PVX-Krowman (talk | contribs) |
|||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
{{PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Ibreaktoilets}} |
{{PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Ibreaktoilets}} |
||
{{PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Mgrinshpon}} |
{{PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Mgrinshpon}} |
||
+ | {{PvXwiki:Requests for Build Master Status/Bob fregman}} |
||
== Instructions == |
== Instructions == |
Revision as of 19:38, 19 January 2008
This page is an official policy on PvXwiki. It has wide acceptance among editors and is considered a standard that all users should follow. |
|
For more information on what a Build Master is, see PvXwiki:Build Masters.
A system-generated list of Build Masters can be found here
An archive of past nominations can be found here. A category containing links to all resolved RfBMs may be found here.
The Process
Nominations
Candidates may be nominated either by themselves, or other individuals. The nominator should indicate the reasons that he or she feels that the nominee would be a valuable asset to the Wiki community, giving particular regard to why they believe that the candidate deserves the additional powers of a Build Master. The candidate should then indicate their assent to the nomination (if they so choose), and should add any additional comments regarding their candidacy (assuming they were nominated by someone else).
Instructions for how to nominate a candidate can be found below.
Voting
Any member of the community is free to indicate their feelings towards the candidate. These “votes” should indicate whether you support or oppose the candidate, or, alternatively, you may indicate a neutral position. These votes are used as an indicator by the Bureaucrats, and, as such, comments should indicate some insight into the position taken by the voter. While a reason is not strictly required, a vote that provides reasoning will not only be a more valuable tool for the Bureaucrats, it will also be cause for greater consideration and will have a greater impact on the final decision.
In order to maintain a sense of decorum on the voting page, responses to votes should be added to the nominees talk page, not on the nomination page itself.
Promotion
It is important to note that a well-supported nomination is not a guarantee for an build master position—the final decision rests solely with the current administrative team. Voting, while an important tool, is not the deciding factor. The decision as to whether a build master is required at a given time is also left up to the current Administrators. As such, the promotion of a candidate could be held off until a later date even if the candidate were acceptable.
A nomination ends when either the Bureaucrats decide to promote the candidate, or, when the voting stagnates and no decision is reached and/or the Administrative team is unwilling to promote a candidates. Candidates may reapply for the position or may be nominated again at a later date.
Active Nominations
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Armond (talk • contribs)
DE says he wants admins to go through a RfBM process before promoting them. I don't agree, but I'll respect his decision. (Note that I put Auron and DE up at the same time as myself, and I would have gone through the rest of the admins had I not wanted sleep.) -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:09, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:09, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- Armond is incredibly knowledgeable about the game, He is one of my first choices when seeking advice/critique on a build and he doesnt put up with crap. He knows what people are using and generally how they use it.--Shadowsin 00:17, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- You are most definately one :) Riff 16:13, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:57, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- HE'S GOT THE POWER! --GuildofDeals 18:17, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Has taught me what I would consider a substantial amount. -Shen 17:09, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- He caresses me in sensual ways. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 23:00, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- I like the way he removes bad votes in spite of those who QQ.Bob fregman 18:05, 15 January 2008 (EST)
I met him on teh GWz and he is cool O_o. Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:36, 16 January 2008 (EST)- I get support now, yeye? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 22:02, 16 January 2008 (EST)
He got the toucher trashed and that's good enough for me. --User:IbreaktoiletsTab Moo 07:52, 17 January 2008 (EST)- Because he's a good person, and voting against him won't take away his vote removal ability. Lord Belar 18:22, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- You, my good sir, fucking rule. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 04:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- as far i know hes a suitable candidate.. i thought hes BM already :/ IIIIwan13 18:25, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
Oppose
- I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to move my vote to oppose. Your recent comments are becoming more dick-like, and less like how a admin/bm should talk. i still don't believe he's done much with anything other than documenting meta builds, and hasn't yet shown to me signs of experience and/or being good at the game.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 19:47, 22 January 2008 (EST)
- Why are you apologizing? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 22:35, 22 January 2008 (EST)
- Very negative and inappropriately contentious. May be experienced in build creation/knowledge, but not the best pick for someone of a leadership nature. His opinions tend to outweight the big picture, and would be evidentially be too biased. - † Lord Xivor † 17:31, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- He's an Admin already, so what the hell are you talking about tbh?--Shadowsin 02:29, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- No. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:45, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- You're not going to weigh the promotion scale by simply saying no with a signature. (vĭk'tə-rē ĭz yôrz) 21:53, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- I fear for bias - I ban you, you come back and vote against me? Not like you can change anything, but still... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 23:14, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- Doesn't know how to HB and his vote for the HB Sp build, and reasons are misjudged.Rainbow Ftw
- Got bored of drama and removed that vote, for the record. Though I don't personally think one should have to be excellent at all points of the game in order to be a BM, but whatever. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 17:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- fair enough, just that HB is pretty much all I know about, glRainbow Ftw
- HB doesn't count @ pvx. It's all the same build or some stupid tank/camp build. Rly. - Unexist 08:42, 12 February 2008 (EST)
- Just because you, and everyone else here don't know how to HB, doesn't mean it doesn't count. Rainbow Ftw
- HB doesn't count @ pvx. It's all the same build or some stupid tank/camp build. Rly. - Unexist 08:42, 12 February 2008 (EST)
- fair enough, just that HB is pretty much all I know about, glRainbow Ftw
- Got bored of drama and removed that vote, for the record. Though I don't personally think one should have to be excellent at all points of the game in order to be a BM, but whatever. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 17:36, 9 February 2008 (EST)
- Lol buildwars & guildwars inactivity. No reason to BM him now. - Unexist 08:41, 12 February 2008 (EST)
- Tbh, you try being active on GW while moving out of college :/ -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:35, 12 February 2008 (EST)
- Then stabilise your personal stuff first(RL>>>>>>>>Gw) and then come buildwars 'n guildwars. Don't BM people that are inactive, it's like giving food to a duck which he won't eat anyway since he's overfed already. - Unexist 15:13, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- Like the duck, though, I'll still eat... :/ (Yeah, I've never found a duck that won't eat.) -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 16:35, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- Then stabilise your personal stuff first(RL>>>>>>>>Gw) and then come buildwars 'n guildwars. Don't BM people that are inactive, it's like giving food to a duck which he won't eat anyway since he's overfed already. - Unexist 15:13, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- Tbh, you try being active on GW while moving out of college :/ -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:35, 12 February 2008 (EST)
Neutral
Agree in a small part with Cheese, he hasn't done much work except for meta builds, which like everyone can do. - Unexist 06:46, 15 January 2008 (EST)- Because neutral is über, Armond nominated himself and there is no evidence. GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 12:47, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Alot people do lately, since all the admins are just wannabe BM's. - Unexist 06:19, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Well, that's not entirely true. Wizardboy, for example, is really an admin at heart. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 07:15, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Yea, I even admit on my userpage that I suck at builds :P ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 12:03, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Well, that's not entirely true. Wizardboy, for example, is really an admin at heart. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 07:15, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Alot people do lately, since all the admins are just wannabe BM's. - Unexist 06:19, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Misfate 22:03, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- Unexist is right but i honestly wish i could give a halfvote in support, because he doesnt deserve a neutral but nor doe he warrant a support.Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 12:54, 8 February 2008 (EST)
- Meta thing again. --Tab Moo 13:53, 8 February 2008 (EST)
- May I ask what specifically? People have yelled at me for both following and ignoring the meta. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 18:46, 10 February 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Auron (talk • contribs)
- Withdrawn as per MSN discussion.
