PvXwiki
Register
Advertisement

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.

General Issues

General issues include (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, banning vandals, and moderating serious disputes. This section may also be used for miscellaneous issues as well as Administrative announcements. See resolved issues here.

Licensing version

See this. Page is protected, so one of you guys needs to fix it. --Wizardboy777 23:48, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

I've been talking to Gcardinal, and we're unsure which is correct, and obviously, we can't fix it until we know which is the problem, so no fix, for the moment. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:04, 22 September 2007 (CEST)
I think we have to use version 2.0. We took over quite some content from Guild Wiki, and they use 2.0 with no note on the possibility of silent upgrades. So we have to put at least the pages which originated there under 2.0. Anyway, we should put up a consistent statement asap. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 20:32, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Ryuwizard98 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Keeps wiping everything off of his talk page which violates PvX:ARCHIVE. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 15:40, 15 February 2008 (EST)

He hasn't done it since you warned him. Unless he does it again, nothing more really needs to be done. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 18:16, 15 February 2008 (EST)

165.138.138.212 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Thought i'd best mention it. not done anything major, and i've reverted everything he did, jsut thought i'd post it up here though....PheNaxKian (T/c) Phenaxkian sig phoenix 15:49, 15 February 2008 (EST)

Tokorumble (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

I think this might have strayed into some minor NPA somewhere along the line. The condom that broke to birth me was a saint. ): --71.229 04:03, 16 February 2008 (EST)

Or you could just say comment deleting... Lol. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 07:34, 16 February 2008 (EST)
And that, and deleting warnings about deleting comments, and vandalizing userpages. This guy really fucking loves SS Rits. --71.229 07:40, 16 February 2008 (EST)
Ban him for giving wiki a bad name imo.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 10:03, 16 February 2008 (EST)
/agreeCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 15:30, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Rawrawr Dinosaur (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

He's been giving 0-0-0 ratings with some rant about Evis->Executioner's->Shock stuff. See here. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 22:58, 18 February 2008 (EST)

Wizardboy's been managing them though. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 22:58, 18 February 2008 (EST)
And DE. Sounds like I'm covering the news. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 23:08, 18 February 2008 (EST)
DE banned him for a week. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 23:19, 18 February 2008 (EST)
I checked the List of Blocked IP's, so yeah. Is the massive finger cramp coming on yet? --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 23:20, 18 February 2008 (EST)

XvivaX (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

NPA over at cooperway redux.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 12:45, 22 February 2008 (EST)

A link would be appreciated. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 14:11, 22 February 2008 (EST)
...--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (EST)
...--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (EST)
...--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (EST)
Its called contribs... and what do you care your not an admin?--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 14:17, 22 February 2008 (EST)

R3d3 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Obviously spamming the 8 contrib requirement. l337 name suggests may be a spammer of some sort so someone may want to look into it.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 12:38, 26 February 2008 (EST)

He's probably just a new user who wanted enough contribs to rate. He doesn't share an IP with anyone, and his name is just a play on R2D2 from Star Wars. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 15:33, 26 February 2008 (EST)
doesnt spamming to get 8 conts go against the whole purpose of having 8 conts. If you can checkuser on 1, then why make it 8 if spamming them is ok?Bob fregman 21:52, 26 February 2008 (EST)
He's probably just a new user who wanted enough contribs to rate. He doesn't share an IP with anyone~Wizardboy..
What if hes on a different computer.. Possibly a school computer. He could be a sockpuppet of some sort :DCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 21:54, 26 February 2008 (EST)
No. 75.75.180.0 21:57, 26 February 2008 (EST)
How do u no?CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 21:58, 26 February 2008 (EST)
@Bob, the point of having 8 contribs is to decrease the likelihood that they'll all be deleted, which would make it so that we couldn't checkuser them. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 22:11, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Myhome1 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandal, ignores warnings. Lord Belar 12:55, 27 February 2008 (EST)

DE blocked him for 3 days. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 19:16, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Do i need to explain it?--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 12:55, 27 February 2008 (EST)

