FANDOM


Sig Testing

Test: Readem 01:04, 2 May 2007 (CEST) Test: Readem (talk*contribs) 01:05, 2 May 2007 (CEST)

Woot, it works, yeah! Readem (talk*contribs) 01:08, 2 May 2007 (CEST)

Here comes trouble. ;-) - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 07:21, 3 May 2007 (CEST)

Imao, shhh Multi-tasking! On Guild wiki too :D Readem (talk*contribs) 07:25, 3 May 2007 (CEST)

(Insert relevant comment here) - Skakid9090 00:04, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

(Insert irrelevant and offtopic yet humorous response here) --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 00:08, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

Gah, you guys are not getting the point Imao... Readem (talk*contribs) 02:16, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

Relevant LOL. - Skakid9090 02:24, 8 May 2007 (CEST)
Sorry, I guess what I ask for is too much ;) lol... Readem (talk*contribs) 02:27, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

Gonna lawl when Solus takes his rant against your irrelevance over to this wiki... - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 07:29, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

It'll happen lol. *shrug* Readem (talk*contribs) 07:30, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

SOLUS SMASH *BOOM* - Skakid9090 23:38, 8 May 2007 (CEST)

Heh. This is Les Bos!!!! Anyway, mind if I steal that Userbox? Ni sigNi 06:22, 12 May 2007 (CEST)

You can burn it, blow it up, sell it on Ebay, I really don't care. Cuz whatever, I do what I want :p. Readem (talk*contribs) 08:34, 12 May 2007 (CEST)

Looks like we have a very observant user here :) -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 21:37, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Votes

lmao, I got 0. There is no way I can lose XD. Readem (talk*contribs) 19:27, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

Dang it, you beat me! I got 0 as well. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 21:49, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

Lottery

If you got 0 as your lottery ticket, please visit vote page again and re-vote. We are sorry for inconveniences. GCardinal 23:30, 13 May 2007 (CEST)

But now I have to give away personal info! I know your ways! You can't get me!!! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:11, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

Newer New New Sig Testing

Newer New Test 1: Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:12, 14 May 2007 (CEST)

Yep, it works. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 04:22, 14 May 2007 (CEST)
Since people ignore it anyway, I am changing my sig back, w/ the exception of the pvx contribs part ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:53, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
What was the difference? ^_^ <embarrased> -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs)
Exactly ;P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:01, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
Oh oh I know! The testing one linked to GuildWiki while the current one is linking to PvX wiki user pages. Do I get to become a soviet spy for figuring that out? :P -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 03:07, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
Nope, you do get a CooKie though ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:08, 24 May 2007 (CEST)
"In Soviet Russia, people spy spies!" :( -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 03:15, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

What happened, Readem? Did some noob like screw up some elite mission or something? :( -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 01:41, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Worst. Met two Flare Spammer Tanks in RA...in a row...with no res... :) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:44, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Aww, poor Readem :P You know who I teamed with in RA once? Well, it was this random assassin. We won the first round but I realized he was kind of crappy, so I made him ping his build (which took forever for that noob to do). And what were the results? The 8 skill slots consisted of 4 lead attacks, 1 offhand, and 3 dual attacks, with no rez, no shadowstep, no self defense. Needless to say, the next round did not go well. ^_^ -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 03:05, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Monks

On Build talk:Mo/Me Mighty LoD Party Healer, you claimed that Healing Breeze and Orison of Healing sucked too much to be on any monk bar. I have to ask how long you've been monking and if you've ever tried monking without a battery. Breeze alone is generally enough to keep a guy's health at the same level for those ten seconds, leaving you to spike-heal someone in the meantime, and Orison is just a strong, staple, cheap, and spammable heal. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:34, 17 May 2007 (CEST)

Copying from my user page (as you missed my talk :P)
Lolz, HB and OoH are some of the worst healing skills out there. If one was to caculate the health healed by HB and its energy cost, it is a HUGE waste. OoH is just horrible...Dwayna's kiss is better in every way. Oh and if you want to see my monk, he's on my G wiki Page. Here's the link: Readem Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:35, 17 May 2007 (CEST)
But Dwayna's Kiss can't target yourself, and Orison can. It's a waste of a skill that can't save yourself when you need it. As for Breeze, you get +9 regen, which is more than enough to counter most hexes and a bunch of conditions - even when there's two or three of either or both. And I can't look at your user page on guildwiki because my school uses a blocker. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 00:03, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

That's no problem. HB is 9 regen for 10 energy though. It is a complete waste of energy, and has been proven to be so. OoH may be able to heal yourself, but if a Monk needs a self heal then Touch is the way to go. I'll upload an image for you if necessary. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:10, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

Meh... I like my skill choices. You go with yours. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:39, 18 May 2007 (CEST)
Lol, ok. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:43, 18 May 2007 (CEST)
Don't bring Healing Breeze.... It's an energy-inefficient slow heal that gets you killed more often then it heals you due to all the enchantment shattering around. Orison can be okay (though I prefer Words of Comfort and/or Dwayna's Kiss) but please leave Healing Breeze to the 55 monks. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 06:36, 18 May 2007 (CEST)
But in PvE there isn't that much enchantment shattering, and it's a great counter to the random degen you find... It heals just as much as a Heal Other, and let's be honest, do you want to wait ten seconds and throw Heal Other on a guy after he's had time to degen, when he's low on health and vulnerable to spikes? Skills are created for reasons. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:05, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

Healing breeze at 9 is 180 points of retro active healing, with a 20% enchantment extender it goes up to 198 points for 10 energy. The strength of Healing breeze is that you can cast it and then go focus on someone else who needs healing. In PVE I often pack healing breeze and healing seed and dump it on my tank, and I don't have to worry about them for 12 seconds and I can work on the rest of the party. With blessed aura it comes on par with Shield of Regen... Shireen 20:34, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

Exactly my thoughts. Now try it with 16 healing prayers, which I pack (as I'm a pure healer in PvE most of the time). -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:41, 21 May 2007 (CEST)
No doubt it is good for PvE, but in PvP... er.... no. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 20:43, 21 May 2007 (CEST)
I never made any claims that it was good in PvP. In fact, we owned a GvG HB wammo pretty fast, and a match or two later we owned a team with a monk with HB. Shatter Enchantment came in handy as I remember.
Any non-prot monk in pretty much any non-RA PvP with enchantments will cause his team to fail. Regen is handy, but enchant removal is just too popular. Prot enchants don't generally last long enough to be removed, though. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:48, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

Why doesn't Ethereal Light get any love huh. :( It's a GREAT spammable heal and it heals for a lot more than Dwayna's or crappy Orison and it can also be used as a self heal. Sure it gets interrupted sometimes but it's just a matter of getting used to and pairing it with healing touch for self heals not to mention HP or LoD can also be used as self heals. The first time I decided to replace orison from my WoH build's bar with Ethereal light turned out to be the best decision I ever made in my monking career. I'm never going back to Orison again...Just try it. -Mooo 21:02, 21 May 2007 (CEST)

I only use Light with Healer's Boon... Thus making it a quick, cheap spike heal. I do like Orison's recharge, though. If Glimmer were back to its one second recharge I'd be using it instead of WoH. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:32, 21 May 2007 (CEST)
Etheral Light gets tonnes of attention in Healer's Boon builds :) And plus, just visit my user page for a B/P build... the monk on it has ethereal and no orison :P -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 00:11, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Eh, Dwayna's is 1337. 700 point heals in DoA. EL is good tho, for an HB Monk that is. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:35, 22 May 2007 (CEST)

Sandbox

Can I ask why you are creating GuildWiki:sandbox:sandbox instead of using PvXwiki:Sandbox? --MasterPatricko 11:56, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

It was linked to from the s&f page. -Auron 13:34, 18 May 2007 (CEST)
I don't pay attention to such minor things as that :p. Guild wiki SB, PvX SB, I use both anywayz lol. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:39, 18 May 2007 (CEST)

Sysoption

Wanna be my guinea pig? o.O - Kowal Krowman (talkcontribs) 09:02, 19 May 2007 (CEST)

I have no idea what that means, but whatever lol. Sure. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:13, 19 May 2007 (CEST)
Guinea Pig = Scapegoat for testing. And thanks for agreeing with me on the vote thing :P I was thinking of starting an unofficial revote, but oh well. I think that if the real policy is not voted out in the best, most eligible way possible... We will just end up how GuildWiki did. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 13:43, 19 May 2007 (CEST)

UHSP?

WASP I'm using Ward Against
Stupid People!

-Auron 16:21, 21 May 2007 (CEST)
rofl. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:35, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
It's not working. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 04:29, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Hmmm... an elitist skill with an elitist acronym.  ;) DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:32, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
It never does work. And why do I always get into edit conflicts O.o? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:34, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
Because you are, as Skuld the Quick would say, "Too Slow!" DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:34, 22 May 2007 (CEST)
*Shrug* I am in no rush. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:38, 22 May 2007 (CEST)

IW guide

If you are doing an IW guide, I would like to help out. They are some of my favorite builds to run. So if you need something, just ask. Shireen 06:22, 24 May 2007 (CEST)

If you'd like, I can help get you started with a basic template. --Mgrinshpon (C/T) 01:16, 31 May 2007 (CEST)

Generic Res

From what I see, it seems they want to do away with generic res, just ftr. -(єronħ) no u 03:20, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

Why? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:24, 25 May 2007 (CEST)
Dunno, sounds like theyéd rather have us actually put a real resurrect skill in. -(єronħ) no u 04:39, 25 May 2007 (CEST)
If you want to try coding it in, be my guest. Though I have to agree with Cardinal that it's not a skill, and it's just as easy to put in a res/sunspear sig and make a note that you can bring any type of res. Not too difficult and with the way PvXcode works it looks a lot better. (I abhor the blankness of the optional slot, too...) -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 16:55, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

SPIES!!!

You should definately add me. My parents were both born in the former Soviet Union (mother from Moscow, father from Leningrad). I speak russian as well. --Mgrinshpon (C/T) 04:30, 25 May 2007 (CEST)

That does seem like a good reason... my grandad was in the CIA... =P ~~User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (talk···contributions) 04:34, 25 May 2007 (CEST)
Dobro dosli —SigmA 06:51, 25 June 2007 (EDT)
HAHA Bolje Vas Nasli :) --Iwan13 12:26, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

add me too.. serbia is nearly same as russia .. hell we even had comunism--Iwan13talk 02:04, 20 August 2007 (CEST)

User Page

Ow. My eyes. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 08:33, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

XD. My Guild Wiki one does the same thing :p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:36, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Well, if I had anything else to do...but of course I don't lol. Oh well. Guess, I'll just fix builds...um comment I dunno lol. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:56, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Ugh... Could you, perhaps, change some colours? :) -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 15:00, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Yes! I have once again blinded users w/ my vibrant page ;P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:13, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

MSN Messenger

Do you have an account? If so, would you mind getting online and messaging me at BTA258@hotmail.com? Thanks. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:38, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

Sure, was about to TA tho :p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:45, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

It will just take a few minutes. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:47, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

Delete

grats on admin - Skakid9090 23:32, 1 June 2007 (CEST)

hehe. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:32, 1 June 2007 (CEST)
gratz... -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 01:01, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
>.> ty? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:53, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

PvXwiki:Sign your comments‎

Is there a reason you deleted half the page, or can I go ahead and revert it back now? -(єronħ) no u 00:24, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

rofl, accident. My comp lagged and I might have deleted it without noticing. This happened before w/ Frw before on Coloneh's Talk. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:40, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
Fixed now. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:42, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
That happened to me once, too... -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 13:49, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Shireen Sig

Sig Fixed Shireensysop 02:15, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

coolz. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:29, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Let up off of Safre, he needs time to cool. He has made it apparant that it's between him, Defiant, and GC. Let him cool down, and if need be, the conversation will most likely be taken off site. This is awefull public at the moment. Shireensysop 05:34, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Very well, I shall refrain unless harassed on my Talk page -_-... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:41, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Me/Mo Pacifist

Readem, your comments are very much appreciated... would you mind to look at the discussion for a little while? =) BaineTheBotter 08:17, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Sure. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:36, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Mass Builds Clean-up

Is there a reason that all of them are abroken links? I would love to help out in the assassin area (or at least start there,) -(єronħ) no u 21:20, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Rather then have to write down every single Build again, this is from my Guild wiki archive. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:27, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
I'm still a little lost, are they supposed to link to the build namespace or something? -(єronħ) no u 22:59, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
>.> ignore the links lol. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:14, 2 June 2007 (CEST)
Alright then, -(єronħ) no u 23:29, 2 June 2007 (CEST)

Sefre

You have taken a personal grudge against me. I will ask you to stop making childish comments meant to undermine and confuse the issue I am trying to bring forward. I understand that you disagree with my issue but I am asking you to act the admin you now are and try to understand it before you try to "undermine" it as you said. I consider many of your actions personal attacks, I have nothing against you and wish we can come to a mature solution here.--SefreSig 05:39, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Merely undermining you is by no means an attack. As I have said previously, you often make brash decisions and publicly disregard those who share different views from your own. I hold no grudges, not even against Solus who has made it quite clear that he is against everything I stand for. Oh, and by the way, you quite often undermine others. Actually, you are doing it at this very moment. What a surprising coincidence! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:52, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
Here is the link, in case you don't know: [1] Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:54, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
I am pretty sure that is a personal attack, at least I feel like I am being targeted and put down without justice being done to what I was being put down for.
Whenever I have "undermined" others it was never because of that poster, but because of the action. I try to follow NPA to the word, I target actions, not users. You seem to be "undermining" me in a way that isn't related to my action. The post on admins on gcardianals page where you say "He knows new admins have been appointed. He was there." was meant to undermine my post without relating to the action itself.
Please either leave the issue alone or act constructively in it. I am trying to be mature here and end this issue with you. So please, stop. --SefreSig 06:04, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
What you consider "Undermining", I consider stating the facts. What you call "attacking", I call word manipulation. Using things you have done in the past, and other comments made by you, against you, is in no way violating NPA. If you do not have an MSN, why not contact me IG? Ill be on in fifteen minutes or so, if you would like. Though this conversation is beginning to drag...not nearly as much fun as it was. And if you did not want to continue, why even respond ;)? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:13, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
I could care less what you call it. I feel that you are attacking me and my comments without understanding then. If that is not against NPA it is still extremely rude and I expect better out of a admin. I will not respond further unless you wish to attack me or whatever you call it more.--SefreSig 06:17, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
Very well ;). Glad we have come to some sort of understanding... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:55, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

I will be discussing this with all of the users involved in the bickering, but, I am going to post here first. The discussion that began on the Administrators talk page has now spilled over onto 4 pages, and it is time that we stopped bickering and started actual discussion. To that effect, I would ask that you limit the scope of your comments to the PvX:Administrator talk page because spreading it out merely leads to greater exacerbation of the issue. Similarly, please make this a civil debate. If you have a point you would like to make, please limit the scope of your comments to a discussion of the pros and cons of a particular issue rather than being sidetracked by petty bickering, particularly between yourself and Sefre, and please focus on the issue. I have very carefully reviewed all of the evidence on all 4 pages, but, I have found no evidence of NPA violations by any party. As such, no one will be banned, or even warned by me for conduct, however, I strongly urge you to stick to the issue at hand before we have greater escalation. And, if at all possible, I would ask people to refrain from posting in any forum for at least a few days in order to prevent escalation. It you feel that you must post, please limit it to the discussion at hand and try to distance yourself from Sefre. Thank you. DE Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:50, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

She/he started it *Points at Safre* jk :P. I really could care less. Just fun to debate about :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:58, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Just one more thing here, are you really saying that the only reason you were trying to screw up my questioning on the admin situation was for fun...? And if so may I ask why you targeted me then...?--SefreSig 20:11, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
That, and the fact what you were arguing was both ridiculous and against my beliefs...other then that I have nothing against you. You would know if I did ;) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:46, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
And they made this guy a admin *shakes head*.
I assumed it was against what you wanted, I was arguing against the method that you became a admin, thats pretty obvious.--SefreSig 22:06, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
QQ Sefre. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:07, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

You've been asked to stop bickering. So stop. - Skakid9090 22:08, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

I did...she/he's the one that keeps dragging it from the grave... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:14, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Actually now I am questioning your adminship(is that a word?). based on events from past comments and actions. I am beginning to doubt that a admin who chooses to harass someone for fun is a good one. You have stated that yourself in above comments.--SefreSig 22:17, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
You two have BOTH been asked to stop. I was about to say that maybe I've not seen everything, but it looks like Readem's right, Sefre's been pulling this up again and again, and when I went to edit Sefre had already left his comment, which confirmed my thinking. Readem, I wasn't there when you were appointed a sysop, I don't know what qualifications they said you had, but I recommend you just don't respond to Sefre on this, at all. Sefre, you're crossing into NPA territory. Please, both of you, stop. I'm honestly starting to get bored of banning people, and I don't want to be the one to demote Readem if it comes to that. (I don't think it will come to either of those cases; I'm just stating the extremes.) Best situation would be if both of you (and everyone else on the wiki!) just left this section alone. I've "locked" it in those hopes. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:25, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Argh, I don't know what I did wrong, but that locked the whole page. Just drop it, everyone. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:27, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Ty for interjecting. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:33, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
>.>...I contribute a great deal to this wiki. More then many of the Users combined. If you would please READ I NEVER once said I did it just to harass you. You are not even worth my time or trouble to "Harass". You, in my views, are nothing but a minor annoyance, bringing up issues in the past and never letting go. Disrupting constantly, and just bothering others. You violate what admins have repeatedly asked you to, you harass me repeatedly on my Talk Page. So all I ask of you Sefre, is to stop harassing me, and start contributing in a more positive manner before this escalates to a degree it shouldn't. A word of advice Sefre, think silent thoughts, it isn't hard to do. I wish you my best regards, and am NEVER responding to any more comments by you, on this page.

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:40, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

Very well, good luck on your attempt to save your own behind, proof is in the history so I don't mind. Good day.--SefreSig 22:43, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

Premades

Don't forget to take care of all the redirects from these builds you're moving. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:46, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

ok, done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:57, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Do I need to fix my page links again? Shireensysop 08:00, 3 June 2007 (CEST) Links Fixed. Names work fine. =) Shireensysop 08:08, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Just cleaning up

Funny how you can make people read old build articles just by popping them up in the recent changes. A little disclaimer: I've nothing to do with the builds I just edited, I'm only cleaning up category tags and such stuff. So don't blame me if these builds suck ;-) --Hhhippo 14:17, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Np, I have been up for 18 hours now, so it really doesn't bother me. Besides, was just checking for vandalism. Cuz you are always destroying stuff and w/e ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 14:21, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
Yea yea. I guess we could use a few more vandals of that type... --Hhhippo 14:35, 3 June 2007 (CEST)
"Skuld! get over here! We need some vandalism and some swash-buckling arguement!" (jk lolz) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 14:39, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Sleep

Been up 20 hours. Time to sleep for 4. Night guys. Wait it's morning... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:46, 3 June 2007 (CEST)

Hmmm...

