mNo edit summary |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
::gwpvx will have a much higher quality of contributors, therefore I think it's safe saying that is will be the better site. [[User:Frosty|<font color="Black"><b>Frostels</b></font>]] 00:18, November 29, 2010 (UTC) |
::gwpvx will have a much higher quality of contributors, therefore I think it's safe saying that is will be the better site. [[User:Frosty|<font color="Black"><b>Frostels</b></font>]] 00:18, November 29, 2010 (UTC) |
||
:::I'm currently working to recruit new, active users to this site, however, using various forums to attempt to reach Guild Wars players. I'm sure we can make PvX@wikia flourish rather well if we can regain an active userbase. -- [[User:Daññy|Danny]] [http://gwpvx.com Goes Rogue] 01:02, November 29, 2010 (UTC) |
:::I'm currently working to recruit new, active users to this site, however, using various forums to attempt to reach Guild Wars players. I'm sure we can make PvX@wikia flourish rather well if we can regain an active userbase. -- [[User:Daññy|Danny]] [http://gwpvx.com Goes Rogue] 01:02, November 29, 2010 (UTC) |
||
| + | ::::PvX@wikia is an established wiki, so most people will still visit and use it. It is likely a few people will notice builds are out of date and update it themselves. This will take awhile and these will likely be users new to the game. In terms of quality, the sister wiki will be better until this userbase establishes new quality users.--[[User:Relyk|<font color="darkblue">'''Relyk'''</font>]] [[User talk:Relyk|<font color="blue"><sub>talk</sub></font>]] 03:05, November 29, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 03:05, 29 November 2010
Archives
--Post Fork--
Post fork
PvX has now forked (with the Sister site being at www.gwpvx.com. It's up to users which site they use. The sister site is identical up to the 4th of October, afterwards the 2 wiki's will differ. ~ PheNaxKian talk 23:19, November 22, 2010 (UTC)
- Which site is better?86.147.227.222 00:15, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
- gwpvx will have a much higher quality of contributors, therefore I think it's safe saying that is will be the better site. Frostels 00:18, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm currently working to recruit new, active users to this site, however, using various forums to attempt to reach Guild Wars players. I'm sure we can make PvX@wikia flourish rather well if we can regain an active userbase. -- Danny Goes Rogue 01:02, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
- PvX@wikia is an established wiki, so most people will still visit and use it. It is likely a few people will notice builds are out of date and update it themselves. This will take awhile and these will likely be users new to the game. In terms of quality, the sister wiki will be better until this userbase establishes new quality users.--Relyk talk 03:05, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm currently working to recruit new, active users to this site, however, using various forums to attempt to reach Guild Wars players. I'm sure we can make PvX@wikia flourish rather well if we can regain an active userbase. -- Danny Goes Rogue 01:02, November 29, 2010 (UTC)
- gwpvx will have a much higher quality of contributors, therefore I think it's safe saying that is will be the better site. Frostels 00:18, November 29, 2010 (UTC)