This guy is pissing me off. Ty GoD for fixing my pagesCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 19:38, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Build:Rt/any SLW Blind Healer check historyCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 19:42, 27 February 2008 (EST)

67.72.98.104 (Talk) Is that him? Look at his contribs :PCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 20:06, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Something like that. I was just too busy undoing. Thanks for finding it. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 20:07, 27 February 2008 (EST)
No. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 20:07, 27 February 2008 (EST)

68.94.189.92 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalizing the shit out of Template:Featured Builds. --71.229 17:27, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Suggestions

Categorization Suggestion

Two suggestions: 1) You might want to add Hero as a profession so users can see viable hero builds without having to wade through all of the ones that heros do not use adequately. 2) A List of builds by function might also be in order. Basically all of the builds fall into one category of character or another. Your character is a tank, nuker, spiker, healer, minion master, etc and when looking for a build user's frequently have this type of organization in mind. -- Sabardeyn 00:14, 23 February 2008 (EST)

As to suggestion one... we already have that... As for your second suggestion, that should be readily apparent without having to wade through too many builds. That said, feel free to start creating categories. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 00:21, 23 February 2008 (EST)
For future Suggestions, please don't put it in the "User Specific Issues." --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 11:44, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Scratch that, I always think General Issues is for people, my bad. WikiNoob here. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 11:46, 23 February 2008 (EST)
LOL - I'm too new to builds to really be an effective categorizer for the project. Let me explain it this way... When reading most Builds in PvXWiki I have to spend a minimum of 30 minutes figuring the build out. Particularly for those builds which presume that the potential user (me) is aware of game mechanics, synergy between skills, etc that come with experience. As for the hero listing, my bad. Noticed it is in PvE, but was looking for it below in Builds by Profession. -- Sabardeyn 15:20, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Ok, well, it's definitely something we can try out... Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:11, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Podcast Suggestion

Just a proposal I thought of. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 21:01, 24 February 2008 (EST)

Zaishen

Any1 think we should have a catagory in the PvP section involving Zaishen? Or at least a PvP general. I Am Jebus 21:16, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Zaishen is PvE. --71.229 21:54, 26 February 2008 (EST)
Yeah, pretty much. If you want to make a Zaishen build, put it under PvP team and then talk about it being Zaishen. Tah-da. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 21:15, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Conformation E-mail bug

I can't get my conformation e-mail and im sure what to do, i've tried different e-mails and it still won't appear. What should i do?--Lord of Destruction 16:53, 28 February 2008 (EST)

Just try to rate something. IDK you need a comformation e-mail. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 17:23, 28 February 2008 (EST)
What email provider are you using? Becuase if it's aol, try uninstalling aol, because aol is a virus. Also, try adding admin@pvxwiki.com to your contacts list. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 17:59, 28 February 2008 (EST)
Ok I do have aol but I'm at school right now and I'll try it when i get home thanks--Lord of Destruction 07:30, 29 February 2008 (EST)
Im having the same problem. someone PLEEZ HELP MAPhoenixÌmmφrτalìs αnìmµs a Kìεsτ (talk/pvxcontribs) 18:08, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by a Build Master or Administrator. See resolved issues here.

If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins or Build Masters of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.

Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.

Team_-_Urgoz_B/P (talk · rate)

Eisenbaer. Seems a bit unjustified, sure they did it in 58 mins, but considering this is for a PuG and not a guild, i think a bit of leeway should be givin in terms of time to complete, also doesn't explain low innovation (insert more ranting about how unfair it is here) PheNaxKian (T/c) Phenaxkian sig phoenix 15:53, 21 February 2008 (EST)

A/any Hidden Spike (talk · rate)

