PvXwiki:Admin noticeboard

The Admin noticeboard

There are a number of issues that can only be solved by an Administrator. The Admin noticeboard is one of the means through which users can contact Administrators in order to identify a problem that needs Administrative attention. Although editors are welcome to directly contact particular Administrators, posting on this page instead may be an easier way to let the entire Administrative group know of the issue (which may be particularly helpful since it increases the odds that at least one Administrator will see, and thus be able to respond to, the issue promptly).

There are only a limited number of things for which this page should be used. Many problems can be solved without Administrative intervention, and, thus, this page should be restricted to those issues that actually require an Administrator. Those are: blocking vandals, (un)deleting pages, (un)protecting pages, removing votes (either as per Real Vetting or because the build has been substantially edited), and mediation (only if the situation demands it).

Even in cases of vandalism, posting on this page needn't be the first step (and indeed should not be the first step). If you see vandalism, just go ahead and revert it, anyone has the power to do so. If it's a new article with no safe version to revert back to, tag it for deletion. In both cases you should leave a message in the talk page of that user to make him/her aware of why that kind of edit is unacceptable on PvXwiki. Only post here if that user persists in his/her actions, ignoring the warnings or if the content requires immediate Administrative attention (eg. if the material on the page is so offensive that should be immediately deleted).

(Be careful in case that user repeatedly insists on vandalizing, avoid a revert war; it's far better to temporarily leave the vandalized version of the page up until an admin has a chance to intervene.)

To create a new request: add an item to the bottom of the list below, providing a brief, neutral summary of the issue. As a sign of courtesy, also leave a message on the talk page of any other involved users so they are aware of this discussion. If you are alerting an admin of a vandal, use the {{IP}} template, with the first parameter being the vandal's IP or username. If you are requesting that vote(s) be removed, please use the {{Build}} template, with the first parameter being the build's name.

Note that this is not a talk page and that the respective moderators of each section reserve the right to remove non-administrative comments without discussion.

Please place new requests at the bottom of the corresponding issues heading.

General Issues

General problems, such as user conduct, vandalism, and bans. Also, suggestions can be posted here. All can be resolved by an Administrator. See resolved General Issues here.

If you're having troubles with your Authentication E-Mail see here and here

74.248.247.75 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Consistent removal of WELL tag from build Davesway, also breaking RV1. AthrunFeya 10:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

he appears to have stopped. If he comes back just bump this. ~ PheNaxKian talk 18:08, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

Bump AthrunFeya 00:15, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

He's done it again, but logged in as User:K David K, but I've now moved the build to userspace so dont think the problem will persist. AthrunFeya 07:40, September 13, 2009 (UTC)

90.220.149.95 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandal with a funny revert war going on. ---Chaos- 17:47, September 2, 2009 (UTC)

Daññy‎ (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

[1] use, and a persistent reapplication of a desruptive code to his userpage. Personal attacks while reverting. --Carnivorous Cupcake 22:13, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

It's pretty sad to know that there are retarded people around who don't know how to not visit userpages if they are "disruptive". uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 22:16, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

What you've said isn't an excuse for using a code to intentionally make the entire page unusable. By the way, if you wish to discuss this matter take it to the talk page. --Carnivorous Cupcake 22:21, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

Why not you do it first instead of doing exactly the opposite of what you are trying to tell me to do? uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 22:24, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

the code is hardly disruptive. if you click the Discussion link, everything comes back. you've also still got the search box. you also violated 1RV, tbh. not to mention, it's userspace. you don't have to be on my page if you don't want to. ···  22:31, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

the problem is, i could see your user page content, the user page (not talk) tab, and the search bar (and part of the log out button), so i can't click on the talk tab. A table is as close as you'll get to what you want (with every seeing it) and the page still acting as a user page. Consider this resolved. ~ PheNaxKian talk 23:00, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

tbh, i could see the other links just fine. if you bothered to tell me that you couldn't see the talk link, i might've changed it, but since you went the brave admin route and didn't say a damned word, now you're just a faggot who involved himself in a misunderstanding. unban me, tell me what browser you're using, and i'll get around to fixing it when i have time. until then, i'd love to know what policy my userpage violates. i'd also like to see carnivorous getting a ban for his repeated violations of 1RV, if you choose not to unban me. Love, 85.13.197.154 23:06, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

His page is still broken. :/ --Carnivorous Cupcake 23:29, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

the page his been reverted to my version. The problem with you're version was that you will always bee screwing up someone's display, because everyone's using different resolutions and you're using absolute positions. It violates PvX:DIS. I won't ban Carnivorous because he was reverting disruptive edits. Big was kind enough to reduce your ban to one day, if you want it to stay like that I'd suggest you stop proxying. ~ PheNaxKian talk 10:15, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