Care to give some details about your upcoming IW guide? |SpriteSODA

Sure, it will merely cover the basics of an IW Mesmer. Similar to that of the Barrage Guide. It will feature all current Tested IW as well. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:32, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

Block

User:Deepseeker Readem...why did you remove the ratings on my build for no reason?

Sockpuppetry looks like. Also, you should be signing your posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your posts. To make your post easier to find, it helps to begin a new topic with a new header at the bottom of a page, not in the middle of someone else's post. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 04:21, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Yeah, people on the talk page were saying that it might be a sock. Also, looking through their contribs, they had nothing :/. Sorry m8. Also, finding this was especially difficult, as there are 2 "Block" titles on this page alone :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:26, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

User:69.222.55.224 keeps vandalizing the A/e farmer, block himm plz. - Skakid9090 23:58, 5 June 2007 (CEST)

Done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:36, 6 June 2007 (CEST)

Can't We All Get Along

I wrote something, and I hope you will read. CWAGA is a project started by me, and maintained by me today. Please share. Bluemilkman 19:16, 6 June 2007 (CEST)


Well done with the healing spike. I got you to think outside the box didn't I? Shireensysop 01:21, 8 June 2007 (CEST)

 :/ I already had an Idea about how it was done. I was testing something about Life Bond as well. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:23, 8 June 2007 (CEST)
Do me a favor and crop that photo just for the number amounts. The whole exercise is for the new guys to see the page try and figure out how it was done. Start making them think about skill interactions. Hence the OSB=UF tag right next to it. Get em thinking outside the box. =) Shireensysop 01:50, 8 June 2007 (CEST)
Only 4 enchantments? Noob... use some varient of this, with Mo/Rt. For the skills that are still optional, just toss monk enchantments on there. Should get ~ 15,000 health fairly easily. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 06:18, 8 June 2007 (CEST)
I had only heros. 3 to be exact. I had 16 enchants on me I think. I am sure I could get + 8-10k if I had more monks w/ me. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:37, 8 June 2007 (CEST)
Fixed link. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 11:31, 8 June 2007 (CEST)

Delete?

- I thought we were holding off on build deltions untill the vetting system was up and running? Shireensysop 01:58, 7 June 2007 (CEST)

Not for the absolute worst of Builds. Besides, one was a template. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:04, 7 June 2007 (CEST)

Difference between deleting via the lack of vetting policy and deleting via PvX:WELL, I assume. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 04:42, 7 June 2007 (CEST)

Soviet spy

I ain't one anymoar? —SigmA 21:06, 10 June 2007 (CEST)

High five!

proper behavior FTW! - Skakid9090 23:25, 11 June 2007 (EDT)

RUNNNNNN

He's an admin! NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoo I thought Skuld was enough! Even though I kinda liked Skuld XD. But still, he's bound to turn into a dictator! - Definatley Not Cheese

Wow, this must be definitely NOT Cheese. Cheese would never make a title such as RUNNNNNN. ‽-(єronħ) no u 20:30, 12 June 2007 (EDT)
Yeah, now you're definitely gonna get banned for sockpuppetry, Cheese :P -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 16:08, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Check and Review

Are you saying they have been checked, or need to be checked. Because some of those need to be reworked, or are definately sub standard compared to other builds. Shireensysop 16:20, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

They work. Not that they don't need to be rewritten because of usage and whatnot. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:21, 14 June 2007 (EDT)

Translation: This build does not currently violate PW:WELL. --Rollerzerris <!--Zerris--> 12:14, 15 June 2007 (EDT)

User:Krowman/Improvement

Would you take a look at this when you get the chance? It's a good place for users to receive direction for edits that they may want to make, and it has the admin task list that I think you'll like. I want to move this into the mainspace and link to it from the Main Page once it has been reviewed by a few more people. Thanks. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 14:36, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

Very well. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 14:48, 16 June 2007 (EDT)


not a CHANCE

you cannot tank aataxes with just AoE and stoneflesh. - Skakid9090 16:39, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

Armor nerf only affects stacking. Still has +80 armor. And yes it can. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:41, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

and...? it's stacking AoE and kinetic. - Skakid9090 16:41, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

I removed AoE. It doesn't absolutely need it. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:42, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

Super prO Builds

[2]

[3]

[4]

[5]

[6]

[7]

[8]

[9]

[10]

[11]

[12]

[13]

[14]

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:30, 16 June 2007 (EDT)

My admin nomination

It was stated that we have a list if we suddenly need admins... just letting you know, I won't be promoted until there is a need, even if everyone on the site says yes. Just letting ya know, no need to change it~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (talk · contributions) 14:34, 17 June 2007 (EDT)

help

Please check it out Help needed. Thx :) The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gcardinal (contribs) .

- Mucho Appriciato for the links bro. Im going to bed. See you later. Shireensysop 17:37, 20 June 2007 (EDT)

Viability Checks

is it just you doing this? - Skakid9090 15:59, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Pretty much :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:06, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

ok, i thought it was some super-secret admin conspiracy ;) - Skakid9090 16:09, 21 June 2007 (EDT)

Uploads

Are borked :( ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 05:36, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Heh? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:38, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Well I cant see the pics u just uploaded anyways. It's sad. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 05:40, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Meh, they work. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:43, 22 June 2007 (EDT)

Warrior Builds (PvP)

W/A Death's Charge Hammer Spiker

Backbreaker Crushing Blow Irresistible Blow Frenzy Rush Death&#039;s Charge Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/A Forceful Burden

Forceful Blow Heavy Blow Crushing Blow Protector&#039;s Strike Shadowy Burden Burst of Aggression Signet of Malice Resurrection Signet

W/A Lone Ganksman

Dismember Critical Chop Executioner&#039;s Strike &quot;You&#039;re All Alone!&quot; Signet of Malice Frenzy Shadow Walk Resurrection Signet

W/A Shove Hammer Spiker

Shove Crushing Blow Thrill of Victory Wild Blow Tiger Stance Death&#039;s Charge Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/A Steady Axe Warrior

Steady Stance Drunken Blow Desperation Blow Critical Chop Signet of Malice &quot;Fear Me!&quot; Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/E Agressive Hammer

Backbreaker Crushing Blow Mighty Blow Grasping Earth Flail Enraging Charge Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/E Charge Sword

Sever Artery Gash Final Thrust Frenzy Shock &quot;Charge!&quot; Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/E Linebacker

Counter Blow Bull&#039;s Strike Crushing Blow Devastating Hammer Hammer Bash Shock Rush Resurrection Signet

W/E Shock Axe

Eviscerate Executioner&#039;s Strike Shock Bull&#039;s Strike Frenzy Rush Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/Mo "You're All Alone!" Paladin

&quot;You&#039;re All Alone!&quot; Sever Artery Gash Final Thrust Flail Enraging Charge Mending Touch Healing Signet

W/Mo Magehunter Strike Spiker

Sever Artery Gash Magehunter Strike Final Thrust Frenzy Enraging Charge Mending Touch Resurrection Signet

W/N Bull's Charge Sword

Sever Artery Gash Final Thrust Frenzy Bull&#039;s Charge Plague Touch Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/Rt Unnatural Fury

Weapon of Fury Penetrating Chop Dismember Axe Rake &quot;Watch Yourself!&quot; Healing Signet Optional Generic resurrect

W/any Charging Anti-kite

Sever Artery Gash Final Thrust Charging Strike Bull&#039;s Strike Frenzy Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/any Charging Executioner

Dismember Executioner&#039;s Strike Axe Rake Critical Chop Charging Strike Healing Signet Frenzy Mending Touch

W/any Crippling Slash Sword

Crippling Slash Gash Final Thrust Frenzy Sprint Healing Signet Optional Resurrection Signet

W/any Dragon Sword

Sever Artery Gash Sun and Moon Slash Dragon Slash Frenzy Rush Protector&#039;s Strike Resurrection Signet

W/any Fierce Hammer

Devastating Hammer Crushing Blow Fierce Blow Bull&#039;s Strike Frenzy Rush Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

W/any Flailing Coward

Steelfang Slash Standing Slash Soldier&#039;s Strike Flail &quot;Coward!&quot; Enraging Charge &quot;For Great Justice!&quot; Resurrection Signet

W/any Lonely Basher

&quot;You&#039;re All Alone!&quot; Tiger Stance Fierce Blow Heavy Blow Crushing Blow Healing Signet Enraging Charge Resurrection Signet

W/any Rage of the Mokele

Mokele Smash Devastating Hammer Crushing Blow Fierce Blow Enraging Charge Tiger Stance Optional Resurrection Signet

W/any Steady Stance Warrior

Steady Stance Drunken Blow Desperation Blow Soldier&#039;s Strike &quot;Watch Yourself!&quot; &quot;Fear Me!&quot; Healing Signet Resurrection Signet

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:32, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

Oh, and we need to fix the shout images. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:35, 26 May 2007 (CEST)

LOL, was that really necessary. Zuranthium 16:55, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Forceful Burden and Lone Ganksman are dupes... -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 18:48, 5 June 2007 (CEST)
Fixed it just for you ;) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:10, 9 June 2007 (CEST)
Moved your compilation of warrior builds here. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 17:27, 23 June 2007 (EDT)
Ty? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 11:28, 24 June 2007 (EDT)

Mesmer Builds

Just thought I'd let you know that your Mesmer builds that are under your userspace are showing up in the builds categories. Would you mind removing the tags from them? I don't want to touch them myself.

And also, consider archiving this talk page ;) -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 07:48, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Not quite understanding...? What category? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:51, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Noob User Box?

Hey, your Noob User Box is a little inapropriate for a Syop don't ya think? Whom do you think comes to PvX looking for builds? Not the uber advanced guys, but the people looking for help reaching that next level, or get started... I really need to write up a letter to the admins on 'quality customer service', cuz I think were all lacking in that area. Shireensysop 08:13, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Um no. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:29, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

(shamelessly stolen from Honorable Sarah)

Newbie Noob/nub/etc
Warrior-icon-small Has never been taught Assassin-icon-small Refuses to learn
Monk-icon-small Listens to the opinions of the more experienced, and decides on their own Necromancer-icon-small Ignores the more experienced, or follows blindly the advice of others.
Elementalist-icon-small Avoids those who exclude others Mesmer-icon-small Excludes others
Ranger-icon-small Is willing to help Ritualist-icon-small Is willing to bill you for it
Paragon-icon-small Temporary Dervish-icon-small Terminal

I see your difference in definitions. Shireensysop 08:38, 25 June 2007 (EDT)

Some random reason (most likely because I pwn)

Thanks for not pwning =) - Skakid9090º_o 12:45, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

K. Will try moar. bb! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 12:46, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

abandoned stubs

theres... so.... MANY! - Skakid9090º_o 15:55, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

I'll delete all that you tag. I wouldn't bother yourself too much. Once the vetting system is in place, it will be a matter of minutes before I delete them all. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:57, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
how'd you delete the same thing twice 0.o - Skakid9090º_o 16:01, 27 June 2007 (EDT)
Look at the section above pls. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:04, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

Archive Time???

WARNING: This page is 60 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections. --Midnight08 16:07, 27 June 2007 (EDT)

User Self Rate

This is simple, do we allow user's to rate their own builds now that they can rate different levels or do we still not trust them enough? ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 05:47, 30 June 2007 (CEST)

What is this "Trust" you speak of o.O? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:49, 30 June 2007 (CEST)

Start rating builds =) - Skakid9090º_o 09:21, 30 June 2007 (CEST)


Thanks for the heads up bro. As for the Virluent Pressure build, there is a spike in there, and that comes from the Toxic shock signant. As for the weakness, think about GVG, Crippling Dagger is great against one target that you can get close to. The weakness, on the other hand, in a GVG match can be quickly spread about to help keep other monks busy cleaning conditions as they arn't sure whether it's blind or something else. The top necro is there for GVG and HA team pressure builds, the lower variant, which you favor, is definately much stronger in TA and RA. If you really feel the 'pressure' build needs to converted to the spiking TA/RA solo kill variant, then after I get at least 2 other people to chime in with that consensus, Ill flip the top and the bottom and varriant skill selection on the daggers. Enfeeble is just a much easier way to get virluence to activate. Shireensysop 10:28, 1 July 2007 (CEST)

Hehe, np. Augury is just overpowered dude, in every respect imaginable. It should be in a lot of Builds actually....merely suggesting tho. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 10:32, 1 July 2007 (CEST)

Then why not leave Augury to be loaded on the actual assasin that the team can load up into a slot? Shireensysop 10:34, 1 July 2007 (CEST)

Well, one reason is because assassins have unusually long attack chains in comparison to other melee classes already. Once they have the necessary utilities (IAS, Expose Defenses, ect) there is just no room for Augury. Besides, Assassins already usually have some source of Deep Wound, while in caster Builds Deep Wound is rather rare, making Augury an extraordinarily useful skill. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 10:37, 1 July 2007 (CEST)

I noted that Deadly Paradox could be replaced with Augury on the Top Necro Build. Augury is on the standard bar of the bottom. You loose the fast recharge of the daggers and signant, but I don't think it really huts the pressure of the build much. Shireensysop 10:44, 1 July 2007 (CEST)

Mallyx

gate trick still works, used it last night. - Skakid9090º_o 01:07, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

Heh, you'd think they would fix that :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:41, 2 July 2007 (CEST)
they fixed it once but then broke it by fixing something else (confusing, i know =P) - Skakid9090º_o 01:44, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

My Sandcastle

Mgrinshpon Sandcastle --Mgrinshpon (C/T) 01:50, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

Vandalism

I want to apologize for my unacceptable actions by vandalizing a user page. I hope to make the Wiki even better. Metal enchantment 04:07, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

As long as I see that you are making an attempt :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:12, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

Cleanup Tags

It's not getting out of hand. I am ensuring that builds are propperly formatted. Difiant knows I am working on this, and once we get people conditioned to actually upholding the quality standards that we have set down it wont be so bad. Its the same standard, I just lowered the tolorance level. If someone has a concern they can come to me for help, check my page, and youll see I'm doing that. Everyone whom asks me for help, I am helping. I'll worry about quality of formatting, you can worry about quality of builds. Shireensysop 23:35, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

You have had at least 3 people contact you about their builds in the past 1:43 minutes...it is getting out of hand. Lower your expectations, or fix the builds yourself. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:44, 2 July 2007 (CEST)
You know on Sunday I placed close to 150 build stubs right? I did a quality control sweep. Our Wiki was that badly riddled with poor formatting and incomplete builds. Why was I able to do that, because We as Admins let it slip. I am just starting the long process of making Build Formating Quality a priority once again (or for the first time) as well as the mechanical quality of that build. Shireensysop 23:49, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

I expect things to get worse and my workload to tripple before this project is done. Shireensysop 23:49, 2 July 2007 (CEST)

This is an impossible task Shireen. Unless you plan on placing a infinite number of clean-up tags, they will never stop coming. If a Build is a Stub, do NOT place a Clean-up tag. Do NOT place a tag, on candidates for deletion, or unfavored Builds.I would rather you place the tags, on Builds that are already favored, or that are in the process of becoming. Our quality must be in the Tested Builds section ONLY. I am not just protecting new users from fixing Builds that are bound to be unfavored; I am saving you from the endless hassle you are making for yourself. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:00, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

A cleanup tag is justifaction to be sent back to stubs. If it needs a cleanup, the build was not finished. And you only say it's impossible because no one has TRIED to actually uphold our quality standards on a full scale. Look at our Trial and Testing sections, every build currently in there is up to standard, can be viewed and easily read. No one is holding poor formatting against those builds and people are focusing on how well they WORK, not how they look. Every build-stub I placed pushed unfinished builds out of those areas and into stubs with a cleanup tag on it. "I am not just protecting new users from fixing Builds that are bound to be unfavored; I am saving you from the endless hassle you are making for yourself." - Yes, it will be a total and horrible hassle if I am the only person doing this. And if you want to sit on your laurels and work on build quality, then help me out and pick out the PvX:Well builds and start marking them. Because I KNOW there are a lot of em in there. But I don't see many tags out of you. Your are helping improve builds, but only those you deem worthy. Your an elitist, and I respect that. You and I are going to butt heads on a regular basis, and for that I don't mind. Just realize that there is more than just the Uber out there. Were here to promote the game and improvement of people with that game, not just the uber build right? Shireensysop 00:08, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Oh, there is one misunderstanding I don't think your getting. Those 150 Cleanup tags I placed, I also moved those builds INTO stubs. I did not go crawling around stubs to place tags there. It was justification for the move. Shireensysop 00:12, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

I don't touch stubs. I will delete them, say they work atrociously, or have no synergy; sure. But I will not go in and find Builds that may never come into existance. More MoR Warriors are in stubs then I can imagine. Moving mass amounts of Builds into stubs, is guarenteeing that a great percentage will never see daylight. New users, and anon users espcially, will give up once they see that tag. You cannot expect, that new users will be able to fix their own Builds. The few determined, will try very hard, and then; the Build becomes unfavored. Some will become openly disruptive; others will lose faith, and will leave the wiki entirely. I don't know about you Shireen, but I would like a more positive atmosphere about the wiki; that is open to new users and accepts their failures, rather then stick a giant finger in their faces. think of this simple analogy: You are currently raising the pedestal. They will adjust their builds, to fit the pedestal's standards. The Builds they post (Most) will become unfavored and fall from grace. The higher up they were however, the harder they shall fall. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:39, 3 July 2007 (CEST)


So what do you want to do then? Just ignore the poorly formatted builds? Ignore the procedures of build evolution? Let users post whatever they want wherever they want? Stubs is for incomplete builds. Part of any build submission to Trial or Untested is that they have a complete skill bar AND are correctly formatted and filled out. You have to have both. And you agreed, when you became a syop, to help uphold the rules. If it's incorrectly formated, work with the author and get it out of stubs. You say that the authors react negatively, and I just want to say your own behavior contributes to that more than mine does. You've said it before yourself, you just want to tell an author their build sucks and move on, only giving those that are of high quality your precious time. THAT contributes to people being pissed off more than working with them hand in hand to improve their build quality. Everyone whom has asked me what was wrong with their build I've assisted, and those individuals are starting to see it. They have accomplished something rather than failed. They have also seen that were more willing to work with them and ARE reasonable and fair if they work with the system. And I am not adjusting the standards at all... For the first time I am enforcing the standard across the board according to our own guides and rules. Shireensysop 01:02, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