Author requesting a vote wipe (as opposed to mass vote rollback). -Shen 19:38, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Just delete it its inferior to other builds. You wipe the votes, people revote again, and the author requests another vote wipe.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 19:46, 22 February 2008 (EST)
the plan was to put it back in trial as it was never really evaluated before testing in the first place, but hey, a complete remake is fine. Sebsig Seb2net (Talk) 19:50, 22 February 2008 (EST)
fine >.<CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 20:57, 22 February 2008 (EST)
Wait, why a vote wipe? nothing has changed. Bob fregman 21:48, 22 February 2008 (EST)
It's suppose to be going back into trial guess nobody did it yet. XvivaX 22:30, 22 February 2008 (EST)

N/W Tactics Corrupt Necro (talk · rate)

Guild of deals and the other 1-1-1.Bob fregman 22:28, 22 February 2008 (EST)

Pretty much:look at whos voting it down. Srsly, rawr was right, pvx fails.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 23:07, 22 February 2008 (EST)
I agree, too many idiots with too much influence.Bob fregman 23:18, 22 February 2008 (EST)
Your the idiot for making the build. Now your necro cant use a staff because hes too busy blocking with repose (sword).CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:00, 23 February 2008 (EST)
If people think the build is bad, you dont fight it, you let it go and make a new build. Why fight the waves when they pull you back to shore.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:00, 23 February 2008 (EST)
ROFL, oh noes cant use staff. the use swords/axes anyways. gg.Bob fregman 00:02, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Staff = More energy and more mods that affect spells (halves skill recharge, halves casting time, extra energy). Seriously, this rly doent have a point. IF your so anxious to block, Run standard anti-melee hexer and replace resurrection signet with diciplined stance... or Aegis :P. Seriously tho, you shouldnt sacrifice extra energy and spell modifications for a simple skill.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:05, 23 February 2008 (EST)
"If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page." This discussion does not belong here. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 00:07, 23 February 2008 (EST)
there is no dispute, he's just wrong and his vote needs to be removed. Look at his reasoning here, it's laughable. If hes so worried about not using his precious staff then tell him to swap to sword for riposte and then stop QQing. Bob fregman 00:10, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Why are you pointing this at me.. theres like 4 other 1-1-1 votes. Go yell at them. Just tell admins to remove my vote and I just wont vote for it. There we go, you get nice votes for your build, and my time isnt wasted. Everyone wins.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:13, 23 February 2008 (EST)

STAFF GIVES +10 NRG AT ALL TIMES, YOU CAN NEVER DROP IT.--AESTHETIC

A/N Virulence Assassin (talk · rate)

Untainted disease in PvP(Tycn's vote)... Build has condition removal now.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 08:47, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Also Yo Ich Halt's build is 0-0-0 only because "someone made this build before"CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 08:48, 23 February 2008 (EST)
You have teammates. And if you stay in melee range, you'll get the disease except in the unlikely event that they die. And the concept has been shot down in the past, I think with the exact or nearly the same bar. Mike Tycn(punch out) 08:52, 23 February 2008 (EST)
Signet of malice is in the main bar. Better survivability in AB and RA, and rids yourself of disease.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 08:54, 23 February 2008 (EST)
If you're getting spiked or ganked, I doubt you'll have time to lay down your stuff for Conditions to use Signet of Malice. Anyway, by Assassins aren't known for being survivable. They go in, spike down an important target (Monks, Mesmers, Necromancers), and either run away to get healed or die, get ressed, and spike again. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 11:43, 23 February 2008 (EST)

DE didn't say that for no reason. Lrn2listen. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 23:06, 23 February 2008 (EST)

IMO, always trust DE's words. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 14:15, 24 February 2008 (EST)

D/E Lyssa's Burner (talk · rate)

Author vote 5-5-5, with no meaning behind it :D.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 23:50, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Doesn't matter, it's trash anyways. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 14:16, 24 February 2008 (EST)

A/D Moebius Sweep (talk · rate)

Lann's Vote needs to be looked over.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:23, 24 February 2008 (EST)