I would love to know where in PvX:DIS my userpage lies. Assuming I'm not literally retarded, PvX:DIS covers text. Not to mention, no one besides you and Cupcake has had an issue with my userpage, and neither of you wanted to discuss it civilliy, which is just terrible on your part, particularly, seeing as you're an admin. I'll be reverting it back to the original state unless you can explain how it violates PvX:DIS and/or are willing to provide me details of how it "screws up" your display. Without that effort, I see know reason why it's anymore disruptive than people using characters in signatures whose native sets I don't have installed on my computer. If you can't be fucked with acting like an adult and having an at least moderately civil discussion, then you're no better than the trash vandals and trolls around here. 76.73.47.42 20:17, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

The point was it's disruptive, it's the spirit of the policy, not the letter. Your ban has been extended, now stop posting or it will be increasing again. ~ PheNaxKian talk 20:20, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

The point should be that no one bothered to say anything about it. It was just Carnivorous and you, an admin, revert warring with me and Pika. If someone had bothered to say what was wrong, the whole situation probably would've just gone away, but here at PvX, everyone, including the admins, act like 4 year olds. I'm not sure if you've realized this yet, but my ban really doesn't matter. The fact is, you've made yourself look like an asshat to a lot of users and even a couple admins. When you're ready to talk about things like an adult, I'll be lurking. 193.200.150.137 20:38, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Disruptive can't really refer to his page. You're not being forced to go there. You have something personal against him, that's fine. Leave it off of this site. Just because he annoys you, it doesn't give you the right to ban with a bias. Everyone on here has something rude to say about PvX. It's a build storage site for a dead game. I mean really, lol? ~ Big sysop 20:42, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

‎85.13.197.154 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism. Looks like User:Daññy avoiding his ban. --Carnivorous Cupcake 23:33, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

how is it that this shitter didn't get a ban for his part in all this? phen, you're never this much of a shitter. =/ i'm sad now. 85.13.197.154 23:38, September 9, 2009 (UTC)

‎TahiriVeila (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Constant breaches of NPA against me, trolling, vandalising [2][3] with no apparent reason on my talk and userpage. --Carnivorous Cupcake 21:46, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Seriously, just ban them both. Toraen talk 03:59, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

‎Shadowsin (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Constant trolling with no apparent reason on my talk. --Carnivorous Cupcake 21:46, September 10, 2009 (UTC)

Carnivorous_Cupcake (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Numerous violations of 1RV, starts shitstorms for no apparent reason, no one likes him, and he's a cunt--TahiriVeila 02:43, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

I'd watch him for a while actually. He seems to think he can say what he likes now admins are 'on his side'. AthrunFeya 13:43, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Link to any of these "sayings" would be appreciated, when I got on my PC last night, all I could make out was "people" randomly vandalising Phen's page and making 1mil+ edits. --Frosty Mc Admin 14:03, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

He pissed off Danny and there was mass trolling, big deal. But mass RC spamming from copying this from his talk page, pretty much line at a time attracted more trolling. Phen's idea of sorting it out was to ban everyone involved, instead of just protecting Cupcakes userspace and telling him to CHILL. Cupcake's actions instigated many others, as proved after my post here - he stopped and the trolling also stopped. I don't think he needs to be banned, I just think he needs to be watched until this happens again (which it will, sooner or later). AthrunFeya 14:35, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Fox007 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Removing text and breaking RV1. [4] ---Chaos- 14:59, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

blocked for 1 day. ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:09, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Koroba (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Obvious sock is obvious. 19:03, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Another one. 19:05, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

being as he hasn't done anything with any of them yet, I'll wait to see which account he wants to use and block the other 2. Also, messages go on the talk page, not the userpage Zyke :/. ~ PheNaxKian talk 19:22, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Huh, my bad, didn't realize I was editing his userpage. 21:19, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

Jaigoda (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

NPA Fox007 20:34, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

That almost looks like every other post in my contributions. :> ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:36, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

You could hardly call that NPA compared to some shit people get away with, stop being so anal fgt. 71.175.196.43 20:57, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

You have to admit that your response sounded pretty autistic. I was just using terms that PvX (and Danny in particular) uses to describe a... not-so-thought-out post, to put it in a nice way. -- Jaiwritesalot . . . 21:00, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

NPA isn't enforced on this site PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 21:08, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

