on recent ratings, then go to see why it was removed because they assume everyone else fails. - Misery Is Friendly 16:40, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Shows as still existing on RC, but it's not in either section on the ratings page. You'd have to ask Rawr for an example, it's a week or so since I last noticed it. Tab 16:48, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Possible reason, vote removed then immediately deleted by voter. We can test this later if you like. - (talk) 03:13, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Nope, it doesnt work. If you vote on something, it appears in recent ratings, but if you delete your vote, the fact that you ever voted on the build is deleted. Another example is if your vote gets rollbacked, it shows up in the "my ratings" page, but if you delete your vote, the fact that it was rollbacked is gone too. Although im not sure what caused tab's problem. :/ JebusMcPachirisu 15:02, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Game Updates RSS Feed

Fucked again. - 09:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)

PvXcode Issues

Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.

Mouse-over Attribute descriptions

Would it be possible to have mousing over an attribute display the in-game description of that attribute? ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:48, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

I agree with the idea, surely it could use the same wiki code or whatever as the ratings? When you hover over Innovation it gives you a description of it, surelt it could be done for attributes? /FrosTalk\ 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

I was thinking about that. It would be nice (especially when calculating things like Expertise and Critical Strikes). --File:GoD Wario Sig.JPG*Wah Wah Wah!* 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)

When you roll the mouse over Palm Strike in a build (with points in Critical Strikes) it does not show the relevant attributes (as if you had not pointed critical strikes in the build) Xiay 08:48, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Health Sacrifice

The fact that health sacrificed doesn't show up in the skill mouseover is kind of annoying. Is there any hope that it will be added? --CJNyfalt 17:35, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

I believe that that is GWshack's task, might be wrong though. Brandnew. 17:36, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

See here. Either gwshack is not up to date or <pvxbig> is not compatible. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 19:27, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

It's a pvxcode problem. gwshack shows sacrifice costs as part of the skill cost now. ~ Zamanee(point out my idiocy) 19:37, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

Leadership glitch?

<pvxbig> [build prof=Para/War leadership=0+3]["Go for the Eyes!"][Watch Yourself!][Save Yourselves!][Save Yourselves! (Luxon)]["There's Nothing To Fear!"][/build] </pvxbig> Energy is shown for GftE and WY, but not SY. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) _{Cuz Steve said so...} ツ 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

i'm inclined to think that's more a GWBBcode thing than our end (could be wrong). PheNaxKian Sysop 16:38, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Probably some Kurzick rank thingy that doesnt show up in PvX bar that affects leadership. I is *Jebus*Enter my contests! 17:54, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

nope. same with luxon. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) _{Cuz Steve said so...} ツ 18:03, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Doesn't work with TNTF, must be something to do with pve skills. Ojamo (>.<(O=(- -Q) 18:06, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

(EC)hmm it might be linked to the PvE rank. even if you put @3 it doesn't change anything (it doesn't even show what the duration should be). Just leave it a while, Hippo or GCard will see this eventually, amd if it's our code they'll fix it. If it's GWBBcode, i've left GCard a message asking him to update to the new version (with their being a new version) hopefully it's been fixed in that version. if not then just tough I guess =p, not much we can do. PheNaxKian Sysop 18:09, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

IIRC, leadership energy bonuses don't show up with energy-based shouts. But I could be wrong. – ツtalkツcontribs 13:42, 6 December 2008 (EST)

<pvxbig>[[theyre on fire@10]</pvxbig>

Its the energy cost is underlined like in the above link, while it isnt underlined in TNTF. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2008 (EST)

oic. – ツtalkツcontribs 15:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

PvXbig links

More of a suggestion than anything. Basically when you use PvXbig without the build information (so you can get a mouseover description of a skill, like this: <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig> which is <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig>) it would be nice if when you clicked on it, it linked to the GWW article. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 13:32, 6 December 2008 (EST)

It does for me. --Frosty 13:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

thanks for tricking me phen. --Frosty 13:36, 6 December 2008 (EST)

Hello, can't you update the gwbbcode database? On gwshack forums they have a new database which is up to date, can't you just replace that with yours? see also: http://gwshack.us/forums/viewtopic.php?t=14402 2nd post Vashan 08:57, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Only GCard can do that, i left him a message a while ago, but he's busy with RL. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 09:17, 21 December 2008 (EST)

I think

Something just updated im i rite? Fox007 09:14, 19 January 2009 (EST) <pvxbig>[[Wail of Doom@12][[Foul Feast@12]
[[Incoming@12]
[[Ray of Judgment@12]
[[Palm Strike@12]</pvxbig> jup i was rite :3 Fox007 09:20, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Its good to look in the upper left on the mainpage. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Numbers on PS are black instead of green, is it because its unlinked? Also not all skills have been updated, such as scavenger strike. Rickyvantof 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

shhh Fox007 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

non-elite version of image for Lightbringer's Gaze needs to be uploaded

--Mafaraxas (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2009 (EST)

also, whirlwind attack. --Mafaraxas (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2009 (EST)

onslaught has differnet skill descriptions still PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 20:32, 26 January 2009 (EST)

PvP only skills

Skill database is hosted wikiside now, can we expect pvp only versions of skills in the near future? shouldn't be too difficult, just have to add new skill entries--GoldenStar 11:51, 27 January 2009 (EST)

List of not-properly updated skills.

1. <pvxbig>[[Ether Prism@12], recharge should be at 15 Fox007 06:01, 31 January 2009 (EST)
2. [[Xinrae's Weapon]</pvxbig>, is now 5 energy rather then 25 energy. Brandnew. 06:13, 31 January 2009 (EST)

iirc some of the skills weren't up to date when GCard synced, so they should be fine when he next syncs. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 07:10, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Palm Strike Doesn't Scale

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=A/any crit=12+1+1][Palm Strike][/build] </pvxbig> No green number thing. Zyke 02:50, 11 February 2009 (EST)

It's been scaling for me...that's odd. 02:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)

I've noticed various skills since the pvxcode update that aren't scaling for me. firefox 3. something wrong with the code? --Mafaraxas (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2009 (EST)

The DB is wrong, notice that the skills that DO scale have only 2 .'s between the numbers. Well none of use knew that so PS is wrong =/ ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    admin   06:19, 11 February 2009 (EST)

It's been like this for ages, I fixed it on the wiki Database but now thats gone (bear in mind i fixed it around the 20th of January :/) Frosty po! 06:27, 11 February 2009 (EST)

PnH doesn't show Div Favor Bonus

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=Mo/any heal=10+1+1 div=11+1][Patient Spirit][Peace and Harmony][/build] </pvxbig> Any comments? Biggles Strongfist™ Sysop 08:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a big deal, but IA shows as a Prep still

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=R/any wild=12][Incendiary Arrows][/build]</pvxbig> Skill description is correct, but it shows up as a prep instead of a bow attack. -- 20:01, 25 March 2009

Content

On the left hand side Content->Highlighted Content all the builds have broken links to them. They are basically missin the "Build|" syntax. I would help out but I don't know how to do it. 12:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)