The whole build needs to be looked over its bad.----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳShadowsin sig 00:33, 24 February 2008 (EST)
I think 90% of the builds i make are bad, but some others disagreeCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:34, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Then why make them/use them.?----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳShadowsin sig 00:35, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Because they look like good ideas until the community finds its flaws. Then you can see what not to do in the future. I'm sure youve made a few horrible builds before. Im not one of those angry authors that gets pissed when ppl vote 000 becuase they dont like the build. Thats why i put a Delete tag on almost half my builds, and the ones ppl dont like, i vote 0-0-0.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 00:39, 24 February 2008 (EST)
I'd look over the one that says "except this can get through guardian". — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 00:58, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Do whatever you pleaseCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 01:03, 24 February 2008 (EST)

P/N BiP Paragon (talk · rate)

Teh uber's vote, imbagon cant be used in HA. elocs also, numbers are a little low to have no reason at all.Bob fregman 15:20, 24 February 2008 (EST)

I agree. It is really useful in PvE, but you should always go by the first tag. I'd like to see Imbagon in HA. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:12, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Removed mine. — Eloc 11:26, 26 February 2008 (EST)

W/A Scorpion Hammer (talk · rate)

The 5-5-5's should be looked at.Bob fregman 15:41, 24 February 2008 (EST)

There aren't any. Lord Belar 15:43, 24 February 2008 (EST)
oh my bad, the 5-4-5s and 5-5-4s. somehow i think the admins/bms woulda known what i meant.Bob fregman 15:45, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Bob means 5-5-5's=high votes, which is basically true. Better than saying "The 5-4-5's, the 5-3-5's, the 6-2-5's, the 5-blue-kitty's" and what-not. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 17:00, 24 February 2008 (EST)
Yeah toomany blue kittysCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 17:09, 24 February 2008 (EST)

D/A SoS Dervish Spike (talk · rate)

Crossfire's vote, lrn2energymanage and lrn2spike. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 16:56, 24 February 2008 (EST)

Taken care of. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:11, 24 February 2008 (EST)
? Energy isnt my only concern tho.. I deleted my vote, but the bar takes a long time to recharge.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 20:11, 24 February 2008 (EST)

E/A Ride the Lightning Augury Spiker (talk · rate)

Revised. Wipe votes plx. --Readem 00:55, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Should be wiped still. -Shen 20:49, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Team - Minion Factory Revisited (talk · rate)

One vote is and I quote "lolololololol.", which is hardly a reason/explanation. Please remove. Also, Rodgort's Invocation is given as another reason, which is borderline comparison of another build... perhaps get him to say AoE is a possible counter?--Sneakysmith12 16:55, 25 February 2008 (EST)

It sucks either way. "lololololol" means "Wow, this blows because it's bad." --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 16:58, 25 February 2008 (EST)
lolololol is a FAR better reason then yours was. the build stinks, a 2 week grace period in too good for it.Bob fregman 20:25, 25 February 2008 (EST)
I quote, "A vote must be based on facts. Votes that are entirely based on a false premise, flagrantly misrepresent a build's ability or demonstrate a minimal understanding of in-game mechanics are considered invalid." -- Please note the "flagrantly misrepresent a build's ability" part... there are a lot of builds all with 0s... stating that the build doesn't work at all... Obviously none of these people have tried this anywhere... Some sense would allow people to realize this works... just try it if you don't believe me. Based on the line taken from our policy... the majority of the votes should be required to be removed... 68.102.139.94 22:05, 25 February 2008 (EST)
PvX:IGNORE. Go to gww if you want strict rules. Lord Belar 22:42, 25 February 2008 (EST)
However, doesn't PvX:IGNORE clearly state a viable reason must be given to break a rule... twice, and as this build does work... and the most people can do is say, "lololol" harldy counts as a reason to break it... my bad... it doesn't. Sorry Belar... even under that policy these people are in the wrong. Sneakysmith12 07:37, 26 February 2008 (EST)
The reason is the build sucks and it's a waste of our time to write a full reason. get over it, the build is totally and utterly pointless.Bob fregman 15:12, 26 February 2008 (EST)
Firstly it isn't pointless... in fact it is effective. Secondly, going back to the Ignore policy... "If you plan on breaking the rules, you had better have a credible explanation for it.", and well now is your time to give an explanation. Each and everyone one of you.68.102.139.94 17:40, 26 February 2008 (EST)
There, reason given. Consider it to be the same for everyone else. Lord Belar 21:17, 26 February 2008 (EST)
First off... no. People speak for themselves if you really want to speak for everyone... buy the sever? Secondly... AoE, E-Denial, Spike covers about every team tactic... so yes its true that some of these could counter the build. However, I'd suggest you look at E-Denial... There are healers... so that is generally an accepted way to deal with damage (I sure as hope :S), and finally based on the policies listed here there is still only two viable votes... remove the others please Sneakysmith12 23:15, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Even the <big> tags aren't helping. ffs 75.75.180.0 23:49, 26 February 2008 (EST)