It's motherfucking Auron. Perhaps literally. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:11, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
- Whatever works for you guys. -Auron 01:09, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- WIN!--Shadowsin 00:18, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- He's motherfucking Auron. --71.229 00:19, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- So i herd u liek Auron? — Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:08, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Yep. He is pretty smart.
viзтиαмзѕз 02:08, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- You were supposed to say "AURON? I LUUUUUUUUUUUURVE AURON!" See here. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:15, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- –Ichigo724 03:05, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- He.. IS.. AURONWULF!!! - (snō hwīt tăn) [sic] [găl'ə-rē] 08:10, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- He gave me an ecto. Mike Tycn(punch out) 08:13, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Still don't get the Mudkipz. Shen(contribs) 15:47, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:56, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Knows everything possibly? — Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 16:56, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- he wasn't before? Punjab 19:27, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Misfate 19:34, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- I have fantasies of playing with Auron (is he kidding, I'm not sure!) —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:56, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Herd he likes mudkips --User:IbreaktoiletsTab Moo 05:50, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Extensive record of valuable knowledge; shown commitment to the site in general. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 03:41, 18 January 2008 (EST)
I herd Auron iz gud. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:19, 18 January 2008 (EST)- Meh. Lord Belar 18:23, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- --Hikari 03:51, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- You, my good sir, fucking rule. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 04:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- lol wtf is thiz ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 10:16, 21 January 2008 (EST)
Its a given. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 02:37, 29 January 2008 (EST)- lol? ~~ frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 08:54, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- Has quite a good deal of knowledge of the PvP sector, knows whats the difference between "sh!t" and "great".Reasonable and thoughtful,people might be more convinced to listen to his voice of reason. BaineTheBotter 09:01, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- I heard builds get hard at Auron. Yes, that was a compliment. --GuildofDeals 18:27, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
Oppose
- Auron bears most of the responsibility for the quality of this website. Incompetent. Corrupt. Scrub. --207.112.100.155 20:58, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Put on User:Mgrinshpon/Epic? Saying he's corrupt makes me lolol. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 21:05, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- How can you be corrupton a bloody wiki?! Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:44, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Umm... If Auron wanted to be "corrupt" he would already do it, seeing he is an admin. Basically this is just for getting him a 200% vote. BTW, he's not corrupt, he's a stud to builds (see my vote). --GuildofDeals 19:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- That's cool but still, how the hell can u be corrupt on a wiki?! Dark Morphon(contribs) 11:57, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- Umm... If Auron wanted to be "corrupt" he would already do it, seeing he is an admin. Basically this is just for getting him a 200% vote. BTW, he's not corrupt, he's a stud to builds (see my vote). --GuildofDeals 19:43, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- How can you be corrupton a bloody wiki?! Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:44, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Put on User:Mgrinshpon/Epic? Saying he's corrupt makes me lolol. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 21:05, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
Neutral
- Bribe me first, i need an ecto too. - Unexist 05:48, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Defiant Elements (talk • contribs)
- User:Defiant Elements was promoted to Build Master on January 21st, 2008
He was owning the game before Izzy was born. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 00:12, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: To be perfectly honest, I don't rate very many builds, and so long as Admins retain the right to remove votes, I don't necessarily see a great reason why I need to be a Buildmaster, but if people want me to be a BM, either way works. *Defiant Elements* +talk 15:14, 14 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- Goddamnit, I lost the game. --71.229 00:13, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- YOU FUCKER ^--Shadowsin 00:16, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- DE owning iQ. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) .
- –Ichigo724 03:04, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- This is actually a mistake of the policy. Admins should be auto-BM's. - Unexist 03:30, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Such was indeed suggested for the policy. DE wished for RfBMs to be made for the admins to prevent "wtfconspiracy" cries. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 03:48, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- At least just auto-BM DE. If someone's pro, he is. No voting required for that. - Unexist 06:52, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- He's a bureaucrat, he can promote himself :P ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:54, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- At least just auto-BM DE. If someone's pro, he is. No voting required for that. - Unexist 06:52, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Such was indeed suggested for the policy. DE wished for RfBMs to be made for the admins to prevent "wtfconspiracy" cries. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 03:48, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Agree with Unexist ^ - (snō hwīt tăn) [sic] [găl'ə-rē] 08:12, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Mike Tycn(punch out) 08:15, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- DE is leet--Goldenstar 15:15, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- — Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 15:16, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Dur. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Noodles. Shen(contribs) 15:43, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- lolwut? Punjab 16:06, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 16:54, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Ohshi the game :/ --Mala 17:12, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Misfate 19:35, 14 January 2008 (EST)
viзтиαмзѕз 19:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- DE hardens my nipples. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:53, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- if someone opposes or neutrals...unistall plx k thx ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 09:35, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- — Rapta (talk|contribs) 16:00, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- I want DEs babies tbh Fishy Moooo 16:06, 15 January 2008 (EST)
Need I say more?No! They deleted the redirect. Still, he's a hunk of build assraping... in the good way. --GuildofDeals 18:39, 15 January 2008 (EST)- --User:IbreaktoiletsTab Moo 15:27, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Becuz mudkipz r cewl and I herd he lieks them. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:23, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Obligatory vote. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 09:30, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- --Warwick (Talk) (Contr.) 12:14, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- You can't say no to god. Lord Belar 18:24, 19 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- Idiot. Extraordinarily bad. --207.112.100.155 21:03, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- lol wut r u talking about ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 10:34, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- I herd ppl who are baed think pros are baed mi right? Fishy Moooo 11:26, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- yah i herd fish was gud ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 18:10, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- I herd ppl who are baed think pros are baed mi right? Fishy Moooo 11:26, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- lol wut r u talking about ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 10:34, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
Neutral
- Not frequent enough imo, but deserves a neutral. GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 15:36, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- lol — Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 15:38, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Fish (talk • contribs • RfBM page)
Fish ownzzzzzzzzzzzzz, also:
Robin says:
moo, im having fun here with a very serious issue
Robin says:
i want to nominate myself for buildmaster but im still to stupid 2 lrn 2 do it myself, hoaw do i do it
Tab 13:23, 26 January 2009 (EST)
Support
- ingratiating comment --71.229 13:24, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Strong McSwede. Image:GodlyCompanion-cube.jpg 13:37, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Fish ownnzz----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳ 15:21, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Less than three Fish, he is good at guild wars nd sht --Ojamo (>.<(O=(- -Q) 15:24, 6 February 2009 (EST)
Oppose
- not active enough InfestedHydralisk 13:32, 26 January 2009 (EST) sry fishy :(
- See talk page for my reasoning. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 13:49, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Whoru? --ϲɽоω ɱϲɑɳǥɽƴɗɽɑɡоɳ 13:59, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Who? ---Chaos- 14:27, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Who? -- lyssan 15:27, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Fish ownzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz but today was the first time he posted in weeks and he speaks english on a third grade level--GoldenStar 16:46, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- :/ -Auron 02:30, 27 January 2009 (EST)
