PvXwiki:Admin noticeboard

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

General Issues

General issues include (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, banning vandals, and moderating serious disputes. This section may also be used for miscellaneous issues as well as Administrative announcements. See resolved issues here.

Licensing version

See this. Page is protected, so one of you guys needs to fix it. --Wizardboy777 23:48, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

I've been talking to Gcardinal, and we're unsure which is correct, and obviously, we can't fix it until we know which is the problem, so no fix, for the moment. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:04, 22 September 2007 (CEST)

I think we have to use version 2.0. We took over quite some content from Guild Wiki, and they use 2.0 with no note on the possibility of silent upgrades. So we have to put at least the pages which originated there under 2.0. Anyway, we should put up a consistent statement asap. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Wyllen (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Links to this users' user page redirect to a page that links to one of his builds. Once you get to his real user page, it has a redirect link to his build. On his talk page, there is one of his builds. I post on his talk page about it, but he just wipes my comment and puts up a build there. Im confused =/.--Victoryisyours (talk_pvxcontribs) 19:07, 13 October 2007 (CEST)

Fixed. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 12:56, 15 October 2007 (CEST)

70.21.5.155 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Requesting ban for vandalism, second offense on the same article. --71.229.204.25 00:36, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

Blocked for a week. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 00:38, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

What happened to quitting GW grinch?— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 01:09, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

I'm still on PvX. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 01:15, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

okay... thats not weird...— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 01:17, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

205.206.129.109 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism. --71.229.204.25 08:06, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

User has been warned by Auron. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:19, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Ayanamij (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

5-5-5 spam with reasons "To elaborate... I tested this, so it's 5-5-5". — Rapta (talk|contribs) 22:34, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Lol and he say's if he submitted it, it's gonna be rated 5-5-5, because thats the quality of his builds or he wouldn't submit them.--Victoryisyours 22:38, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

If you'd like I'll just take them down, just let me know. I am happy to remove all the builds I have created. --Ayanamij 10:17, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Simply removing your votes that had a rating of 5-5-5 with the rationale that "that's the quality of [your] builds" will suffice. Otherwise, I'll go around finding them myself. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 10:34, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

I don't mind removing the builds ... if no one finds them useful, then they have no place here anyhow. 5-5-5 is not the quality of all my builds; I have a database of about 20 or 25 I circulate for RA with varying degrees of success. The ones I posted here are the best of those. I think the problem with the voting is that a lot of the builds here are general "cure all" builds that, while used for GvG are assumed to work for RA, but in fact, do not. For instance, the RA MoR build has no self heal (suicide in RA, obviously) and the RA SoD build consumes too much mana in RA. It was my attempt to post builds which had a more narrow scope of design but performed better in the given arena (CM, RA). Obviously, I failed, and that's fine. I don't mind removing the builds, since they are just causing clutter at the moment. --Ayanamij 10:52, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

They would have been removed anyways, as an obvious biased author vote. We look at author votes more... heavily? Author's MUST provide reasoning, or it will be removed. 5-5-5 is fine, but say a GOOD reason why. ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop/Halo 3 File Share) 12:25, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

75.18.191.45 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism --71.229.204.25 02:26, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Fixed. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:25, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Readem (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Demotion I think is in store for him. He broke the 1RV rule on vote removal, NPA infractions for that same vote, and just general going back to what he was before the last time I did this. This needs to be delt with this time. If letting him slide by is going to be repeated again, I've lost a lot of faith in the wiki's admins. Look here to see what I mean. Bluemilkman/Talk To Me 03:29, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Everyone has their off days every once in a while. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:30, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

He's doing the same thing he did before. I'm pretty sure this is a repeat of what he was before. He needs to be dealt with. I respect him as a gamer, I'm sure he's one of the best, but if people skills is what he lacks, he should not be an admin. Bluemilkman/Talk To Me 03:33, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

I've snapped before too. Everyone is human. Just part of the human experience. Let him just wait it out and take some pills or meditate a bit or whatever works for him. He'll be back soon anew. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:37, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

You've been warned before too, and outbursts are only acceptable to a certain extent. If someone isn't mature enough to just stop posting when they're pissed past the point of NPA, they don't belong in a position of leadership on this wiki. -Auron 03:41, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Wait, how did he violate 1RV by re-removing a vote? If it was exactly the same as the vote that he removed the first time, then bob broke 1RV, not Readem. If not, 1RV doesn't even come into the picture. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 03:39, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

+1 for edru.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 03:40, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

They both broke PW:1RV — Skakid9090 05:07, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