(EC ×3)I got banned for it last week, so shush. Please move this discussion to Fox's talkpage, refrain from discussion on AN. ---Chaos- 21:15, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah before I ban all of you. ~ Big sysop 21:39, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

^ he'll do it. :O ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:50, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Bigs isn't afraid to show anyone who the big scary black man around here is :O--TahiriVeila 21:59, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

Crow (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Vandalism on my userpage :/ PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 20:15, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

that is how crow tells you he appreciates your contributions to the wiki. ··· Danny Pew Pew 20:25, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

Sounds like sarcasm + vandalism to me, but im just a muffin so what do I know PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 20:30, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

dont be a fucking pussy. just click revert and have a good laugh at it. people are so serious these days, jesus. --Angelus 20:45, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

Solved--X 22:18, September 22, 2009 (UTC)

Shadowsin (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Spam/Trolling. --Carnivorous Cupcake 10:14, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Daññy (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Spam/Trolling. --Carnivorous Cupcake 10:14, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Wow, I understand that you've been trolled and flamed a lot here, but that's already far fetched. Maybe counts as disruptive editing or something as retarded. ---Chaos is gay - 10:20, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

It was disruptive at the time but they stopped so I'm willing to let it slide. ~ PheNaxKian talk 11:17, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

TahiriVeila (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

multiple cases of NPA/trolling. A BM should do better than this. -- Jaiwritesalot . . . 15:38, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

I see no personal attacks. You should read policies and really do this you can talk to me on my talk page not here--X 15:50, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Agreed. that guy needs some time off wiki to cool off. --Carnivorous Cupcake 18:13, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Dios1234 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Might be a sock of Tomosa123. Put up the same exact build with the same name (albeit different word order). See here and here. 17:52, September 25, 2009 (UTC)

Xtreme1ne (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

can we just ban this nigger already

Tsb wants me banned? I have failed. Please do as he says for I have offended Tab....out of all people. I am sorry but I deserve whatever he suggests. Tab...of all people. Respect--X 20:38, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

Athrun Feya (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

Here.

New BM, used bad choice of words, told a user that:"noone here other than you (Graz The Healer) wants it as part of our buildspace. Let it go already." (talking about a build posted by Graz, who has proof it works, and I'm sure there are tons of builds that people dont want on PvX that are still here). Very bad behavior for a BM, and contained the use of personal feelings toward Graz, dislike, which can be seen from their disputes on the DOA Rangerway talk page. .Fire//Starter보 21:14, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

WAAAAAAAHHHHHH-- $ɧor₮ talk 21:15, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

he did post on a page of a completely unrelevent topic, to be fair. AthrunFeya 21:20, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

(EC ×2) What Short's trying to say is that NPA doesn't matter here to an extent and that BMs are meant to tell people that they are wrong, bad, etc. Graz has been persistently disputing a WELL tag, which is retarded because it's and Admin's decision anyway. Fact is, users get frustrated when their builds get tagged with WELL or trashed. BMs are around to tell them to shut up. ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:22, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

TO be fair, you are a BM. .Fire//Starter보 21:25, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

...and? I'm quite watered down and nice compared to the rest of them, I'm told. AthrunFeya 21:28, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

It still isn't a privilege to tell a contributor that nobody else wants a build on pvx, especially considering you have/show you are holding a grudge against him and it is interfearing with not just the build. .Fire//Starter보 21:44, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Athrun Feya (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build:Team_-_UWSC_Ritway http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build_talk:Team_-_UWSC_Ritway

Abusing both power as BM and harassing build maker. Made personal insults both inside and out of PVX, tagged build for deletion without sensical reasoning, and has threatened account banning if resistance is met. Conflict on interpretation of build rating criterion, and refusal to allow vetting apart from her own. 21:21, September 29, 2009 (UTC)Innoruuk

I giggled. Seriously.-- $ɧor₮ talk 21:23, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Hm. Can I just make it clear I have not contacted or attempted to contact this person outside of PvX, /shrug. And I said he may be banned if he persistently removes WELL tags "until a consensus has been reach" as stated in the WELL tag itself (something which is starting to fuck me off majorly, after the last time). AthrunFeya 21:25, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

I believe giving me a personal message which is sent directly to my email still counts as direct confrontation does it not? It is not recorded on PVX, so to my interpretation, it is outside PVX. Also, I believe I need to remind you of the very criterion you should be using to rate my build. (http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/PvXwiki:Real_Vetting) Ring a bell? 21:36, September 29, 2009 (UTC)Innoruuk And do you really have to say "fuck me off majorly"?

bawwwwwwwwww 86.30.179.100 21:44, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

First of all, PW:OWN. Second of all, PW:BM. Third of all, PW:WELL. Also, PW:1RV. And finally, PW:VETTING. Fuck's sake, you haven't read a single fucking policy on this site, have you? ··· Danny Pew Pew 21:44, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

Build-Specific Issues

Build-Specific refers to any issue pertaining to the removal of votes, usually resolved by a Build Master or Administrator. See resolved issues here.