Still waiting... do your job admins... even if you don't like it (not saying you do)... I'm undoubtedly right...Sneakysmith12 17:01, 28 February 2008 (EST)
I wouldn't hold your breath. And the BMs handle most of the vote removal, not the admins. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 18:04, 28 February 2008 (EST)
I don't see a case here. The build has been unanimously trashed. If the author disagrees with the votes, it is his prerogative to raise the discussion on the build's talk page; not on the admin noticeboard. Notices are intended for mediation or immediate administrator intervention, not for dragging us into a one-sided debate. --Scottie bow Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise/complain) 18:52, 28 February 2008 (EST)

E/any Icy Shackles Elementalist (talk · rate)

Look at Cheeze slayer's vote plz. Low rating because he's comparing it to his HA build.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 18:39, 25 February 2008 (EST)

It's not only for HA. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 18:45, 25 February 2008 (EST)
He's right. What's not covered in the Warder is covered in the other one. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 18:45, 25 February 2008 (EST)
? This build focuses on Maelstrom + Icy shackles. And cheeze slayer's build is tagged solely for Ha with different skills.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 18:47, 25 February 2008 (EST)
Then add Maelstrom as a variant in the existing ones. Don't create an entire build with the same purpose, same skills, same usage, same attributes, and then whine on the Admin noticeboard about it being different. It's been going on for a while now and it's something that needs to be addressed immediately, and I'm taking this opportunity to do so. A few somewhat-similar existing builds does not give one leeway to spam dupes. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 18:50, 25 February 2008 (EST)
Alright, delete it then, I agree. Icy Shackles Warder > This.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 18:52, 25 February 2008 (EST)
Information added to specified build page. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 18:55, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Team - Ursan Eskimos (talk · rate)

User:Rihadol's vote says you should take wolven blessing. And as for the more pros than cons, I think 45% damage reduction and almost double damage is better than 33% less healing and secondary professions that arent even used in ursan form (where most of the time is spent). In all fairness, User:Lord Belar's vote should be elaborated. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 20:49, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Elaborated. :P Lord Belar 20:57, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Merging would be appropriate. -Shen 20:59, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Huh, what am I saying, the variation has been mentioned. This should be deleted. -Shen 21:01, 25 February 2008 (EST)
Didnt see note at bottom of Any/Me Ursan thing, so delete away. --- Monk-icon-Ressmonkey Ressmonkey (talk) 21:11, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Rt/E Wielder's Zeal Ritualist (talk · rate)

Rewritten. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 22:04, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Rt/any Painful Boss Farmer (talk · rate)

Dark Enzan's Vote needs to be looked over by an adminCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 16:32, 26 February 2008 (EST)

and after that, look over all the good votes and remove plx.Bob fregman 16:40, 26 February 2008 (EST)
What do you find wrong with it?CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 16:45, 26 February 2008 (EST)
uhhh, read his vote maybe? same goes for mine --InfestedHydralisk InfestedHydralisk sig(Talk*Contributions) 16:49, 26 February 2008 (EST)
Did you actually try using it to farm? TBH this is the FASTEST ritualistboss farming build.... let alone the only one. This ISNT A necro so i wouldnt suggest 55 necro at allCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 16:50, 26 February 2008 (EST)
we're talking about farming in general, E/A and A/E shadowform beats the rit....hard --InfestedHydralisk InfestedHydralisk sig(Talk*Contributions) 16:52, 26 February 2008 (EST)
move this discussion to the build page.Bob fregman 16:52, 26 February 2008 (EST)
So why are builds being vetted "great" because its only the only build tat uses seeping wound or somthing. Why dont the voters compare the build to Shadow Prison or all those other meta sinsCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 16:56, 26 February 2008 (EST)
That build has a 1.88 rating. Try again. --71.229 16:57, 26 February 2008 (EST)