You're all technically wrong abou the 1RV point. It specifies nothing about the removal of ratings, and therefore is invalid. - Krowman {{sysop}} 06:30, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Precedent says that 1RV applies to ratings. 1RV should probably be updated. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 06:51, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Bit of poking gives us this quote from real vetting: "Each user has the opportunity to change his/her vote any time as the work on the build progresses. This includes the submission of a new vote after a vote was stricken. Note however that the re-submission of the same vote without any further explanation is violating 1RV." -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 06:52, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Meh, good reason to draft a PvX-specific version of the policy. Until then, you can't thump that policy with any relevance. That quote is wrong, rather than referring to policy guidelines that don't yet exist being right. BTW, original poster please provide a link to the actions that have been called into question, so that anyone reading this thread can see what specifically you are talking about. Thanks in advance. - Krowman {{sysop}} 07:34, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Bob fregman Is what I was talking about, you can find the vote from there. I already posted this link before. I also remember seeing somewhere that taking a vote down more than once is part of the 1RV policy somewhere, and I'll look for it sometime. Bluemilkman/Talk To Me 12:36, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

It's all well and good that someone may have said that at one point; fact is, the policy doesn't mention anything about vote removal. That's what makes it invalid. Edru's points above may apply too, if the user was simply reposting his once-removed vote. - Krowman {{sysop}} 20:42, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes. See resolved issues here.

Me/any Illusional Mimicry (talk · rate)

Voter has voted low on my build and said that the build would be better in a team rather than alone, however the build is designed for Random Arenas and Team Arenas. Boss 21:46, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Also, what happened to the other 2 users who had voted on my build? Boss 21:48, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

DE removed one of the 5-5-5's and then gave it an even lower vote than Y0 ich halt. And the rest of Y0's points stand, whether or not you're on a team. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 04:21, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Mo/D Mystic Runner (talk · rate)

Kappo's vote is probably the author's friend in his guild, being that he rated it 5-5-5, has no contributions, and said WE'VE used it. BCturk also said it works WELL, and rated it 4.7 overall, so some of these votes should be removed or something...--Victoryisyours 22:19, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Build:Mo/D Signet of Mystic Speed Runner now.--Victoryisyours 03:03, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

None of the votes seem to be issues to me. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 03:12, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

So your saying kappo having 0 contributions and rating the build 5-5-5 isn't suspicious, or the fact someone says it works WELL and votes it 5-5-3 isnt odd?--Victoryisyours 21:10, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

The no contributions one has been removed, the others are fine. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 22:02, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Resolved. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:21, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

A/W Shadow Prison Assassin (talk · rate)

Bob fregman's vote has poor reasoning. RA, literally does not need defense. I know a great deal of players who bring no self-heal, as it is a waste of attributes. It is still able to easily incapaciate others in TA, w/ hardly any coordination required (123 Sin + Orb = gg). In HA, sins have never been popular, due to their fragility in general (soldier's is the new exception). In GvG they have mostly fallen out of the metagame, but it is still the most commonly used chain. Finally, Bob lacks significant expierience in HB, and is only able obs the top 100, who use very diverse intricate builds to match their unique sin chains. Everyone else either uses a A/R BoA, A/W BoA, or YAA sin (and they usually fail). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:05, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Someone please resolve this. I simply cannot absorb such large doses of bull shit, without vomiting. Oh, and I'll be away from the wiki for a few weeks, feel free to contact me in-game if necessary. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:02, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Wait, sins have never been popular in HA? Did you miss the time during 6v6 and for a while after the return to 8v8 where dual SP sins and SH nukers was one of the most common builds? It was that and spiritway, and some other build I don't remember that were the meta builds, and occasionally some other gimmicks. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 05:18, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Readem is pretty much right, sins were never popular out of odd gimics until now, with the sinway/soj assacaster/deadly arts spike. and 6v6 HA was phail, don't even go there.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 06:11, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

N/any Discordian Finish (talk · rate)

[1] 16:18, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

didnt look at the build page, sorry. 16:45, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Build has been deleted. *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:24, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

D/Mo Feathered Road Runner (talk · rate)

Rapta appears to not have read the build very carefully, and neither did cheese. Lord Belar 23:22, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Rapta's vote is correct. — Skakid9090 23:25, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

I meant the self heal part. Lord Belar 23:26, 18 October 2007 (CEST)

Added "good" before "self heal". And unless the entire vote is going to be refuted instead of just one word of it, a vote would not be touched. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 05:50, 19 October 2007 (CEST)

General Coding Issues

Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.