- His contribs are as strong as Crow's. - (talk) 12:52, 1 February 2009 (EST)
- This is not a popularity contest, so, no. Needs to be more active, on build pages specifically.PikaFanFile:Chrismaspika sig.jpg 13:00, 1 February 2009 (EST)
- It's all been said. crazycow 13:46, 4 February 2009 (EST)
- Know who he is and I know he's never on.-- Liger414 talk contributions 13:50, 4 February 2009 (EST)
- who? stop nominating random people its not even funny. --Anonimous. D: 11:22, 6 February 2009 (EST)
Neutral
- Fishymoo Frosty po! 14:00, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Not very active, tbh. I think I've been more active than him....and that's sad. 14:07, 26 January 2009
- Moo moo, needs to be more active Brandnew. 14:11, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- I had Fish for dinner no longer than wo hours ago. Rickyvantof 14:23, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- me too coincidentally -- 14:26, 26 January 2009
- nommy mcfishums needs moar activity. JebusMcPachirisu 22:08, 26 January 2009 (EST)
/support if you be more active. moo.--Ojamo (>.<(O=(- -Q) 22:14, 26 January 2009 (EST)- Definatly support if you get active. --EVANERGELTONUS 22:21, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Give me a few more days of either activity/inactivity and I'll support/oppose. Fish is good at the Guild Wars, but activity has been spotty at best. -- Guild of Deals 14:20, 27 January 2009 (EST)
- Fish isn't that bad--Relyk 11:15, 6 February 2009 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Ensign (talk • contribs)
More of a formality, really. Ensign is the most knowledgeable person about Guild Wars in all of Guild Wars. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 02:38, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- he contribs here? — Skakid9090 02:39, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- And we actually have to vote him in? --71.229.204.25 02:41, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- His one Paragon comment convinced me. Shen(contribs) 02:53, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Let's face it, we all know what the outcome of this is gonna be. *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:17, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Duh. -- frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 04:54, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- What's our excuse for not making him a BM? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 07:01, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Cuz they said so, Although sounds really awesome. :D--Shadowsin 09:08, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- A definite support. -Auron 11:55, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Ensign, hope you can help us making pvx less gimmicky and just give the site/builds more sense, you got more knowledge and us and plx send babies. Fishy Moooo 15:38, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- Look at contribs, he only made a few in october... I doubt he's coming back :/ --Mala 16:22, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- If he comes back, then he deserves build master status...--(talk/pvxcontribs) 22:53, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- While normally id vote NO to a user who doesnt contribute, nor shows any intent to do so, it's ensign...Bob fregman 23:54, 3 December 2007 (CET)
- see my page - Rawrawr 00:48, 4 December 2007 (CET)
- It's freaking Ensign. Kabu To 09:01, 4 December 2007 (CET)
- did armond and skuld really oppose? really?... its Ensign, cmon--Coloneh 09:01, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I supported and made a comment under oppose. Skuld opposed. Coffee? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 03:25, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- okie, thats good. skuld should know better though, he has a guru account.--Coloneh 18:46, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- I supported and made a comment under oppose. Skuld opposed. Coffee? -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 03:25, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Even if he isn't hugely active, we should make what he does contribute count. Tab Moo 05:55, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- refusing to vote ensign as a buildmaster on this or any guild wars site is like refusing to acknowledge God in church. Punjab 19:22, 15 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- Erm, he doesn't post. — Skuld 20:35, 6 December 2007 (CET)
- ^^ –Ichigo724 21:11, 6 December 2007 (CET)
- We're working on that. :o -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 22:52, 6 December 2007 (CET)
- You guys go right ahead and do that! -- Nova -- (contribs) 03:33, 7 December 2007 (CET)
- 21 contribs, the last one being almost 3 months ago... No. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 15:33, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- so?--Coloneh 00:30, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- He doesn't contribute? Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:40, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- so?--Coloneh 00:30, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- So what is the use in it? Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:37, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- So in essence we can count the votes of you and most of the other people opposing as support if and when he begins contributing again? *Shrug* Fine by me. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 12:40, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Yup. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:24, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- So in essence we can count the votes of you and most of the other people opposing as support if and when he begins contributing again? *Shrug* Fine by me. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 12:40, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- So what is the use in it? Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:37, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- so?--Coloneh 00:30, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- His last contribution was in October when from the time I'm opposing right now... I don't give a crap who it is, but having extreme knowledge of Guild Wars and backing it up with no knowledge/usage of PvXWiki is a fail. --GuildofDeals 09:05, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Would be easy support if he actually came here, but he doesn't Nyktos (talk · contribs) 23:28, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- so?--Coloneh 00:30, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Obvious yes if he actually showed much interest here, but that doesn't seem to be the case. Rah 17:37, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- If Ensign (or any player of a similar calibre) actively contributes, I hardly think he/she'll be doing menial tasks such as voting and removing votes. Mike Tycn(punch out) 08:18, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- The point is that he (it is a he :o) will have the increased vote power. Tab Moo 08:34, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- There is no point in having a inactive sysop just because he owns at being sysop, neither is there a point in having a build master who doesn't contribute just because he's awesome at the game. If he decides to become active he'll have to prove he has knowledge of the game on the wiki. GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 12:49, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Your first sentence makes perfect sense, but your second sentence made me lol... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 12:53, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Not until he actually contributes. Lord Belar 18:29, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Anybody not contributing to PvX Wiki has failed. Failed hard. Rickyvantof 19:28, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Classic example of why prejudice fails hard. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 20:26, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Yes, the best player in the entire sodding game fails hard because he doesn't actively contribute to a site that most players consider a total joke. --71.229 20:29, 19 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- Should I feel bad for not having a flaming clue about who this guy is? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 06:56, 3 December 2007 (CET)
Will Support/Oppose when he actually starts contributing.--GuildofDeals 19:01, 30 December 2007 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Cedave (talk • contribs)
cuz he is awesomsauce in a bottle.--Shadowsin 01:13, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Accepted Might as well, if for nothing else but the lulz. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 01:28, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I'd like to add, as frightening as this may be for some of you, that in light of recent occurrences, and as I've already somewhat mentioned on the talk page here, I will strictly uphold site policies, so long as it is for the better of the Wiki, particularly WELL, You Are Valuable, Real Vetting, and DICK. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 01:15, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Support
<3 TBH i believe he is the prime candidate for this policy as he has shown no vote page faggotry or anything else that looks like gangbaning a new user vote page.--Shadowsin 01:13, 7 January 2008 (EST)is not allowed to vote someone i nominated soz D: nomination = auto support.- yay...--Coloneh 09:03, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Yes, of course. Good Helping People. Fair and neutral in comments. Think can be a great Build Master. Chuki 18:24, 7 January 2008 (EST))
