- The following discussion is an archived debate of the nomination of a user for adminship. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Unexist (talk • contribs)[]
Request for adminship closed by Defiant Elements on 14:58, 23 June 2008 (EDT). Nomination failed.
Cuz I'm gud. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 16:19, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: Ups. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 16:20, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
Support[]
- Active, most active BM atm... I think he would make a good admin, nice and friendly. ~~ Frvwfr2 talk contribs admin 18:44, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- He wouldn't be bad. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 07:03, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- Smarter than the average Chimpanzee--X14 09:50, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- <3 carebear. --71.229 07:48, 17 May 2008 (EDT)
- Deserves to be an admin. ¬ Klumpeet 02:47, 18 May 2008 (EDT)
Oppose[]
- We fight to much, do i can't really see you as admin, although it can be anger sex we are doing. Fishels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 17:24, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- just be happy with ur BMship..dont see u as a Admin either --InfestedHydralisk (Talk*Contributions) 18:34, 15 May 2008 (EDT) much luv 2 u
- Don't see you as being an admin, and we don't need another one. Neutral has a chance for you to get admin. sorry luvly Hide-And-Seek 18:40, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- --- Ressmonkey (talk) 19:05, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- Good at the game =/= adminworthy. Godbox 10:05, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- (your vote here)
Neutral[]
- I <3 you Unexistypoo, but I don't really think you'd suit being an admin.--Tab Moo 16:36, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- I agree with Tab and Frv. Not that you'd make a bad admin, but there's no real need for another one. Not yet, at least. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹ 18:36, 15 May 2008 (EDT)
- There was a precedent established with one of the other RfA's that number of admins would not impact votes. If an admin were to leave, Unexist would become the next one, I believe, was how it worked. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 07:02, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- See Auron's comments on the talk page. The way RfAs are supposed to work is that they maintain a dynamic list of suitable candidates so that when there is a need for more Admins a name can be chosen from that list. What that means is that the need for new Admins is entirely irrelevant and votes should pertain to the suitability of the candidate. *Defiant Elements* +talk 09:41, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- There was a precedent established with one of the other RfA's that number of admins would not impact votes. If an admin were to leave, Unexist would become the next one, I believe, was how it worked. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş 07:02, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- Dunno.Frans 10:12, 16 May 2008 (EDT)
- Already own enough as BM, Armageddon would be upon us if you became admin >_< . Not to say you would be a bad one though.--RELYK ʞlɐʇ ʎɯ 02:35, 5 June 2008 (EDT)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.