See these two links? Tag them. Ignore the rest, as they have not been submitted to the public eye, and are not yet ready for testing. I have fixed numerous Builds Shireen...given my honest opinion on builds that are "In-testing" and advice for builds that are "in-development". I do Not randomly select Builds and trash them, no matter how bad they are. Sure, I'll say it doesn't work, but trash builds I will not. You are abusing the clean-up tag Shireen. There is a difference, between a poorly written build, and an illegible build. If we are unable to understand the basic underlying principles, it needs to be cleaned up. If it is just rather breif, and not too specific, just say so on the talk page. The people you have helped, have yet to feel the pangs of failure. We have few unfavored Builds atm. Their is a reason, Shireen, that no one takes the intiative to do what you are doing...and that reason is that it is impractical, impossible, and in the end will ultimately FAIL. [16] [17] 01:40, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Ok, I'm coming in on this. Readem, shut the heck up. I'm sorry, but you need to listen to Shireen. I've seen a lot of the cleanup tags. They should be there. Sure, a lot of the builds will fail, but a few will succeed where they might have failed otherwise. If someone fails, they should, and most likely will, try again. This time, they can make it right the first time, and maybe get that one vetted. You are looking at the wiki as a bunch of experienced players. Not all people who come here are. I'm seeing a lot of the current admins as being what Shireen named "elitists", even at the vetting procedure talk. This wiki is for everyone, not just the ones that have played 4000 hours in the past 12 months. So I've put in my 2 cents. Bluemilkman 06:14, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Dude, really. This is not relating you whatsoever. Refrain for interjecting. I have seen many of those tags, some need it, others do not. Shireen does not know what he is getting into. I am trying to prevent this, before further hassle occurs. Few will help him, as it is a tedious never-ending task. Oh, and for the record about being an elitist, stfu. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:40, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Yea, that's the way an admin should talk. This does relate to me, and the rest of the wiki. I am free to interject where I see fit. I saw fit, so I did. I think he does know what he is getting into. He's getting into helping the builds become better quality-wise. He saw something that needed to be fixed, so he started to work on fixing it. Maybe you should spend less time hassling him about what he's doing to help, and start finding new ways you can help. Isn't that what an admin does? Bluemilkman 06:47, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

You were openly rude. As an Admin, and as a User, you have no right to act in the way you did. I merely retorted. This does not relate to you, not at all; if it comes down to be harshly blunt, that is what I do best. You are but a User, this does not involve you or any other User besides Shireen, and myself. If you think that I have restraints as an Admin, you are dead wrong. I am one of the rashest users, rashest Human beings, that you will ever meet. I will not tolerate, being pushed around by anyone, especially you. Now I politely asked you to refrain from interjecting, and I would appreciate it if you would. Do not try me. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:58, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Sounds like its time for some intervention. Readem, honestly, if Shireen wants to go through all this work, let him. Shireen, I agree with the unsigned comment, in that we can prioritize the testing builds for clean-up. In practice, the most horribly written builds are posted by anons, or users who come to the wiki to post only that one build, and they usually get abandoned. Just leave it to be deleted in its uncleanly state, rather than let it get deleted in pristine condition. We don't want to waste anyone's time cleaning up a build, only to have it deleted later. Bluemilkman, it's a sad fact of the game that elitists exist. Just meet Auron in-game and ask him to rank-flash you; that's the whole point of titles, to distinguish and differentiate players. (P.S. I'm gleefully enjoying this conversation. It's like watching a sitcom where the adorable slob and the uptight go-getter are paired as roommates together. Srsly, though, solutions exist, so let's work at them.) - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 06:53, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

I really don't care what Shireen does, it's his problem. I am just trying to prevent endless hours of work for everyone. Until they enter the Tested Section, or if the underlying principle of a build cannot be determined, then leave it be. Don't go "Willy-Nilly" with the Clean-up tag. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

lolololololol willy nilly - Skakid9090 07:03, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

I don't care what titles he has. This is not the game. This is a site to help those who don't have all those titles, as well as those that do. I also don't appreciate being told to shut the fuck up. Just because you're an admin doesn't mean you can say whatever you want. Show respect, and you will get it in return. Don't show respect, and you probably won't get it. I am different and won't go there, that's not me. But the newer players need guidance to make their builds better. We don't need admins saying their build isn't worth making better. That will just push them away. But since I don't have all those titles, maybe you shouldn't listen to me. I'm not "good" enough. Bluemilkman 07:05, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

No one has said you are not "good enough." Gaming elites exist; that's a fact that needs to be dealt with. You can consider some of the in-game titles as accreditations. They are evidence of a player's skill, knowledge or time spent in the game. Throwing around 'elitist' comments like you have only serves to bait users. I don't feel any pity for you; Readem could have thrown an insult right back at you for all I care. Though he could have handled it more politely, you provoked him, and instead of insulting you in return, you essentially closed discussion on that topic. That is a good thing, as it will keep the clean-up tag discussion on topic. No one here has said that new players don't deserve guidance; every user in this conversation has at some point contributed to developing a build. The point being discussed here is the use of the clean-up tag. Shireen wants to follow proper procedure; Readem wants to spend time more usefully. That is what the debate is about; keep it on topic. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:16, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Never once have I said I was an "Elitist". It has negative connotations that I do not believe I deserve. I am fair to all users, give advice whenever possible, and usually I make their builds MUCH better. I do more then add worthless "clean-up" tags. I take it a step further. Now Bluemilkman, don't you think you are being a bit hypocritical here? You clearly told me to "Sthu", did you not? May I not do such as well? If I feel attacked, as I am feeling, may I not defend myself? Do I have less rights as an Administrator, then you do as a user? Just something to think about. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:14, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Blue, Buddy, chill out, or I'll give you a little madatory time out time to cool down. You provoked Raedman and jump dead center into a conversation between Syops and Administration Philosophy between those two individuals. I did not need a public defender as no exchange between Raedem and I had reached any true level of personal involvement. For now, lets adjourn this. Rad, sorry for bringing this down on your user page and will finish this discussion later. Shireensysop 07:11, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Oh, don't worry, I will give myself some time out. I'm sick of people thinking they're better than everyone else. No, this is not all because of this, because I see it a lot. I shouldn't have called him an "elitist", but that doesn't call for anything like how he talked to me. So right now, you can thank yourself for losing a major contributer for a while. Congrats admins. Bluemilkman 07:16, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

... Peace and harmony, people. Peace and harmony.-- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 15:12, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

I thought about this for the past couple days, and have come to the conclusion that when I see someone heckling someone else for doing something they believe helps, I don't take to it very well. I have no beef with you, and I should not have made it personal, as it wasn't before I came in. I want what is best for this site, and I get pretty passionate about it sometimes. So what I'm trying to say, is that I'm sorry I was a butthead, and I'll try and not go there again. Take it as you will. Bluemilkman 08:56, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

Solo SS necro

hey there, i saw you changed spirit bond to reckless haste after i changed the solo build. i just wanted to say that reckless is totally counter synergistic with insidious parasite, and reckless haste is generally not needed as most of the farming done in this day and age with a 55 nec is done in hard mode, and that makes reckless haste's increased atk speed useless. as for its 52% miss chance, your survivability is just fine with spirit bond. i'm going to go ahead and change it back if you don't mind, because the spirit bnd variation is incredibly effective at keeping you alive as well as still doing plenty of damage, and it's easy for first time wiki copiers to pick up and go. any reason i shouldn't? 76.24.233.12 04:04, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Go ahead, RH was just mendtioned on the Talk Page :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:17, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

Vote

Bringing to your attention some retarded vote of this build. Please ask the voter to change his vote from 5/5/5(100%) to something else, and if he can't be serious, simply remove it... Thanks in advance. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 15:05, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

And plox archive your talk page. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 17:00, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
WARNING: This page is 84 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 17:01, 3 July 2007 (CEST)
Zomg, it's Golem Festival :O. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:02, 3 July 2007 (CEST)

while you're at it delete the vote at Build:R/Me Fissure Forest Farmer. the guy unfavored it cause he cant use it right =P - Skakid9090 20:13, 3 July 2007 (CEST) Would you also delete the last vote on Build:R/P Pressure Spear? The guy voted out of hate.Ansom 14:50, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

Build:Team - Deathly Spike question

What does the "introduction to NF" have to do with removing a 5-5-5 rating? Mgelo21 02:18, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

It mainly has to do with the statement "It's so cool it will work." Which implies that the concept is cool, but the author has niether tried it, nor has had experience working with such a build. Coolness is not a strong cofidance adjective when describing a builds ability. Thats the main reason the 5 5 5 was removed.Shireensysop 10:26, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

It's introduction of NF. I'm guessing he means the skill could be better because of the introduction of NF, so a perfect score shouldn't be there. Just a guess though. Bluemilkman 09:02, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

Guys...it if Golem Festival...it sux. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 12:55, 4 July 2007 (CEST)
But golem festival is fun! - Skakid9090 13:14, 4 July 2007 (CEST)

W/Mo Gladiator vote

Chop chop (remove my vote). Leave a funny reason too. — Rapta Rapta Icon1 (talk|contribs) 06:09, 6 July 2007 (CEST)

Funny...I don't understand Rapta? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 10:32, 6 July 2007 (CEST)

2:30

wut is this sleep, that I need? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 10:33, 6 July 2007 (CEST)

stop being nub >.> - Skakid9090 04:03, 7 July 2007 (CEST)

Wut, r u sure that is me? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:03, 7 July 2007 (CEST)

you took it toooo far dude - Skakid9090 04:17, 7 July 2007 (CEST)

Took wat? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:25, 7 July 2007 (CEST)

Well, ttyl guys. Off to RL now :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:13, 7 July 2007 (CEST)

Do you not see what I am trying to do?

Im trying to give you and every other wiki administrator a justification, a documented case, inorder to delete wammo builds on site, with needing little more than a brief explination and a link on the user page. Also, we now have a category to post "Please check here to ensure your build is not one of these before submitting." Im trying to save us work and cover our ass, and increase the buffer zone between what may be precieved as a personal attack against a new user. Trying to help stop the whole, "Lets get but hurt" kind of thing. Will you just show me a little trust. Im not being an idiot, the system will work. Shireensysop 05:26, 8 August 2007 (CEST)

That is the thing Shireen, we do not need justification. It is a waste of time. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:26, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Umm

Can you check out my build Spike Remedy Masterseru 03:23, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Sure. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:26, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

MSN

I know you and I don't sometimes get along, but I was wondering if I could sit in on your conversation when you're having it. No, I'm not going to say anything, I just wanted to see it. If you don't want me to, that's fine. Maybe you could give me a copy of it or something. If not, tehn I guess this was a fruitless request. Bluemilkman 05:13, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Sure. I don't care. As long as the others do not protest :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:51, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

i protest! muwhaha - Skakid9090 05:52, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

But unfortunately for u, u r teh roxxors. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:53, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Featured PvE Build

I was wondering that since Build:Any/D Generic Forge Runner has been vetted, if you can put my build Build:E/Mo Hard Mode Kirin Farmer as the featured PvE build? I don't know if I'm wrong here, but I can't put it there myself as the featured builds are shown on the main page >.< --Teh Uber Pwnzer 11:51, 9 July 2007 (CEST)


Shadow Sanctuary (Luxon)

[[Image:Shadow_Sanctuary_(Luxon).jpg]]. Ta-da. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 17:03, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

PvXwiki:Real Vetting

[18]: What's wrong with contacting the user? Shouldn't that be the first step, to ask him to explain the vote and see if it was just some misunderstanding? You can still complain on him if asking doesn't help. – HHHIPPOsysop› 23:03, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

We have many cases. They contact the user, and violate NPA. Has already happened more then it should have. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:15, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Oh, that's bad. They should ask the user, not insult him. Hmm, hard to say how to solve that. We can't really say it's forbidden to use each other's talk pages, but NPA violations should be pursued. – HHHIPPOsysop› 23:27, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

Yeah. I suggest this:

  • We do not allow the discussion of votes on user talk pages (Exceptions would be Administrators)
  • Suggest the use of the Build Talk Page instead, to vent

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:31, 9 July 2007 (CEST)

What if the voter doesn't respond because he's not checking the build talk page? Voting doesn't put the page on the watchlist. Shouldn't we rather enforce NPA, wherever needed? – HHHIPPOsysop› 23:59, 9 July 2007 (CEST)
If the bad vote is brought to the attention of an administrator, then in most cases it won't be even brought to the user. This method is a more subtle way of handling NPA's. Worse case scenario, an admin will bring the vote to the user, and ask specifically why the voter voted as he did. No Bias, no NPA. Case closed. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:03, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Hmm, yea, we can try that. I'm afraid the kind of people who violate NPA will not care about such rules, but let's see. – HHHIPPOsysop› 00:07, 10 July 2007 (CEST)
Probably, but should negate some unnecessary conflict. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:22, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

Reverts to the Monk builds

The variants were perfectly valid and to a certain extent I agree with them, so why remove them? ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 23:39, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

Because one, just added the word "Good". The other is not a worthy note :/. GoLE is much better then DS, in almost all scenarios :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:40, 10 July 2007 (CEST)

True... But nothing goes to say they can't be USED xP ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 00:06, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Fix to PvX:NPA

Fix the redirect please, tried to make one since one didn't exist, but it isn't working. Help would be appreciated. (Orange female istani looks better btw lol) ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:29, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Purge your cache. -Auron 02:31, 11 July 2007 (CEST)
kk, got it. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:00, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Rate to Touch Ranger

Bob fregman made a vote which is not necessarily valid. He says it doesn't deserve a 5 for innovation as it is an 'old' build, and that is scores a 0 for universality for some BS. Just read his votes, one skim over is good enough to prove it delete-worthy... Everyone hates the build but it deserves it's great status. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:00, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Mo/R Resilient

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Search?search=Mo%2FR

It seems that the MediaWiki search engine is not too happy about the '/' in the pagename. Try this instead. – HHHIPPOsysop› 10:31, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Invalid vote

Build:E/Mo Savannah Heat Farmer Rapta has made an invalid vote which I feel should be crossed. Sure, there are hellloads of UW farmer builds about, but scoring something low just because there are lots about isn't really fair. It's like slamming 20+ builds which use cripslash in totally different situations because there are 'too many'. As you can see, I'm no very happy with voting in it's current state... ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 19:53, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

About Awe

It's not an elite by the way. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 20:19, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

I know. it is just not very good. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:20, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

On a hammer warrior it's not bad if they are P/W. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 20:47, 11 July 2007 (CEST)

Featured Untested

Change the featured untested plz... thanks. ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (talk · contributions) 02:46, 12 July 2007 (CEST)

Build:N/E Reaper's Mark Anti-Melee Necromancer

Will fail less next time =(. Sorry. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:18, 12 July 2007 (CEST)

Your vote on it was removed due to PvXwiki:Real Vetting briefly forbidding author votes. For the moment, the matter is undecided. Feel free to vote again on the build. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 05:29, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

smite some votes

go smite the 2 extremely low votes in SH ele that say easily countered by running out, the description says its to be used with KD or snares. you're on do not disturb btw >.> - Skakid9090 21:21, 12 July 2007 (CEST)

Yay!

I finally finished removing ALL bad votes in the PvP section ^.^. I win! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:45, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

"If a vote appears unjustified (e.g. only 0-scores or no meaningful reason given), the voter should be asked for clarification. As a last resort, admins have the power to strike a vote." Did you forget this part before striking all the votes? Bob fregman 19:24, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
I forget nothing. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:27, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
I guess it's just disregard then, ironic actually Bob fregman 19:47, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
I strike bad votes ironically, and idiotic one's for shits and giggles. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:49, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
You seem to strike virtually every vote that doesn't seem to score the build the same as you. Half the time your reasons for striking them are questionable(or poorly written), and i don't think you ever consult the person who rated it. Can't you at least follow your own policies. Bob fregman 20:38, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
Yes, because I strike dumb votes. Poorly written (Oh, it is "I" not "i" the last time I checked)? Must I consult ever newb who votes poorly? Can you QQ? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:43, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
Oh, and please get to the fucking point sometime tomorrow, ty. This regards the removal of the Touch Ranger vote. [19] here, now QQ. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:48, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

builds-table

unprotect it, you're the only one who wants it protected. nubbycake - Skakid9090 21:29, 13 July 2007 (CEST)


5.is readem nub?

orly?

YARLY

  1. - Skakid9090 21:29, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Newb, anons can delete the main page :P. Just tested :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:30, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

duh, that means you get more chances to ban. doesn't that sound fun? - Skakid9090 21:31, 13 July 2007 (CEST)
Um no, as I am gone in 2 days :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:33, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

it takes a whole two clicks to revert. Bluemilkman 22:10, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Actually, only one to rollback :). The preceding unsigned comment was added by Readem (contribs) .

History, Compare, Undo, Save... 4 to me, but I'm just a regular user. =P. ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (talk · contributions) 22:11, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Yeah, Readem isn't god. We all know I am. I pwned the arse off of 4 people, which was 1 monk 1 ranger 1 derv and 1 necro... And that was all sitting guarding the priest. I was running surprise surprise, the Me/W Illusion Slasher. I tanked, I raped, I ROCKED. It was derv down first, then the ranger, then the monk and then the necro. 4 people killed by one little mesmer. THIS! IS! NAPALM! *nerf 4 peeps* ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:50, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

I r god newb. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:06, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Template:Builds Table

Doesn't help when you delete it. Now the main page looks like crap. Good job. Bluemilkman 23:38, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Pls, stfu while I do this. Ty. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:39, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Mk, I'll take that back. You fixed it pretty fast. Bluemilkman 23:41, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

haha, I'll talk when it pleases me. But then again, all you have to do is ask nicely. Bluemilkman 23:42, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

Rlly, stop. I am trying to do this. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:44, 13 July 2007 (CEST)

lawl sure u r ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:51, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Greetings

Greeting comrade! ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:47, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

o, hi dar :) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:58, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Yees comrade, your spies (or rather me) have noticed something is not quite right. Taan's vote to Build:Mo/any RA Bonder is indescriptive, inconclusive and says pretty much nothing. It's not that I don't agree with his scoring... Just look for yourself comrade xP ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 03:10, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Weird stuff im so popular and famous - Skakid9090 06:30, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

A blank sheet of paper...very nice Skakid, very nice O_0... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:33, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

click on it tbh. - Skakid9090 06:34, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
That doesn't make much sense tbh :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:35, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Readem sucks tbh. - Skakid9090 06:38, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
? You save Gaile's quotes?!? You sick bastard! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:39, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Later Guys

Tomorrow working all day, and Sunday on a plane at 6 :P. Be back when I have access to a computer (May not happen soon :/...) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:45, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

dont nub up that airplane plz... thx and bye =) Skakid9090 06:46, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Bye Readem. I am not sure if I will be able to survive without your wisdom. --Edru viransu 06:48, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Take care. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:28, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Is this what you do at work, Readem? --Edru viransu 21:46, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
I am 17, moving, and have been up since 6 this morning :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:48, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Ah, I interpreted working as the job kind of work. --Edru viransu 21:53, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Well, speaking that I was carrying boxes for 5 hours until my hands began bleeding from all the chafing, I guess it is all a matter of opinion what a "job" truly is :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:58, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
Landed successfully :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:17, 16 July 2007 (CEST)
Good point. I interpreted working as the employment kind of work, then. Good to hear that you landed successfully. Does this mean that I can expect your wisdom again, now? --Edru viransu 01:37, 16 July 2007 (CEST)
wb - Skakid9090 01:30, 16 July 2007 (CEST)

lol

you're gonna have to remove the unfavored tag from all those builds =) Readem sucks - Skakid9090 21:26, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

Oh gawd, that's not your signature now, is it? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 21:54, 14 July 2007 (CEST)
i decided to change it =P - Skakid9090 21:55, 14 July 2007 (CEST)

What readem is missing =P

Maturity, Logic, and Reason. you must grow up. ty and have a nice day. that is all. =P--Lokre 19:15, 16 July 2007 (CEST)

You are fucking kidding me? Readem;; (talk*pvxcontribs) 16:05, 17 July 2007 (CEST)
A mildly entertaining jest, at best. --Edru viransu 23:02, 16 July 2007 (CEST)
Not trying to be a jerk or anything, but I think you said exactly what he wanted you to say. At least, he probably wanted that type of reaction. Bluemilkman 16:25, 17 July 2007 (CEST)
PvX:NPA. Nuff said. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 20:06, 18 July 2007 (CEST)
O.o? He quoted exactly what I said to him... then laugh at that, and people start repremanding me? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:09, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

I'm not repremanding you for anything. Just watch the language. I'm sure he didn't say that. I still like you though. Bluemilkman 04:58, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

My build is good so i am going to complain in my title to you, but seriously, for a seeping build its pretty tight. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 06:11, 18 July 2007 (CEST)

... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:01, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

Sorry, I am a spaz. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 00:05, 19 July 2007 (CEST)
You are not alone :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:10, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

Struck Vote

hey i dont see any reason why you had to remove my vote in the touch ranger build. your motivation made me lol. touch rangers are not warriors, and if i dont like to switch target 'cause I already wasted half of my energy on one, I dont see why this would make my opinion invalid. --Morten 17:00, 18 July 2007 (CEST)

Will check. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:15, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

Just revote with a slightly better reason m8. Kiting ofc is a counter, but that is one of the few that can counter a touchy; making it a very solid build in-general. It's like a war, that is immune to blind, and does AI damage :/. Pretty good imo. The Warrior comment was a reference to target switching. For example, in GvG if you see someone being pre-protted, you merely switch targets. It is also a very effective way to kill some kiting, and increase your overall match dps. should try it, tis fun. Just remem kids, Addren spikes r 4 newbs ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:23, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

oook,i see where you are coming from, but after all my vote was still high, i know the build's good at pressure. just found it odd you'd strike my vote just because i like sticking on the same target: i know the build very well, and i actually played it a lot. anyway spike>pressure. lol --Morten 14:25, 19 July 2007 (CEST)
um could i ask you to check a vote in my build Build:Rt/any_Grasping_Bomber? tycn seems to assume i rely completely on a destruction spirit, when i covered a whole section of usage to describe a spike which doesnt require a spirit. however i am not requiring you to strike it. thats completely up to you of course. i settled this with the author of the comment, so nevermind and thanks anyway. --Morten 14:41, 19 July 2007 (CEST)

scythe sins

I don't like the idea either, but it works in pve. Don't pester anyone about it, everyone knows you dislike it already. -Auron 06:38, 20 July 2007 (CEST)

...