- Policy Nazi=Yes pleaseUnder Gunned 22:21, 9 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- I feel judging him by shens standards is acceptable. I'll dig if i find time.Bob fregman 22:05, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- seeing as his average build rating is below 2.5... i'd be really surprised if he got this.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 23:07, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 09:58, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh wai?--Shadowsin 10:07, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You need to explain votes nao? Ok, I don't think Cedave is simply good enough at builds to be BM. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:09, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Its not always about making builds, but being able to recognize a great build from a good build, or any trash build, cedave has that distinction. Plus its really hard to make a really great build anymore because all the idea's are pretty much exasted.--Shadowsin 10:11, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said he was bad at making builds. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said you did either.--Shadowsin 10:20, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Then why are you questioning my vote? Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:24, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Because its not always just about making builds.--Shadowsin 10:27, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You compltely lost me, Shadowsin. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:06, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Someware in there i completly lost myself o.o' VOTE CEDAVE!--Shadowsin 22:42, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- You compltely lost me, Shadowsin. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 15:06, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Because its not always just about making builds.--Shadowsin 10:27, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Then why are you questioning my vote? Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:24, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said you did either.--Shadowsin 10:20, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- I never said he was bad at making builds. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:12, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Its not always about making builds, but being able to recognize a great build from a good build, or any trash build, cedave has that distinction. Plus its really hard to make a really great build anymore because all the idea's are pretty much exasted.--Shadowsin 10:11, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- You need to explain votes nao? Ok, I don't think Cedave is simply good enough at builds to be BM. Swiftslash \\ (contributions *sandbox) 10:09, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh wai?--Shadowsin 10:07, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Never rly see him =\ - Rawrawr 15:58, 9 January 2008 (EST)
- Lolwut?--Shadowsin 12:45, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Although Cedave shows many attributes required of the Brave Masterknight, including bravery, gallantry, strength, and a fondness for romping with men, I feel that untill he has slain atleast three trolls, I can't support his bid for BMship. Ibreaktoilets 04:28, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- lol...— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 18:25, 10 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- Read that as "awesomesauce in the can." Felt you should know. --71.229 01:31, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Will dig — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 18:26, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Cause he told me to support? idk... -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 01:52, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I feel judging him by my standards would be too harsh. Shen(contribs) 17:40, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Lol? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:45, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- And your standards are? - Unexist 04:25, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Lol? cedave (contributions_buildpage) 17:45, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I honestly haven't seen him around much. If he starts epic raping builds and stuff I'll move to Support/Oppose, depending on if it's the good rape or the bad rape. --GuildofDeals 15:39, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Gotta dig too. - Unexist 12:08, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Not yet? Lord Belar 18:31, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Coloneh (talk • contribs)
I know if look at my contributions I dont look that active, but im on here reading build everyday. With no authority to remove votes and whatnot it wasnt really worth the time to discuss or even vote most of the time. --Coloneh 09:09, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Accept If elected, I plan to lower taxes and become more active in actually posting on articles and voting.--Coloneh 09:12, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- I kick ass--Coloneh 18:49, 10 January 2008 (EST)
- He knows shit bout PvE, so only for that. Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:42, 11 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- No real evidence of build master qualification, he doesn't seem to vote well when I do see his votes either. — Victoryisyours (talk/RfA) 10:07, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Nein. Ibreaktoilets 16:10, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I remember some awful stuff coming from this fellow. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 20:43, 8 January 2008 (EST)
Don't think i've ever heard of you. And you nominated yourself ffs.--Goldenstar 20:46, 8 January 2008 (EST)- Coloneh is one of the oldest contributers here. He came way before you. Also, self-noms are fine. He shouldn't be a buildmaster because he's not good with builds, not because of your two reasons. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 20:48, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Thanks Grinch, removing my vote.--Goldenstar 21:16, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Coloneh is one of the oldest contributers here. He came way before you. Also, self-noms are fine. He shouldn't be a buildmaster because he's not good with builds, not because of your two reasons. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 20:48, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Shen(contribs) 21:09, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Bob fregman 22:02, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Vørrax 22:04, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- I don't see him around that much to say he could be worthy of a BMship. More contribs are really needed. --GuildofDeals 16:27, 11 January 2008 (EST)
- Nyktos (talk · contribs) 23:32, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- no way in hell.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 18:45, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Who? - † Lord Xivor † 00:07, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- What? Lord Belar 18:33, 19 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- sorry dunno you dude, but for realz you nominated yourself? xD.--Shadowsin 10:37, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- You've shown a lot of growth since I first met you, and you've helped me create probably one of the most used Tombs Orders builds today, or at least get it on the Wiki, but I'm not certain you'd qualify for this. Lemme dig around a bit, k? Things tend to look up for people when I dig. cedave (contributions_buildpage) 15:57, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Ressmonkey (talk • contribs)
Because I can. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Yep. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 21:29, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- :D--Shadowsin 19:30, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Despite how many people may oppose he makes good builds and nice comments. That = BM, IMO. --GuildofDeals 17:15, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- He rocks dude xD Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:25, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- He is intelligent and innovative in his builds and he is respectful of others opinions. He is one of the few on this wiki that I feel deserve this role. - † Lord Xivor † 00:03, 18 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- Nope. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 20:44, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Goldenstar 20:47, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Childish behavior unbefitting of a Build Master, demonstrated particularly in ventures outside his comfort zone. This makes me question this entire RfBM. Shen(contribs) 21:09, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Bob fregman 22:02, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Definately not.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 20:55, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Tha Club gotta stay exclusive. - Unexist 05:50, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- In soviet Russia, no says tab. --User:IbreaktoiletsTab Moo 05:52, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Because I can. Lord Belar 18:35, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Thats cold. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- I may reconsider. Lord Belar 19:16, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Yay. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 19:28, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- I may reconsider. Lord Belar 19:16, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Thats cold. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 19:07, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Not seen much to make me support, plus there's this. --Tab Moo 09:33, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- So unexist is an ass, its a fact of life. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- How is he an ass? I didn't see him do anything wrong there. --Tab Moo 09:37, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Not there, other places, which you will never find. And if you really want to find them, check my userpage history, go through the builds that are no longer on there, but arent deleted yet, click on them and see whos vote put them in trash, then maybe youll understand. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- You have issues if you hate somebody for voting on a bad build and then trashing it like a build master is supposed to do. Get over it. --Tab Moo 09:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- I agree with tab. Why hate him because he voted poorly on your builds. If they are all deleted, then at least 4 other people must have voted badly as well, do you also hate them.Bob fregman 10:33, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Be happy i said rewrite, I could also just 0-0-0 if you like. Epic fail bars stay epic fail bars, no matter how hard you scream. - Unexist 11:00, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- I agree with tab. Why hate him because he voted poorly on your builds. If they are all deleted, then at least 4 other people must have voted badly as well, do you also hate them.Bob fregman 10:33, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- You have issues if you hate somebody for voting on a bad build and then trashing it like a build master is supposed to do. Get over it. --Tab Moo 09:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Not there, other places, which you will never find. And if you really want to find them, check my userpage history, go through the builds that are no longer on there, but arent deleted yet, click on them and see whos vote put them in trash, then maybe youll understand. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:44, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- How is he an ass? I didn't see him do anything wrong there. --Tab Moo 09:37, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- So unexist is an ass, its a fact of life. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Kill the monkey already. GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 14:26, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Sorry, but I don't see it.--Relyk 20:48, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- If pve and pvp BM's become separate entities i will wholeheartedly and happily support his BMship. But as of now he in no way is deserving of vote weighting on pvp builds. 20:57, 20 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- BaineTheBotter 08:05, 8 January 2008 (EST)
