Skakid9090 (talk • contribs)
This user has been on the wiki a while and is well known. He is almost always at every build to give advice and support. He has also submitted some great builds himself. Warrior Zez 23:56, 27 July 2007 (CEST)
- let the flame war begin, I accept - — RAWR!
Skakid9090 00:00, 28 July 2007 (CEST)
Support
- Active on the wiki, been waiting for him to show up for nomination. ~~
frvwfr2 (talk · contributions) 00:15, 28 July 2007 (CEST) - Skakid's not an admin? This needs fixed. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 00:18, 28 July 2007 (CEST)
- Knows what he's talking about, knows the game, knows the wiki, and is active on it. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ〚₮/ḉ〛 00:19, 28 July 2007 (CEST)
- Readem (talk*pvxcontribs)
- Skakid=win, and makes me feel all fuzzy on the inside.
Punjab 07:36, 28 July 2007 (CEST) - Teh Uber Pwnzer
- Yeh. — Rapta
(talk|contribs) 20:59, 28 July 2007 (CEST) - Victoryisyours 22:44, 30 July 2007 (CEST)
- Misfate 22:45, 30 July 2007 (CEST)
- Of course. Belgianbronco
- /agree --Lost 02:04, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
- Avatar of Admin [---------- ] -Kaelor 04:44, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
- Wyvern 04:48, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
- It's my belief that the policy and administrative work on this wiki needs to be stepped up. Proposals are going nowhere, objectives are not being met, tasklists are being abandoned; the Community Portal and the Improvement Drive are largely ignored. When you look at our admin team, nearly half are inactive. It is no wonder that so little is getting done! With Rapta's decline on his RfA, my remaining preferences to replenish the admin pool are frvwfr2, Skakid9090 and Edru viransu. Note that this statement in no way reflects collective admin opinion, and neither should it be interpreted as foreshadowing the outcome of any of these users' RfAs. - Krowman {{sysop}} 08:41, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
- Right...about the foreshadowing...not at all. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:45, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
- Note: im going to vote for all 3 posted in Krowmans statement - seriously i thought they already were in some sort of admin position. They do the job here better than most and are extremely active and seem very level headed--Midnight08 05:53, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
- I herd he lieks mudkipz and I luv mudkipz. Also, Roosters. Asdfg 00:29, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
- Full Support. Before that RA Bonder article I doubted you, but since then I've taken a different opinion of you. Best of luck! ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ (talk)·(contributions) 00:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
- — Luobailong ···talk ···builds 00:34, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
- So you're NOT admin? I always thought you were... Must change this!'''Lacrymosa'''
- How the heck is Skakid not an Admin? That's messed up. LavaEdge324 20:30, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
- A vote almost seems unnecesary here Bob fregman 02:11, 10 August 2007 (CEST)
- Si! Shido 03:58, 10 August 2007 (CEST)
- Tycn 16:40, 11 August 2007 (CEST)
- He contributes A LOT. Swift Thief 03:32, 15 August 2007 (CEST)
- Adminify him ~ ZamaneeJinn(contribs) 23:51, 15 August 2007 (CEST)
- This one knows what he is doing, my idol :D Fish 21:27, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
Oppose
- only experience with him, was a case he didn't bother to read what he voted on. much less try it. if you are going to vote based on your opinion, rather than your experience, its probably a bad thing. also noticed he has ops remove votes in his builds that dont favor his buildsPalewook 13:28, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
- Comments I have seen made by this user have been abrupt or unconstructive sometimes swearing. (eg: "No" "err.. F*ck yes") He should learn explain his decision making better and in a nicer manner. Joseph 15:35, 10 August 2007 (CEST)
Neutral
- im neutral because i rock. --Chris 21:41, 11 August 2007 (CEST)