A/any Nolani Academy Farmer (talk · rate)

Most the votes are just 100% wrong. SF/SA is faster and can kill more.--AESTHETIC

I'd say the only wrong vote there is your's. It's designed specifically for killing the boss, NOTHING else. This is a lot more effective than the SF/SA for killing the boss, this doesn't have the risk of sliver not targeting the boss, this is GUARANTEED to target the boss (granted if sliver does get the boss it's more effective, but the problem is your not always going to). While it might not be able to get all of the bosses there (unlike sliver when it works) it has the added bonus of being more reliable. PheNaxKian (T/c) Phenaxkian sig phoenix 18:24, 26 February 2008 (EST)
SA will almost always target the boss and if it doesn't the creature it targeted will drop in a few seconds then it will kill the boss.I tryed both too, SA is just better.--AESTHETIC
/agree with aesteticCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 06:58, 27 February 2008 (EST)

E/any Mind Blast Hybrid (talk · rate)

SotiCoto's vote. He clearly doesn't know how to MB. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:06, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Skakid raped it. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:17, 27 February 2008 (EST)

A/W AB Moebius Assault (talk · rate)

Someone plz look over Lord belar's vote.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 19:25, 27 February 2008 (EST)

Don't just post votes you disagree with. Start a section discussing the vote on the build's talk page. -Shen 20:09, 27 February 2008 (EST)
So whats the noticeboard for?CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 20:10, 27 February 2008 (EST)
[1] -Shen 20:13, 27 February 2008 (EST)
(e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. (his vote is nothing about the build, and ill start discussion on the page now)CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 20:15, 27 February 2008 (EST)


A/W HB Flourish Sin (talk · rate)

Craptastic build that has 4.5+ ratings O.o--Goldenstar 21:29, 27 February 2008 (EST)

It wasnt craptastic before GoD suggested i change it lol :(. Check discussion page plz.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 21:33, 27 February 2008 (EST)
Nah, it was mediocre the whole time. --click moar Mafaraxas 21:39, 27 February 2008 (EST)
I am now sadCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 21:40, 27 February 2008 (EST)
When did I suggest a change? --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 17:25, 28 February 2008 (EST)
The whole "it needs a shadowstep" thing and now ppl rate bad because theres no longer an IAS and the shadowstep sucksCompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 18:06, 28 February 2008 (EST)

R/any Prepared Ranger (talk · rate)

The high votes. --click moar Mafaraxas 14:03, 28 February 2008 (EST)

Me/A Mesmacaster (talk · rate)

Please look at these votes... both the good and bad ones.CompanionshipCross xXx Fire(contribs) 16:15, 28 February 2008 (EST)

D/N Arcane Orders Dervish (talk · rate)

Severely conflicting votes. --71.229 16:46, 28 February 2008 (EST)

I personally think it's crap. Still, many people are either 5-5-5's or 1-1-1's/0-0-0's. An admin should make the decision on whose right. Still, common sense would say a N/D can run Masochism, save their elite, use the same Dervish healing skills, and have better attribs in Blood Magic to provide better orders. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 17:26, 28 February 2008 (EST)
STOP FUCKING COMMENTING ON THIS PAGE FFSSkadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 17:27, 28 February 2008 (EST)
What Skakid said. Please try to keep the noticeboard as streamlined as possible. If you have any comments, please add them to the respective talk page. --Scottie bow Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise/complain) 18:55, 28 February 2008 (EST)

A/W Auspicious Assassin (talk · rate)

