PvXwiki
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 34: Line 34:
 
# Define yourself a bit more around the wiki and we'll talk. - [[Image:Kowal.jpg|15px]] '''[[User:Krowman|<font face="dauphin" color="maroon">Krowman</font>]] <small><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[PvXwiki:Administrators|sysop]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></small>''' 10:30, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
 
# Define yourself a bit more around the wiki and we'll talk. - [[Image:Kowal.jpg|15px]] '''[[User:Krowman|<font face="dauphin" color="maroon">Krowman</font>]] <small><nowiki>{{</nowiki>[[PvXwiki:Administrators|sysop]]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></small>''' 10:30, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
 
#I'll support this nomination if and when another general maintenance Admin is necessary. Until then however, Frvwfr2 has yet to do anything to distinguish himself in such a manner so as to warrant immediate promotion. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|<font color=black>'''*Defiant Elements*'''</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=darkred><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 16:56, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
 
#I'll support this nomination if and when another general maintenance Admin is necessary. Until then however, Frvwfr2 has yet to do anything to distinguish himself in such a manner so as to warrant immediate promotion. [[Image:DE Sig Test 2.jpg|50x19px]] [[user:Defiant Elements|<font color=black>'''*Defiant Elements*'''</font>]] [[user talk:Defiant Elements|<font color=darkred><small>''+talk''</small></font>]] 16:56, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  +
#What Defiant said. You've done quite a bit around the wiki, but I don't think you've done quite enough to become an admin. [[Image:Frenzy.jpg|50x19px]][[User:Punjab Prince|<font color="Brown">'''Punjab'''</font>]] 07:59, 30 July 2007 (CEST)
# (your vote here)
 

Revision as of 05:59, 30 July 2007

frvwfr2 (talkcontribs)

Always been a good member of the community, I'm sure this user could be a good admin. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)(contributions) 01:03, 17 June 2007 (EDT)

I accept the nomination User:Frvwfr2 frvwfr2 (talk · contributions)

Support

  1. Yeah, he'd be an excellent admin. He knows the game, is a kind fellow, and very active. I don't see why not. --Mgrinshpon (C/T) 04:02, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. Definatly a good candidate. Couldnt in good mind say a bad word bout this user.--Advent Mongoose Hex Breaker (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. Looks like a fine admin to me. ^ Pretty much what those two said. Been around here for quite a while too, I was personally surprised he wasn't already an admin :P -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 08:05, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
  4. I can see him being an admin, yeh. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 16:30, 18 June 2007 (EDT)
  5. Rather helpful and contribuous in good ways to the wiki. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 17:12, 20 June 2007 (EDT)
  6. Conditional Support. The nominee has demonstrated considerable knowledge of the way a Wiki works, and has participated in the development of this Wiki's policy, as well as making constructive edits. Would make an excellent admin if he is able to show extensive knowledge of builds, the metagame, as well as game mechanics.Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 17:23, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
    Full support. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 21:05, 20 July 2007 (CEST)
  7. -Auron 15:44, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  8. -Misfate Rune Elementalist Sup 21:30, 20 July 2007 (CEST)
  9. -Rawrawr Dinosaur 21:31, 20 July 2007 (CEST)
  10. -Bluemilkman 21:34, 20 July 2007 (CEST)
  11. Would probably be a good admin. Bob fregman 03:36, 25 July 2007 (CEST)
  12. would make a good admin, imo, very coolheaded and clearly has in-game knowledge. - — RAWR! Skasig Skakid9090 00:05, 28 July 2007 (CEST)
  13. Would be a good admin, in my opinion, as well. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 00:17, 28 July 2007 (CEST)
  14. (your vote here)

Oppose

  1. I dont think he has what it takes to be a PvX admin. He left for 3 months, if you check his history and that can't happen as an admin. Ni sigNi 19:15, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. I don't see why he has to be an admin, Ni said the rest. 86.83.15.245 01:43, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. (your vote here)

Neutral

  1. He has yet to express wanting to be an admin... other than letting people vote for him. --Sneakysmith12 06:38, 19 June 2007 (EDT)
  2. Define yourself a bit more around the wiki and we'll talk. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 10:30, 24 June 2007 (EDT)
  3. I'll support this nomination if and when another general maintenance Admin is necessary. Until then however, Frvwfr2 has yet to do anything to distinguish himself in such a manner so as to warrant immediate promotion. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 16:56, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
  4. What Defiant said. You've done quite a bit around the wiki, but I don't think you've done quite enough to become an admin. FrenzyPunjab 07:59, 30 July 2007 (CEST)