Rate Tab

This is directed at gcard or anyone who has coding experience. Is there anyway for you to be able to have the rate tab available while on the discussion tab? It's kinda annoying to go to the build tab again just to rate something after adding to the discussion. --Lost 05:43, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

I agree, it is a lil annoying... hardly priority though. Search system>this. -- frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 05:58, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

I'm working on it, but it's difficult since the tab on the talk page has to trigger an action on another page. Be patient... – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 23:22, 27 September 2007 (CEST)

Recent Ratings

Fixed a bug that caused the vote timestamps to be wrong for readers outside GMT+2. The times are shown in the reader's local time now. Note that atm, only the last update (that is, submission, edit, rollback or restore) of each vote is shown in Recent Ratings. There are plans to improve on that.– HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 23:22, 27 September 2007 (CEST)

Div Frames

They don't work. Some examples of hide-able div frames are this and this. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 16:15, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

What do you mean? Єяøהħ 16:57, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

Click the show/hide buttons. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 16:59, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

Sorry, at frist I thought those were PvX links. I'm sitting here thinking "they work fine for me..." Єяøהħ 17:05, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

Will have a look. It's low priority though. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Watchlist bug

Not sure if this is a bug with MediaWiki or what, but I have the page Build:Me/N Well of Illusions on my watchlist, and even after I visit it several times it still thinks I haven't looked at it since its last update (its still in bold). Other pages act normally. This has happened in the past, but it goes away after a while. --Wizardboy777 00:50, 14 September 2007 (CEST)

Happens every once. I use the mark all as read function to bypass it. Still a bug tho Swiftslash \\ (contributions *warrior guide) 16:56, 14 September 2007 (CEST)

Ditto. –Ichigo724 17:07, 14 September 2007 (CEST)

Have seen that, too. Seems to be a Mediawiki thing. I think it's something like the wiki believes a page is on the watchlist but the talk page is not, or vice versa. The one that is not on the watchlist will not trigger the 'read' status. A workaround is to unwatch and watch again. Make sure that both page and talk page are watched (that should usually be the case automatically). – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 04:06, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

See also here. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Checkuser links

I don't know if this is possible, but a Checkuser link next to people's names in Recent Changes and Ratings. Like Scarymonsterclan (Talk | contribs | Checkuser)... that would be nice, it's not to hard to do it now, but sounds like if it's possible it'd be an easy code. ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 22:34, 22 September 2007 (CEST)

Should be possible, but will take some work. I'm not sure I'd like to modify Recent Changes, since that's a core part of Media Wiki and changes will make it even more difficult to upgrade the wiki software. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Ratings

Timestamps on the ratings would be nice. Don't think it would be hard to implement, but adding them to all the old ratings might be tough. Not a big deal, but if possible, add it. --Wizardboy777_(T/C) 22:44, 27 September 2007 (CEST)

Stop reading my thoughts, I'm working on that ;-) – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 23:22, 27 September 2007 (CEST)

I has mad mind-reading skillz. :P --Wizardboy777_(T/C) 23:23, 27 September 2007 (CEST)

More ratings stuff

I see this in the recent ratings: '16:52 . . Team - Conflagrated Coalition; Rating: 2.45 (acceptable) . . E:2 U:2 I:5' It's rated a 2.45, but says 'acceptable'. I thought the lowest 'acceptable' score was 2.5 --Wizardboy777_(T/C) 23:22, 28 September 2007 (CEST)

That may be a result of an original discrepancy as to whether we wanted to round votes up or not. Not a major issue but one that I guess should probably be fixed. *Defiant Elements* +talk 00:24, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

I'll have a look. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Yet more ratings stuff....

I was wondering (this may not be possiable at all jsut a thought though) would it be at all possiable to make a template or something where it automaticly updates the catagory it's in (e.g if something was at 4.49 in the good catagory and someone votted and it went to 4.5 or 4.51 to make it great, instead of having to manualy switch it it would automaticly do it.)PheNaxKian (T/c) 21:22, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

ENGLISH IZ GUD. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 22:09, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

Dynamic templates. Not too hard to understand. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:25, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Is on our major-things-to-do-list. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

If you're gonna get into dynamic templating... if you put, say, a {{build-stub}} tag on a build, then move the build, the build still appears in Category:Build stubs under the old title, and you have to remove and then put the stub tag in again to get it into the right place. It would be nice if it updated itself. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 04:08, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

That's what i mean-where the template automaticly updates and changes what catagorey it's in.PheNaxKian (T/c) 17:59, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

Recent ratings and rollbacks

It would be helpful for detecting violations of 1RV with votes if it was possible to see previous rollbacked/deleted/edited votes. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 05:02, 6 October 2007 (CEST)

User:Krowman/P&H Flagger

Click the link and I think you can understand what is going on that's weird. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 07:05, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

Um, the server doesn't seem to like the ampersand... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 08:17, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

Wait, so how did you even make the page if the server seems to disreguard everything past (and including) the &? Like, how did you get to the page for the very first time? єяøהħ 00:44, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

It used to work fine. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:50, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

Cry of Pain

Cry of Pain's image isn't appearing on the new skillbars. Build:N/Me_Sunspear_Spiker — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 23:31, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

Still missing. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 22:41, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Don't bump a topic constantly. Hhhippo or Gc will get around to it when they have time. Real life comes before some wiki. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 22:53, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Never said it didn't. Just trying to make sure someone saw this. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 04:02, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

We see that. It's on the admin noticeboard. Don't bump topics. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 06:01, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Split Skillbar?

