onoes... ---Chaos- 14:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

lol, good luck. although isn't this kind of what archival is for? --Tai Sig 14:41, 24 February 2009
My thoughts exactly. ĐONT*SYSOP 14:44, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Err, we don't need this. Rickyvantof 14:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

There are still builds voted as good or great that have slipped out of the meta although not nerfed. Also, some builds that have been archived were never a part of the meta. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 15:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I've already brought up that we should only archive builds that are used in meta. But builds that are out of meta because of a nerf should be archived, while builds that slip out of meta without a nerf just get the meta tag removed. We don't need a tag that said it was once meta, it seems kind of pointless. Rickyvantof 15:15, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Oh, I got a good idea! Let's put this massive tag on each previous meta build that includes the whole biography of each person in some way related to the making of the build, in addition to a listing of persons that should be thanked.. Maybe you can pick those facts of obs? On the subject, none is interested in the fact that a build used to be meta, few go through archived builds.. and you're not going to find anyone to do the job for you. ---Chaos- 15:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Takes too much of my precious time to look it all up. Also, it's not always updates that shift meta. Brandnew. 15:41, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

looks too much like the meta tag. ---Chaos- 09:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
We should get iQ's or evil's cape as the pic for this one tbh -Auron 09:19, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.