m ({{Build|A/any Fox's Promise PvE Sin}})
m ({{Build|A/any Fox's Promise PvE Sin}})
Line 167: Line 167:
Honestly, there is nowhere in PvE where unblockability has a more positive effect than spamming MS/DB. [[User:Life Guardian|<b><small><font color="black">Life]]</font></small></b>[[Image:WikiLOD7.gif]] 09:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
Honestly, there is nowhere in PvE where unblockability has a more positive effect than spamming MS/DB. [[User:Life Guardian|<b><small><font color="black">Life]]</font></small></b>[[Image:WikiLOD7.gif]] 09:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
:Raptors with Critcal Defenses? [[User:Selket Shadowdancer|Selket Shadowdancer]] 09:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
:Raptors with Critcal Defenses? [[User:Selket Shadowdancer|Selket Shadowdancer]] 09:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
::Enchantment removal. And keep it on Talk pages, they are such wonderful things. --☭[[user:Guild of Deals|'''Guild''']]<small>[[user talk:Guild of Deals|*talk*]]</small> 11:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
==={{Build|Team - Icy Veins PvE}}===
==={{Build|Team - Icy Veins PvE}}===

Revision as of 11:03, April 20, 2009

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

Note that this is not a talk page and that the respective moderators of each section reserve the right to remove non-administrative comments without discussion.

Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.

General Issues

General problems, such as user conduct, vandalism, and bans. Also, suggestions can be posted here. All can be resolved by an Administrator. See resolved General Issues here.

If you're having troubles with your Authenticication E-Mail see here and here (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Continually blanking Talk pages despite numerous warnings. --☭Guild*talk* 01:08, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Done, but I'm in a Kanthrax run, sooo MSN if any other troubles. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 01:21, 4 April 2009 (UTC) (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeataly submitting Build: A/E Unsuspecting Flash as an aritcle page. Also things it's a good build. Zyke-Sig 04:17, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Trial Build Tag

Im not sure if this is the right spot to say this but, It says on the bottom of the tag, Do not remove this tag until the build has been vetted by the community, doesn't that mean that it needs to be voted upon? Because earlier on the tag it says Do not vote on this build. Just confusing imo, or do I have a misunderstanding of the word vetted. Drah McNinja 18:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

changed. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 18:22, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Unikatil (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism on Build:Team - Racway. I'm guessing that the IP that was fucking with it is him as well. See history. LifeWikiLOD7 23:52, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

ChuckieReturns2 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeatedly blanking talk pages after being told not to many times. Zyke-Sig 21:48, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

that was taken care of manFile:Signature1.png 21:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ibreaktoilets (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

uploading images over already existing images, warned, told, and asked several times. Gotten warnings, still reuploading new image over existing ones. File:Signature1.png 15:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Xxunrealxx1 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Repeatedly broken 1RV. Also warned & asked. Rawrawr Dinosaur 15:49, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

ban me.idc as long as my shit stops getting ruined.File:Signature1.png 15:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Rawrawr Dinosaur (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

vandalism. User:Xxunrealxx1 asked to stopFile:Signature1.png 15:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

lolololol 1rv lololol 1rv lol!11111!!!!!!!1!!! (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

I'm unreal and I like huge cock. Sincerely, Angelus. --AngelusEverton 15:58, 15 April 2009 (UTC) (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism on Build:E/Me Solo IDS Farmer twice.----Signature-Liger414The Liger talk 08:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 17:21, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Toroxus (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Blanked his talkpage 3 times, asked not to twice.----Signature-Liger414The Liger talk 08:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 17:23, 15 April 2009 (UTC) (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

And many others on Build talk:A/E Shadow Bomber. It appears we have spambots now. Toraen 05:07, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

skakid9090 & sadly TAB

Vandalism on my page. I can't recover. Wiped it clean.Xtreme Hunter 21:40, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Bad Blood Day (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism of images. Has been warned. Toraen 04:54, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Tycn got it. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 04:59, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by a Build Master or Administrator. See resolved issues here.

If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins or Build Masters of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.

Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.