Yeah is that really an appropriate reason to strike out my vote? Grow up Readem, Cya Pvxwiki. Much better places... Six 05:00, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

Who r u? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:05, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

How about you "suck less" Readem. ^^ Bai bai now. I gots to go own them HB Balanced sins with mah Mesmer. ^^ Ciao. Six 06:19, 22 July 2007 (CEST)
Your vote didn't make any sense, by the way. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 07:54, 22 July 2007 (CEST)

At this point I am just going to point out that your customer service ability has just driven one person away from the wiki. With better social interactions messages like these would never appear on your user space. This is an issue, and don't tell me that, "Well, we don't need them here anyway." Bad attitude bro. Im not pulling this out of my but just to but heads with you. Take a minute and try and see that your constant behavior is not appreciated or deemed acceptable to many, and the above will become more frequent the longer you persist in you method of handleing people. Shireensysop 07:26, 22 July 2007 (CEST)

Don't care sorry :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:47, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

Yo

Check it out please:Build:W/D 'Liteless AxeDark0805|Rant 19:38, 21 July 2007 (CEST)

Done gogogo. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:49, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
Thanks. I feel bad though i wasnt asking to cancel out bad votes. A review woulda been fine lol. But thanks. Its annoying for once the build i post doesnt feel halfassed and yet rapta comes to ruin my fun.Dark0805|Rant 21:07, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
Rapta ruins fun for all :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:08, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
I hear he 1v1ed fun and beat him with echo mending.Dark0805|Rant 21:41, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

ARCHIVE

PLZKTHX -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 06:02, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

WARNING: This page is 118 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 06:22, 23 July 2007 (CEST)
dont do it readem, dont be a conformist! - Skakid9090 06:41, 23 July 2007 (CEST)

Users

Hi, just wanted to let you know that I told sorry to Six guy who is quited b/o you. On our wiki there is place for everyone and administrators sould be a very last reason of b/c people leave. And maybe you think some people are bad in PvP (hell I never done HoH) - I am good at something else. I do understand that you have passion for the game and that you do know a lot, but you are administrator you are here to make sure that all people play nicely and dont kill each other. Comments like "What do people not understand, about "I have played this game, way the fuck more then you have."?" and "sux less" is not a style for admin. If I "worked" out my issues with Sefre so can you with almost any user. Just a reminder from me to you gcardinal 00:32, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

I don't even know what vote six is talking about man :/... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:04, 24 July 2007 (CEST)
I've spoken with you on several occasions and I have documentation that shows you complete lack of regard for the user base here on the wiki. I've tried to bring it up to you quietly, and later forcefully with you in private. This is my public statement, "I do not wish you to be an Administator." This is a serious issue. One on one, as a person, you a great guy. But you lack leadership qualities and the maturity necessary to warrant continuation in an administrative role here on the wiki. I don't need to say anything more to you as we have allready had our discussion two weeks ago and it did not phase you. You did this to yourself. Shireensysop 00:39, 24 July 2007 (CEST)
I know your views Shireen. I have them documented on my labtop. Now please refrain from trying to change my views/opinions. Accept my differences, or don't associate with me. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:05, 24 July 2007 (CEST)
I do not try to associate with you. I AM associated with you with OUR titles as syops. I have no problems with your decisions or your contributions. It is how you handle people Raedem. Plain and simple. And as you ask, "Do not associate with me," Thats what I am trying to do. Remove the title that gives us association. Shireensysop 05:52, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

On notice

This is your... warning? Nah, just a friendly reminder to chill out and remember your responsibilities as a sysop here. Stuff like this isn't acceptable... ever. When I chatted with you on MSN about it, you shrugged it off; it isn't a laughing matter. Please take your role here more seriously, or risk losing it. -Auron 00:59, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

I know, I said it wouldn't happen again remem? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:06, 24 July 2007 (CEST)
Actually, it is a few topics up from this one, where I apoligized ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:07, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

Just a Note

At the least, contact people about votes you choose to remove. That's all I think you should improve of yourself. (and to be honest, I wouldn't have contacted people about votes I removed until just recently. I wouldn't have even thought about it.) Anyways, I don't agree with any form of Demotion at this time. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 03:49, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

Block

I know I've unblocked myself before, I assume Readem can as well, so what's the point of this block? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 05:46, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

symbolic imo. - Skakid9090 05:50, 24 July 2007 (CEST)
If users believe I am too harsh, then Auron and I have come to a resolusion that will please all involved. ttyl. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:52, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

Hi

Hi m8, I am sorry to see that discussion about you went that far. I hope we can work out all the issue if there is any. Get on MSN when you can and say hi :) gcardinal 06:30, 24 July 2007 (CEST)

Hi I got a strange msg from you when you say ttyl. And I replied right away but you was instantly offline? gcardinal 03:43, 26 July 2007 (CEST)
Hmmm :/. A tad strange, speaking I was on for an hour or more :P. I'll try again later, after I finish my appointments. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:48, 26 July 2007 (CEST)
Still waiting for yo... gcardinal 00:37, 27 July 2007 (CEST)
At school atm, sorry :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:38, 27 July 2007 (CEST)
I am still waiting for a chance to chat with you. Please leave me a msg when you are online on msn so we can talk. gcardinal 09:45, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
When can I expect to see you online? I have been waiting for 5+ days to talk to you. wasup? gcardinal 15:49, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
Dude, I have been on multiple times lol :P. Ask Auron, or even DE. I am just probably in a strange time zone for you lulz :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:50, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
Again just add a MSG to my talk page next time you are on. I would remind you that I told you not to rate any builds until admins can have a discussion according you and your behavior - I see that you ignoring my warnings and I have been trying to talk to you for almost a week now. This is a last warning - stop removing any ratings until we have a admin meting. gcardinal 22:52, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
Errm people have asked me to do those. I have not removed any, that have not been brought to my attention. It is not my fault G, if we are on completely different timezones, and I am on vacation, and I am going to school. Again, what left is their to talk about? O.o Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:53, 1 August 2007 (CEST)
I have been online all that time, since my last msg - you have not been online on MSN, yet you find time to remove another rating. I told you that it was a last warning not to remove any ratings and yet you do so again? I don't understand do you want me to permanent ban you from this site? I gave you last warning and you don't care at all? What kind of attitude is that? Why do I have to waste my time on removing your rollback's in mysql?
If you: remove a rating, rate a build, enter any discussion on any build's talk page before admin's meeting this weekend you will be permanently banned from this wiki for ever.
This is your very last warning, and don't come back telling me I didnt gave you any. If you made a mess, be a man and answer for your actions. Stop playing around, I don't have time for any babysitting. gcardinal 01:41, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Wth...? I haven't done anything but positively contribute since the whole debate O.o? Go ahead and look at my talk page even. I can get on right now, but you need to act in a more responsible manner my friend, and realize that I have done nothing wrong since. Now please, be the respectable individual I know you can be, and speak openly with me. Do not insult me, with very little reason. I have a life, I go to school! If I am unable to reach you, or vice-versa then that must be taken into account. I am in California, and you are pretty much on the otherside of the world. Either accept this, or our conversation must be kept on-hold until the meeting with the rest of the admins. Do you agree to such terms? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:48, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
I and Auron gave you a warning - that was very clear. We was agreed that you will stay away from rating and or removing ratings. I don't care for what reason you rated or removed - warning was given multiple times and you don't care at all. For good reason or for bad reason - you currently don't have right to rate or remove any ratings. And you will stay way from rating's and discussing anything on any build's talk page until admin's meeting. If you rate anything for any reason you will be banned.
And just for the record I chat both with Auron, Armond and DE without any problems. If you find time to do something you don't have permission for then you have time to get online on MSN. gcardinal 01:54, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
I apologize GC, but you continue to resist reason. In its stead, you act irrationally and are irresponsible. I have no time for childish arguments, and neither do you. Take this time, to reconsider your actions and responsibilities to this wiki. Have a good day, and best of wishes Gcardinal! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:26, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Sorry if this ain't my place to comment but just what the FUCK is going on here? Threatening to ban Readem when all he does is make constructive edits? No, really, what the FUCK is going on on this wiki lately? Man this is some confusing shit. Either that or I can't understand anything when I'm stoned x/ ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:38, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Many of his edits, even if we is correct in removing them, involve very immature and often insulting comments towards the user in question, some of whom are honestly voicing their opinions on it. His conduct when dealing with others is very immature and to be honest, he doesn't appear to be qualified to be an admin, despite his playing experience. He can contribute with equal efficency as a user, and we won't have to deal with his crap. Bob fregman 19:29, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
No offense m8, but you are highly out of place to say anything of the sort. You rarely contribute, and have no idea what we are even talking about. I would appreciate you leave this between me and GC :). Ty. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:57, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
I know, your a great contributor and i wouldnt take that away from you, but your people skills are lacking. For example what you just said sums it up fairly well, using your contributions and position and holding it over the head of someone else to prove a point(on a wiki nonetheless) is not proper behavior for an admin, imho of course. Not to mention thatmy contributions are totally irelevant in this case, since someone just reading all the articles and never posting could notice it. Thats it, im done, i just wanted to provide a counter-point to Napalm.Bob fregman 01:35, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
I think you'd have had a stronger point had you said it before Readem became a nice friendly carebear(kidding, but, yeah... he suddenly stopped being a blunt offensive helpful person and became a nice, friendly, helpful person). --Edru viransu//QQ about me 01:42, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

Check your GWiki talk page

Left a question for you on there thinking I was on PvX. I'm guessing you're more active here though, so thought I'd give you a heads up on this talk page. — Hyperion` // talk 05:17, 25 July 2007 (CEST)

Sorry mate, been on vacation. Will check. (Yay, by hitting keyboard with hammer, it is working better!) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:36, 26 July 2007 (CEST)

Images

Do you happen to know the copy writes of the new Gwen Skill images? (Also, talk page too big, I start leave messages at top. 2 lazy 2 scrol) ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 05:12, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

guild shack. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:51, 27 July 2007 (CEST)
 ? I mean can I upload them for my own use until they get BBcoded (which will prolly be sometime after they 31st next month) ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 05:52, 27 July 2007 (CEST)
Oh, well give credit to GWW. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:54, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

Build Rating

WARNING: This page is 128 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections.
Are We allowed to rate our own builds as seen here? User:Skakid9090 made this build and appears to voting on all the builds he created. If this isn't in policy it should be. Regardless if he had good intentions users will always favor there build and give positive reviews for it. --Metal enchantment Metal Enchantment (talk · contributions) 20:50, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

It is allowed, in the current vetting system. We just hope for the best, and see what happens. If the vote is obviously biased, then it shall be removed. Otherwise, we just let the general userbase unfavor it for themselves. Perhaps in the future, we shall make such a transition, but for now users may vote for their own builds. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:56, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

OK thanks for the info.--Metal enchantment Metal Enchantment (talk · contributions) 20:58, 27 July 2007 (CEST)

5000

1/2/3/4/5/6/7/8/9/10/11/12/13/14/15

Build Box

way not to capitilize the 2nd words nub. — RAWR! Skasig Skakid9090 04:15, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

I did. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:21, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

Help me

Help me with making this build better, please? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 06:11, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

Question

I was checking out some trial war builds and on one:

  • "Endure pain... lulz-Readem"

Whats wrogn with EP i use it and i wanna know what i am doing wrong? Its excellent when the hits are coming hard and fast, and you need to get out.Dark0805|Rant 23:07, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

It has to do with the unreliabilty of Endure Pain. Also, the Endure Pain glitch is annoying at times. However, if one was able to keep endure pain up indefinately, it would most certainly be worth using, as there would be no risks, and you could also run all sups, as it would subsidize their costs. Generally, keep in mind, that just having a high reg health rate and Heal Sig, is generally a better idea :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:19, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

Glitch? Never heard of a endure pain glitch. And of course, i know its not a viable heal... but i always though of it as the warrios feigned neutrality.Dark0805|Rant 23:33, 30 July 2007 (CEST)
The glitch is that fact you die when you use heal sig, and are at neg health. I like just Mending touch, and heal sig on my war for PvE. Then I just let my SoR hero do the rest ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:36, 30 July 2007 (CEST)

Votes

Hi, Readem. I was wondering if you could check out a rating or two and see if it could be removed? Thanks. Build:Rt/E Burning Rifter, Build:P/E Focused Flame Paragon

Sure, I'll take a look. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:57, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Hm, some of the votes did have rather valid points my friend. Mind if I take a look, and see what I can do? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:03, 31 July 2007 (CEST)


If you wouldn't mind. I completely rebuilt my D/ Rt Splintering DW Dervish and taged it as trial. I'd like to start with a clean slate if I could? Greevar 04:00, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Ok. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:00, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:02, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Thanks much! Greevar 04:08, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

You, actually

I know you probably strongly dislike me right now, but I do want to say this. From what I've been seeing, you have been awesome lately. If there was a vote, I would probably say give you another chance. I didn't want it to have to come to this, but it seemed the only way for anything to change, which I'm glad to see has been for the better. I've always respected your knowledge of Guild Wars, just wasn't too happy on some of your acts. Keep up the good work. Bluemilkman 06:05, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Erm, Auron just told me I was being a dick, so I stopped. I am still pissed about that "Demotion" campaign tho >.>. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 08:59, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Hang on, what the FUCK happened here? Tell me all on my talk page please? I'm ill-informed. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:31, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

Well night guys

Ttyl. Just wanted to ask before I go to sleep, but how does the check user function work. I would appreciate it if someone enlighten me :). Ty. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:01, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Click on this link for starters. Once there, put the user name into the User box, and it will display his/her IP. Put the IP into the IP box to check which accounts have been accessed from that IP, and what they have contributed. It's pretty simple; doesn't take long to become proficient with it. Have a good night. :-) - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 09:05, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Aww, very nice. ty. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:07, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

== Bad Rating ==

Hello again Readem. This user,asdfg, has been to many of my builds and gave it stupid low ratings. Could you remove one from this build for me, thankyou ur awesome. Build:E/D Earth Tank.

--Victoryisyours 16:12, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Hm, I think I should help you on this one, see my response on the talk page. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:04, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Removing my rating makes me sad. :( Asdfg 18:12, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

errr, I didn't. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:13, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Build:A/Mo_Fear_Shattering

I must have moved this to testing and completely forgot. Apperently it was still a /necro at the begining of it's test's and has votes based off that. Could you purge the votes that vote on it's /necroness? ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 17:41, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:02, 31 July 2007 (CEST)
Cool. I just figured rollback any that mentioned Necro and stuff. but that works too. ‽-(єяøηħ) no u 18:08, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Build:E/D Earth Tank

Thankyou readem, i would like to have the ratings remove and taken back to trial phase.--Victoryisyours 20:09, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

ok, np. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:11, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Could you take a look at the new changes? It looks great!--Victoryisyours 21:33, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

139 kilobytes...

remove the 0-0-0 vote plz — RAWR! Skasig Skakid9090 20:59, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:01, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Build:P/E Focused Flame Paragon

I have to take this build under construction and change some stuff to it. Could i get a clean slate please? Thankyou.--Victoryisyours 21:48, 31 July 2007 (CEST)

Ok. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:44, 1 August 2007 (CEST)

You posted on my user page, May I take some artistic license for you build? (Spear Chucker:Fix it a bit). What do you mean?--Victoryisyours 02:26, 1 August 2007 (CEST)

My Userpage

Thanks for fixing the communist thing!!!Belgianbronco 22:20, 1 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:A/any Beguiling Shocker

Hey again Readem, can you check out a new build i submitted and tell me what you think.--Victoryisyours 00:21, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

Sure :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:24, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

MSN

I would appreciate it if you were to pass my MSN around to the other sysops. It's gamefreak229@hotmail.com

And by the way, you look like you are in need of an archive soon xP ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:43, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

He was in need of an archive a month ago. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 01:46, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Only that recently? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 01:48, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Holy shit, 104 sections. THIS NEEDS ARCHIVING NOW! *stamp* ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:55, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

Warn the Russian Spies!