I messed up moving the build originally. The build was moved to the page above but the corresponding talk page Build:A/W Auspicious Armour needs to be redirected and somehow wont. Can you fix this please? Selket Shadowdancer 06:39, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Ok, I did a small fix myself. I made a new build page here: Build:A/W Auspicious Agility and moved thetalk page acordingly which worked for me. Now the mess I made needs clearing up. I would add delete tags but I'm not exactly sure what I should be adding them too if at all. Sorry for the inconvenience. :( Selket Shadowdancer 06:56, 29 February 2008 (EST)

R/any Prepared Ranger (talk · rate)

0-0-0 rating with bad reasoning and a few votes before a chance --Fox007 14:58, 29 February 2008 (EST)

I think you should look at the 5-5-5sStoneflesh Aura←Crossfire Is Buff 15:40, 29 February 2008 (EST)
Meh got pissed because some put a bad vote because i insisted to keep the PvE tag which he chanced without any discussion --Fox007 15:46, 29 February 2008 (EST)

General Coding Issues

Coding refers to any issue or bug that needs to be dealt with by a Server Administrator (Gcardinal or Hhhippo). See resolved issues here. PvXcode related issues have their own section below.

Restoring Votes

The reason for restoring votes never shows up. -Shen 11:29, 18 February 2008 (EST)

Show/Hide

Back in the resolved general coding issues, I mentioned div-frames. They were able to shown or hidden at will. Here is the extension, I think. [2] —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 10:43, 19 February 2008 (EST)

PvXcode Issues

Coding issues related to PvXcode. See also PvXwiki talk:PvXcode. Resolved issues are moved here.

Seed of Life

Seed of life doesn't seem to be effected by @xx. see here SoL is set @7 (at rank 7 as indicated in the note section) this should make it last 4 seconds, however it still says it lasts 1...5 seconds. PheNaxKian (T/c)Tag thumb 23:15, 21 November 2007 (CET)

That's true of all title-track skills I believe. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:54, 21 November 2007 (CET)
Not all-i think on the main page there's something down near the bottom about it and it has something to do with the asura title track where @xx works.PheNaxKian (T/c)Tag thumb 23:07, 22 November 2007 (CET)

Cool idea i think

Could we maybe get a bar sayin like Crit rate and DPS on weapon based builds? like for a warr have Crit rate based on wep mastery, and a DPS based on wep attribute. Mehbe not worth it, but useful nonetheless. ~~ User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 02:22, 10 December 2007 (CET)

Would it be like base DPS? I dunno how useful that might be in some builds. Shogunshen Sig Shen(contribs) 02:38, 10 December 2007 (CET)
True... Maybe just crit hit chance then, but that has negligible use except for on Sins, but then they use a lot of crit increasing skills too. Maybe just forget it. ~~ User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 02:42, 10 December 2007 (CET)
I think that would be quite kool, but then you have to think of how to get it only on rangers/warriors/ass. etc. and not jsut casters with a wand -.-. also on the idea of adding things-equipment template code(s) maybe? would mean we don't have to just list it....i think (would have to for PvE builds i guess....)PheNaxKian (T/c)Tag thumb 21:16, 11 December 2007 (CET)

PvE Attributes Counter

It would be nice. Basically the ability to put the PvE rank into the attributes and let it calculate how the skill works. Just my opinion IMO. --GoD Holiday Sig 2GuildofMoses 10:16, 24 December 2007 (EST)

[Skill@1...12], if ever the need arose. One can also click the actual skill. Though it'd be pointless to have a set attribute for such a variable attribute. Should a minimum value be prudent, simply note so. Shogunshen Holidaysig Shen has cookies 10:22, 24 December 2007 (EST)
That doesn't work properly though, it displays what rank you should be at but it doesn't supply the relevant information, what damage/healing etc. it does it still has the range in.PheNaxKian Phenaxkian christmas sig 13:49, 27 December 2007 (EST)
Perhaps we should also have a system where it shows how many attribute points there are left over, displayed next to the Attributes and Skills section of a build.

