Platform for improvement. Frosty po! 21:28, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- lol i think you covered most of it -- 21:28, 23 February 2009
- my thoughts is that the template is unneeded (personally I find it ugly but that's just me =p), you could just add a category instead. If this policy is approved, i'd suggest just adding it to PvX:RV instead of keeping it as it's own policy. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 21:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'd like to keep it here during discussion, it can be moved later. Personally, we need something to show whether shit is meta or some fags theorycraft. Either an addition to build tags or a new tag is my preference over just a category. No one looks at cats anyway. - Misery Says Moo 21:34, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- my thoughts is that the template is unneeded (personally I find it ugly but that's just me =p), you could just add a category instead. If this policy is approved, i'd suggest just adding it to PvX:RV instead of keeping it as it's own policy. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 21:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
I did suggest somewhere to update the Build templates so you could have this build is part of the meta yadayadyada Frosty po! 21:36, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- Frosty has all the answers >: -- 21:38, 23 February 2009
- well it would be possiable to update the build tags with a PvP/PvE meta tag (basically the same as we have it say PvP HB or something), if that's what you want. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 21:41, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
By adding say |Meta| to the list, it will add a note saying it is in the meta game (then link to the meta category/guide), but I am not the wikilingo guy so I have no idea whether its possible and what not. Frosty po! 21:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sure it's doable. You'd be best asking one of our More code knowledgeable admins. ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 21:58, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- It can be done very easily if
|meta=yes|
is used.|meta|
would be better of course, I need more time to review the template in order to make it work, though. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 22:16, 23 February 2009 (UTC)- I vote make the process to add it to meta long and arduous, so random anons can't add their bad theorycrafts to it =/ -- 22:21, 23 February 2009
- It can be done very easily if