- Nyktos (talk · contribs) 23:25, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Real good at farming builds, not so much in PvP.--AESTHETIC
- Hit the nail on the head. But I do have 3 PvP builds that I authored that are vetted. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- Additionally, I don't think being a universal know-all is required for BM status. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 02:58, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Doesn't say there needs to be a universal know-all, in fact it states "Build Masters are encouraged to designate an area of expertise to assist users looking for help in a specific venue", the opposite. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 18:41, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- To comment Scotty, it isn't. DE himself said that BM's should just concern what they are good in, if PvP BM's aren't good in PvE build, don't mind pve builds. If PvE guys aren't good in PvP builds, then don't mind PvP builds. If you're good in PvE builds but also trying to be good in PvP builds but you aren't, you don't get BM. /Done. - Unexist 11:16, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Doesn't say there needs to be a universal know-all, in fact it states "Build Masters are encouraged to designate an area of expertise to assist users looking for help in a specific venue", the opposite. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 18:41, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Additionally, I don't think being a universal know-all is required for BM status. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 02:58, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Hit the nail on the head. But I do have 3 PvP builds that I authored that are vetted. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 17:52, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- I won't oppose you, but some of your comments make me uneasy. --Hikari 03:53, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
InfestedHydalisk (talk • contribs)
cuz he told me too and i agreed :D--Shadowsin 01:13, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: decline, agree on ppl who think im not active at build section ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 19:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- Cuz the Swiss are always neutral. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- If Hydra was worthy of BMship, I would've nominated him ages ago. Not to say he's clueless about the game, just that he hasn't demonstrated a level of expertise I consider necessary and proper for promotion. However, I will dig and may support after a page of his previous ratings has been made avaliable. Shen(contribs) 19:25, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- yah iz tru, i should rate/help or whatever moar here...i do it moar ingame tho ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 19:31, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Sorry, but no.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 20:55, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- I like the guy, but he's not worth BM. - Unexist 10:16, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Ditto - I like the candidate, and he shows consistent understanding of the game's mechanics. Not as active in build creation and discussion as much as I would think, and like Shadowsin's RfBM I'm not sure of how serious the candidate is based on the nomination. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 02:57, 19 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- is for the damn swiss.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Shadowsin (talk • contribs)
he paid me 50 bucks. ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 19:14, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
AcceptedIS ALL LIES!--Shadowsin 19:15, 13 January 2008 (EST)- Decline I'm mean and nasty and i like it that way. so many RFBM's atm and mine is going well bad. xD To be perfectly honest it was a joke nomination anyway. --Shadowsin 03:18, 21 January 2008 (EST)
Support
- Cool. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- Cuz I herd he lieks mudkipz. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:48, 18 January 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- Shen(contribs) 19:23, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- aww D: jk :P.--Shadowsin 19:34, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- At aurons request, i'm going to explain my vote a tad more. Shadowsin has not demonstrated the qualities that i feel are required by a bm. He has a large number of contributions, most of which are not related to builds at all, be they contests, arguments, talk pages, etc. Most of his contributions to builds are talk pages, where he rarely says anything productive. It's tough to discern any amount of skill from his talk posts, and his votes often seem moronic, so thus i can't give him a support. In addition, he's a D-bag, which is another reason why i lean towards oppose. Bob fregman 20:47, 13 January 2008 (EST)
- ofc xD it wouldnt be an RFBMs w/o your name under oppose.--Shadowsin 00:43, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- I've supported a number of candidates, mostly the good ones.Bob fregman 18:07, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh ouch, my feelings. --Shadowsin 19:28, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- I've supported a number of candidates, mostly the good ones.Bob fregman 18:07, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- ofc xD it wouldnt be an RFBMs w/o your name under oppose.--Shadowsin 00:43, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- No, and here's why. He hasn't really demonstrated knowledge of GW, and has little qualities which i do not like for a BM. Like Bob said, many of his contributions for builds (for which there aren't many) are pointless and don't help the build.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 19:28, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Links? o.o--Shadowsin 03:44, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- — Teh Uber Pwnzer 20:56, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Because you have "This user is mainly a Pve Player" AND "This user is mainly a PvP Player" on ur userpage -_-.-Jax010 23:06, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Seems biast every now and then. Also, his contribs for his current page (when I posted) contain VERY LITTLE BUILDS. Get back on builds and not on Talk pages and RfA's, IMO. --GuildofDeals 15:15, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- no u :P--Shadowsin 03:24, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- Definitely an active contributor, but I'm afraid I haven't seen a significant display of BM qualities. The nominee is seen very often, but recent contribs show that most edits are on user talk pages. Provides modest insight into builds and shows solid understanding of game mechanics, but I have not seen a proactive approach to handling builds. He is a good player with a good, critical mind; but I don't think he needs to be a Build Master to be a respected presence on build pages -- at least, not at this stage. I also don't believe the nomination and the nominee's responses reflected the expected manner of a BM. -- Scottie_theNerd (argue/criticise) 10:09, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- No. Lord Belar 18:43, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- No too. - Unexist 11:17, 20 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
- No picture in sig=phail. GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 15:25, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- I want 50 bucks! Midget chinese 18:02, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Ibreaktoilets (talk • contribs)
- User:Ibreaktoilets was promoted on May 14th, 2008 by User:Defiant Elements
Will be the best Build Master on the wiki. — SkaKid 14:45, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: --Tab Moo 15:06, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
Support
- ^ —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 15:00, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- should have been a BM a long time ago. Punjab 15:02, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- No, Jay KayzZeecron 15:05, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- Shock Axe in PvE. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 15:12, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- Tab is one of the guys who undenyably knows alot about theorycraft wich works in practics, share ur moo with me, and my spelling ownz. Fishels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 17:20, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- knows far too much about GW for his own good. Also, one time he touched me and made me promise not to tell. Oops. - PANIC! sexiness! 17:36, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- Horribad BM, so I support. --GuildofDeals 17:40, 3 May 2008 (EDT)
- While an impartial position in disputes isn't one of Tab's most prominent tendencies, I feel PvX will benefit with Tab as a BM. His knowledge and commendable level of activity puts Tab a bar above the rest. -Shen 10:54, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- No question ¬ Klumpeet 10:56, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Moo. --71.229 11:17, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Ska thinks he's better then me. That's pretty nasty. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 17:09, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- Troll or not, this toilet breaker deserves the BM status. - (rĕ'küt ŏv ū'rūk)[snō hwīt tăn] 05:02, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- What Shen said. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 06:32, 7 May 2008 (EDT)
- He's gud. Smurf 11:32, 8 May 2008 (EDT)
- Knows his theorycraft. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 10:18, 11 May 2008 (EDT)
He's better then me. Way better. How come he's not BM yet? —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 15:53, 12 May 2008 (EDT)Forgot to notice that i already voted, lol.