I dislike Russians. I throw Russians off of boats. Hah, some cocky abusive little RUS shit decided to get mouthy to me coming back from a boat trip. He was like 'Do you wanna go for a swim? Shut the f*ck up you stupid f*cking English piece of sh*t!' So I gave him my 'THIS IS SPARTA!' treatment and kicked him overboard. Man, I feel so proud. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 01:58, 2 August 2007 (CEST)

umm.. wtf? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 02:02, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Yeah, every Russian I've known has been an arsehole so now I have a negative image of Russians firmly imprinted in my mind. And that's not the first time I kicked that Russian into the sea. That was the 7th. Ooh, he was such a little dick head. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:04, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
... i can't tell if he's serious. Skakid9090 02:05, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
First of all, I find it strange that you can get an edit conflict typing the exact same message up, but w/e. Secondly, you know GCardinal, the site founder, is Russian, yes? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 02:06, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Well I never knew he was Russian, that's the FIRST Russian person that I have know that hasn't been an arse. Seriously, the FIRST. And yes, I'm serious, they pissed me off big time on holiday and nearly ruined it. Good thing is, I gave one of them what he had coming. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 02:08, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
I'm russian. Parents were born in the Soviet Union and everything. Mother from Moscow, father from Leningrad. WHAT NOW!!? —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 19:53, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Grinch is one of the best, friendliest players of this game. So there for russians! ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (talk · contributions) 20:02, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Just remember Napalm, that sterio-types should generally be avoided. The few you met, were probably just exceptions to the rule :). Grinch is not bad, right ;)? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:07, 2 August 2007 (CEST)
Exactly, and if you disagree, I'll torture you till you do.don't. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 02:02, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Heh, that sentence may not have been worded quite right, since currently it equates to "if you disagree, I'll torture you until you disagree". --Edru viransu//QQ about me 02:07, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

Triple Bond Mels

I heard of a build called Triple Bond Melandrus. Not on here or crapshack. What is it? —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 04:26, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

EDIT: Figured I'd ask you since you've HAd alot. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 04:29, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

It's a GvG build that iQ made, it used a life barrier runner, three mels dervs and other superpowered shit. It was made to roll teams in 2 minutes or lose the game... most teams got rolled in two minutes, though :p -Auron 04:32, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Why does no one have a copy? If its so superpowered, PvX should get a page for it. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 04:36, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Mostly because it requires so much skill. Merely coping the bars would do nobody any good. -Auron 04:41, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Yeah I HA some, but not seriously (My friends joke about HA). I haven't been in a PvP Guild for a couple of months. However, I still guest frequently :). For HA things, I would usually ask Auron, as he will not only be right, he'll rank flash you in the same process ;) (He cares more about HA then I do :P) Also, if you want an example, just look in my Build box at a version my friends guild ran the day before I left on vaca. We did more of a QQ Anti-melee thing though -2 hexers (iQ prefers only 1, and a tainter) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:42, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Well, we already have the flagger posted. It is a ship out of water without the rest of the build, if anyone knows of it, would you help post it here as well? All I know of it is 3 Mel Dervs with SoH/JI and the Life Barrier flagger with no speed boost. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 05:00, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Read my comment aboe Krow Man ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:13, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Also, it generally includes 4 Monks/3 AoMs/ and 1 iQ Tainter. We just ran it with added hex pressure. We got rolled once, but won 3 times just fyi (unranked ftw!) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:17, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Oh, ok thank you. And duh. >.< I'll see if anything is posted on Guru and hassle Auron. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 05:19, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
There's a thread about it on Guru. I think Auron posted a link to a post in the thread on the Life Barrier runner's talk. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 05:28, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
[20] This one? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 05:31, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Meh, no point Krowman. You can't copy unless you are actually good. And no, this is not just my opinion. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:00, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
Have a look here. Soon everyone and their dog will be copy-catting it (/sniff FoTM...), we can beat them to the punch and post it here. Help solidify our status as a serious Builds site, not just an extension of GWiki's disaster. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:21, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

guys...

i smel liek poo Readem (talk*contribs) 05:34, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

You can take a shower. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 05:36, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
lawl Skak. Btw, it takes forever to load this page, archive please. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 05:40, 3 August 2007 (CEST)
That's why there's a policy being voted on right now :D —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 05:42, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:Team - TA Balanced

HOW DARE YOU TANTALIZE ME WITH YOUR EDITS, THIS MEANS WAR! Skakid9090 07:17, 3 August 2007 (CEST)

DO NOT WORRY SKAKID, THAT IS JUST THE OPPOSITE OF MY INTENTIONS. LET US CONTINUE WRITING IN BOLD CAPS, AS IT IS GUD, NO? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:48, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
WUT?! The preceding unsigned comment was added by Skakid9090 (contribs) . 07:50, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
Mommy! -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 21:43, 4 August 2007 (CEST)
lol, cannot even post on my own page in IE lulz... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:23, 5 August 2007 (CEST)


Your vote on it was removed due to PvXwiki:Real Vetting briefly forbidding author votes. For the moment, the matter is undecided. Feel free to vote again on the build. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 05:25, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

RE: Banning of User:He opened me wide

Just for clarification purposes, may I ask why you banned that user hours after he had received a warning from me? Both instances of "vandalism," the vandalism of the template, and then the vote, which was at the very least immature if not outright vandalism, were reviewed by me (he was warned about the template by me, and then I removed the vote and he was warned again by Wyvern before I had the chance to do so). Given that, and given the fact that in general, the right to punish is deferred to the first Admin on scene, what prompted you to ban the user? Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:46, 5 August 2007 (CEST)

He repeatedly acted in an immature fashion. We as Administrators, can in no way support such childish behavior. In my views, Vandalism insults not only my intelligence, but also the wiki's as a whole. Even the Users name, was inappropriate; do you not agree? Hopefully the user will take this time to evaluate what he/she has done, and reconsider when the next opportunity arises. Hopefully, you took no offense the placement of the ban. If it so matters, you may adjust the ban as you see fit. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:14, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
It's not necessarily that I disagree with the ban. Merely that I feel that a couple of instances (particularly since they'd stopped long before you banned him) don't necessarily qualify him for a ban. Besides, you're on... thin ice... shall we say at the moment, so I was surprised that you felt the need to ban him after he'd already been warned. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:19, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
Get on MSN plz. gcardinal 06:20, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
Probably not a bad idea Readem. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 06:23, 5 August 2007 (CEST)
Damn you guys choose bad timing...I have ten minutes? Maybe less, that enough? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:25, 5 August 2007 (CEST)

Signing your comments

How do you make your standard signature have a certain color/style with a little picture next to it?--Victoryisyours 01:34, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Special:Preferences, put the wikicode for your custom signature into Nickname and check the raw signatures (without automatic link). --Edru viransu//QQ about me 01:40, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Thanks! Ok how do i make a little picture next to it?--Victoryisyours 02:09, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Use the image tag coding stuff (yeah!). Check out the coding on User:Armond/Signature for some ideas. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 02:34, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

How do i get my own unique image no1 else has used?--Victoryisyours 04:08, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Upload it at Special:Upload. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 04:21, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
Thanks guys. Also, if you have any more questions, feel free to ask :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:18, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

How do i make the image smaller? I mean look at what it looks like right now. --VictoryisyoursVictory is Mine! 15:56, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

That image is too large. It violates our signature policy. Make it smaller by putting a pixel number after it, example: [[image:Victory_is_Mine!_.jpg‎|12px]] —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 16:32, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Thanks all i have a signature now =p--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours 16:42, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

You may want to check PvX:SIGN to see how large that picture of yours can be. In general, you should familiarize yourself with the policies and the rules here on PvXwiki. To see the policies and rules, go to PvXwiki:Policy. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 16:46, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
Thanks. I think my picture is small enough though now.--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours 18:27, 6 August 2007 (CEST)
Oh, I meant make it a little larger. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 19:08, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Lol its at 12 px right now. What should it be?--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours 19:46, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

How is this? Is this a good size?--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours 19:48, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Yep, just fine :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:52, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

Sweetness thankyou all!--Victory is Mine! Victoryisyours 19:55, 6 August 2007 (CEST)

lolol at game balance

Well the idea was to create a Hex in and out type of teleport, I do question the high recharge I don't think any of the 45s recharge skills get much use. The deepwound is odd, You can make some fun builds without Twisting because of this, but I do agree the numbers a bit off. It's fun when used with shatter delusions, as you can control when you leave. I think the numbers just need tweaking I mean if this had 0 recharge it would be insane. Clearly there is a number between 0-45 that is correct. ~Izzy @-'---- 01:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

:Why would this be fun with Shatter Delusions? =P Mikey 01:54, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

::Shatter Delusions only affects mesmer hexes anyway...Luminarus 08:34, 25 July 2007 (UTC)

lololol, Izzy you never fail to amaze me. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:29, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

This is win, tbh. Izzy needs to play more, imo, and to be less out of touch with the game. I think that he could actually balance the game pretty well, if he did so. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 00:39, 7 August 2007 (CEST)
Sorry Edru, he is busy atm playing WoW. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:43, 7 August 2007 (CEST)
No, he isn't. He's playing Fury beta, atm. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 00:44, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

Yeah, that was pretty funny. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 00:35, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

That is sad. :( Asdfg 00:39, 7 August 2007 (CEST)
I know, it is. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:43, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

Is not RV1

It's GW:1RV, not GW:RV1 --Edru viransu//QQ about me 01:40, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

I know m8, changed it already :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:49, 7 August 2007 (CEST)

 :)

Let's see how badly Anet ruined the game, shall we? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:19, 8 August 2007 (CEST)

How do you mean? —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 02:21, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
What did they do this time? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 02:21, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
Err, I am just seeing what changed since I left :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:22, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
Who cares, tbh? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 02:24, 8 August 2007 (CEST)
O.O [21] Did Izzy start playing GW again? There are some pretty good changes in there. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 23:09, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
Most of those came from his underpowered/overpowered section. I like some of them, but I'll miss the imba of Aegis. —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 23:42, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
I love GPS buff, Guardian buff, BL buff(even if it won't really do much), and the hex changes, also the remove hex buff, because I no longer feel tainted by having it unlocked... Some other stuff was nice, I think, but I don't remember what. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 23:59, 9 August 2007 (CEST)
I have the feeling that Reckless haste got a buff, the rit spells will never ever see any use, Blessed Light needs a Heal buff nod a recharge buff and that Melandru still isnt fixed and will get stronger as there are less hexes. Same goes for Rampage as One.Asdfg 00:29, 10 August 2007 (CEST)
Ancestor's Rage was used a lot, but it still sucks to see it nerfed :( Sshaun007 11:59, 12 August 2007 (CEST)

RecCha

"# (Deletion log); 11:07 . . Readem (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Build talk:N/Me FoC Spiker": content was: '#REDIRECT Build talk:N/Me FoC Necro' (and the only contributor was 'Skakid9090'))"

"# (Deletion log); 11:07 . . Krowman (Talk | contribs | block) (deleted "Build talk:N/Me FoC Spiker": content was: '#REDIRECT Build talk:N/Me FoC Necro' (and the only contributor was 'Skakid9090'))"

Didn't even know that was possible until now. I feel guilty about posting here and making your page even more difficult to load though. :-) - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 20:10, 8 August 2007 (CEST)

I noticed that too...creepy as hell O.o... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:14, 8 August 2007 (CEST)

Dumb question...

This is going to be a really dumb question, but since I just joined here (been visiting for a while) I'm still hunting for the information on how to go about submitting a new build to the site. I'd rather do it the right way the first time, but since builds are tested and such I wasn't sure exactly what I needed to do first. It's a Wiki, but a bit different than what I'm used to.  :) ~ J.Kougar UserJKougar sig 02:22, 11 August 2007 (CEST)

PvXwiki:Style and formatting —ǥȓɩηɔɧ/〛 02:24, 11 August 2007 (CEST)
Grinch resolved the issue, I see. Ty Grinch. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:32, 11 August 2007 (CEST)

Merge

Ah I see. That would be good. Sorry for the harsh comments... Matti Nuke 03:16, 11 August 2007 (CEST)

Np, happens to everyone. Tell me what you think is vitally important in your build, and I'll add it Skak's for you. Then people will vote (most likely favor), and then both of you can take credit for it, if you want. No reason to be upset, over silly things such as builds m8 ;). Well, I hope you continue to contribute the wiki, and enjoy doing so. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:22, 11 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:P/Mo Energy Support Paragon

Why did you remove my vote from that build? -Auron 16:25, 12 August 2007 (CEST)

You gave no reason, other than "What" =). If I must give acceptable reasons for my actions, I sure the hell am bringing everyone else with me ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 18:48, 12 August 2007 (CEST)

You really need to re-think your role here. "If I must give acceptable reasons for my actions, I sure the hell am bringing everyone else with me" is a very poor attitude to have. -Auron 06:22, 13 August 2007 (CEST)
Saying, "Umm....what?" is a poor excuse for a vote regardless. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 17:56, 13 August 2007 (CEST)
I think you missed the point. -Auron 04:17, 14 August 2007 (CEST)
Everyone is held to the same standards, even you Auron :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:27, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

Real Vetting

I am sorry but you will have to rollback edit you made to the real vetting policy. Such big change must be discussed before being added to a official policy. The minimal here will be to post changes on the talk page, inform all admin about the ongoing discussion and when the discussion is over changes can be added. Even we had a brief discussion on this subject other users and admins must have the say before making change official. Please rollback and start a discussion. gcardinal 19:07, 13 August 2007 (CEST)

Very well :). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:18, 13 August 2007 (CEST)

Could you have a look please

in build Build:Rt/E_Obsidian_Ritualist user moonspell gave a triple 5 with no viable reason. --Morten 20:37, 13 August 2007 (CEST)

Done. I will remove tomorrow, if no return answer. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:08, 14 August 2007 (CEST)

When you get a chance...

Please review this when you get a chance. If you have any questions/comments/concerns, I'll be on MSN for a while... or you can leave a note on the policy talk page, my talk page, etc. Thanks in advance. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:16, 15 August 2007 (CEST)

Saying words other then "Heh", would be a nice change in pace ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:19, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:P/Mo Energy Support Paragon

Hey buddy. I'm really pressing to have that GvG tag brought down from this build. Even though the discussion at that page got a little sidetracked, I was wondering if you had any objections (since the debate is pretty much you vs. Auron and a few). My reasoning is basically, when was the last time you saw a battery in GvG? I don't recall one since the Energizing Finale balancing. I figure that it would be right to have that as a GvG build when people actually start running batteries there, but right now, no one runs any kind of battery (that, BiP, etc), so we shouldn't be recommending it alongside some of the other, more verifiable GvG builds in our Good/Great cats. I've posted a bit over there that you may not have read yet, but atm, do you have any objections? Thanks in advance. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 07:22, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

I already told Auron on MSN, I defended it because of the low innovation scores. Don't mind at all. And the last time I saw a battery was Cry vs vD with a P/N BiP. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:31, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
Ok, thanks. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 23:34, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

Nice spider pig?

Heya, can you be nice and just look at this ha build and tell me if u see something that u maybe can improve. Maybe change the paragorn to some other profession/build wich benefit synergy more.(It's bonding will only be on the monks) thx in advance. (if u do it)

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/User:Fish Fish 15:52, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

I don't think Readem likes going over HA builds. He thinks GvG is the highest form of PvP. MisfateDaipenmon 16:18, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
Okay, but for some with a guild that can't play gvg it's kinda hard >.>, but ty for telling me Fish 17:03, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
I don't mind. I dislike HA, merely for its lack of gimmick build balance, and players who think they are good (When in all reality they can't go without Channeling). ALso, they use staffs which sucks. If Izzy would lrn2balance then I would have no problem with HA. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:42, 16 August 2007 (CEST)
But staffs are great for 15^50 wand sets for casters. +60 hp and 15^50 on the same weaponset. Hax, imo. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 23:51, 16 August 2007 (CEST)

Archive

When new year comes, I shall archive, don't worry =) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:48, 17 August 2007 (CEST)

You're breaking policy by not archiving this beast. It's a massive, massive monster that eats livestock in the dead of night, and then the farmers who previously owned the lifestock. It's that enourmous. If you don't archive this talk page now it will murder millions more. Do you want that? Do you? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ//Д 04:50, 17 August 2007 (CEST)
In light of this new information, I would like to request that you not archive for a while, Readem. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 05:25, 17 August 2007 (CEST)

NO! It takes my psp like 10 min to load it. --User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/RFA) 05:28, 17 August 2007 (CEST)

This talk page is beginning to hurt my eyes to scroll down... --Edru viransu//QQ about me 07:35, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

So don't scroll down it! TOCs and section editing were made for a reason. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 07:50, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

Laziness is next to godliness. --Edru viransu//QQ about me 07:52, 18 August 2007 (CEST)
To expand on this, that would involve some actual effort, as opposed to moving my finger in a vertical manner, I would need to move it in several different directions! :) --Edru viransu//QQ about me 07:54, 18 August 2007 (CEST)
heh, it takes a few scrolls just to get through his TOC =P — Skakid9090 07:53, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

Before I go lol...

