PvXwiki
(It's bed time, I will work on this tommorow.)
 
mNo edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
<div style="width: 100%; background: #dbf3ff; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 10px 0px; text-align: center">
 
<div style="width: 100%; background: #dbf3ff; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 10px 0px; text-align: center">
<font size=3>Any help improving the articles nominated on this page is greatly appreciated.</font><br>See the [[PvXwiki:Style and formatting|style and formatting]] guides for editing help.</div>
+
<font size=3> The Quality Control Initiative</font><br>See the [[PvXwiki:Style and formatting|style and formatting]] guides for editing help.</div>
 
{{TOCright}}
 
{{TOCright}}
  +
[[Category:Community projects]]
 
[[Category:Cleanup]]
 
 
==Purpose==
 
==Purpose==
The Build Stubs and Quality Control project is a child of [[PvXwiki:Improvement Drive]]. It is here to document the site standard in build formatting and presentation, give precedure and examples of how to place cleanup tags and assist in improving the overall quality of every build article on PvX Wiki.
 
   
 
The Build Stubs and Quality Control project is a child of [[PvXwiki:Improvement Drive]]. It is an attempt to organize and maintain a driving movement to uphold the basic quality standards of formating that every article on this wiki should posses.
Shortly after the implimentation of [[PvX:Real Vetting]] the entire untested build section underwent an quality control sweep to help identify those builds that had been created during the large block of 'stagnant' time that still needed a little (or a lot) of general improvement in the presentation of the information available in those builds. After this point, Presentation Quality, was given a higher degree of necessity in order for a build to be considered for vetting.
 
   
  +
By mandating and upholding a minimum level of Article Quality the wiki will achieve a greater overall success. Articles will be easier to read and reference, knowledge and understanding of builds amongst contributors will increase, and overall the site will become much more pleasing to the eye. Also, if everyone reaches the same minimum level of build formatting, more emphasis is given to the build itself, which in turn will garning more accurate results from the vetting system.
This project is not here to define what makes a build good or bad, in the ways of game mechanics, but rather what constitues the standard in build presentation.
 
   
  +
This initiative is <b>not</b> to screen builds out of the vetting process, on the contrary it's here to assist in the improvement of those builds to the point that people are seeing the build mechanics instead of the poor build formatting, allowing for a more honest rating of the build and it's capabilities.
   
  +
On 01 July 2007; shortly after the implementation of [[PvXwiki:Real Vetting]], the entire untested and trial build sections underwent an quality control sweep to help identify those builds that had been created during the large block of stagnant time between migration and vetting policy implementation. Following this sweep any User who views build found to be of inferior quality in Trial or Untested sections may place a [[Template:Cleanup|cleanup]] tag onto the build and send the build back to [[:Category:Build stubs|stubs]]. Included in this tag will be a detailed explanation of what is wrong with the formatting of the build and the initial responsibility to fix the build will rest on the author. When the formatting is fixed, regardless of the build makeup of the article, it will be eligible to be sent to untested or trial phases at the initiative of the author.
== The Cleanup Tag ==
 
   
  +
As was stated earlier it is the initial responsibility of the build author to try and fix the page. It is noted because people learn more by doing than by having it done for them. That being said however, they may ask for assistance from an admin, and depending on the user level of the author, an Admin will assist that author appropriately to get their build up to formatting standard.
The existance of the Templates {cleanup| Explination} and {Cleanup2| Explination1 | Explination2} is to help identify those builds that do not meet minimun standards in formatting, presentation, and style. You place these tags onto a build in an attempt to assist in improving the build in those areas.
 
   
 
== What is the Formatting Standard ==
It is not there to mark or distinguish good or bad builds from one another, the vetting sytem is used for that.
 
   
  +
We have several guides that dictate those standards we are to uphold:
In most cases, a Cleanup tag placed on a build IS grounds for that build to be moved out of Testing or Trial status and directly into stubs untill the build is fixed. It is highly encouraged that whomever places such a tag be available to assist the author in cleaning up and improving the build to an appropriate standard.
 
