/Archive 1

Changes from V1.0

The "meta" category will only be for HA and GvG builds. I believe that was the main issue. (other changes still apply (see Archive for the changes from current system). ~ PheNaxKian talk 14:47, May 24, 2010 (UTC)

i haven't read over it thoroughly, so correct me if im wrong, but can we add a section that says that people should discuss it on the talk page and give 24/48 hours before tagging it or something. i feel like otherwise people will just willy nilly throw the tag on too many things. Gringo 15:01, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
Yea I think it should be more of a proposal to tag something as meta instead of people just tagging and then discussing. That way we can make sure builds aren't tagged without initial discussion. --Frosty Frostcharge 15:07, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
well considering there should be discussion during the trial phase (lol, thinking people using trial phase) and it goes Trial --> Meta I didn't see any point in that, but I'm not objected to adding it in. ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:12, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
Yea I understand what your saying, but with the way it's worded people can just meta tag it and then we have to discuss whether it isn't meta. I would rather it be the other way round to stop the chance of that drama happening. --Frosty Frostcharge 15:14, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
better? ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:19, May 24, 2010 (UTC)
Yea that's a better note. --Frosty Frostcharge 15:21, May 24, 2010 (UTC)


everything's in place for this to be implemented, so does anyone have any final comments/suggestions? ~ PheNaxKian talk 17:42, June 21, 2010 (UTC)

Looks good to me, let's get it rolling--TahiriVeila 17:46, June 21, 2010 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.