This skill bar on this page is split-level for some odd reason. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 00:10, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Still goofy-looking. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 22:41, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

What are you talking about? ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop/Halo 3 File Share) 00:42, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

The first 3 skill blocks are positioned higher up the page than the other 5 other. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 04:02, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Not for me they aren't. *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:04, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

I've checked it on two different computers across town from each other. It's messed up on both. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 06:05, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

You must be using IE. IE fails. Solution: switch to FireFox. There, that's simple. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 06:08, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

On another note, I use IE as well. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 06:11, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

I do web design/development for a living. I use IE because MOST people use IE. If I can't see any problems the majority of my users will see then I'm just setting myself up for failure. Maybe Firefox IS better than IE...doesn't matter until Firefox becomes standard - which it's quickly becoming. But not yet. On another note, I always have someone check my work in FF, too, it doesn't get everything right, either. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 06:47, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Day 2 - Skillbars not Loading

The skillbar images are freaking out again. Is this gonna happen every day at lunchtime? — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 19:24, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

I'm getting some problems with skill bar images againa as well-not as bad as yesterday, i can see some skills but not all....(i use firefox BTW)PheNaxKian (T/c) 19:40, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Looks like it starting to clear up again. Does GWW do server maintenance in the afternoons or something? — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 19:50, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Before whining, it would be nice to have an idea of what you're talking about. Posting a screenshot helps. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 22:16, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

I really doubt this needs a screenshot to be understood. Skill pics on skillbars were not loading at all, loading sporadically, or loading extremely slowly. Happened yesterday at about the same time, too. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 23:45, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

Sounds like it's something on your end, I never have problems with this. Lord Belar 23:49, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

We've already established yesterday it's not a problem on my end. At least 3 other users have reported the same thing during the same time period. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ 01:18, 13 October 2007 (CEST)

Post a screenshot so others' know what the hell you're talking about. It doesn't matter if there's "3 other users that have reported the same thing". It no one knows wtf you are trying to say, it won't get fixed. In conclusion, don't be lazy, put up a screenshot. — Rapta (talk|contribs) 18:36, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Like this. File:Missingicons.jpg Lord Belar 19:19, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

I think I messed that up. Oh well. You get the idea. Lord Belar 19:20, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

I think he's trying to say this. It only started for me today, but none of the skillbars are loading.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 19:30, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

wow, now everything is fine....— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 19:40, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Mine would load, except wherever a picture would have been, it was just white. The hex/enchant arrows would show up, as would the lead/offhand/duel marks, just not the picture itself. Lord Belar 20:55, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

(reset indent) neither is quite what i get, i jsut get a white box where the skill image should be no box with a red cross in like Cheese and no enchant/hex etc. marks appearing.....(hasn't happened to me since the other day though.....)PheNaxKian (T/c) 20:58, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Spoke too soon Image:Skill_not_loading.jpg PheNaxKian (T/c) 21:02, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

I am aware of the problem. Currently switched back to old server. Will try out some new server configurations tonight so might be unstable. gcardinal 15:17, 15 October 2007 (CEST)

PvXcode Issues

Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.

Saving Template Codes

Now, when you try to download a template code, the default name is {art_name}.txt
I'm assuming art_name is a variable and stands for article name, but I think you need another bracket or two to get it to work right. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 23:27, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

Skill bar bug

See this image. Stone striker is too high... here's the build page. There's one bracket missing (in the pvxcode), and he has mantra of earth twice, and no attribs, but even when I fix those it still shows up wrong in the preview... Not to mention that image I linked to is bugged, at least for me. It just shows up as a white square with a shadow. Clicking on it shows the right thing, though. Edit: I linked to the actual url, so it's fine. See what I'm talking about with the image bug here --Wizardboy777(T/C) 02:25, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

Page and image display fine for me. --Peter 21:03, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

Weird...Probably because you're using IE. :D Lord Belar 21:05, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

I figured out what the problem is. If you put spaces between the skills (like [Stoneflesh Aura] [Obsidian Flesh] instead of [Stoneflesh Aura][Obsidian Flesh]) the 'split' occurs wherever the first space is. --Wizardboy777(T/C) 04:22, 19 October 2007 (CEST)