  +
* [[PvXwiki:Style and formatting|Style and formatting]] &ndash; Guide for writing a build article, including an example ready for copy & paste.
  +
* [[PvXwiki:Writing good builds|Writing good builds]] &ndash; More notes on how to write a build that meets the standards and expectations of PvXwiki.
  +
* [[PvXwiki:Build Naming Policy|Build Naming Policy]] &ndash; Understanding the syntax for naming build articles.
   
== Examples of Quality Formatting and Presentation ==
+
== Examples of high quality formatted builds ==
  +
{{Section-stub}}
   
 
== Those individuals who have made a pledge to assist in the Build Stubs Quality Control Program ==
List links to the style guides.
 
   
 
# ''''[[User:Shireen|<font face="arial" color="Green">Shireen</font>]]<small>[[PvXwiki:Administrators|sysop]]</small>''''
Give verbal explinations of what people want to see: Conciseness, bulleted items, 3rd person, little chatter, visual refrences, propper organization.
 
   
 
[[Category:Community projects]]
* The PvP Build
 
* The Team Build
 
* The PvE Build
 
* The Guide
 
* The Farming Build
 
* The ??? Build
 
 
== Examples of Bad Formatting ==
 
 
Examples of bad formatting, and what to place in the delete tag.
 
 
== List of pages that do need Cleanups ==
 
 
[[Category:Cleanup]]
 
 
== Those individuals who have made a pledge to assist int he Build Stubs Quality Control Program.
 
 
# ''''[[User:Shireen|<font face="arial" color="Green">Shireen</font>]]<small>[[PvXwiki:Administrators|sysop]]</small>''''
 

Latest revision as of 04:27, 7 April 2009

The Quality Control Initiative
See the style and formatting guides for editing help.

Purpose

The Build Stubs and Quality Control project is a child of PvXwiki:Improvement Drive. It is an attempt to organize and maintain a driving movement to uphold the basic quality standards of formating that every article on this wiki should posses.

By mandating and upholding a minimum level of Article Quality the wiki will achieve a greater overall success. Articles will be easier to read and reference, knowledge and understanding of builds amongst contributors will increase, and overall the site will become much more pleasing to the eye. Also, if everyone reaches the same minimum level of build formatting, more emphasis is given to the build itself, which in turn will garning more accurate results from the vetting system.

This initiative is not to screen builds out of the vetting process, on the contrary it's here to assist in the improvement of those builds to the point that people are seeing the build mechanics instead of the poor build formatting, allowing for a more honest rating of the build and it's capabilities.

On 01 July 2007; shortly after the implementation of PvXwiki:Real Vetting, the entire untested and trial build sections underwent an quality control sweep to help identify those builds that had been created during the large block of stagnant time between migration and vetting policy implementation. Following this sweep any User who views build found to be of inferior quality in Trial or Untested sections may place a cleanup tag onto the build and send the build back to stubs. Included in this tag will be a detailed explanation of what is wrong with the formatting of the build and the initial responsibility to fix the build will rest on the author. When the formatting is fixed, regardless of the build makeup of the article, it will be eligible to be sent to untested or trial phases at the initiative of the author.

As was stated earlier it is the initial responsibility of the build author to try and fix the page. It is noted because people learn more by doing than by having it done for them. That being said however, they may ask for assistance from an admin, and depending on the user level of the author, an Admin will assist that author appropriately to get their build up to formatting standard.

What is the Formatting Standard

We have several guides that dictate those standards we are to uphold:

  • Style and formatting – Guide for writing a build article, including an example ready for copy & paste.
  • Writing good builds – More notes on how to write a build that meets the standards and expectations of PvXwiki.
  • Build Naming Policy – Understanding the syntax for naming build articles.

Examples of high quality formatted builds

Those individuals who have made a pledge to assist in the Build Stubs Quality Control Program

  1. 'Shireensysop'