FANDOM


Nice temp. Maybe that pile of shit is a bit tóó much though. Dragnmn talk cont 12:00, 28 December 2007 (EST)

It's clearly a stuffed animal that's a piece of shit. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴƿıęGrinshpon animooted pie 13:09, 28 December 2007 (EST)

A notes section why the build is well'd would be good User Ckow SigcKowDont 07:06, 31 December 2007 (EST)

Added "Reason:". feel free to revert if not needed / inappropriate User Ckow SigcKowDont 07:23, 31 December 2007 (EST)
I don't think it'll be helpful; anything falling under WELL's domain should be pretty obvious, with the exception of people like the author who truly thing it's a good build. And in those cases, a single reason (or even a list) won't help; it'd take a full-blown discussion on the talk page. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 23:36, 31 December 2007 (EST)
If it was obvious for then, they wouldn't have submitted it. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 07:52, 11 January 2008 (EST)
No, people are dumb. If it were obvious and they didn't submit it, we wouldn't need the policy. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 13:58, 11 January 2008 (EST)


REASONS ARE GOOD



ARMOND.
Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 13:24, 4 February 2008 (EST)

Agree. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 14:04, 4 February 2008 (EST)
If it's so obvious, the reason can be skipped but the reason box was nice. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 17:07, 4 February 2008 (EST)
It's still there, smart ones. It's just hidden if you don't define variable 2 (which the flat template doesn't). -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 18:40, 4 February 2008 (EST)

New design anyone?

If you can see this, please shift-refresh or hit ctrl-F5 to refresh the page and get the new CSS.
User Dont-WELL PvX:WELL Hex Spell. After 5..1 days, target build is deleted. PvX:WELL ends prematurely if that build changes 1..3 skills.
    {{well}} Energy ~~~~~ Activation    
Admin Power    

J/k ~ ĐONT*TALK 15:03, 19 April 2008 (EDT)

Change to that pic imo, it's way more cooler. And switch color for something more fitting. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 15:07, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
User Dont-WELL This build is a candidate for deletion as per PvX:WELL. Please discuss this imminent deletion on the build's talk page or save it to your userspace if you wish to see it again. Do not remove this tag from builds you authored unless a consensus has been reached on the talk page.

This build was tagged on {{{1}}}.

Any better? (Or you mean the icon's colour?) ~ ĐONT*TALK 15:32, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
That looks pretty cool, a bit too fat outline and don't really like the color, a bit darker maybe. Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 15:34, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
Changed accordingly, kinda. We'll see how'd admins like this. ~ ĐONT*TALK 16:07, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
If they don't agree then they should ragequit :p Godbox GodlyCompanion-cube 16:19, 19 April 2008 (EDT)
That's pretty awesome eye candy tbh. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 18:12, 20 April 2008 (EDT)

Timestamp

It is not pointless because you should give chance to the author to copy the build to his userspace. A day or two is enough, but it is still important. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 09:19, 4 August 2008 (EDT)

You're a sysop; go ahead and add it. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 11:52, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
Well, that would've been PvX:1RV violation, so I proposed the change at the talkpage. However since there are no objections, I restored the version with timestamp. ~ ĐONT*SYSOP 12:36, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
How does a timestamp help them put it into their userspace? If they see the WELL tag, they see it, the date it was posted on has no effect on that. — Skakid Rally- kupo!S9M 14:54, 24 December 2008 (EST)
Besides, if it gets deleted they can always just ask for an admin to restore it.. Brandnew. 14:55, 24 December 2008 (EST)
^ And if they wrote the build once they can most likely write it again in userspace. ɟoʇuɐʌʎʞɔıɹPanic srsbsns 14:56, 24 December 2008 (EST)
Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.