If you wish to dispute another user's vote, it is advised to do so on the build's talk page. This section of the noticeboard is intended to notify Admins or Build Masters of issues that can be speedily resolved (e.g. factually incorrect votes) or issues in need of mediation. Avoid debating builds or votes here.

Note: If applicable, please identify specific votes to improve admin response time.

N/any OoU Minion_Master (talk · rate)

Outdated build and votes are outdated. Lacks any utility present in common MM builds. ··· Danny Does Drugs 19:29, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

resolved, build changed AthrunFeya 14:58, September 21, 2009 (UTC)

A/Me Permaform Runner (talk · rate)

Bar has been improved for better speed and energy management. I think the trash votes are invalid now. Toraen talk 22:14, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

Not all the issues the votes address have not been rectified. AthrunFeya 07:45, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Team - Shove Spike (talk · rate)

Readem's vote, this is not beat nearly everytime, unless ppl running this is bad (leech is NOT a counter if your not fail) PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 01:55, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

We're talking Readem here. He's talking for himself, and if he says that he almost always beats Shovespike, then he almost always does beat Shovespike. Reply on Shovespike talk if you want some llama drama. ---Chaos- 11:32, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

R/D VoS Speed Runner (talk · rate)

Shino & Jj are not my friends. Survivability doesn't matter when the runner knows what he's doing, srsly. Also, neither one comprehends how to use Serpent's in the build, which is kinda sad. ---Chaos- 16:29, September 7, 2009 (UTC)

The build needs deleting anyway - there is a any/D which mostly covers it. I'll do this when I clean up the running section some time in the next week. AthrunFeya 09:49, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

Category:Build: Me/N Domination Necrosis

Needs to be moved to the right place. 04:27, September 14, 2009 (UTC)

A/W Imbasin (talk · rate)

Really could use a votewipe. I've explained far too many times that it is completely comparable to MS>DB. The majority of the people rating it had bad misconceptions about the build because of LF's history. If you really want to delete it, I'd prefer if it could be moved to my userspace so I can keep the epic 90-some kilobytes of terribadness from disappearing. -- Jaiwritesalot . . . 03:46, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

resolved, build was moved to userspace AthrunFeya 14:57, September 21, 2009 (UTC)

Team - Balanced RTL Spike (talk · rate)

if the "Proper Build" suck why would i want to put on wiki. Fox007 13:34, September 15, 2009 (UTC)

In case you are too retarded to understand, if the proper build is bad enough already, what makes your inferior variant better? uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 20:37, September 17, 2009 (UTC)

W/E Shock Axe (talk · rate)

TahiriVeila's vote, lacks innovation PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 02:31, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Innovation means "Is it meta?" correct? If it does then that build is far from innovative. If it means "Is it original?" then no that was not original because builds before it used the same concept but with gale. -- Drah 02:54, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

No innovation means that all the votes make the average score be perfect, but now its not perfect and I have OCD PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 03:09, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Stop talking on the admin noticeboard. Be happy that its still in the great section instead of being archived, seeing that with primal rage its pretty much obsolete. -- Drah 03:12, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Not to mention Coward. ··· Danny Pew Pew 17:55, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

R/A SA Ranger (talk · rate)

Some of the votes probably need to be looked at. 06:42, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

A/any GW:EN Speedbooker (talk · rate)

maf--Relyk 19:58, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

Done AthrunFeya 14:54, September 21, 2009 (UTC)

R/A Expert's Blossoms (talk · rate)

Glory's vote, underrating effectiveness of build PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 22:07, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

nvm resolved PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 23:24, September 19, 2009 (UTC)

R/Mo Concussion Shot Ranger (talk · rate)

Gringo's vote can be removed, as it is no longer tagged for GvG and never should have been (he went on a small spree for bad GvG builds). Toraen talk 03:51, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

ill remove it myself, next time drop me a note instead. Gringo 04:01, September 29, 2009 (UTC)

General Coding Issues

Please use The Wikia Noticeboard. Old resolved issues can be found here.

PvXcode Issues

Please use The Wikia Noticeboard. Old resolved issues can be found here.