I apoligize for being such a Troll, and knowing nothing. I am sorry, truly I am. I hope that these experts, will teach me their ways, so I too can become a Pokemon Master! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:05, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

HOW DARE YOU HAVE AN OPINION!!!!!!! — Skakid9090 07:21, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

i no..../shame Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:15, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

adminship

i couldnt be as much of an asshole if i was an admin =( — Skakid9090 07:31, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

I have that problem, as an Admin :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 07:33, 18 August 2007 (CEST)

nope im horrible.... Carbunkle 01:39, 20 August 2007 (CEST)

Turn that frown, upside down! =) (Just not in the queer way...:P) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:51, 20 August 2007 (CEST)

00:25, 20 August 2007 Readem (Talk | contribs) deleted "User talk:Mizzouman2002"

why? -Auron 03:35, 20 August 2007 (CEST)

NPA. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ/ 03:46, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
Except that NPA doesn't say you can actually delete the page for any reason. The information did not pose a significant and continued threat to the user, and thus should not have been deleted, merely archived. -Auron 03:49, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
Policy-based trickery? With a helping of 10 million clauses on the side you say? Madness I say. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ/ 03:51, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
I merely took the initiative that the Victim would rather not read a page full of insults directed at himself, and that the Aggressor would regret the saying of such things in the near-by future. I thought and hoped that if at all possible, the issue could and should be resolved without any emotion involved. If I broke Policy maliciously, it in no way was it intended, and I apologize. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:17, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
Damn it, Readem! The proper response is Madness? This. Is. SPARTAAAAAAAAAAAAA! —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ/ 04:19, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
Question: how can someone possibly unintentionally break policy maliciously? --Edru viransu//QQ about me 04:25, 20 August 2007 (CEST)
Yeh Readem I wasn't trying to accuse you of anything, I was just wondering why you did it :p
In the future, however, leave the blanking/archiving up to the user, and definitely do not delete the page. (Also, use the restore feature next time, copy-pasting text screws the history up bigtime). -Auron 05:32, 20 August 2007 (CEST)

Math

is easy, especially calc. — Skakid9090 04:15, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

R u Calc 2? I have to take it to graduate lol... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:20, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

yeah i read an article somewhere that amde it really easy, i'll see if i can find it for you. — Skakid9090 04:25, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
Yay for easy Advanced Calculus! (Prays that such a blatant contradiction that defies all logic, does not upset some omniscient being) :( Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:30, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

Are you taking AB or BC, since I've taken AB and am in the process of teaching myself BC. Oh, yea, I'm going for a PHD in math when college time comes around. Bluemilkman 03:08, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

Very nice. I am taking it merely because it would look bad if my brother (younger) did, and I did not. Also, I need 3 credentials in mathematics (and I skipped 2 yrs cuz they were dumb and I took them in middle :P), to graduate. I believe it is AB. I am going to Major in Biology most likely, and just get an MD (Enough school as it is lulz :P) later Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:52, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

When

IS pvx updating with the GWEN skills? i wanna post builds! and dont archive your talk page!Dark0805|Rant 05:31, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

When BBCode is updated, PvXcode will be updated as well. However, I wouldn't expect to see it happen in the near future. On a related note, we don't actually update skills, GWShack updates BBCode and that updates us. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:33, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
  • Slaps head* i knew i shoulda been bitching over there!Dark0805|Rant 05:57, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
Yeah, don't complain to us. We have good Mods, who have no lives, and use such power to benefit the wiki. :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 06:01, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
Oh, like gwonline, except for benefit? thats pretty cool. especially for someone coming from the runescape wiki, like me.Dark0805|Rant 19:38, 23 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:Me/Rt E-Surge Domination Mesmer

Your vote on it was removed due to PvXwiki:Real Vetting briefly forbidding author votes. For the moment, the matter is undecided. Feel free to vote again on the build. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:41, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:R/P Hero Battle Spear Ranger

Your vote on it was removed due to PvXwiki:Real Vetting briefly forbidding author votes. For the moment, the matter is undecided. Feel free to vote again on the build. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:42, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:Mo/E SoD Grasping Monk

Your vote on it was removed due to PvXwiki:Real Vetting briefly forbidding author votes. For the moment, the matter is undecided. Feel free to vote again on the build. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 05:44, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

(heh, this is intended as a form message, unfortunately, I didn't realize how many of your votes had been removed :)

Yeah, I know. A lot. :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:47, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

132

u've only been called a nub 132 times... u gotta get working man. ill even help you out. readem iz nub. there 133 already. u'll have more nub comments than kilobytes on your talk page in notime! well, maybe not that much...—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 07:34, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

holy shit, took 2 mins just to edit your page... oh yeah! readem iz nub! 134 already!!!—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 07:35, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
ban cheese for NPA violations, you nub — Skakid9090 07:39, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
That's 135 136 you nub. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 07:42, 22 August 2007 (CEST)
I feel more nub just reading this... In other news, my GWW sig is awesome! Readem Sorry, I'll stop trolling now.
lol, you put Gaile in here place and everyone hates you.  ;) ~ J.Kougar UserJKougar sig 20:05, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

Favor

Might I ask a favor? I need a bit of moderation on one of my build's talk pages. Someone went out of their way to attempt to insult me for everything from my lifestyle to my playing ability because he didn't like a skill I used. Rather silly I know, but if you'd just pop over when you have a second. Thanks. Build:A/any Evasive Blades ~ J.Kougar UserJKougar sig 20:02, 22 August 2007 (CEST)

Taken care of. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:41, 23 August 2007 (CEST)

Archive

New Year. Promise. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:32, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

Pew Pew

Next time i go on a spree like that, just tell me to stfu and call me noob etc. Should work fine. And it doesn't count as NPA if you have my permission, does it? Signet of DisruptionRawrawr Dinosaur \m/ 15:03, 24 August 2007 (CEST)

Exams

Good luck, glad to see you are having a go at life. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 18:56, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

I have always received excellent grades ;), so I wouldn't call it that :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:13, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

Hello

Hello, I'm happy you don't use templates to say hi. Bye bye --Lumenil 21:22, 25 August 2007 (CEST)

hai

h8 parents, <3 mudkipz... it all balances out -Auron 11:58, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

Yeah. It happens. Designing a new page, might look like shit in teh end. Who cares, I don't. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 12:01, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

Archive

Your talk page needs an archive, it's too big. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 13:24, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

No, not rlly. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:14, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

err yah rly it's fucking huge and annoying to scroll through. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 04:51, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Opinion

Build:W/Mo Pure Strike‎... Delete it for PvX:WELL? Or just leave it time to improve? (If it does at all...) ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 13:24, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

I think you answered your own questions ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:14, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

Userpage

Don't you even think about making a black background. Makes me want to bleach my eyes everytime I see your userpage. Asdfg 14:26, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

I'll make it pink, just for you. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 15:30, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

255 105 180 pls Asdfg 21:08, 26 August 2007 (CEST)
lolwut? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:09, 26 August 2007 (CEST)
RGB Code. 255 Red 105 Green 180 Blue. Asdfg 21:10, 26 August 2007 (CEST)
Those are the worst colors ever...I say no. srsly, I fail. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:12, 26 August 2007 (CEST)
But it's my favourite pink! Asdfg 21:13, 26 August 2007 (CEST)

Escape ganker

Sweet build, really. I posted under it about attributes - not sure what you were using, but looked like a nice idea - always a fan of novelty :) --Epi

Hehe, cool =). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:29, 28 August 2007 (CEST)

NPA?

Build talk:Rt/E Obsidian Ritualist. Mizzou's comment. I take rawr rawr's side on mizzou so i'm kinda hoping it is.Dark0805|Rant 20:53, 28 August 2007 (CEST)

He's attacking the Build, not the User. Asdfg 20:55, 28 August 2007 (CEST)
Dam. And sorry readem i guess i should be taking these concerns to the admins that dont have a do not disturb on their talk page. But they scare me.=/Dark0805|Rant 20:57, 28 August 2007 (CEST)
The reason you shouldnt post on readems talkpage is because it's becoming ridiculously long. Asdfg 21:00, 28 August 2007 (CEST)
Rofl, first time I have ever heard that the other admins are scarier then I :P. Also, he was more obnoxious then rude. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:50, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
Nah hes just the only one i've ever talked to. But dont archive this talk page, its pretty cool like this.Dark0805|Rant 03:16, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:Team - TA Hex Pressure

And I quote (from Real Vetting) "Excepting cases of sockpuppetry and/or vandalism, Administrators are expected not to remove votes from builds they have created, and should allow another less biased Administrator to make a determination on whether or not a vote should be removed." The vote you removed on the TA Hex Pressure build may in fact have been biased, I don't know; however, in general excepting the most blatant instances of vote removal (i.e. Sockpuppetry, Vandalism, etc.), you're probably better off not removing votes from your own builds if the removal is even theoretically debatable, since it just gives malcontents more ammunition for complaining about biased Admins and what not. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:15, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

True, I shall refrain from doing so in the future. It does not make my point any less valid however :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:24, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Never said it did, and in fact, I didn't attempt to verify or disprove your claim, I was merely stating a fact. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 01:26, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

I left a comment for the user, regarding his/her vote. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:31, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

 :P

Approximately seventy-five percent of your edits contain the abovementioned emotion. Remember that a policy regarding smiley faces exists. Please refrain from excessive use of the abovementioned emotion, lest you harm its poor tongue. Thank you. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 04:42, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Only 75...? :P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:49, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
Eighty. Consider this your last warning. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 19:01, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
It can get way too annoying. My gf used to do it all the time. ‽-(єяøהħ) no u 20:17, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
Meh, I'll stop then. Don't want to be like your GF for god's sake :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:31, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Build:A/E AoD Shock Sin (formerly Falling Shocker)

Hiya, you rated this build before its recent update. Could you take another look and reconsider your vote? Thanks :) -Auron 15:31, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Oh, and archive your talk page. Thanks. -Auron 15:33, 29 August 2007 (CEST)
Done. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:33, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Archive, thanks.

Your talk page is inhibitive to your role as a sysop on this wiki. If you were a normal user, I wouldn't care how lazy you were or how much of a dick you wanted to be by keeping your page unarchived; but because you are a sysop and your talk page is pretty much the only means of communication people have with you, it needs to be neat, orderly, and easily navigable. Archive it as you will or let someone else do it for you, however, it needs to be done in the next day or so. -Auron 23:02, 29 August 2007 (CEST)

Will fix. Reached my goal regardless. Will archive more regularly now. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:34, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Gz :P -Auron 00:58, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Mending touch!?

what does that have to do with this!? ~ ZamaneeJinnZealot&#039;s Fire(contribs) 02:31, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

You can't run Mending Touch on a P/R. Therefore, Readem says, P/Rs are bad ranger(all barragers are rangers, regardless of actual profession combination, kk?) builds. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 02:36, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

That skill is better then that build. Plx read my header. Ty. Basically, what he said. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:38, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

mmmm....

clean. — Skakid9090 02:32, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

u r face is clean. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:46, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

In light of earlier events...

In light of the earlier events, and the fact that people don't have to try builds to rate them (something I wasn't initially aware of) would you mind going ahead and deleting my Build:W/any Flourish of Pain build? It's older than others that have already gone to testing, but it never did... which is probably for the best because like my FB build, it requires actual testing to see how well it works, and since the general opinion is that adrenal skills are superior to energy ones (even if the damage is the same or better and with unlimited energy and no recharge times you an spam them quicker than adrenal skills) I have a strong feeling that people will treat it the same way they did the FB build because it goes against the preconseptions people have about how builds should be.
I will try to post some more conventional builds later, when I decide which ones to share, but for now I think it best to keep the more complex and non-conformist builds to myself. ;) Thanks. ~ J.Kougar UserJKougar sig 03:55, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Done gogogo. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:45, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

deathechoes

disable account creation imo. — Skakid9090 04:17, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Already is a preset ;). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:18, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Could you take a second to respond to my above question? Just yes or no will do.  :) ~ J.Kougar
Sure, the Pain build will likely be unfavored for three reasons. Very little utility, no DW, and Healing signet is generally better as it is an on demand heal. Hope that helps. If you would like, I will delete it; it is up to you. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:26, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Wiki is going downhill

Looks like our old community of decent people is starting to go to pot now, as it is starting to fill up with idiots/retards. Any way to save us from the wave of idiocy that comes with increasing popularity? ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 05:24, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

We're boned. 71.187.72.225 05:25, 30 August 2007 (CEST)
lol fail moar grinch. You ish banned, take yer soddin break =O ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 05:26, 30 August 2007 (CEST)
Run Portable Swamp. MisfateDaipenmon 05:31, 30 August 2007 (CEST)
This isn't grinch! Sure, this may be the same IP and may redirect to his userpage but uhhhhh... uuuuuuuuuuuuhhhhhhhh... I'm his brother? That's worked before, right? 71.187.72.225 05:31, 30 August 2007 (CEST)
Run Portable Swamp. MisfateDaipenmon 05:32, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

That is what popularity is. more people = diverse opinion = the only things everyone agrees upon are simple and compelling, not necessarily good or effective. Popularity takes everything to the lowest common denominator - just look at prime-time tv. The only reliable solution is some version of communism or imperialism, which is unquestionably bad because it destroys all creativity. This is why i find the rating system has little relevance. SpaceBiscuit 08:15, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

I hate creativity. This is a creative free zone. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:45, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

bwahahaha =) nice one SpaceBiscuit 11:08, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

Soon, really, this wiki is just going to be a big pothole of that stupid SoD guild signature scrawled all over the place (so noisy) + IP mendingwammo idiocy. Brace yourself. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 03:30, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

GvG monk build

Heya, yesterday i joind a guild for gvg and was supposed 2 play LoD/infuser, and he told me 2 use this build and not anything else. We played legoway with a E/mo SoR runner. I myeslf don't belive that this build is such good since it lacks any kind of defense, or e-managment thats good for gvg. He also told me 2 split a team, i take care of 5 people including myself without any semi healer, 1Da para though.

<pvxbig> [build prof=Mo/Me name="Meh bar?" ins=6 hea=12 div=11][Light of Deliverance][Infuse Health][Orison of Healing][Dwayna's Kiss][Healing Seed][Signet of Rejuvenation][Holy Veil][Channeling][/build] </pvxbig>

And another thing i wonder, is this build any chance to use in gvg, if you cange channeling for Return/Gole? http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build:Mo/Me_Protective_LoD Fish 12:51, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

That build is terrible. I wouldn't even recommend using it in HA. Tycn 13:03, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Thx :D just needed 2 know if i don't got any brain, or did u mean the build i linked or the one on the page >.<
No, the Orison build, not the build you linked. That one would work fine, minus Channeling. Draw is also usually taken on a midliner instead. Tycn 13:38, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

<pvxbig> [build prof=Mo/Me name="For HA" ins=5 hea=12+1+1 div=9+1 prot=8+1][Light of Deliverance][Reversal of Fortune][Infuse Health][Protective Spirit][Dismiss Condition][Dwayna's Kiss][Holy Veil][Channeling][/build] </pvxbig> <pvxbig> [build prof=Mo/a name="For GvG" hea=12+1+1 div=10+1 prot=8+1 shadow=2][Light of Deliverance][Reversal of Fortune][Infuse Health][Protective Spirit][Dismiss Condition][Signet of Rejuvenation][Holy Veil][Return][/build] </pvxbig> Ibreaktoilets 14:02, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

Those 2 builds are very effective, THAT is what you call a LoD hybrid. I personally would recommend taking channeling with sig of reju, Mo/A is mostly for guilds that can't manage pressure on their monks and/or cannot keep their backline as a backline, and the Mo/Me one is more effective if the monk is under some pressure, which is more likely than not. Sure, recall IS a good skill. It mostly comes down to personal preference, I just prefer sig of reju in either. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 15:42, 30 August 2007 (CEST)

I have run these before...
Hex-Meta

Reversal of Fortune Light of Deliverance Infuse Health Dwayna&#039;s Kiss Protective Spirit Signet of Devotion Deny Hexes Return

Defensive Team

Reversal of Fortune Light of Deliverance Infuse Health Signet of Rejuvenation Spirit Bond Holy Veil Disciplined Stance Soldier&#039;s Defense

Standard Bar

Reversal of Fortune Light of Deliverance Infuse Health Signet of Rejuvenation Spirit Bond Dismiss Condition Holy Veil Return


Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:00, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

Heya, disturbing again, how do you run a 2monk backline for balanced?, wich skills on both bars? for gvg ofc.Fish 22:37, 1 September 2007 (CEST)


Reversal of Fortune Light of Deliverance Infuse Health Signet of Rejuvenation Protective Spirit Dismiss Condition Holy Veil Return
Restore Condition Mending Touch Reversal of Fortune Gift of Health Spirit Bond Divine Spirit Deny Hexes Glyph of Lesser Energy


A lot of guilds are running RC, and some still SoD. Just preference really. Divine+Deny is pretty popular, however can be subbed in for Veil and Aegis. Guardian can be also subbed into the LoD bar, though I don't recommend it. Hope that helps ;) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:00, 1 September 2007 (CEST)

It helps alot :D thx. Fish 18:19, 2 September 2007 (CEST)
Thx alot :D we have just won 5 gvgs a row, rank 673 now :D and its running down. Fish 23:30, 2 September 2007 (CEST)

Fast

Wow you fucking deleted that fast didn't ya! I was just adding a delete tag and then BAM! It's gone... You ish teh winrar. ~~ Napalm Flame ^_^ Napalm Flame Sig Image (talk)·(contributions) 04:23, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

=) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:25, 31 August 2007 (CEST)


vandal scums!

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/208.108.223.182 he deleted peoples things -.- inc. mine! fiendish ****** plx not the rest of this convo will involve a lot of astrixs.....PheNaxKian (T/c) 22:22, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

i suggest something quickyl more's going by the second...http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/208.108.223.182PheNaxKian (T/c) 22:28, 31 August 2007 (CEST)
Sorry, I go to school =P Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:53, 31 August 2007 (CEST)
lol doesn't matter grinch has sorted now =) PheNaxKian (T/c) 22:58, 31 August 2007 (CEST)

E-Surge Dom Mesmer

As I was reviewing GW:EN skills, it struck me that Aneurysm might make a nice variant for the E-Surge Mesmer. Despite the fact that the focus of the build is not spiking or anything, simply by playing the build effectively, your target should be primed for an Aneurysm spike that can be used to quickly finish off your foe. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 23:40, 2 September 2007 (CEST)

Playing an e-denial build that gives them energy back ftw. Put Power Return specced at 0 FC in there too. Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 09:11, 3 September 2007 (CEST)
Yeah... no. Unless you're spamming Aneurysm or something stupid like that... Aneurysm is in the build so that you can efficiently (and rapidly) "finish off" an opponent. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 09:22, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

PM

You pmed me while I was trollingmonitoring PvX and I got back just in time for the regular spam from Rawr and Tab and I missed it. What was it you needed me for? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲShield of Deflection 05:11, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Oh, probably just to show you that 1337 corrupt build. If not, I have no idea. I talk to too many people to remember :P. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:12, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Link plx. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲShield of Deflection 05:14, 3 September 2007 (CEST)
It was...er ig? lol Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:14, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Userbox

  • Userbox:
Escape This user has broken the law is currently hiding out in the Hidey Hole.

--Theupstandingbob 05:22, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

no u r Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 09:12, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

My HB build

I have a new HB build. Tell me what you think, k? --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 09:26, 3 September 2007 (CEST)


[22]

Bob fregman voted this build a 2.7 overall while most of the votes are around 4-4.9, i curios to see if u can ask why he rated it so low or strike out the vote. Thanks, I have no clue how to admin help, i looked throught the polices and found nothing, so tell me if i am doing this wrong.Tsupert 14:21, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

His vote is prefectly reasonable. By the time you finish activating Rapid Fire, your enemy will practically be on the other side of the map, and youhave to rebuild that adrenaline for Battle Rage. Losing Shock or Rending Touch is also a pretty big hit, and your spike is still mild compared to Eviscerate builds. The combination works on paper but is extremely clunky in practice. Tycn 14:28, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Tycn Go back to the build page to respond to yoru comments, i don't wanna mess up readons pageTsupert 14:30, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Don't worry, this is the new forums... Tycn 14:35, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Both Tcyn's and Bob gave reasonable votes m8. Though I always hate the votes questioning the utils, they seem solid. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 19:47, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Tycn Changed his vote after bob votedTsupert 21:31, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Perhaps bob made tycn come to a realization? Anything is possible m8. Unfortunately, they do have valid points, and did not rate too unfairly to justify vote removal. Sorry :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 21:34, 3 September 2007 (CEST)

Userbox Contest

PM Mr Misfate to redeem your 2k. Shield of DeflectionMisfate 16:20, 4 September 2007 (CEST)

HELP

i have account on guildwiki but i forgot it plz help ty--Lucky121 (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:43, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Really can't solve your problem m8...not an administrator on GW, and no Check so...sorry. Any info you can give me, hinting to it? A page you posted on a lot? Anything? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:24, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Double Re-Vote

Just a quick question regarding your removal of my vote on the SP sin. Your comment was "double re-vote". Just curious, are we only allowed to re-vote once? Not necesarily contesting the removal, but is that policy somewhere? The re-vote in question came due primarily to the metagame conditions of the sp sin, which i thought was a fair reason for re-voting.Bob fregman 02:49, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Complete change in the build. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:00, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

ohh, i get it, you mean re-vote again. Lol i thought you erased it because i re-voted twice. Sorry about that.Bob fregman 02:45, 7 September 2007 (CEST)

Delete

Hi sorry to bother you, but can you delete the image I have uploaded? It is the latest one on the upload log. Thanks.--DarkEnzanArikado (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:30, 6 September 2007 (CEST)

Name? Єяøהħ 23:43, 6 September 2007 (CEST)
Blacklagoon3, it has already been deleted but thanks anyways and thanks again Readem.--DarkEnzanArikado (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:53, 7 September 2007 (CEST)

Unarchive plz

Seeing your TOC less than four scrolls long is sad. QQ Unarchive please. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:59, 7 September 2007 (CEST)

thanks

-- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 21:53, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

For what? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:30, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

Talin

:D -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 22:22, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

...srsly don't. My User Name is Readem for a reason... Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:29, 8 September 2007 (CEST)

lol

All the vandal could do was erase my template lulz. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:10, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

scrubs

u r teh sroob lulz Skakid9090 23:42, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

i no, and scrubs no oter scrubs! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:43, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

i love that show... FrenzyPunjab 23:47, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

Wow you're quitting for a while too? PvX is losing everyone ... ۷ïεדИǺмЄŠЄ. 23:49, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

I'll be back eventually, when things cool off a bit. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:53, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

HB

Come help with/vote on these HB builds, please:

They are fine. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:53, 9 September 2007 (CEST)

U still play?

i saw you in RA just now... i was using your build =P FrenzyPunjab 02:30, 11 September 2007 (CEST)

I know. I was running Corrupt Utility, but we had no frontliners, so it was a moot point. Great build tho, huh :P? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:41, 11 September 2007 (CEST)

User:Defiant Elements/Sandbox#90 DPS is FTW

Thoughts? Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 02:50, 11 September 2007 (CEST)

Interesting lol? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:32, 11 September 2007 (CEST)

Spirit Bond

Is teh sux on a LoD. unless you're korean you can't spirit bond and infuse at the same time. and then your prot monk has no antispike. luv pwning readem cuz he iz such nub. NO THIS IS NOT NPA. and yes, im really bored.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 03:04, 13 September 2007 (CEST)

SoD and RC are both strong anti-spike skills, particularly SoD. Since your non-infuse will be either RC or SoD, SB is fine on the Infuser, especially since one often puts the monk with better infusing reflexes on the infuser, thus meaning that they're less spikable due to being able to SB themselves. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 03:09, 13 September 2007 (CEST)

You are wrong. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:05, 13 September 2007 (CEST)


If you don't believe me...you are wrong. SB just ownz. Grasping ownz so you fail. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:13, 13 September 2007 (CEST)

Lost

what? Are you telling me to get one? Єяøהħ 03:35, 13 September 2007 (CEST)

Navigation bar

of your talk page displays really small for some reason.