W/R NRA Rage War (talk · rate)

Some pretty bad other votes. should be great worthy →BERKS deedle... dum... 03:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

To be more specific:
Treesbyty's vote assumes rly bad players. rly bad.
Teutonic's vote says it lacks focus while it's focus is doing big fucking damage.
Eloc Jcg underrates.
Relyk is just a terrible player. WE axe doesn't get double adrenaline.
Tai is bad and never heard of +30/-2. Brandnew. 08:49, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Hardly Great worthy. --Anonimous. D: 22:32, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Resolved. Misery CowMisery Says Moo 10:34, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

A/E Perma SF Raptor Farming (talk · rate)

0/0 and 1/1 trash votes by people who do not understand PW:VETTING policy or are trolling with the intent of causing unnecessary problems. Skie M 12:41, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

New topics at the bottom of the relevant section please =). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 12:42, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

N/Mo Lost Soul Protector (talk · rate)

Wow, epic fail. Pure prots on a necro means no healing whatsoever. Lack of DF makes me sad. Heroes also can't prot worth shit so I have no idea why it has a hero tag. Basically this build was powervoted to great by noobs who cream their pants at a necro/X trying to accomplish something a primary does better. LifeWikiLOD7 05:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/any Lyssa's Degenerator (talk · rate)

RachG being bad at the game is not a valid reason for voting down. Zyke-Sig 07:27, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

reeeeesolved. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 08:45, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/A Assassin's Promise Spiker (talk · rate)

Auron's vote is mainly bullshit - pretty much every point in it is just wrong. Andy 13:17, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

W/E Shock Axe (talk · rate)

My Roflrockets Go Pewpew's vote. Toraen 15:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

lol@tab's removal. resolved. Jebus 19:54, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Mo/N WoH Support Hero (talk · rate)

ChuckieReturns2's vote. Total wtf. Zyke-Sig 23:18, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/any Draining Pressure (talk · rate)

  • Votes of 1 do not reflect reality of the build.
  • Explained on the Discussion page why Lyssa Degenerator is inferior (constantly ripped Lyssa in TA is less energy gain (less alone energy steal) than Energy Drain and Lyssa can't be covered with another enchant as it is contantly reapplied.
  • Some people only rate the pressure when the focus is energy denial
  • Power Drain compensates for the Energy difference between Energy Drain and an unripped Lyssa enchant if the objective is pressure
  • People disregarded optional slots.
  • Weapon sewapping doesn't always work (conflicting priorities forces wrong weapon choice when faced with melee pressure)
  • Energy denial doesn't have its only use on healers. It makes any other player useless
  • I don't think that a build that makes me decisive in many matches can receive a rating below 3 11:07, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi there, issues relating to vote removal go under the "Build-specific issues" header, and new issues go at the bottom =). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 11:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I posted comments to each user's talk page. Please check votes in a few days and mediate as necessary.MindMaze 13:10, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/any Echo Mesmer (talk · rate)

This build received trashed vote (0 and 1). The build is valid and doesn't deserve this. GoR is not necessarily superior and requires 5 energy for each copy when echo doesn't which is better energy management. I think intuitively you would expect this build to be at least in the good category.MindMaze 14:32, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

hey, when posting build issues make sure you use: "{{Build|Me/any Echo Mesmer }} as oppoosed to "{{Build:Me/any Echo Mesmer }} (you did the latter which places the contents of the page in question on the AN =D). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 14:37, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

R/E Archer's Raptor Farmer (talk · rate)

5-5 votes overstate effectiveness. It's less reliable than the Generic Mist Form and only as fast as it at best. Toraen 23:53, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Rt/Mo Caretaker's Support (talk · rate)

Lots of bullshit overrating. --☭Guild*talk* 22:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

REQUEST lots of bullshit underrating. I think Jaigoda's vote is biased cause he was trying developing the same buildXtreme Hunter 10:49, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, we need a BM to go through the votes again.--TheDarkshineKnight 07:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Team - FireWay (talk · rate)

Lots of bullshit overrating.--Relyk 03:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/E Lyssa's Fire (talk · rate)

Severe mental retardation by MindMaze. 08:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Does anyone NOT notice his reasoning was absolutely rubbish? 21:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Admins/BMs are busy atm most likely; refrain from making unnecessary comments here. Jebus 21:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
"Unnecessary comments" ^ups for a perfect example. 21:33, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/any Energy Leak (talk · rate)

Yet more stupidity by MindMaze. 08:56, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Any/Rt CoF Leech (talk · rate)

