FANDOM


Chaos (talkcontribsRfA page)

I'm nominating myself as per [1]. With Frosty stepping down, we need another sysop or two, and I can't see anyone in for the job, with practically all of the old userbase being gone and only a handful of persons still knowing how the site works. I know that many people consider me a troll or overly talkative, but have a look at my contributions (which undeniably are user talk for the most).

Anyways, I leave the judging to you. Auron said he'll let the community decide on this one. --ςοάχ? -- 13:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: --ςοάχ? -- 13:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Shadow Form Slayer
  2. because if you vote no, it means you're homophobicUnreal sig 1Cute mc puppies 21:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. The reason is...Chaos takes the time to get to know a user. He dosen't jump on band wagons and stays very neutral. He dosen't side with guilds and if he dosen't know he will find out. He gives users a chance to prove themselves (even if they prove themselves autistic) and that is good sysop material. He has been around long enough to know how things work and dosen't let others dictate ones reputation. He is on all the time and for some strange reason he really cares about this wiki. I know he contributes a lot but I think a level of responsibility would make his edits better.---XTREME 01:37, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  4. He's quite funny and good spirited. I think he would make a healthy (and hilarious) admin. Docta Jenkins 20:41, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Despite being ridiculously active, he doesn't really do much. Andy 14:07, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Adding a random comment with no content at all after every comment somebody makes is totally what an admin is supposed to do. --Brandnew 15:23, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Oppose as per this. --Frosty Frostcharge 11:12, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  4. lol. --Crow 11:51, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  5. lol no -- Big McStrongfist 18:14, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  1. I don't see what he would do different if he were an admin Tyrael--(Talk) 10:44, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Chaos isnt detrimental to the wiki and i dont believe he trolls much if at all, however i simply dont see him active enough in the build space to feel comfortable with supporting, so i'm neutral unless i see a change in either direction.--Steamy..x 13:57, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Andy's vote. I appreciate Chaos' hilarious antics and occasional trolling, but I have a hard time seeing any of his qualities transferring well into the sysop position. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 14:20, 8 June 2010
  3. Is the site honestly that dead? Misery 15:28, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  4. His comments generally dont reflect builds, his language is a bit on the offensive side, he will never censor himself and got recently banned but nonetheless he is an awesome guy who i think can become admin if he 1. Posts more on builds (with relevance) this wiki is about builds after all 2. fix his language--GWPirate 15:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  5. KJ's vote. ToraenTheJanitorToraenSig2 10:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  6. Athrun Feya 18:06, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Novii 18:13, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.