Also, I am honored to be listed twice in your Soviet Spies list.

-- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 21:26, 14 September 2007 (CEST)

It fits fine in FF. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:49, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

I'm having the same problem. I use firefox, btw. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 03:51, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

Not sure. Looks fine to me. Different formatting perhaps. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:52, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

Post a screen. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:53, 15 September 2007 (CEST)
Fixed. – HHHIPPO ‹sysop› 03:58, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

aww, now i am only listed once. :p Anyways, thanks for restoring that build. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 21:49, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

np. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:09, 15 September 2007 (CEST)

Bored O.o?

hello world...lol i am bored...--I Am Ant 23:40, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

That's nice. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:48, 16 September 2007 (CEST)

O Hey

Cheese says we shud be friends. --Teh Uber Pwnzer 07:37, 17 September 2007 (CEST)

U both check recent changes every 2 secs, so i thought it wud be a gud idea.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 07:51, 17 September 2007 (CEST)

GvG help plx

This is the random noob that connected you ingame tday but didn't answer :P, i had to make myself some breakfast. Well, mt guild is remaking our build because we belive it is to defensive and needs higher spike/dmg output, but would like a comment from your side :). http://gwshack.us/be1aa is our build, forget the lower ones though, we only use the top bars. Any idea what we should change of if we just fail at playing? Fish is baed 11:51, 19 September 2007 (CEST)

Not Readem and kind of a GvG noob, but I'd suggest dropping one axe for a sword and swapping ZB for RC. That paragon seems a little iffy. Also, three monks? --InternetLOL 12:12, 19 September 2007 (CEST)
Swords fail, ZB is a runner... Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 12:14, 19 September 2007 (CEST)
Internet lol, fail less please, zb is a runner if you cant see storm djinns. This build is also a bit old, everything aint right since the leader hasent fixed in a while. But if you got any idea to raise our dmg output give tips please :).... and..... "WARNING: This page is 30 kilobytes long; some browsers may have problems editing pages approaching or longer than 32kb. Please consider breaking the page into smaller sections." Poor readem :P Fish is baed 16:52, 19 September 2007 (CEST)
Drop dchop, unless your War prefers it or w/e. Would probably go a second shock axe, depends on your playing style though. Res sig on the bsurge, drop storm's. Replace P Return for leak. LoD needs RoF. I prefer Wild and Harrier's on the same bar, but thats just me. Gl w/ your guild btw. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:18, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Needs more Bull's, imo. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 01:24, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

[23]

<3 Readem —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 04:38, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

/agree. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:42, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Also, IRC plx. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 04:43, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
I might as well have asked to be banned. Totally ownz. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 11:48, 20 September 2007 (CEST)
Speaking of GWW, can you please give me a link to their IRC channel? —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 12:50, 20 September 2007 (CEST)

WTF

UHM USER IMAGE TAG + NAMING ANAL VIOLATIONS PLZ — Skakid9090 04:04, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Later :p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:07, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Picz

Stop now, before you overload the internet with win. GD Defender-Signature|GD Defender / contribs 04:03, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

zzz, image copyrights

All of the "please visit our site for un-watermarked images" pictures are obviously copyvios. Please delete them. 166.122.31.2

I'll delete you! Are they really gonna sue Readem for free adverting their site? — Skakid9090 04:15, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
I highly doubt it. Free advertising is free. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 04:16, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
lol public domain lol stolen images lol reasonable use. --InternetLOL 04:18, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Readem is a genius. And I'm completely serious when I say that my internet is slowing down because of the massive influx of win. GD Defender-Signature|GD Defender / contribs 04:20, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
If this is win, I'll have to upload some of my stuff. :P --InternetLOL 04:22, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

As a little research(i.e., going to the url mentioned) shows, said site does not own the copyrights to the images it hosts, but it will remove any if the copyright owner QQs, so if anyone's copyvio'ing, it's them. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:21, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

People pulled that faulty logic on GWiki; "omg i got this from wikipedia so magically I'm not breaking copyvio!" Where the hell do you think that up? It doesn't matter if someone else is breaking copyvio as well, because it doesn't lessen the fact that you're breaking it too.
And reasonable use? Yeah, no. 166.122.31.2
Okay, let me put it more simply, then, since you seem to have failed to understand my point. If the copyright owner of an image on that site doesn't like their hosting of their images, they get removed. Therefore, since the people who make retarded images like that would know of that site, if an image continues to be hosted by said site, most likely, the copyright owner does not object to use or redistribution thereof. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:34, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
You're ruining the fun /cry — Skakid9090 04:27, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Sign in plx Auron. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:25, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

You're missing the point. Every one of these images are considered public domain. You will never be able to find the original creator of any of them, ever, and even if you do you'll never be able to prove it. --InternetLOL 04:26, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Luckily enough, the burden of proof falls upon the uploader. 166.122.31.2
What does he have to prove? That he made the pictures? Well, shit, we better take down all the skill bar pictures, 'cause nobody here made those. :3 --InternetLOL 04:29, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Thats reasonable use /cry — Skakid9090 04:30, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Then so is uploading an edit of picture nobody can find the creator or the editor of into a public profile on a public website without any claim to have created or own said picture.
Do I win? :D --InternetLOL 04:32, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
No, you don't win. I'm pretty sure Anet releases the skill pictures as part of their fansite kits, meaning we have permission to use them, meaning it's fair use since anet made the pics in the first place. --Wizardboy777 04:34, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
May I refer you to the image use policy currently in effect, and the link it has to the licensing help page? You seem woefully ignorant of our image policy.
(EC) Yes, Wizardboy777 is correct. Those images are all attributed on GWiki and here. 166.122.31.2
I can tag all Public Domain, as all pics (Except for a small few) were found on various forums posted by others. =) Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:38, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Thanks, I was about to request a link to that. Give me a minute to read up. --InternetLOL 04:40, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
That's not how life works, Readem. I can't buy a car from a car thief and say I own it legitimately; you're still breaking the law. If the original posters broke the rules (or even didn't, hell, depending on the license of the forums they were found on), that has nothing to do with us; as soon as you use the images under our license, you are breaking the rules. 166.122.31.2
That link indicates that the burden of proof, from a policy perspective, is on the argument that it is a copyvio, not that it isn't. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:45, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Most of those are from various chans, which means the original author is gone. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 04:42, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

That wasn't very descriptive. Each and every one of those images were an edit of a pre-existing picture. In that case, would you credit the photographer or the editor? If the editor doesn't explicitly provide terms and conditions, would that make it public domain? What if the editor didn't get permission from the photographer, or couldn't find the original photographer, and neither of them are aware of it? What if I found the original image and made an almost identical edit? I have many questions.
And Grinch, most of those existed before the *chans. 2chan.net is the oldest, started in (IIRC) 1998, and that's Japanese only. --InternetLOL 04:46, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

Exactly Auron. Unless the Author/Creator specifically patents his/her work, they have just released it into the Public Domain themselves. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:49, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
You are wrong, at least in the US, simply recording in some manner a copyrightable work copyrights it. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:52, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
And if a picture has been transferred multiple times, to a point where no conceivable Author can be found, we label it how? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:57, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
You don't. You delete it unless you can prove it isn't a copyvio.
To edru (in reply to "That link indicates that the burden of proof, from a policy perspective, is on the argument that it is a copyvio, not that it isn't."): the policy is conveying the wrong message because of when it was created. The burden is on the uploader, it's just that on GWiki, over 20,000 images had already been uploaded, so most of the work to be done was ferreting out the copyvio images and deleting them. However, the burden is still on the uploader; look on GWW, if an image there untagged, it gets tagged for deletion. That's how we should be doing it as well. 166.122.31.2
Yeah, but now we start getting really meta. If I live in Pirateland and download a picture created in the US from a US server, reupload it to a Pirateland server, and start posting it around, the copyright no longer applies on my version of the picture because it's no longer hosted in the US, and therefore isn't bound by US copyright law. If it was created outside the US, copyright probably doesn't apply. If it was created outside the US with a picture stolen from a US photographer, edited, and rehosted on a US server, what the hell do we do then?
Really, the only ways to do it without going insane and wasting your life looking around for originals are either to ban all images that aren't owned by ANet (icons, tags, Ichigo722's sig), or allow all pictures except in the cases of obvious infringement. --InternetLOL 05:00, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
So, as long as Readem is willing to vouch for the pictures and no jackhole editor comes forward to demand everyone delete the picture from their computer because he never gave them permission to use it, he's in the clear, correct? --InternetLOL 05:02, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
(EC)Which is how the policy is supposed to work. All guild wars related images can be deemed fair use because we are a fansite... all others must have copyright information or be deleted.
No, Readem is not legally able to "vouch" for anything. The copyright information is pretty much the only vouching he can do. 166.122.31.2
So, the policy is either have something that's practically impossible to find, or have it deleted. You've got a lot of work ahead of you, Auron, can't say I envy you. --InternetLOL 05:08, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
I will look more into Copy Right Legalities this Weekend Auron. If you feel that this is absolutely necessary to impliment atvm, then by all means go ahead and begin tagging. The template must also be created, the policy, as well as a help guide. Hf =). Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:10, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Did I also mention lol, that the policy and templates cannot be copy vio's from either GWW or GW? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:11, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
Speaking of copyrights, the links on the bottom of every page link to CC by-nc-sa license version 2.5, while the copyrights page links to 2.0. Which are edits licensed under? --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 05:15, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
PvXwiki is licensed under the 2.5 version. The copyright page is on guildWiki, which is licensed under the 2.0 version. Any edits made on pvxWiki would be licensed under the 2.5 version. --Wizardboy777 23:25, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
The copyrights page here links to version 2.0, which creates a certain degree of inconsistency. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 23:29, 21 September 2007 (CEST)
I didn't even know that page existed. But it was originally copy/pasted from guildWIki, and then modified for pvx. Either we were originally going to use the 2.0 and gcardinal forgot to change it, or he just wasn't paying attention. The page is protected, but I put a note on the talk page. I'll put something on the admin noticeboard, too. --Wizardboy777 23:45, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

+TA+

Readem you hate me, and if you dont you probably should. That and your experience make you the perfect person to criticise This. Was thinking of a Grenth derv or a curses necro for the last spot; and yeah its morphing into a proper team build. SpaceBiscuit 07:35, 21 September 2007 (CEST)

That is one build...? Am I wrong? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 00:26, 22 September 2007 (CEST)

u r rong. Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 16:21, 24 September 2007 (CEST)
Also lack of shame is saddening. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:05, 25 September 2007 (CEST)

doesnt matter, it didnt work - underdeveloped idea, not enough damage. thnx though. SpaceBiscuit 14:48, 1 October 2007 (CEST)

[GWW]

I'm interested in joining. Edru said that you might know something about the guild's timezones. Tycn 14:20, 25 September 2007 (CEST)

Go to our forums and post an app. You can find it on our GWW page. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 23:24, 26 September 2007 (CEST)

Hai.

You have been kicked from [GWW]. Reasons include alleged being of an asshole, alleged arrogance, alleged pretending you run the guild, alleged insulting me, and also being surprisingly baed at builds. I am not saying that you are an asshole, arrogant, insulting, or pretending you run the guild. However, were we communicating via another medium, I might say that you were. Feel free to contact me by another medium if you would like to know which is the case. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 01:24, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

Tbh, I don't care. You guys can continue being bad, not my problem. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:27, 29 September 2007 (CEST)
I fail to see how we are the elitist shit when you came in, practically attempted to take over the guild, called most people in it bad and then proceeded to say a build (which vZ were running as we talked about it lawl (though they sux. Meh.) is bad compared to FEVERED DREAMS. Rawrawr 01:28, 29 September 2007 (CEST)
gg, should see your trip surge build. I don't have time for both Guild bs drama, and running bad builds. Have fun failing. Oh, and Wiki drama stops now. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:31, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

I love you readem :( —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 02:23, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

I like you too grinch, I just don't like drama. drama=rage and rage=fail. Gl. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 02:38, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

Aww...you left? You were the only one who could beat my fagway spirit spammer build in a scrim, sorry things didn't work out for you in [GWW], I don't know what you said in MSN earlier, but whatever the case, I'm sure it couldn't of been THAT bad. I'll miss ya dude, maybe I'll still see you in game some time. --Hikari 07:02, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

this is fucking PHail.Darksig 07:08, 29 September 2007 (CEST)

Readem Iz Uber Haxxzorz At HB

Broke the top 800... uhh... wewt?—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 00:32, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

Was 688 at one point, then started running interesting builds...failed ;(. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:53, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

You should know better than that. Interesting builds fail at HB. --Kyrax 08:40, 2 October 2007 (CEST)
R637 woot! ;p Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:09, 9 October 2007 (CEST)
Broke 600 woot. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:14, 11 October 2007 (CEST)

Mooo?

can you check and review this build plx, its for gvg. http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/User:Fish_sandbox Fish is baed 10:51, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

i fail, this page now http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/User:Fish/Sandbox Fish is baed 11:07, 2 October 2007 (CEST)


LOOK HERE

I was wondering if you could make a contest to see who could make the best order of apostasty build, i have been trying to make a good on to no avail. I would host it, but my userpage is never visited,also, ur one of the only admins i know, thanks.Tsupert 21:00, 2 October 2007 (CEST)

Mystic Regeneration Signet of Pious Light Pious Haste Order of Apostasy Dark Fury Order of Pain Optional Optional
Here you are. It's D/N, btw. Run one of the energy breakpoints for mysticism, at least the 3 regen breakpoint(8?) for earth, most of the rest in Blood, a little in curses. iirc, QQ ran it some as a flagger. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 22:52, 2 October 2007 (CEST)
8 is the mystic regen breakpoint. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 08:46, 3 October 2007 (CEST)

Commas

Avoid using commas, in unnecessary places. — Skakid9090 04:13, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

Does, not, compute. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:41, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

Well, duh, each comma means you start a new command. You can't use them in the middle of commands. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 05:45, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
,,,,,,,,,,?, —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 12:59, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Don;t use commas; use semicolons; They are the only kind of punctuation you ever need; ;P ;;Wizardboy777 SigWizardboy777(T/C) 00:07, 5 October 2007 (CEST)
Inorite; a period and a comma in one svelte package; —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 00:11, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

[24] +1 to readem — Skakid9090 02:15, 10 October 2007 (CEST)

This=you

When i saw this, i thought: Readem.
Elitism
~ ʑʌɱʌɳəəɺɨɳɳZealot&#039;s Fire(contribs) 04:33, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

Despair Poster = awesome. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:37, 4 October 2007 (CEST)

inorite? ~ ʑʌɱʌɳəəɺɨɳɳZealot&#039;s Fire(contribs) 04:38, 4 October 2007 (CEST)
Nah, that's not Readem. You have to be elite before you can be elitist :p -Auron 03:15, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

Furious Critical

I was wondering if you could look at the Build: R/P Furious Critical. The first two votes don't really don't apply anymore since the build does in fact have interrupts. Greevar 15:20, 5 October 2007 (CEST)

Votes have been changed. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:06, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

Curios

Do you know anyoen selling a mini roller beetle or greased lighning or whateverTsupert 20:45, 7 October 2007 (CEST)

Nope, sorry. they were selling for quite a bit tho, I remember. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:54, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

HA

O.o Tycn 10:26, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

Grinding as we speak; at this rate it will take me forever. Speaking all other forms of PvP are impossible/not fun to grind, I'll be owning w/ Sway lulz! Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:37, 8 October 2007 (CEST)

sway is gay... run a real build like zergway!—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 00:08, 9 October 2007 (CEST)
Well, when I find an HA guild (that I qualify for) I'll stop running sway ;p. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:07, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

Archive

I thought I'd drop in to tell you you need to archive. You know, I never let up. ;) Napalm Flame 00:27, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

Nope, you don't. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:09, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

I'll archive you again if I have to >.> -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 22:33, 9 October 2007 (CEST)
No Readem, resist the archive as much as you can! - Rawrawr 22:34, 9 October 2007 (CEST)

Readem

User talk:Readem ‎(995 links)

5 moar. — Skakid9090 05:28, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

lolwut? Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 05:28, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

4 more? Lord Belar 05:40, 12 October 2007 (CEST)

HA

I wanna HA with Readem, I'm sure we'd pwn, no staff monks. -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 15:01, 13 October 2007 (CEST)

Staffs own. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 19:38, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
Mostly I hate the no 40/40 staff monks. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 22:14, 13 October 2007 (CEST)
Staffs are nice because they have 20% HSR all spells and decent mod options besides HSR(making them great for MoR). I'd run a 40/40 set on any non-MoR caster, though. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 00:28, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
I run staffs for Aegis. That is all. If you are a mesmer, you better be running 40/40 all the fucking time. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:47, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
If you run HSR on a MoR mesmer, you are on drugs. This is truth. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 02:26, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
Drugs that make you uber good. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:32, 14 October 2007 (CEST)
Playing WoW atm, so I'm too lazy to go look at that thread, but the most recent thread I recall there about MoR mes weaponsets, the consensus was one staff with 40%HCT earth or inspiration and one with 40% HCT dom, I think. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 03:36, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Axiom's:

