FANDOM


It's been forever since the sysops have been formally reviewed, and in order to appease certain members of the public, we'll just do a full sysop team review instead of doing it one by one.

In each sysop's section, provide links to actions you feel make the person an unworthy sysop - power abuse, personal attacks, voting with their buddies, etc. Discuss links/sections on the talk page; leave this project page relatively clear of chatter.

Athrun Feya (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • ...

Auron (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

Bigtymerxg4 (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. I can excuse the last one, but those are some recent examples. --Chaos? -- 10:28, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • [6] gives a good insight on his attitude to admin duties, [7], [8], [9], [10]. This is beginning to go into the December drama, which you know something about. Most of this is quite okay, and what happened around last Christmas was anyways a retarded clusterfuck, but I think his approach to those issues is a show of really bad adminship. --Chaos? -- 17:18, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • Banning me for 3 days for making this edit only twice: [11]. Don't bother crying about it being personal, that was the dumbest ban ever Oo. Gringo 21:01, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
    • [12] Was his first "revert", to elaborate. On the second time he only removed the youtube tags, since it was disruptive. --Chaos? -- 06:53, March 10, 2010 (UTC)
  • [13] Perma-ing a user for a first offence (I know it's vandalism, but still, a 3 day and a warning). ~ PheNaxKian talk 21:18, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • 1 week ban for this seems a tad extreme again. ~ PheNaxKian talk 21:18, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • an issue was raised here on Lau's RfA talk (User:InfamousMyzt incident specifically, Big deleted the user's build ~5 mins after being WELLed, and the user raged because of Big's attitude). ~ PheNaxKian talk 21:18, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • "And if you want to try to flame me even more so, I will ban you. And it is an abuse of admin powers, and I'll delight in doing so." from [14]. Gringo 21:21, March 12, 2010 (UTC)
  • ...

Frosty (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • ...

Karate Jesus (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • [15] nothing major, worth noting though. Instead of asking the user (who requested a perma) if they wanted to come back (either on their original account or this new one) he just banned the new account (the one in the link). ~ PheNaxKian talk 23:04, March 9, 2010 (UTC)
  • ...

Misery (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • ...

Phenaxkian (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • the top one and [16]. Banning Thunda for a month and perma'ing Der Pwnzer for "socking" when they didn't actually sock. Cool abuse of power, bro.

Toraen (talk · contribs · logs · check user · block user · block log)Edit

  • ...

OutcomeEdit

  • Athrun Feya, Auron, Frosty, Karate Jesus, Misery, Phenaxkian, and Toraen had acceptable records and feedback. These sysops can continue what they're doing.
  • Big had a rather large wall of complaints. Some links were petty, some were troubling. After talking to the user privately, he's agreed to go more or less inactive (i.e., let other sysops deal with situations unless nobody is around) in order to reduce any potential abuse of power.
  • Any final comments can go on this project's talk page.
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.