PvXwiki talk:Requests for Build Master Status/TahiriVeila

TAHIRI VEILA IS BEST GWSER IN GAME AND ANYONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE IT IS A /CRYFAG. ···  17:12, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Can't argue that--X 22:40, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

bumppppppppp--TahiriVeila 01:58, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Most people are waiting for the your first few weeks-months of good contribs to wear off. Then when you start becoming a flaming faggot, you will most likely be promoted to BM status. Drahgal Meir 04:00, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

So very cynic, and likely true too. ---Chaos- 11:08, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

already have all the bms we need tbh--Relyk 11:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

We have 1, for PvE only... Wut? ---Chaos- 11:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

And I don't even do anything... AthrunFeya 16:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Athrun only gives a damn about SC builds because the rest of PvE is a complete fucking joke anyway. <3 ···  16:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I am not going to support someone becoming a BM whom I feel will pull a goldenstar/saint on us. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 11:33, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ups please look at some of my contribs. On several different occasions I've posted long-winded and in-dpeth analyses of the problems with builds that have potential. The only time i just trash something outright is when it's something that looks completely hopeless and would never see any play. Also, on the GM illusionist, i gave it a "good" rating, despite the fact that it only ever sees byob play. B/c it does see some kind of play it should def. have place on wiki imho.--TahiriVeila 12:07, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

When I say you will pull a goldenstar/saint, it means I don't think you will be dedicated enough to stay a long time on the wiki, and I attribute that to the fact that you miss out obvious stuff. I didn't say that you were wrong to give a good rating; rather, I noted the fact that you changed out a vital skill in the chain without considering the context as to why the skill would be run. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 13:36, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

PIKA DRAMA

At this point, Tahiri doesn't pay enough attention to builds to actually contribute to them from the perspective as a BM. I don't really care if Tahiri's a good player, if Tahiri isn't going to put in effort to not tl;dr while commenting on builds, I don't think it's right to have such a person in a position that requires more than just superficial judgement. @Tahiri It's not just once that something like this happened, both incidents on the Potspiker and the GM Illusion Mesmer pages just tells me you aren't taking it seriously, or your performance is erratic at most, and even if elected, you will probably pull a Goldenstar/Saint on PvX.uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 06:53, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

lol'd. also, you're telling me that if, now this is a bit of a hyperbole, but if Ensign decided he wanted to be a Build Master for this shit hole, you wouldn't just hand it right the fuck over to him? No one should have to take the time to explain why something is terrible. Most of our BMs sure as fuck never have. It's not their fault that someone is an abs shitter. They're just there to tell them that the build is bad and move on. ···  16:27, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Funny, but because you are under the delusion that I was ranting about Tahiri not giving a good reasoning for everything when I am actually concerned about whether Tahiri is going to pull a disappearing act like Goldenstar and Saint considering the lack of enthusiasm to actually pay attention to builds. If you actually bothered to tl;dr and /fanboi less, you would have figured out that much. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 16:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

His point is Pika that you are basing it off of what someone else did. Not really Fair to the RBM--X 16:46, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

It might not be fair, but it is relevant. Regardless, though, does it really matter if he only stays around for a month? I mean, I'm honestly not sure why anyone would actually attempt to contribute in a positive manner here, but if Tahiri wants to, I say fuck it - let him at it. ···  16:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I rather have no BMs than a short-lived happiness. Frosty understands the game well enough to easily take off votes that are dumb, I don't see a need to elect a new BM everytime someone that supposedly is decent decides to, on a whim, "contibute in a positive manner", unless it's a long term commitment. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 17:11, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

It's because you're a communist asian. :< ···  17:17, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Tahiri could try and convince me that it is at least a mid-term commitment. Looking at our recent elected BMs just make me sweatdrop at how fast they decide to "quit pvx". uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 17:19, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Ohai, i'll be around for a while--TahiriVeila 17:21, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

That's really convincing. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 17:22, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

danny shut up and stop being a drama queen--Relyk 17:23, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

nou. At the very least, he is capable of coming up with genuine reasoning to persuade me, unlike a certain someone who disagrees for the sake of disagreeing. A whoru asking another person whoru is ironic and hilarious. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 17:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

(Reset indent) Pika, can I ask: Is your vote based on the fact you genuinely feel that Tahiri will stop contributing after a short period, or that you feel given the incidents with saint/GS that it could happen? ~ PheNaxKian talk 17:30, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think he's taking it(improving buildpages) seriously, in the sense that he sometimes does and sometimes doesn't. There is always the risk that any BM or admin we elect ragequits soon after, and should not be used as an excuse to say "Oh, he might ragequit so I will disagree even though he's shown me otherwise", but we as the people who vote should ensure that, at least at the point of election, the nominee will be able to fulfill the standards of being whichever role they are aiming for.

He has shown me the "otherwise" I mentioned earlier, hence I will oppose this. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 17:43, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Reasoning works for me. I'd like to be able to tell him that I'll do fine, but i'm not sure I could convince him. I respect your decision and it really doesn't bother me b/c you've come to a perfectly logical conclusion =\--TahiriVeila 17:47, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Except he's still a communist asian. <3pika ···  17:54, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

I would reconsider 1/2 a month later, but for now, it's a no. uɐɟɐʞıd o^_^o¸«` 18:51, 21 August 2009 (UTC)