Skakid9090 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:KMD are a very good guild. — '''[[User:Skakid9090|<font color="#CC0099">Skakid</font>]]''' <small>Rally- kupo!</small>[[Image:S9M.png]] 18:18, 26 January 2009 (EST) |
:KMD are a very good guild. — '''[[User:Skakid9090|<font color="#CC0099">Skakid</font>]]''' <small>Rally- kupo!</small>[[Image:S9M.png]] 18:18, 26 January 2009 (EST) |
||
+ | ::Still they loose to rawr each match. '''[[User:Fish|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color: blue">Fishels</span>]]'''[슴Mc슴]'''[[User talk:Fish|<span style="font-variant: small-caps; color: red">Mootles</span>]]''' 06:59, 27 January 2009 (EST) |
Revision as of 11:59, 27 January 2009
looking at his contributions, he's made about...20 edits (including his userpage), since late August, I wouldn't call that active. Plus there aren't loads of build/build talk edits (looking at his most recent 500 edits). I'd prefer a BM that edits builds and gets involved in build discussion, rather than voting a lot (as was mentioned in his last RfBM). ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 13:49, 26 January 2009 (EST)
I know everything about KMD's build and why they run it, how come?, oh, i copy belzor talking on msn!!!!. Fishels[슴Mc슴]Mootles 13:56, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- KMD are a very good guild. Tab 14:12, 26 January 2009 (EST)
- Allow me to expand somewhat. I'm not necessarily saying your not capable of being a BM, but a BM needs to be quite active, especially in the build and build talk area, which IMO you're severely lacking... ~ PheNaxKian Sysop 14:19, 26 January 2009 (EST)