The Admin noticeboard
There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).
There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).
Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).
(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)
To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.
Note that this is not a talk page and that the respective moderators of each section reserve the right to remove non-administrative comments without discussion.
Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.
General Issues
General problems, such as user conduct, vandalism, and bans. Also, suggestions can be posted here. All can be resolved by an Administrator. See resolved General Issues here.
If you're having troubles with your Authentication E-Mail see here and here
85.247.137.38 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Detracting from the productivity of the wiki. --Short 10:57, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
- blocked. ~ PheNaxKian talk 11:14, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
24.178.124.65 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Constantly vandalizing Build:Team - DoA Glaiveway. 
08:15, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
User:Pryon
autism ahead---XTREME 21:09, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
95.139.173.148 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Vandalism on Build:Me/any VoR Mesmer and Build:Me/any Energy Spike. Tyraelxy 15:36, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- Edits rolled back and the IP was banned. Thanks, Ty Karate Jesus
97.103.131.175 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Vandalising/clearing Build:Team - Frostmaw Ashway --
16:52, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
81.158.111.204 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)
Autism ahead. Juze 
10:06, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
- I actually lol'd at the start ones.--Oskar 12:51, July 27, 2010 (UTC)
Build-Specific Issues
Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by an Administrator. See resolved issues here.
If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.
- Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.
Team - UW DLway (talk · rate)
May need a vote wipe since the build has been changed due mindblade update. Juze 10:51, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
- After looking through your changes, I'm having a hard time seeing where the build has fundamentally changed to the point that it warrants a vote wipe. Maybe expound a little and I'll take another look. Karate
Jesus 13:04, 13 July 2010
Team - Kathandrax Runners (talk · rate)
A whole new build, wipe votes, and have it testing again. —Forget 07:12, July 15, 2010 (UTC)
- I'd like to see a discussion of the changes prior to votewiping the build. Let people weigh in on what was changed and come to a decision as a community. Karate Jesus
Any/N Cho's Farmer (talk · rate)
TahiriVeila's vote. It's not really that pointless to farm the area when you get unid golds anyway that sell for 700g each. And I see many people selling old-school items everyday. Also, effectiveness 2 is just stupid when it works well. Universality is also downrated when everything is optimized for every profession. Juze 10:42, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Team - Deep Physway (talk · rate)
Vote board is sabotaged by the same person, trying to kill it's rating. On top of copy + paste vote trolling, it's not offering any good arguments other than, "this build isn't good because these builds can be replaced" and giving no other builds to backs up the persons reason why. Infuser God 17:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- They do have reasoning, and you alone do not get to define what a 'good' argument is. Admins != Buildmasters so the votes stand unless/until you can convince each user why they are wrong. I'm certainly not in a position that would allow me to say which of you is right. ToraenTheJanitor 16:34, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- They don't have reasoning, the person is saying it's bad but proves no evidence or reasons why. Look at the vote page, 4 votes are there just to troll the rating. For example on the talk page: No, you're wrong and you're stupid. This build is far from great, partly because several of your player slots are wasted. How are they wasted? Why are they wasted? What should they be? Answering those would have been a 'good' argument. The person sabotaging the vote board using multiple accounts is not giving any good arguments. Zodiac Meteor 17:37, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- firs the votes provide reasoning "Very few enemies in the deep hit enough for prot bond to be useful" that's saying that a skills being sued that doesn't need to be there, when you could use something else for more benifit to me. "3 or 4 of the builds can be replaced by one seed monk with no loss in survivability" basicaly it's taking 3 or 4 people to do the job that one person could. Those are reasons, I by no mean c;aim they are correct, like Toraen, I'm in no place to say if they are, and that aside we decided to remove all "build master" related issues because of the amount of drama that comes with it far out weighed any benefit we gained.
- what's on the talk doesn't affect what's on the rating as far as we're concerned.
- as for your last point, they're all different people, they're just too lazy to use their own reasoning so they copy one persons vote, we don't have anything against that.
- I suggest you do as Toraen said and bring it up on the build talk or the voters talk if you have an issue, as every else does. ~ PheNaxKian talk 18:11, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Now clear as day it's sabotage, build rating of excluded has been changed to 0 and comment replaced with "Might aswell replace two eles with one monk, add a tank to ball and replace sins with 100bs. Then you have a REAL team build." The votes are violating vet system, upon discussing in talk page their reasons are false. Zodiac Meteor 19:36, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Excluded's was removed. The others are still perfectly fine as i see it, now stop arguing, Me and another admin have told you what you can do. If another admin sees this and feels the votes should be removed, then fine, that's their choice, and i won't object to it. However I assure you, posting again and again on the Admin Noticeboard won't help things. ~ PheNaxKian talk 21:28, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Frosty's troll vote needs removing. 2-2-0 and the reason "good build? NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH" I can't see how it's still up there.Minion 06:07, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Frosty's troll vote needs removing. 2-2-0 and the reason "good build? NAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHH" I can't see how it's still up there.Minion
- Excluded's was removed. The others are still perfectly fine as i see it, now stop arguing, Me and another admin have told you what you can do. If another admin sees this and feels the votes should be removed, then fine, that's their choice, and i won't object to it. However I assure you, posting again and again on the Admin Noticeboard won't help things. ~ PheNaxKian talk 21:28, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Now clear as day it's sabotage, build rating of excluded has been changed to 0 and comment replaced with "Might aswell replace two eles with one monk, add a tank to ball and replace sins with 100bs. Then you have a REAL team build." The votes are violating vet system, upon discussing in talk page their reasons are false. Zodiac Meteor 19:36, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
- They don't have reasoning, the person is saying it's bad but proves no evidence or reasons why. Look at the vote page, 4 votes are there just to troll the rating. For example on the talk page: No, you're wrong and you're stupid. This build is far from great, partly because several of your player slots are wasted. How are they wasted? Why are they wasted? What should they be? Answering those would have been a 'good' argument. The person sabotaging the vote board using multiple accounts is not giving any good arguments. Zodiac Meteor 17:37, July 24, 2010 (UTC)
Team - UW Physway (talk · rate)
"certainly not an effective way of doing the UW, just an easy one, relies heavily on the skill level of the bonders." - Not effective? When it's been shown to have completed UW with Dhuum even in under an hour without a single dedicated tank. Also, every balanced team relies on their backline, when tanks are not present. This vote needs removing if they cannot change their reasoning.Minion
19:40, July 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Not a talk page. I'll look at it. Karate Jesus 21:00, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Karate Jesus 21:04, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
General Coding Issues
Please use The Wikia Noticeboard. Old resolved issues can be found here.
PvXcode Issues
Please use The Wikia Noticeboard. Old resolved issues can be found here.