PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Bigtymerxg4

Bigtymerxg4 (talk • contribs • RfA page)

I like KJ, but he is kinda new. Also, someone RfA me. Biggles Strongfist ™ 01:29, 10 February 2009 (EST) Brandnew. 03:55, 10 February 2009 (EST)

I accept Biggles Strongfist ™ 04:00, 10 February 2009 (EST)

Support

1. I'm actually going to go ahead and support him. He keeps his cool and having an extra admin doesn't hurt. I'm not sure how he's going to do it, but I like the idea of him trying to make make PvX appeal to more people. --EVANERGELTONUS 18:33, 10 February 2009 (EST)
2. I've never seen him in an argument, and im sure he will help out with godly admin powers.-- 23:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)
3. I like him. I think he has been level-headed in the past and can continue to do so as an admin. He's been active enough lately and I think he actually wants good for this site and it's users. More importantly, I think he sees some of the big problems this site has had and wants to help fix that. I don't know how him being an admin would help change that, but I'm willing to find out. (→11:33, 11 February 2009 - )
4. Yes--Relyk 11:37, 11 February 2009 (EST)
5. Very tempted to make an Obama joke. Brandnew. 11:42, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   Already been done. Look under neutral. (→11:49, 11 February 2009 - )

   Doesn't make it any less tempting. Brandnew. 11:49, 11 February 2009 (EST)

6. What Brandnew said, before he said it, unless he edits his statement somehow ;o ---Chaos- 11:48, 11 February 2009 (EST)
7. Oppose = voting McCain. the bigmfingD would make a good respectable admin. Frosty po! 11:52, 11 February 2009 (EST)
8. Would make an epic admin. Always keeps his cool and isn't annoying. gogogogo -- wins. 21:12, 11 February 2009 (EST)
9. Seems like he would be dedicated after becoming admin PWNAGEMUFFIN crabs 08:21, 13 February 2009 (EST)
10. Impeccable logic. He's a dick, you're a dick, and we all know two dicks don't mesh well. Also calm head and active. Knows what he's doing when it comes to GW.-- Liger414 talk contributions 15:50, 16 February 2009 (EST)
11. Biggles is strong -- 15:54, 17 February 2009
12. Barack Obama won the presidency. Big is black, too. Therefore, Big should be an admin.   ツ cedave (☆contributions☆) 17:29, 17 February 2009 (EST)

Oppose

1. rfa'ing random people who never contribute to this wiki for the win right? --Anonimous. D: 15:30, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   <drama moved to talk>

2. Hrm, since my opinion is more important than any of you faggots it has been decided Big should not be admin, because, as has been discussed between Tab and I, our fears have been confirmed that Big is in fact a Suxon and does not aid the Kurzicks in any way :<. --Crowels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 17:51, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   Uh oh. Bandwagon time. (→17:56, 11 February 2009 - )

   LUXONS FTW. But I still think you're sensual, Crow. :< 18:10, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   He's actually a spy for us kurzicks, so don't make his undercover work difficult.PikaFanFile:Chrismaspika sig.jpg 18:12, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   ups. 18:14, 11 February 2009 (EST)

3. --GoldenStar 21:34, 11 February 2009 (EST)
4. In the pretty long while I've been on the wiki, I have seen basically nothing from Big, let alone anything that could qualify adminship. If I were to start saying I can change the wiki and calling people on PvXwiki good I wouldn't qualify for adminship either. I have nothing against you big. <3 Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 20:47, 12 February 2009 (EST)

   that's fine dude lol. I can't argue your opinion. Thanks for being honest. 21:50, 12 February 2009

Neutral

1. Hasn't shown many people handling skills and such, but first black admin would be awesome, the bigmfingD Frosty po! 04:35, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   There is precedence. Combo breaker imo. - (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   If he runs on a platform of hope and change with a strong egalitarian socio-democratic undertone, I think he'll win (all of which are awesome, btw). (→15:30, 10 February 2009 - )

2. Nothing special compared to any other user that makes him adminship worry. Isn't seen handling arguements or what not. -- Guild of Deals 15:20, 10 February 2009 (EST)
3. Neutral. The stereotypical neutrality.PikaFanFile:Chrismaspika sig.jpg 15:35, 10 February 2009 (EST)
4. I like him, but after I went through some of his older contribs I've been pretty convinced that he'd do a decent job. Pretty level headed (except with Pika, but who is with him/her) and seems like he could stay out of the wiki drama. EDIT: Need more time to decide. Thought you had a previous account that you had used longer, but it appears you've only been a user a little longer than I have. Just need time to think. (→15:16, 10 February 2009 - )

   :O I've been coming to this site for 1 1/2 years, didn't decide to make an actual account until about a year ago. 17:49, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   A year ago? I see June '08 as your oldest contrib unless I'm missing something. (→17:52, 10 February 2009 - )

   The site broke around then lol 17:53, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   Oh, yea. Good call. Can you link an early contrib of yours? (→17:53, 10 February 2009 - )

   Site broke around August/September tbh... Rickyvantof 18:01, 10 February 2009 (EST)

   I was a member when it broke, but I didn't know that we couldn't even access archives and stuff.....my bad. (→18:02, 10 February 2009 - )

5. Would like to see more activity and display of admin worthiness. Image:GodlyCompanion-cube.jpg 11:49, 11 February 2009 (EST)
6. Would Big becoming an admin help or hurt the Kurzicks? Tab 15:42, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   He's a spy for kurzicks.PikaFanFile:Chrismaspika sig.jpg 18:16, 11 February 2009 (EST)

   No, me and big talked over the Kurdick/Suxon debate extensively the other day, and I am convinced that he is a devoted Suxon. Tab 10:13, 12 February 2009 (EST)

   Then he has done his job. If too many people are convinced he is an undercover kurzick, then he isn't an undercover kurzick anymore.PikaFanFile:Chrismaspika sig.jpg 15:57, 17 February 2009 (EST)

7. He is pretty active his innacivity really seems to be a cause of his computer but I still dont know this user enough to discriminate for or against his adminship. --Anonimous. D: 06:36, 13 February 2009 (EST)