KJ is bad and i cba to mediate anything. ··· Danny Does Drugs 22:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Mo/A Shadow ZB (talk · rate)

Dragnmn's vote. Use reasoning "Zz" just to piss him off. LifeWikiLOD7 01:03, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

no such vote exists. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 22:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
I saw it earlier, he must have noticed this on AN and deleted it. Jebus 22:32, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
See conversation on my talk why I deleted it, I made a wrong assumption. Dragnmn talk cont 10:16, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
Admins/BMs probably already knew that; refrain from making unnecessary comments here. 21:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

R/A Super Sniper (talk · rate)

Trial votes. LifeWikiLOD7 02:52, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Big got them. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 22:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Any/Rt CoF Leech (talk · rate)

terrible build, votes overflowing with pvx 5-5-100% retardation. --Anonimous. D: 21:24, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

deleted the build. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 22:00, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Team - RoJ Nukers (talk · rate)

Tons of bullshit overrating. --☭Guild*talk* 11:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Handled. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 09:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/any Energy Leak (talk · rate)

Saketh is stupid. --☭Guild*talk* 21:10, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

resolved. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 09:24, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Rt/any Mobile Spirits (talk · rate)

Zzz, Overrating. Spirit spammers aren't great. LifeWikiLOD7 00:14, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Remind me to have build masters look at this and the build below. ~ Big Big sadface sig sysop 09:25, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

A/any Fox's Promise PvE Sin (talk · rate)

Honestly, there is nowhere in PvE where unblockability has a more positive effect than spamming MS/DB. LifeWikiLOD7 09:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Raptors with Critcal Defenses? Selket Shadowdancer 09:23, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Enchantment removal. And keep it on Talk pages, they are such wonderful things. --☭Guild*talk* 11:03, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Team - Icy Veins PvE (talk · rate)

Vast overrating for such an utterly horrible build. --☭Guild*talk* 19:59, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Mo/any Air of Enchantment Aspenwood (talk · rate)

Absolute shitters like Guild of Deals and Relyk who can't understand kurzick-side FA is about keeping NPCs up, not players. 21:55, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Build:Any/Rt CoF Leech (talk · rate) - 2

This build should be restored. Just because Anonimous feels that it doesn't belong doesn't mean anything. ··· Danny Does Drugs 22:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

He isn't the only one that thinks that.Xtreme Hunter 22:41, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
You're not the only retard on PvX - case in point. ··· Danny Does Drugs 22:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

Me/E Vaettir Farmer (talk · rate)

Trial Vote. LifeWikiLOD7 03:25, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

R/W Stance Tank (talk · rate)

Major changes to build. Requesting vote wipe for re-testing. Toraen 04:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

General Coding Issues

Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.

Rating Page Lock

We need a way to lock rating pages from additions and removals(Like a page protection). Also useful for archived builds, to keep the rating page unchanged. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   16:53, 13 May 2008 (EDT)

I agree, but also for deleted builds. — Balistic 22:03, 20 February 2009 (UTC)

Forum links

Could possibly get some coding to link to the forums for specific builds? For example, if in the article, there is some code such as "forums=(URL)" then it would add a link to the top. Is this possible? We could just make a template and add it to these pages I guess. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   12:50, 25 September 2008 (EDT)

Display issues with Safari Browser

Well, I recently downloaded the new Safari browser and i like it a lot. However, there seems to be some kind of display issue with PvX. The navigation bar that is supposed to appear on the left hand side of each article is just a blank white area and the links from that are pushed down to the very bottom of the page below the white area. Could be something to do with my computer, but can someone else using safari confirm? Thanks Peter 02:58, 26 September 2008 (EDT)

