PvXwiki
Register
Advertisement

Chaos (talkcontribsRfA page)

I'm nominating myself as per [1]. With Frosty stepping down, we need another sysop or two, and I can't see anyone in for the job, with practically all of the old userbase being gone and only a handful of persons still knowing how the site works. I know that many people consider me a troll or overly talkative, but have a look at my contributions (which undeniably are user talk for the most).

Anyways, I leave the judging to you. Auron said he'll let the community decide on this one. --ςοάχ? -- 13:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: --ςοάχ? -- 13:54, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

Support

  1. Shadow Form Slayer
  2. because if you vote no, it means you're homophobicUnreal sig 1Cute mc puppies 21:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. The reason is...Chaos takes the time to get to know a user. He dosen't jump on band wagons and stays very neutral. He dosen't side with guilds and if he dosen't know he will find out. He gives users a chance to prove themselves (even if they prove themselves autistic) and that is good sysop material. He has been around long enough to know how things work and dosen't let others dictate ones reputation. He is on all the time and for some strange reason he really cares about this wiki. I know he contributes a lot but I think a level of responsibility would make his edits better.---XTREME 01:37, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  4. He's quite funny and good spirited. I think he would make a healthy (and hilarious) admin. Docta Jenkins 20:41, June 10, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Dandy is just dandy--TahiriVeila 02:27, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Son, don't disappoint me. See reason 3. Novii 10:32, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Neutral reason went into support --GWPirate 17:55, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
  8. He's helpful and doesn't lack humour like most ppl on PvX do Tyrael Strikes Back- 15:23, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  9. I'm game, Chaos has matured on the site, and is a helpful individual. Wouldn't mind seeing him as an admin. —Forget Bible 18:34, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  10. I can see him growing up more fore Admin, an old member still. Not a lot better for the job really. Vincent Evan [Air Henchman] Vincels 03:33, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. Despite being ridiculously active, he doesn't really do much. Andy 14:07, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Adding a random comment with no content at all after every comment somebody makes is totally what an admin is supposed to do. --Brandnew 15:23, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Oppose as per this. Ok updating the vote because some people are really dumb, if you fall for this all be it good attempt at being nice and such, then you should consider yourself retarded. --Frosty Frostcharge 11:12, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  4. lol. --Crow 11:51, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  5. lol no -- Big McStrongfist 18:14, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Per Andy and Brandnew. ~ PheNaxKian talk 13:59, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Pseudo-trolling [2] is good when you have an open RFA Dandy. Lau 86.30.179.100

Neutral

  1. Chaos isnt detrimental to the wiki and i dont believe he trolls much if at all, however i simply dont see him active enough in the build space to feel comfortable with supporting, so i'm neutral unless i see a change in either direction. Update: I dont think he'd make a very good admin, but i dont think anybody else would either.----Steamy..x 19:04, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  2. Andy's vote. I appreciate Chaos' hilarious antics and occasional trolling, but I have a hard time seeing any of his qualities transferring well into the sysop position. Karate KJ for sig Jesus 14:20, 8 June 2010
  3. Is the site honestly that dead? Misery 15:28, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  4. His comments generally dont reflect builds, his language is a bit on the offensive side, he will never censor himself and got recently banned but nonetheless he is an awesome guy who i think can become admin if he 1. Posts more on builds (with relevance) this wiki is about builds after all 2. fix his language--GWPirate 15:40, June 8, 2010 (UTC)
  5. KJ's vote. ToraenTheJanitorToraenSig2 10:53, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
  6. Athrun Feya 18:06, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  7. Novii 18:13, June 9, 2010 (UTC)
  8. While he's knowledgeable and all that, he's not very good at conflict resolution, so it's 50-50 for me--Relyk talk 23:42, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
  9. --Short 13:58, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
  10. I kinda want to vote yes but not yet sure. :O He's a funny and generally nice individual who doesn't jump on hate wagons, this coupled with his ability to keep cool no matter what drama he has to deal with can make him a very fine admin. He tried to act adminly today and did a good job imo, it reflected the nature of this site and community really well. If he can keep it up this way I might as well vote yes. :3 --Iggy 's other account 19:30, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
Advertisement