FANDOM


m
Line 6: Line 6:
   
 
There are still builds voted as good or great that have slipped out of the meta although not nerfed. Also, some builds that have been archived were never a part of the meta. '''[[User:Mgrinshpon|<font color="purple">—ǥrɩɳsɧƴ</font>]][[User talk:Mgrinshpon|<font color="deeppink">ɖɩđđɭɘş</font>]]''' [[Image:Grinshpon blinky cake.gif|19px]] 15:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 
There are still builds voted as good or great that have slipped out of the meta although not nerfed. Also, some builds that have been archived were never a part of the meta. '''[[User:Mgrinshpon|<font color="purple">—ǥrɩɳsɧƴ</font>]][[User talk:Mgrinshpon|<font color="deeppink">ɖɩđđɭɘş</font>]]''' [[Image:Grinshpon blinky cake.gif|19px]] 15:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
  +
:Yeah, I've already brought up that we should only archive builds that are used in meta. But builds that are out of meta because of a nerf should be archived, while builds that slip out of meta without a nerf just get the meta tag removed. We don't need a tag that said it was once meta, it seems kind of pointless. [[User:Rickyvantof|Rickyvantof]] 15:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:15, February 24, 2009

onoes... ---Chaos- 14:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

lol, good luck. although isn't this kind of what archival is for? --Tai Sig 14:41, 24 February 2009
My thoughts exactly. ĐONT*SYSOP 14:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Err, we don't need this. Rickyvantof 14:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

There are still builds voted as good or great that have slipped out of the meta although not nerfed. Also, some builds that have been archived were never a part of the meta. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 15:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I've already brought up that we should only archive builds that are used in meta. But builds that are out of meta because of a nerf should be archived, while builds that slip out of meta without a nerf just get the meta tag removed. We don't need a tag that said it was once meta, it seems kind of pointless. Rickyvantof 15:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.