Yea, the sidebar links are getting pushed down below the article body on every page. I'll look into it and see if I can change the css or something to fix it if I have time. Hhhippo might know how to fix it. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:44, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
Nothing I've tried fixes it. It's entirely possible it's a safari bug. But if anyone else who knows some css wants to try to figure it out, here's a summary of what I tried:
  1. Reducing the width of the article body and/or sidebar just leaves a bigger gap between them.
  2. Changing the white-space:nowrap in the h4, h5, and h6's for .portlet to white-space:normal removes the big section of whitespace, and the sidebar looks normal... except that it's still shoved down below the article.
  3. Changing the border, padding, and margin for .portlet and #pBody did nothing.
I tried more than this, but I don't remember it all. Also, guildwiki, GWW, and wikipedia all look normal in Safari. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 18:26, 26 September 2008 (EDT)
Confirmed, no other wikis seem to be having this issue. Peter 07:53, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
Opera, IE, Firefox, and Chrome all load the wiki fine. I'm guessing it's a rendering issue in Safari. If you want, I could try to write up a CSS that'll fix it for just you that you can put in your monobook. Cedave bad  ツ cedave (☆contributions☆) 20:24, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
If it was a rendering issue would it not an effect on the other wikis? Its not a huge problem by an stretch of the imagination, just a bit inconvenient. I will contact apple and see what they say....Peter 04:26, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Well, all I can get out of apple is that its not a Safari browser problem.....back to using firefox i go lol. Peter 02:46, 1 October 2008 (EDT)

Display Issues with Chrome

Same problem as described above with Safari. [[1]]. Anyone got anything? Sometimes its not that far down, it depends on the page I'm looking at. - McTai Tai Sig Image 3 14:31, 2 December 2008

Same but it ends under the red window. Fox007 User Fox007 sig 14:45, 2 December 2008 (EST)
(EC)Maybe add style="vertical-align:top"? Only Hhhippo or GCardinal can test / fix it though. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 14:47, 2 December 2008 (EST)
For me the nav bar (ie, Recent Changes) starts right at the end of the article. For this page, for example, it's wayyyy down there. Tai sig Image 78 14:48, 2 December 2008
(EC)Also the white part is a huge link to the main page. I do not know if that would help though. Fox007 User Fox007 sig 14:49, 2 December 2008 (EST)
This is exactly the same problem I have with my Safari Browser, it seems to push everything down to the bottom of the articles for some reason, most likely because the advert does not fit in the navigation bar. However, as above, widening this seemed to have no effect. Any coding experts out there? Peter 14:09, 3 December 2008 (EST)
Keep in mind, Chrome is still beta. You'd have to wait until it was production-state for anyone to bother submitting an aesthetic fix. However, it sounds like a browser rendering issue in the way that IE renders things differently than Firefox. It might get fixed by Google, but there's a solid chance you'll have to edit your personal Monobook file. (I'm not entirely sure if this is possible, however. =/) 08:10, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Vote Wipe Button

Could BM's/Admins possibly get a vote wipe button, where it asks you for the reason and then all the votes get removed for that reason? Helpful for vote wipes if it was a minor change etc. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   18:57, 18 December 2008 (EST)

One semi-related question: should archived builds all be votewiped? I second frv btw. -- Jebuscontests 19:18, 18 December 2008 (EST)
currently, policy suggest we should vote wipe archives, I believe Dont wants to remove that line(looking at the EB talk page). Also ()no offence meant by this) I fail to see what you seconding achieves when you lack access to said tools (or should said tools be implemented). I wouldn't mind a vote wipe button either in any case (though I can leave deleting and restoring). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 12:04, 19 December 2008 (EST)
nah im just saying its a good idea. -- Jebuscontests 12:28, 19 December 2008 (EST)
On Dont's issues with the vope wipe thing, I removed it. I kinda wrote that part and realized I was being stupid when I wrote the whole vote wipe thing. It already hurt us deeply. --GoD Hammer and Sickle Guild of Deals 22:22, 21 December 2008 (EST)

Vote removals

Both me and Rawr have noticed that sometimes a vote that's shown as removed in recent ratings doesn't appear on the removed list at the bottom of the ratings page, making it impossible to check the validity of a removal/restore the vote. Cute McMonkeyTab 14:51, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Does the vote still appear in the valid vote section or has it just been nuked from the face of the earth? I'm not sure I'm understanding the problem. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 16:27, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Might they have deleted the vote b/w the time of your last refresh and the removal? ~~     Frvwfr2   Frv Boston  talk    admin   16:34, 19 January 2009 (EST)
I'm assuming not, because it sounds like they see a removed vote on recent ratings, then go to see why it was removed because they assume everyone else fails. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 16:40, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Shows as still existing on RC, but it's not in either section on the ratings page. You'd have to ask Rawr for an example, it's a week or so since I last noticed it. Cute McMonkeyTab 16:48, 19 January 2009 (EST)
Possible reason, vote removed then immediately deleted by voter. We can test this later if you like. - Miserysig (talk) 03:13, 22 January 2009 (EST)
Nope, it doesnt work. If you vote on something, it appears in recent ratings, but if you delete your vote, the fact that you ever voted on the build is deleted. Another example is if your vote gets rollbacked, it shows up in the "my ratings" page, but if you delete your vote, the fact that it was rollbacked is gone too. Although im not sure what caused tab's problem. :/ Jebuspachi-1-1.jpgMcPachirisu 15:02, 22 January 2009 (EST)