Oppose
The reason I oppose Tab as BM is the same reason I would oppose myself as a BM. While we both know the game well enough, we're also trolls. It would not be in the best interests of the wiki if Tab was a BM just because of that whole troll factor.—ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 13:36, 4 May 2008 (EDT)- I also troll, and still you did voted for me? —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 17:08, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- You weren't as much of one back then. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- wtf grinh i meen srsly. trol dunt hav mch 2 du wit bein gud 8t bilds, nd newai his biga den u so go dy u fkin ltlle prik —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 22:04, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- i liek owh u takl --InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 05:28, 12 May 2008 (EDT)
- wtf grinh i meen srsly. trol dunt hav mch 2 du wit bein gud 8t bilds, nd newai his biga den u so go dy u fkin ltlle prik —The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 22:04, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- You weren't as much of one back then. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- I also troll, and still you did voted for me? —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 17:08, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- (your vote here)
Neutral
- any more the eviscerate executioners strike spike dont work that much but its fairly effective. very weak against any type of anti-melee and shock is a costly interrupt skill. Misfate 21:56, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Mgrinshpon (talk • contribs)
Since only BM's are "supposed to" remove votes while admins "shouldn't". Makes my life easier this way. Now I can remove your shitty vote based off of false premises without getting shit about it from you! —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 23:07, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
- Jews are known for their vote removal expertise. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 23:14, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Most badass joke evah. Rly. - Unexist 06:18, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Yeh ok -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 23:25, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- Bwah hah.--Shadowsin 23:31, 14 January 2008 (EST)
- I can't deny the blinking piece of cake... — Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 07:13, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- Grinch is gud. 09:19, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- Yep.--DarkEnzanArikado (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:56, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- What a MONSTER. Shen(contribs) 18:57, 15 January 2008 (EST)
- i herd u were gud --71.229.204.25 03:24, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Becuz he iz gud at monk. Dark Morphon(contribs) 12:40, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- "Since only BM's are "supposed to" remove votes while admins "shouldn't". Makes my life easier this way. Now I can remove your shitty vote based off of false premises without getting shit about it from you!" Ticket for '08? --GuildofDeals 17:17, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- –Ichigo724 21:09, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- +10. - Unexist 06:17, 17 January 2008 (EST)
- Cause he's leet! 'Nuff said. Infidel(talk) 15:36, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- Because he has cake. Lord Belar 18:49, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Now that he's no longer an admin, his nomination sounds a little off, but i still support him in his bid for bmship.Bob fregman 22:20, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- he's good. Punjab 19:46, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- he's one of the best--Goldenstar 19:54, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- PvX needs more beer volcanoes. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 20:02, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- — Rapta (talk|contribs) 16:26, 8 February 2008 (EST)
- Because stupid letters are kewl and IE is gay. Godbox 15:49, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
Oppose
- His recent actions (as pointed out by auron) are forcing me to say no. i don't think that kind of behavior is suitable for a BM, and
definately not a current admin. once again, he has showed characteristics i would never want in a BM.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 01:17, 16 January 2008 (EST) - What he lacks in stupidity he makes up for in rudeness. All-around failure. --207.112.100.155 21:12, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- He carries no sense of intelligence outside the current meta, allowing for very little innovation in builds. And to top that off, he is quite rude and very patronizing. - † Lord Xivor † 00:04, 18 January 2008 (EST)
- Agreed with the above, recent actions aren't acceptable, he's rude, pushy, follows the meta like glue, and is patronizing. I will bring my hammer of justice onto you ingame, grinshpon. You shall feel my wrath =] Plus also did I mention he is just a complete twat by definition? ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 04:40, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Metagame is metagame with a reason tbh. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Because it works, and it's good. But still, just because balanced is metagame in TA, doesn't mean it can't be beaten. One perfect example is shove spike, against almost all balanced teams, even the good ones, you can still roll them, even through the interrupts. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 12:06, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Shovespike was for nubz. Dark Morphon(contribs) 06:32, 25 January 2008 (EST)
- LOL NAPALM YOURE FUCKING BAD — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 15:49, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- Don't beat a dead horse, Ska. -- Armond Warblade{{sysop}} 16:56, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- Because it works, and it's good. But still, just because balanced is metagame in TA, doesn't mean it can't be beaten. One perfect example is shove spike, against almost all balanced teams, even the good ones, you can still roll them, even through the interrupts. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 12:06, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Metagame is metagame with a reason tbh. Dark Morphon(contribs) 09:45, 23 January 2008 (EST)
Neutral
His name contains stupid letters that aren't possible to read. And he got a cake and not a cookie. Guess what the word phailcake comes from!GΩdlﺄεﻯt™ -_- 12:51, 16 January 2008 (EST)- My gibberish is perfectly legible to me! use firefox —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 14:47, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Omg, grinshpon is RIGHT for once? Yes, firefox is win. Down with IE. Get Firefox or be lol'd at all round. ~~ Napalm Flame >=] (talk)·(contributions) 04:41, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- My gibberish is perfectly legible to me! use firefox —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 14:47, 16 January 2008 (EST)
- Misfate 22:02, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for Build Master status. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Bob fregman (talk • contribs)
Smart, knows his stuff, basically always right about every build, deserves this. Punjab 14:38, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
I accept.Bob fregman 14:54, 19 January 2008 (EST) - Never had a chance, no longer play gw, liberals crying(big suprise), etc. Decline.Bob fregman 22:15, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
- Why, I do believe the average IQ of the wiki just went up several points. Lord Belar 22:22, 21 March 2008 (EDT)
- you're leaving too?Bob fregman 00:14, 22 March 2008 (EDT)
Support
- XvivaX 16:50, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- He aggrees with my votes yay! Dark Morphon(contribs) 07:16, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Knows his stuff. +1 for him, like it to have him in da Club. - Unexist 11:13, 20 January 2008 (EST)
See the date stamps on the votes here, he's consistently on the money, and in this case, way before others caught on. Granted, Bob gets into arguments, but I've yet to witness an instance where he's let personal enmity bleed into build-related affairs. Except for that one with Readem, which I strongly believe to be the reason he's chosen to refrain from such acts. If I'm completely off in my postulations, sorry.-Shen 21:33, 17 February 2008 (EST)- Very smart and knows what he's talking about when it comes to builds.