Build Template

Would it be possible to add the blank build template on to the toolbar instead of Styles and Formatting-> View Source->Copy->Pasting it? Would be helpful imo.--ViYsig5Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 17:54, 26 December 2007 (EST)

User:Teh Uber Pwnzer/Template:Blank Build imo.Uber sig pic 1 UberizAwesome 03:09, 30 December 2007 (EST)
Well, we have the Bold text on the toolbar, which all you have to do is put 3 's around the word. And since this is a build site, you might as well have the build template on the toolbar. ViYsig5Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 20:11, 31 December 2007 (EST)
You mean the toolbar on the editor? Cuz that would actually be pretty awesome. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 02:57, 1 January 2008 (EST)
Yes that one. — ViYsig5Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 18:30, 8 January 2008 (EST)
That would be pretty awesome. — ( ɔ \ ʇ ) uɐɥʇıǝɹ Reithan Sig 10:45, 19 February 2008 (EST)

Keyboard Shortcut

I'm not certain this is the place, but it seems the best place. The Alt-Shift-X shortcut for Random Build no longer works. - Ayumbhara Ayumsig 16:50, 23 January 2008 (EST)

Fixed - Ayumbhara Ayumsig 00:31, 20 February 2008 (EST)

wtf?

71.229 Wtf mate

On here. Cleaned up when I cleared my cache, but wtf? --71.229 13:06, 28 January 2008 (EST)

wtf? - Rawrawr 21:50, 18 February 2008 (EST)
wtf? — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 21:51, 18 February 2008 (EST)

Armond issue

Armond glitch IDK how. I tested it, and it adds directly to the userpage. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:32, 19 February 2008 (EST)

It's the "NEWEDITSECTION" thing. IDK if he should have that :O --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:36, 19 February 2008 (EST)
It's not an error... he has __NEWSECTIONLINK__ at the top of his page which is what's causing that button to appear. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 19:39, 19 February 2008 (EST)
May I ask why? Seriously, I personally wouldn't want an easy access point to editing my userpage. --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 19:50, 19 February 2008 (EST)
Then i wonder what the "edit" button is for...—Cheese Slaya's Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 21:15, 19 February 2008 (EST)
I asked and he said it was for blogging or something. I mean, it's not like I blog at all... --GoD Sig3GuildofDeals 11:45, 23 February 2008 (EST)

W/P Stunning Spearmaster

Shows "Missing skill. Id=1259; Name=gw" at any attempt to save the page or watching it. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 14:05, 20 February 2008 (EST)

Someone hasn't clsoed PvXBig tags, had this problem before(see resolved issues and Team GvG or something like that), think an admin needs to do it (not sure how you edit it when it's like that....), but seen as the issues arised again, can i direct this more at GC or Hippo-could it be made possiable not to save a page unless all Pvxbig tags are closed to prevent this happening again? (or somesort of counter measure)PheNaxKian (T/c) Phenaxkian sig phoenix 14:38, 20 February 2008 (EST)
You just need to add &action=edit to the URL bar, and make sure your preferences aren't set to show a preview on the first edit. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:04, 20 February 2008 (EST)
Fixed now. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:04, 20 February 2008 (EST)

template.php Bug

The script to save the builds has a bug. Some build templates have a '+' in it, like Build:R/Mo_Magebane_Shot_Ranger. The problem with this is that the + is a url escape character for a ' ' space, so the script returns a file with a ' ' where a '+' should be. Fixing this is easy, just urlencode($template) before you write back the file. THC4k 07:22, 21 February 2008 (EST)

I've been meaning to mention that. I hoped someone else would bring it up because i lacked enough savvy to repeat what you said.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 10:09, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Front page

Someone appears to have monumentally fucked it up. Flashing images, some rant about admins, and a huge blown up image of frenzy--Goldenstar 17:05, 29 February 2008 (EST)

Someone vandalized the Featured Builds template. Gone now, clear cache. WTB maximum character limit for edits. --71.229 17:09, 29 February 2008 (EST)
Advertisement