PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Rawrawr Dinosaur/Archive 2

Rawrawr Dinosaur (talk • contribs)

Cuz. — Skakid9090 06:03, 9 December 2007 (CET)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:May as well <_< - Rawrawr 01:08, 14 December 2007 (CET)

Support

1. First. -- frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 06:04, 9 December 2007 (CET)
2. I don't see anything wrong with it Joshgt2 (Talk) 06:25, 9 December 2007 (CET)
3. More neutrals than supports? That isn't right. --71.229@home
4. 4 is needed? you owe me for this shit, alex. making me type when i dont have to. 16:21, 12 December 2007 (CET)
5. Much <3 2 u.--Shadowsin 08:21, 13 December 2007 (CET)
6. [E.C.] Digging resulted in me turning +. With Skakid and Rapta sure-ins, we need someone who's a bit more light-hearted and has a view of things that break out of the meta to accomplish something that no one expects. Plus, he's got a lot more constructive criticism than napalms, which will be a good opposition to the previously listed BMs who I'm sure can be expected to firebomb anything that takes half a step from the meta. T_T cedave _{(contributions_buildpage)} 08:23, 13 December 2007 (CET)
7. 5 Rawrawr is teh hax, he makes good commentary on builds and everybody wuvs him O.O --Rhys 01:07, 14 December 2007 (CET)
8. 6 No u, he makes good builds for ta as such, though he dont post them (maybe lucky or pvx would be even more gimmicky. Fishy Moooo 11:05, 14 December 2007 (CET)
9. I'm such a fag, that i support. - Unexist 10:55, 21 December 2007 (EST)
10. ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 16:28, 21 December 2007 (EST)
11. Not the most...erm...mature person that could be running for Build Master, but I don't have any problems with it, he has a unique opinion and I think he will do well as a Build Master. RustyTheMesmer 02:59, 27 December 2007 (EST)
12. arg says the pirate--Coloneh 09:02, 7 January 2008 (EST)
13. Had a talk page that was too long to save, so perfect BM material. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:35, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Oppose

1. Hasn't shown a great taste in builds or a great opinion on what is good. Will dig up links if I get time. -Auron 06:28, 9 December 2007 (CET)
2. Ibreaktoilets 18:45, 9 December 2007 (CET)
3. Same as Auron, and he doesn't seem like he'd be completely honest and fair when it comes to rating... IMO. --GuildofDeals 19:18, 9 December 2007 (CET)
4. Nope, sorry.Bob fregman 01:41, 10 December 2007 (CET)
5. Absolutely unfair with votes. He is biased with friend's builds and trolls other's even when the rest of community thinks opposite. Can give examples. No child behaviour, thanks. Chuki 18:20, 7 January 2008 (EST)

Neutral

1. Misfate 06:22, 9 December 2007 (CET)
2. tbh, haven't seen much of him in much of the builds. will dig... BaineTheBotter 08:35, 9 December 2007 (CET)
3. Good, but not so active atm, if that changes I support Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:24, 9 December 2007 (CET)
4. While demonstrating a knowledge of the game, he oftentimes shows extreme stupidity uncharacteristic of what my idea of a buildmaster is. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 14:33, 21 December 2007 (EST)
5. too much trolling.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 13:53, 6 January 2008 (EST)
6. Moar demonstration of skillz and less trolling plix plox. GΩdlﺄεﻯt -_- 11:03, 7 January 2008 (EST)