viзтиαмзѕз 01:46, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Highly active dealing with builds, knows his shit, and can prove you wrong. — Vıctoȓƴışƴouȓş (talk/pvxcontribs) 08:11, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- ViY hit the nail on the head. He will prove you wrong, and is very fair with voting. Would make a good bm.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 17:51, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- This user occasionally votes poorly on builds to cancel out votes that he sees as being too good. lolwut?--Shadowsin 21:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- But do i actually do that?Bob fregman 17:04, 22 January 2008 (EST)::
- Just having that user box on your userpage doesnt lead me to believe otherwise.--Shadowsin 17:39, 22 January 2008 (EST)
- But do i actually do that?Bob fregman 17:04, 22 January 2008 (EST)::
- This user occasionally votes poorly on builds to cancel out votes that he sees as being too good. lolwut?--Shadowsin 21:35, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Knows wtf he's doing Nyktos (talk · contribs) 14:49, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- See below, over at neutral. -StarSeeker | My talk 15:51, 23 January 2008 (EST)
above?— Vɨctoȓƴışƴouȓş (talk/pvxcontribs) 16:09, 23 January 2008 (EST)- @ neutral ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 16:13, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh I see, figured he meant above instead of below as oppose is below. — Vɨctoȓƴışƴouȓş (talk/pvxcontribs) 16:15, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- "Look farther then the lenght of your nose!" ;p -StarSeeker | My talk 16:30, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Oh I see, figured he meant above instead of below as oppose is below. — Vɨctoȓƴışƴouȓş (talk/pvxcontribs) 16:15, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- @ neutral ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 16:13, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Those who voted "no" probably got a low rating on their build (like me but I'm honest). He always has good reasons for his votesFrans 15:25, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- So he can archive his talk page. Godbox 15:29, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- Now that's a good reason! o.O--Frans 15:31, 24 January 2008 (EST)
Misfate 22:01, 24 January 2008 (EST)Actually does know his stuff after some more thought. As for "being a D+Bag" (see below) and stuff, people don't cater stuff all soft and plushy: If a build or whatever sucks, people will be blunt honest with it. --GuildofDeals 15:31, 25 January 2008 (EST)- iz actually pretty gud do u give ectos away by any chance? ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 16:11, 25 January 2008 (EST)
- Know's what he's talking about, votes fairly, and backs-up what he votes. Plus I feel guilty for stealing his boxes. Lol Colonel Hawk 16:41, 28 January 2008 (EST)
- Unfortunatly he doesn't tell people their builds suck as much as Unexist and Shen do, but he still knows how the game works inside and out.--Goldenstar 21:40, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Sometimes when builds really suck, there's nothing to say that wouldnt be a waste of time...Bob fregman 21:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Words of wisdom.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 23:15, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- cheesy words said by cheese ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 11:09, 31 January 2008 (EST)
- Words of wisdom.— Cheese Slaya (Talk) 23:15, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Sometimes when builds really suck, there's nothing to say that wouldnt be a waste of time...Bob fregman 21:53, 30 January 2008 (EST)
oh u! —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 13:32, 2 February 2008 (EST)- d('-'d) - (snō hwīt tăn) [sic] [găl'ə-rē] 07:56, 14 February 2008 (EST)
- <3--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 19:44, 19 February 2008 (EST)
- Voted my build; Great! Woop. <3 Rickyvantof 15:06, 22 February 2008 (EST)
Oppose
- Elitist without being elite. Lord Belar 18:50, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Rude, D+Bag=Bob, his votes are redundant and retarded.--Shadowsin 19:31, 19 January 2008 (EST)
- Could you link some of those please? I haven't seen a single unfair one. - Unexist 11:22, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- I'm not fishing anywhere outside "Recent Ratings" But if memory serves when he rating bombed every build in testing alot of his ratings were "I agree with "blank"" and then he voted lower. That and he is rude. Just knowing his stuff doesn't qualify him for this position, bob holds grudges, and if given power would probably abuse it.--Shadowsin 03:25, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Lulz at you, if people make the best possible comments @ epic fail builds, why then even bother adding something? If you have like, a mending warrior, why even bother to make a comment about it, you know it's bad. I agree is usually enough for the epic fail 1-1-1 food(when someone already pointed out that it is bad), unless it's like a hard case, or the person who he agreed with was wrong. - Unexist 15:03, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- Almost EVERYONE on PvX can be rude. Bob likes to serve dinner a lot, and his favorite food to serve is COLD HARD TRUTH. Bob=truthiness, and he's not so much of a D-Bag. --GuildofDeals 18:52, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- Well and theres this http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:D/A_Beguiling_Assault&action=rate + http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:D/A_Shadow_Spiker&action=rate rediculous contradictory votes.--Shadowsin 02:51, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- Contradictory? They use the same spike. One recycles faster and uses a snare and ias. One recycles slower and uses dazed and a ims to cover for lack of snares and has no ias. If anything, your vote is contradictory since you 0-0-0'd one while 5-5-5ing the other.Bob fregman 10:14, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- I think i voted 000 on a bad dupe. Unlike you I actually tried both and that one works better, im sorry i think +33% IMS and -33% DMS on your opponent are equivalent to each other. and if you really want a snare, you have cripples! and those are cheaper and spammable so ummm??? BTW Daze>Auto snare anyday --Shadowsin 20:40, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- But the fact that you said they were condtadictory is completely falseXvivaX 21:15, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- I think i voted 000 on a bad dupe. Unlike you I actually tried both and that one works better, im sorry i think +33% IMS and -33% DMS on your opponent are equivalent to each other. and if you really want a snare, you have cripples! and those are cheaper and spammable so ummm??? BTW Daze>Auto snare anyday --Shadowsin 20:40, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- Contradictory? They use the same spike. One recycles faster and uses a snare and ias. One recycles slower and uses dazed and a ims to cover for lack of snares and has no ias. If anything, your vote is contradictory since you 0-0-0'd one while 5-5-5ing the other.Bob fregman 10:14, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- Well and theres this http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:D/A_Beguiling_Assault&action=rate + http://www.pvxwiki.com/w/index.php?title=Build:D/A_Shadow_Spiker&action=rate rediculous contradictory votes.--Shadowsin 02:51, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- Almost EVERYONE on PvX can be rude. Bob likes to serve dinner a lot, and his favorite food to serve is COLD HARD TRUTH. Bob=truthiness, and he's not so much of a D-Bag. --GuildofDeals 18:52, 29 January 2008 (EST)
- Lulz at you, if people make the best possible comments @ epic fail builds, why then even bother adding something? If you have like, a mending warrior, why even bother to make a comment about it, you know it's bad. I agree is usually enough for the epic fail 1-1-1 food(when someone already pointed out that it is bad), unless it's like a hard case, or the person who he agreed with was wrong. - Unexist 15:03, 24 January 2008 (EST)
- I'm not fishing anywhere outside "Recent Ratings" But if memory serves when he rating bombed every build in testing alot of his ratings were "I agree with "blank"" and then he voted lower. That and he is rude. Just knowing his stuff doesn't qualify him for this position, bob holds grudges, and if given power would probably abuse it.--Shadowsin 03:25, 21 January 2008 (EST)
- Could you link some of those please? I haven't seen a single unfair one. - Unexist 11:22, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- All people like Unexist shouldnt be BMs. --- Ressmonkey (talk) 09:34, 20 January 2008 (EST)
- Wtf is your problem, if you got a problem with me, then take it to me, don´t take it to bob. Seriously man, you are such a little kid. - Unexist 11:10, 20 January 2008 (EST)
Err... Doesn't really no his stuff IMO. Not a frequent enough contributor from my perspective to be a good BM.--GuildofDeals 16:56, 22 January 2008 (EST)- I find that Bob needs to work on his GuildWars skills first. — ク Eloc 貢 09:09, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- i think a comment would be quite fitting, actually. Punjab 20:39, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Ya pretty much XvivaX 21:32, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Except I don't have to give a comment. It's just a simple oppose. — ク Eloc 貢 12:13, 31 January 2008 (EST)
- u actually need a comment, as Auron stated before ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 12:26, 31 January 2008 (EST)
