PvXwiki
Line 36: Line 36:
 
:::Let's ban Tai for no good reason :D - [[Image:Miserysig.PNG|117px]] [[User talk:Misery|<small><font color="black">(talk)</font></small>]] 19:42, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 
:::Let's ban Tai for no good reason :D - [[Image:Miserysig.PNG|117px]] [[User talk:Misery|<small><font color="black">(talk)</font></small>]] 19:42, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 
::::Misery is best admin on site, no need for evaluation--[[User:Relyk|Relyk]] 19:45, 3 February 2009 (EST)
 
::::Misery is best admin on site, no need for evaluation--[[User:Relyk|Relyk]] 19:45, 3 February 2009 (EST)
  +
:::::That's very kind of you, Relyk. --[[User:71.229|71.229]] 19:48, 3 February 2009 (EST)

Revision as of 00:48, 4 February 2009

Archives
Archive 1 ~ April 2007 - April 2008

why isnt tab on here or the build masters page? IAmJebus sig2*Jebus* Is I Enter my contest! 22:31, 30 July 2008 (EDT)

Here. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 04:47, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

shouldn't phenax

be restored? or do we have to go through process again? CABOSE(LVPoW)"Hey chicka bum bum!" 16:08, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

It's on AN, wait for an admin to come online and take care of it. --GoD Hammer and Sickle Guild of Deals 16:11, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
Bureaucrat. ~~     Frvwfr2     talk    contribs    admin   19:56, 11 September 2008 (EDT)

Mmm

Scottie, Eronth, and Edru don't talk much anymore, Rapta beens more active lately--ShadowRelyk Sig 00:26, 11 November 2008 (EST)

Lies! — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 00:28, 11 November 2008 (EST)

prefer it as

table, looked better. FrostrageFrosty po! 08:54, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Agreed. - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 09:09, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Ok, I removed the colspan thing. It should be perfect by now :< ĐONT*SYSOP 09:21, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Looks good, but I confess I only half remember what you changed ;o - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 09:26, 7 January 2009 (EST)
See PvX:BM for comparison. ĐONT*SYSOP 09:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)
That's broken, did you break that? :> - Misery Is Friendly Misery Dog obaby 09:32, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Indeed. Because it also uses {{Sysop entry}}. Meh. Whatever, I will just update that one too. ĐONT*SYSOP 09:34, 7 January 2009 (EST)

Evaluation

Isn't it time we evaluate the current admins or something? Half of the admins on the "active" list are inactive and several of the others don't contribute in any credible way. If they really are supposed to be "voted on" by us, then it's time some of us newer guys got a say. Unless we plan on treating them like the freaking pope and they're just allowed to do w/e the hell they want til they die or retire.

I know that I'm the last person that should be suggesting this, but it needs to happen if we plan on ever improving the quality of this site. Or if no one cares, then fuck the rules and let them do w/e until GW and along with it, this site are dead. Karate Jesus (im on my cell and it doesnt have tildes). The preceding unsigned comment was added by Karate Jesus (talk • contribs) .

Admins make PvX boring >.> --Tai Sig 19:20, 3 February 2009
How do additional inactive admins detract fromt he site at all? There is no cap on the number of admins. If you know someone worthy of becoming an admin, RfA them. - Miserysig (talk) 19:39, 3 February 2009 (EST)
let's RfA the next anon to vandalize a page --Tai Sig 19:40, 3 February 2009
Let's ban Tai for no good reason :D - Miserysig (talk) 19:42, 3 February 2009 (EST)
Misery is best admin on site, no need for evaluation--Relyk 19:45, 3 February 2009 (EST)
That's very kind of you, Relyk. --71.229 19:48, 3 February 2009 (EST)