Ads glitch

On the left, where should be an ad, sometimes there is place reserved for it that now is grey except the topmost, well, about 80 pixels where a flash player happily plays his flash minigame (its this silly thing where you have to chin the bar faster than the computer) 19:54, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

PvXcode Issues

Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.

Mouse-over Attribute descriptions

Would it be possible to have mousing over an attribute display the in-game description of that attribute? ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:48, 9 June 2008 (EDT)

I agree with the idea, surely it could use the same wiki code or whatever as the ratings? When you hover over Innovation it gives you a description of it, surelt it could be done for attributes? /FrosTalk\ 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
I was thinking about that. It would be nice (especially when calculating things like Expertise and Critical Strikes). --File:GoD Wario Sig.JPG*Wah Wah Wah!* 07:59, 11 June 2008 (EDT)
When you roll the mouse over Palm Strike in a build (with points in Critical Strikes) it does not show the relevant attributes (as if you had not pointed critical strikes in the build) Xiay 08:48, 28 January 2009 (EST)

Health Sacrifice

The fact that health sacrificed doesn't show up in the skill mouseover is kind of annoying. Is there any hope that it will be added? --CJNyfalt 17:35, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

I believe that that is GWshack's task, might be wrong though. Brandnew. 17:36, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
See here. Either gwshack is not up to date or <pvxbig> is not compatible. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 19:27, 9 July 2008 (EDT)
It's a pvxcode problem. gwshack shows sacrifice costs as part of the skill cost now. ~ ZamaneeJinnSigZamanee(point out my idiocy) 19:37, 9 July 2008 (EDT)

Leadership glitch?

<pvxbig> [build prof=Para/War leadership=0+3]["Go for the Eyes!"][Watch Yourself!][Save Yourselves!][Save Yourselves! (Luxon)]["There's Nothing To Fear!"][/build] </pvxbig> Energy is shown for GftE and WY, but not SY. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) Cuz Steve said so... ツ 16:04, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

i'm inclined to think that's more a GWBBcode thing than our end (could be wrong). PheNaxKian Sysop 16:38, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Probably some Kurzick rank thingy that doesnt show up in PvX bar that affects leadership. I is *Jebus*IAmJebussig3Enter my contests! 17:54, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
nope. same with luxon. ☆Imbagon♥McSteve☆(LVPoW) Cuz Steve said so... ツ 18:03, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Doesn't work with TNTF, must be something to do with pve skills. Ojamo (>.<(O=(- -Q) 18:06, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
(EC)hmm it might be linked to the PvE rank. even if you put @3 it doesn't change anything (it doesn't even show what the duration should be). Just leave it a while, Hippo or GCard will see this eventually, amd if it's our code they'll fix it. If it's GWBBcode, i've left GCard a message asking him to update to the new version (with their being a new version) hopefully it's been fixed in that version. if not then just tough I guess =p, not much we can do. PheNaxKian Sysop 18:09, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
IIRC, leadership energy bonuses don't show up with energy-based shouts. But I could be wrong. – talkInfidel sigcontribs 13:42, 6 December 2008 (EST)

<pvxbig>[[theyre on fire@10]</pvxbig>

Its the energy cost is underlined like in the above link, while it isnt underlined in TNTF. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 13:46, 6 December 2008 (EST)
oic. – talkInfidel sigcontribs 15:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)

PvXbig links

More of a suggestion than anything. Basically when you use PvXbig without the build information (so you can get a mouseover description of a skill, like this: <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig> which is <pvxbig>[[glyph of lesser energy@0]</pvxbig>) it would be nice if when you clicked on it, it linked to the GWW article. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 13:32, 6 December 2008 (EST)

