Talk: Requests for adminship/Daññy/Archive 3

Revision as of 17:22, 1 April 2010

PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Daññy/Archive 3/Archive 1
PvXwiki:Requests for adminship/Daññy/Archive 3/Archive 2

2 archives :<--Relyk _talk 07:25, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Danny has a lot to say---XTREME 10:00, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

KJ's Vote

"Danny has an advanced understanding of code in general, not just wiki code. I think this could benefit the wiki in the future, especially if we ever decide to improve upon the foundation of the site or if we decide to do a PvX2 for GW2."

I don't have any major issues, I just wanted to make a small comment on the bit i've bolded. If we do a PvX2 then it'd be a fresh start (similar to GWW and GW2W), so that shouldn't have any impact on whether he should be an admin here or not =p. ~ PheNaxKian talk 15:26, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

An admin is always a good person to be founding a PvX2? --Chaos? -- 15:36, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

My point wasn't that that statement should influence others' decisions; however, it does influence mine. Also, having an advanced understanding of code and script can help PvX now as well. Karate

Jesus 15:39, 1 April 2010

Hence why I said, "especially if we ever decide to improve upon the foundation of the site" Karate

Jesus 15:58, 1 April 2010

Amorality's vote

Is there anything to do besides troll around here half the time?
I'm pretty terrible at PvP besides running the strongest flagger builds ever. (In all fairness, though, everyone who's active on PvX is pretty terrible at PvP, too. Even that cutie from Social Darwinism.)
I am very, very inconsistent and my most beneficial actions on this wiki usually happen over MSN or when I get suckered into writing scripts for the site.

··· Danny So Cute 16:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

That's not the attitude that I'd like to see from a potential admin, that's not to say you can't have fun but keep it acceptable like Frosty does.
I think there's a bit of modesty here, from what I've seen you have exemplary pvp knowledge and are able to contribute to builds confidently unlike some of the janitorial admins we have here.
Then it's up to you whether you truely want to be an admin. Amorality 17:21, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 <span style="cursor:help;font:8pt 'Verdana';font-weight:100;">'''···'''&nbsp;''[[User_talk:Daññy|<span style="font-weight:100;"><span style="color: #68838B;">Danny&nbsp;</span><span style="color: #355058;">So</span>&nbsp;<span style="color: #021725;">Cute</span></span>]]''</span>&nbsp;[[User:Daññy|<span style="color:#666666;font:100 8pt 'times new roman';">16:52,&nbsp;1&nbsp;April&nbsp;2010&nbsp;(UTC)</span>]]
 :# That's not the attitude that I'd like to see from a potential admin, that's not to say you can't have fun but keep it acceptable like Frosty does.
-:#I think there's a bit of modesty here, from what I've seen you have exemplary pvp knowledge and are able to contribute to builds unlike some of the janitorial admins we have here.
+:#I think there's a bit of modesty here, from what I've seen you have exemplary pvp knowledge and are able to contribute to builds confidently unlike some of the janitorial admins we have here.
 :#Then it's up to you whether you truely want to be an admin. [[User:Amorality|Amorality]] 17:21, April 1, 2010 (UTC)