- There, added. — ク Eloc 貢 01:58, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- His skill in guildwars is different then his ability with builds unless whats what you meant XvivaX 03:12, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- If you're not really good at GuildWars, then you aren't good at judging builds, so same diff. — ク Eloc 貢 04:00, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- Actually, you can be good at buildwars while you fail at guildwars. It's really different, buildwars means you need to know the metagame and what skills are good, guildwars you must mean you must know how to use the skills. You don't need to use skills with builds, simple theoretical thinking is enough. - Unexist 06:41, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- Says the already BM... Us 1 Eloc 0 XvivaX 13:01, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- Actually, you can be good at buildwars while you fail at guildwars. It's really different, buildwars means you need to know the metagame and what skills are good, guildwars you must mean you must know how to use the skills. You don't need to use skills with builds, simple theoretical thinking is enough. - Unexist 06:41, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- If you're not really good at GuildWars, then you aren't good at judging builds, so same diff. — ク Eloc 貢 04:00, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- His skill in guildwars is different then his ability with builds unless whats what you meant XvivaX 03:12, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- There, added. — ク Eloc 貢 01:58, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- u actually need a comment, as Auron stated before ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 12:26, 31 January 2008 (EST)
- Except I don't have to give a comment. It's just a simple oppose. — ク Eloc 貢 12:13, 31 January 2008 (EST)
- Ya pretty much XvivaX 21:32, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- i think a comment would be quite fitting, actually. Punjab 20:39, 30 January 2008 (EST)
- Sometimes his votes on builds are kind of questionable, I'll look through more recent rating now... — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 13:43, 1 February 2008 (EST)
- I can't support such hostility. Mediation is something to strive for. -Shen 21:17, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- I'm really sorry you feel that way. Sadly, he instigated me, and depending on my mood at the time, my tolerance for idiocy isnt that high. What he said was dumb as fuck, and i went on to explain why. Someone calls me an idiot and then goes on to make a statement like his, then yeah, my retort is going to be hostile. I didnt know that bms were carebears, his response was a combo of insult and idiocy, i feel my response was justified, particularly considering the circumstance and that within my response was also constructive information. Just how i percieved that incident. Bob fregman 21:51, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- And getting defensive whenever someone questions your judgment isn't a quality I want to see in BMs. Lord Belar 22:08, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- If you mean "getting defensive" as I think you mean it, I might agree. To Bob, that's PvX. That's exactly what I try (need) to work on. -Shen 22:14, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- And then you notice you're wasting your time and effort defending a site that will never truly be good until more experienced players join and PvX:BAD is passed. 75.75.180.0 22:38, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- @Belar, i dont think "you're an idiot, necros need to have staff" is a question of my judgement, not a good one anyway. I basically posted this just to adress shens concern, since i do care what he thinks(unlike most people in oppose, save ska and DE). Ive known for awhile that i wasnt going to be promoted, im fine with that, im caught up in cod4 right now and as dark said, this wiki is, despite its merits, "fail"(not as bad as gww, but not good). I was just adressing shen. If you think my attitude is a problem, then i respect that, but i think that my attitude is WAY less detrimental to the wiki then the scrubs that it's directed towards.Bob fregman 18:39, 27 February 2008 (EST)
- And then you notice you're wasting your time and effort defending a site that will never truly be good until more experienced players join and PvX:BAD is passed. 75.75.180.0 22:38, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- If you mean "getting defensive" as I think you mean it, I might agree. To Bob, that's PvX. That's exactly what I try (need) to work on. -Shen 22:14, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- And getting defensive whenever someone questions your judgment isn't a quality I want to see in BMs. Lord Belar 22:08, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- I'm really sorry you feel that way. Sadly, he instigated me, and depending on my mood at the time, my tolerance for idiocy isnt that high. What he said was dumb as fuck, and i went on to explain why. Someone calls me an idiot and then goes on to make a statement like his, then yeah, my retort is going to be hostile. I didnt know that bms were carebears, his response was a combo of insult and idiocy, i feel my response was justified, particularly considering the circumstance and that within my response was also constructive information. Just how i percieved that incident. Bob fregman 21:51, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- As per the rant currently on my talk page: Build Masters should be blunt, but while their actions may, at times, be unpopular, they should not be a source of conflict. Furthermore, although they need not be quintessentially "up-standing" members of the community, they should be well-respected, and while I respect Bob's knowledge of Guild Wars, I don't respect his methodology (on the same lines as Shen). Thus, I'm forced to oppose this nomination. *Defiant Elements* +talk 22:30, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- Idiots should not be given power. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 22:08, 27 February 2008 (EST)
- ^ --71.229 22:18, 27 February 2008 (EST)
- There's a difference between being blunt and being rude and tactless. ¬ Wizårdbõÿ777(sysop) 19:56, 28 February 2008 (EST)
- any more the eviscerate executioners strike spike dont work that much but its fairly effective. very weak against any type of anti-melee and shock is a costly interrupt skill. --Readem 20:09, 28 February 2008 (EST)
- There's a difference between being honest and blunt and being plain immature. Sad to say, his bad rant cost him any possibilities at BMship. --GuildofDeals 09:19, 1 March 2008 (EST)
- Democrats ftw.--Fallen (talk) 21:19, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
- I dont think so. Ni 22:21, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
Neutral
not so sure yet ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 10:53, 20 January 2008 (EST)lrn2innovation and I'll support. Innovation is a score of how much will this be used? not is this idea old/new? — Teh Uber Pwnzer 04:12, 21 January 2008 (EST)- I thought we were just going to get rid of innovation as a whole. I'll take what you said into consideration in the future.Bob fregman 08:09, 21 January 2008 (EST)
Obviously skilled. But look at his userpage, and look at the 'Great' userbox. That's not what a BM should do, imo. But I'll see what the future brings, and I'm leaning towards support. Any thoughts on this, Bob? -StarSeeker | My talk 14:54, 23 January 2008 (EST)- Ok, heres my thoughts. When i made that userpage back in july, the wiki was alot different than it is now. There were quite a few cruddy gimmick builds in great, and ratings were alot less well enforced. Lots of 5-5-5 author votes and sockpuppets. Now, the great section has alot less gimmicky builds. I just havent changed my userpage since i don't really like making userboxes, nor do i feel like thinking of new ones. I think that my actions are different than what those boxes say, but if it's a concern i'll remove them so that people can look at what i actually do as opposed to what the boxes say i do.Bob fregman 15:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Okay, gotcha. You'll probably need to make your userpage anew/fresh it up if you become BM. ;) I support. Let's just hope it doesn't turn out different in the future. -StarSeeker | My talk 15:51, 23 January 2008 (EST)
- Ok, heres my thoughts. When i made that userpage back in july, the wiki was alot different than it is now. There were quite a few cruddy gimmick builds in great, and ratings were alot less well enforced. Lots of 5-5-5 author votes and sockpuppets. Now, the great section has alot less gimmicky builds. I just havent changed my userpage since i don't really like making userboxes, nor do i feel like thinking of new ones. I think that my actions are different than what those boxes say, but if it's a concern i'll remove them so that people can look at what i actually do as opposed to what the boxes say i do.Bob fregman 15:20, 23 January 2008 (EST)
Most of the time, he's right, but could anyone give me a link of a build he did not vote below 3?Frans 15:06, 24 January 2008 (EST)- Hhippo has my thanks for the myratings page. Build:Team - GvG Balanced Split, Build:Team - HB Massacreway, Build:E/Rt Splinter Harm, Build:N/A Rhilion Refuge Farmer, Build:D/A Pious Shadow. these are recent ones, i could go back farther but i think thatd be redundant.Bob fregman 15:16, 24 January 2008 (EST)
He never voted on any of my builds....Rickyvantof 10:25, 2 February 2008 (EST)- lulz strange way to vote neutral, u actualy rate here for general voting ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 12:25, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- I know how this works. Basicly what I meant is that I barely see a vote of his, that's probably just me though. Rickyvantof 22:03, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- lulz strange way to vote neutral, u actualy rate here for general voting ----InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 12:25, 2 February 2008 (EST)
- Misfate 22:57, 26 February 2008 (EST)
- (your vote here)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Instructions
This simple three-step plan was adopted from the Requests for Adminship in order to facilitate nominations.
-
Insert the following text in the active nominations section above:
{{{{subst:FULLPAGENAME}}/Username}}
-
Proceed to click on the red link created by the 1st template, and insert:
{{subst:bm1|Username|Rationale for nomination. ~~~~}}
-
Finally, insert the following templates at the top of the nominee's talk page:
{{subst:bm2|Username}}
Note: The nomination itself counts as a "support" vote.