It does for me. --Frosty 13:35, 6 December 2008 (EST)
thanks for tricking me phen. --Frosty 13:36, 6 December 2008 (EST)
Hello, can't you update the gwbbcode database? On gwshack forums they have a new database which is up to date, can't you just replace that with yours? see also: 2nd post Vashan 08:57, 21 December 2008 (EST)
Only GCard can do that, i left him a message a while ago, but he's busy with RL. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 09:17, 21 December 2008 (EST)

I think

Something just updated im i rite? Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:14, 19 January 2009 (EST) <pvxbig>[[Wail of Doom@12][[Foul Feast@12]
[[Ray of Judgment@12]
[[Palm Strike@12]</pvxbig> jup i was rite :3 Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:20, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Its good to look in the upper left on the mainpage. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 09:24, 19 January 2009 (EST)

Numbers on PS are black instead of green, is it because its unlinked? Also not all skills have been updated, such as scavenger strike. RickyRicksawsmfacevantof 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

shhh Fox007 User Fox007 sig 09:26, 19 January 2009 (EST)

non-elite version of image for Lightbringer's Gaze needs to be uploaded

1815.jpg --Mafaraxas (talk) 19:01, 23 January 2009 (EST)

also, whirlwind attack. --Mafaraxas (talk) 18:01, 24 January 2009 (EST)
onslaught has differnet skill descriptions still MuffinPWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 20:32, 26 January 2009 (EST)

PvP only skills

Skill database is hosted wikiside now, can we expect pvp only versions of skills in the near future? shouldn't be too difficult, just have to add new skill entries--GoldenGoldenstarStar 11:51, 27 January 2009 (EST)

List of not-properly updated skills.

  1. <pvxbig>[[Ether Prism@12], recharge should be at 15 Fox007 User Fox007 sig 06:01, 31 January 2009 (EST)
  2. [[Xinrae's Weapon]</pvxbig>, is now 5 energy rather then 25 energy. Brandnew. 06:13, 31 January 2009 (EST)
iirc some of the skills weren't up to date when GCard synced, so they should be fine when he next syncs. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 07:10, 31 January 2009 (EST)

Palm Strike Doesn't Scale

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=A/any crit=12+1+1][Palm Strike][/build] </pvxbig> No green number thing. Zyke 02:50, 11 February 2009 (EST)

It's been scaling for me...that's odd. Biggles 02:58, 11 February 2009 (EST)
I've noticed various skills since the pvxcode update that aren't scaling for me. firefox 3. something wrong with the code? --Mafaraxas (talk) 03:13, 11 February 2009 (EST)
The DB is wrong, notice that the skills that DO scale have only 2 .'s between the numbers. Well none of use knew that so PS is wrong =/ ~~     Frvwfr2   Frv Boston  talk    admin   06:19, 11 February 2009 (EST)
It's been like this for ages, I fixed it on the wiki Database but now thats gone (bear in mind i fixed it around the 20th of January :/) FrostrageFrosty po! 06:27, 11 February 2009 (EST)

PnH doesn't show Div Favor Bonus

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=Mo/any heal=10+1+1 div=11+1][Patient Spirit][Peace and Harmony][/build] </pvxbig> Any comments? Big sadface sigBiggles Strongfist™ Sysop 08:32, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Not a big deal, but IA shows as a Prep still

<pvxbig> [build name="Empty" prof=R/any wild=12][Incendiary Arrows][/build]</pvxbig> Skill description is correct, but it shows up as a prep instead of a bow attack. -- KJ needed a new sig....sig 20:01, 25 March 2009


On the left hand side Content->Highlighted Content all the builds have broken links to them. They are basically missin the "Build|" syntax. I would help out but I don't know how to do it.Xtreme Hunter 12:10, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Here is the link Editor's PickXtreme Hunter 17:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
the links have to lead to "Build X/X blah blah, not just X/X blah blah. thats the problemFile:Signature1.png 17:16, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Yah that is why I stated that at the start....but the link I showed is the problem area...fix thouse links and it should be good.Xtreme Hunter 17:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
you need to contact wikia, it's a special page so server access is required. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 17:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)


Would it be possible to change the archived tag into something more along the lines of the WELL tag? As of right now it's a little awkward to use(and by that I mean all the blank= stuff). Something like...{{archived|Reason|Category|Date}}. Real example: {{archived|Outdated|Great|~~~~~}}. Eh, just a thought. LifeWikiLOD7 05:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.