  • Wild Card (in the current meta, it's either a 40/40 earth set or a 40/20 staff for Flesh of my Flesh)
  • 40/40 Dom
  • +30 energy
  • Axe/Shield

Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:43, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

Regardless, people aren't going to waste two upgrade slots(which they are if they're using a 40/40 set on a pre-nerf MoR). Adept staff of Fortitude with 20% HCT inscrip ftw, imo and also in the opinion of the only person who mentioned MoR mesmers specifically. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 04:53, 14 October 2007 (CEST)

HB Crippling Ganker

My rating is valid, tbh you fail with ur one sided views. Bah arrognat admin with lack of knowledge! I amke a valid point, don't remove because you don't like the fact I disagree with you! PATHETIC--Drowning Pigeon 18:16, 15 October 2007 (CEST)

LOl, w/e ur pretty sad aren't you ^o) --Drowning Pigeon 08:00, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

I really don't have time for this...break NPA again and I will ban you. This is your last warning. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:09, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

I restored your vote because it was valid but don't ever break NPA. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 13:25, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

fair enough, thanks. --Drowning Pigeon 19:38, 20 October 2007 (CEST)

renoway

Every time I've ever seen it run with mindblasters the mindblasters have hex breaker. - Rawrawr 21:55, 15 October 2007 (CEST)

Not getting diverted is gud. Ibreaktoilets SignatureIbreaktoilets 22:43, 15 October 2007 (CEST)
Talk to Auron if you don't believe me, that build is generally bad. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 01:13, 16 October 2007 (CEST)
I know, but its a meta one. - Rawrawr 17:50, 16 October 2007 (CEST)

Vote Removal

You really need to cut down on random vote removals- particularly on valid votes. If your reason is "I disagree" or something to that degree, just drop the subject and don't remove their vote. It's been a problem in the past; please don't make it one again. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 03:54, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

Plx read my response Grinch. We can't have good builds failing, because people like pony's more then fucking pixies. " 2-2-2 / Shock Axe lol? But rending is so much better imho!" Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:40, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

O, and sorry for removing people (who have no fucking idea what they are doing)'s votes. "i leik SP sin more because I do. Those silly top 100 are running this build for no good reason at all! Too condition imo!" Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:43, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

I'm not going to comment on any specific examples; however, from past experience, I've learned that good scores on bad builds and bad scores on good builds will, in the long run, not make any substantive difference for the simple reason that they are likely to be nullified given that, in general, the more active voters are generally the more informed voters. If a vote is provably fallacious, or at least, fallacious beyond a reasonable doubt don't remove it. A very simple way to avoid jumping the gun when it comes to vote removal is to post it on the Admin Noticeboard. That way, you can, if the vote removal is controversial, generate general debate, or, if not, at the very least, two Admins will have to have agreed that the vote merits removal. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 04:48, 17 October 2007 (CEST)

You would be surprised by what a B+ did to my 4.3 gpa :/. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 04:50, 17 October 2007 (CEST)
That's not a good analogy however. There are a finite number of grades that are, collectively, your GPA. Once those instances are expended, you have no more opportunities to remedy the situation. However, in the case of voting, we have, for our purposes, an unexpendable number of opportunities. Defiant Elements Sig Test 2 *Defiant Elements* +talk 19:17, 17 October 2007 (CEST)
I got a D and a C and I still have a 3.8. Bluemilkman/Talk To Me 22:50, 19 October 2007 (CEST)


R.I.P.

R.I.P Sweet Prince. Fare thee well. —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 05:48, 20 October 2007 (CEST)

Indeed. You'll be missed. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 06:05, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Why did he resign, I'm sad =(--Victoryisyours Sig ImageVictoryisyours 17:46, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Bye. Tis a sad, sad day.Darksig 20:06, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Can't say I'll miss him as a person, but I will miss his experience. :( Lord Belar 20:10, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Goodbye you Leader of us mere mortals.... PheNaxKian (T/c)Tag thumb 20:19, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Good night on you to. Fish is baed 22:45, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
Readem iz nub =/ — Skakid9090 23:34, 20 October 2007 (CEST)
 :( Scourge 02:27, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
This sux. I will miss the trolling on GWW the most... — Hyperion` // talk 03:49, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
Is he gone from there, too? Lord Belar 03:54, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO. Misfate 05:40, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
You were too good for this world.....Why must the good die younnnnng?!(Kiron 15:46, 21 October 2007 (CEST))
damn, ima miss him... Alpha firebornAlpha Fireborn Cripshot 18:45, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
Too bad, you have retired yourself, Readem. You have always been a brave voice in the daily battles of PvXwiki. You will be missed. — Ranger-iconLuobailong ···talk ···builds 19:15, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
Are you gone for good? :( --MalaMala sig Mind Blast 19:45, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
No, only for bad. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 19:47, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
Good riddance. I've been waiting for this to happen for awhile. --Evernix 22:14, 21 October 2007 (CEST)
How tactful and cordial of you. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 02:52, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
EVERNIX, IM CALLING YOU OUT!. Misfate 03:17, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
So long Readem...you were a brilliant contributor to PvX, this wiki was your baby, and now it's all grown up and you're leaving it. It's sad, because I presume it's the only kind of child Readem could ever have...RustyTheMesmer 04:35, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
I'm going to break my silence from lurking on PvX for months just to say thanks Readem for everything you did for this site, and I'm sure everyone hopes to see you around in GW in the future. I think skakid and cheese slaya said it best: Readem iz nub. GG. --70.79.83.149 04:55, 25 October 2007 (CEST)

waaah!!! -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 22:40, 21 October 2007 (CEST)

Ill miss this DUDE. he was like a god amongst men.--Fallen 02:49, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
Dude...this is so sad. Readem you were (and are) so awesome. T_T. PaintballerSig The Paintballer (T/C) 01:36, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
bye bye. Leeroythefeared 23:39, 23 October 2007 (CEST)
Goddamn. I can see why you quit. You still going to play WoW? -- 71.229.204.25

And he's still active on GWiki. I am pissed. Lord Belar 05:29, 25 October 2007 (CEST)

Hmm curious, when you say Checked and Reviewed on builds For Viability, what does that mean? Huynh 05:52, 26 October 2007 (CEST)

You ask that in his R.I.P section? - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 06:10, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
Lol :P It just means the build is good in his opinion. Hammer And Sickle۷ïεדt/c 06:12, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
Actually, I think it meant less than that. It meant that it was possible to win with that build (i.e. viable), not necessarily effective/efficient. Mostly used on GWiki builds. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 06:14, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
Dang it Readem. Now a vacuum will develop and the discussions will be filled with trolls phailing to act like you. :( Bowflight 00:36, 29 October 2007 (CET)

GOODNIGHT, SWEET PRINCE. --71.229.204.25 00:40, 29 October 2007 (CET)

GET BACK FFS. - Unexist sigUnexist 13:27, 29 January 2008 (EST)

top 500

Geez. — Skakid9090 03:04, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

Eh? Lord Belar 03:25, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
[[25]Skakid9090 03:30, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
I just battled him, he's worth his rank. He was down 10-5 and he beat me 11-17 Teutonic 04:06, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
I thought he quit GW, too. :/ Lord Belar 04:07, 22 October 2007 (CEST)
hes on GW twice as much as he used to.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 06:06, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

Gogo Readem, we're rooting for you! -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 23:36, 22 October 2007 (CEST)

gl on GW Readem, take 'em down! (lawlz I phail at HB) LavaEdge324 01:27, 23 October 2007 (CEST)

woa cya §Ω☼Vorrax☼Ω§ 04:17, 23 October 2007 (CEST)

I'm gonna miss this guy, even if he did 0-0-0 one or two of my builds. He had insight into things I would never even think to have wondered about, and I must say, I've learned much from him. Now, if I only could figure out how to be anything near decent in HB.. cedave(contributions_buildpage) 02:11, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

Yay for Readem! ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 02:16, 24 October 2007 (CEST)
/agree. Misfate 05:22, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

lol i quit HB cuz i was too good :P §Ω☼Vorrax☼Ω§ 20:35, 24 October 2007 (CEST)

Readem on WoW? 111!!!!@@!#!#ZOMG. If your seriously are gonna play, play on Kel'Thuzad =) We'll miss you Readem! --Hikari 08:21, 25 October 2007 (CEST)
Khaz Modan imo -Auron 08:30, 25 October 2007 (CEST)
Isn't that a PvE Server? PHAYL. --Hikari 17:36, 25 October 2007 (CEST)
Seems as if we're losing quite a bit of PvX users because of WoW. CURSE YOU WOW!! >:( Hammer And Sickle۷ïεדt/c 03:01, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
not no really. Misfate 03:02, 26 October 2007 (CEST)
We're losing wiki players due to the cabal. That, and peer pressure. :p -- Nova Jirouji-Nova -- (contribs) 20:29, 27 October 2007 (CEST)
Wiki players simply represent the macro of GW players. Tons of people are leaving GW. - Kowal Krowman {{sysop}} 20:48, 27 October 2007 (CEST)
Anet+unfun balances=FTL~ ʑʌɱʌɳəəɺɨɳɳZealot&#039;s Fire(contribs) 04:47, 30 October 2007 (CET)
it also has to do with the fact that most people are getting bored with GW, people just whipped through EotN way to quick, quicker than A-Net expected...i'm expecting heavy nerfs int he future. Riff 22:59, 30 October 2007 (CET)

I thought he just resigned Admin-ship, not the whole wiki. Anyways Readem, your in my HB spot, i'll knock you out of it soon :D- Jak123X 04:09, 31 October 2007 (CET)

you mind if I add you on my friends list? We could do HA/TA/Dumb things. haha- Jak123X 04:11, 31 October 2007 (CET)

What does gngb mean?--Victoryisyours Sig ImageVictoryisyours 22:35, 7 November 2007 (CET)

Goodnight goodbye —ǥrɩɳsɧƿoɲ 00:06, 8 November 2007 (CET)
Nice to have all of your contributions somewhere, we will remember you.Focused AngerDevintomb1+talk

GGs Readem. I will keep your sig warm until you decide to return. — Tycn (talk*pvxcontribs) 09:24, 8 November 2007 (CET)

lol —Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 00:55, 9 November 2007 (CET)

HB Game

GG readem... Lameway(Ritway)>Readem Test Way. gg, gl testing. ~~ User Frvwfr2 signature frvwfr2 (T/C/Sysop) 01:51, 9 November 2007 (CET)

Yea, unfortunately. The build I was using is completely nerfed anywaz ;p. As is my usual A/R, Mo/E, Rt/N, D/A =(. Owellgg. ~yeaizme

http://pvx.wikia.com/wiki/Build:A/D_Beguiling_Insight

Hello, consider re-voting on the build. It's strong and wasn't hurt by the recent nerfs. Zuranthium 20:25, 17 November 2007 (CET)

He left almost a month ago. --71.208.133.30 21:16, 17 November 2007 (CET)
He still contributes and votes sometimes. --Edru viransu//QQ about me/sysop 21:18, 17 November 2007 (CET)
Yeah, but he's probably not going to revote on a bad build just because it wasn't nerfed. --71.229.204.25 03:26, 19 November 2007 (CET)
Guess what? He actually revoted.--DarkEnzanArikado (talk*pvxcontribs) 03:34, 19 November 2007 (CET)
Oh wow. I just got owned twice. XD --71.229.204.25 03:38, 19 November 2007 (CET)
LOL, RA Assassins ftw! Zuranthium 17:13, 19 February 2008 (EST)

TA gayway

wtb soon — Skakid9090 03:15, 19 November 2007 (CET)

When I get back from vaca. 72.199.154.179 05:57, 19 November 2007 (CET)

http://gwshack.us/aaa99 tbh

lol i first thought that this user died because u'r posts are so sad Plohek 10:13, 31 January 2008 (EST)

ohai second account - Rhysrazputin 16:25, 12 February 2008 (EST)

some random stuff

lol first. --71.229.204.25 20:49, 12 February 2008 (EST)

OH SHT NIGGA — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 20:51, 12 February 2008 (EST)

HI READEM!!! — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 20:57, 12 February 2008 (EST)

...fail. Readem (talk*pvxcontribs) 20:58, 12 February 2008 (EST)

wb and whatnot. — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 20:58, 12 February 2008 (EST)
U stole my first post bich, haha Readem nice ban on GWW, well worth it tho himynameisbobbyjoe 20:59, 12 February 2008 (EST)

readem is back right as tycn quits. weird. wb, mate. IliekfrenzyPunjab 21:02, 12 February 2008 (EST)

I am actually just changing a few things that bothered me. Not really going to contribute. Thanks regardless. --Readem 21:35, 12 February 2008 (EST)

ur gay — Skadiddly[슴Mc슴]Diddles 21:35, 12 February 2008 (EST)
It would take some kind of faggot to contribute to PvXw oshi~ —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 21:40, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Hi Readem. -Shen 21:37, 12 February 2008 (EST)

In b4 protection

0th. Misfate 21:47, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Guess you found your password, Readem? -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 21:48, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Actually, I was banned for weeks and gave up. My PW is universal, so I doubt I would forget it. --Readem 21:49, 12 February 2008 (EST)


First

before protect. — Teh Uber Pwnzer 21:51, 12 February 2008 (EST)

PvXwiki:Editing_User_and_Talk_Pages. Misfate 21:53, 12 February 2008 (EST)

...archived in massive archive. --Readem 21:54, 12 February 2008 (EST)

Your archive will be the new copy+paste for vandals. Misfate 21:55, 12 February 2008 (EST)

No orange bar = no care. --Readem 21:56, 12 February 2008 (EST)

What orange bar? Misfate 21:58, 12 February 2008 (EST)
lolwut? Lord Belar 10:30, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Lolwut the nub is bk miright or just... erh... moo. Fish Signature Fishy Moooo 17:38, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Does this mean we get to put more pointless "first" spam here again? Lord Belar 19:08, 13 February 2008 (EST)

... The preceding unsigned comment was added by Readem (contribs) .

can we protect this already, i'm sensing a mega readem rage coming.—Cheese Slaya&#039;s Sig Cheese Slaya (Talk) 19:10, 13 February 2008 (EST)

Just hide under your desk and wait for it to blow over. Lord Belar 19:11, 13 February 2008 (EST)

So I heard

you like orange boxes? Lord Belar 19:31, 13 February 2008 (EST)

You're back @ pvx? Geegee. - Unexist sigUnexist 07:17, 16 February 2008 (EST)

FYI, Checkuser is a rather iffy proposition. It has a bad tendency to give fatal errors when you give it a username and ask for IPs... so I'm searching for your username in the user and user talk namespaces. And for the record, you talk to too many people. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 00:44, 21 February 2008 (EST)

Alright, that should be all of them. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 01:01, 21 February 2008 (EST)

People in HA are stupid

r6 yells in team chat "I CAN'T RUN RELICS" *drop* -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 20:21, 25 February 2008 (EST)

Mo/Me DS

you mentioned it on the talk page of the WoH Shield Bash build - does it look anything like this?

Reversal of Fortune Zealous Benediction Dismiss Condition Guardian Shielding Hands Deny Hexes Divine Spirit Hex Breaker

i've seen a high ranked glad running that or something similar. 24.63.206.168 23:41, 22 July 2008 (EDT)

Not hex breaker. MoC. Don't bother me. --Readem 17:37, 23 July 2008 (EDT)


I <3 U

I only left so I could join a PvE guild to help with farming the Ectos. I have 10, and when I get the rest I'll be coming back. And ah, you still love me, :). --Mahsa 23:58, 23 July 2008 (EDT)

I love you too, Mahsa. :( —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 00:30, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

I am not radiant.--Camizzle 16:26, 24 July 2008 (EDT)

Crow thinks you are strong and manly! <3 Crow 18:02, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Also you are pretty fucking powerful in TA at smite. Crow 18:05, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
hello crow. --Readem 21:25, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

Camizzle is Cammy. Cammy is a chick, and by no means is she manly, :P --Mahsa 22:30, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

I qstep with wasd

True story. —SkaKidSkakidasaur 21:26, 31 July 2008 (EDT)

My qstep is far superior to that of any mortal man. --Readem 21:27, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I can qstep from my Guild Lord to the enemy Bodyguard with 1 step. —SkaKidSkakidasaur 21:27, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I frenzy in the opposing team's base during VoD (with no regards for my monk's energyz) --Readem 21:30, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I thought so. --Readem 21:34, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I fucking dollarstep —SkaKidSkakidasaur 21:34, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
I raincheckstepobaby. --Readem 21:35, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
Ok, so, a monkey walks into a bar and I forget the rest of the joke but your moms are all whores. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 22:50, 31 July 2008 (EDT)
Most informed comment yet. -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image{{sysop}} 03:04, 3 August 2008 (EDT)

FIRST. --Crow is PhatNThat 07:06, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

So when are you gonna make CCC again, I'm sure they won't ban it this time. --Crow is PhatNThat 07:19, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Not sure. Still waiting to see whether GvG will suck balls or not. Probably going to HA for awhile, and or HB. --Readem 07:46, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
GvG is still fine, we found out we were shit at splitting, so now we just run a smiter and stuff, and we rape stuff with it ;P. A week ago we were struggling with r1000s, but now we are rolling r300s lol. --Crow is PhatNThat 07:48, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
HA is just boring, which is why I am only R4 :P. What rank are you in HB anyway then? :P --Crow is PhatNThat 07:49, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Currently r3 in HB. I want to get r5. I played ages ago. --Readem 07:50, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
I'm r3 too! :O. What you run there? Or just run whatever you feel like? --Crow is PhatNThat 07:51, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

These idea were made several months ago. Perhaps November range even. --Readem 07:54, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Or... You can stop being so fggt and be lame and run BB sin!!! --Crow is PhatNThat 07:55, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Guestage

If we GvG and need some stuff wonna guest? --Crow is PhatNThat 08:02, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

PD is for scrubs. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 18:01, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

I use it in TA to destroy res sigs. --Readem 18:01, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Dshot/Mbane/A war ownz :P The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 18:02, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
I run Distracting blow on my monk now. Interrupt Bull's Strike and Dev Hammer before it is used. so strong. --Readem 18:05, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Or channeled strike. I heard those rits were pretty strong. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 18:07, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

nothing really

Insta-archive bores me. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 19:37, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

you sir, are a nigger. --Readem 19:37, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

So... archive? The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 19:38, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

...aids. --Readem 19:39, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

shit shit fuck pants

Not my intention
I got so brave, drink in hand
Lost my discretion
It's not what, I'm used to
Just wanna try you on
I'm curious for you
Caught my attention

I kissed a girl and I liked it

The taste of her cherry chap stick
I kissed a girl just to try it
I hope my boyfriend don't mind it
It felt so wrong
It felt so right
Don't mean I'm in love tonight
I kissed a girl and I liked it
I liked it

No, I don't even know your name
It doesn't matter,
You're my experimental game
Just human nature,
It's not what,
Good girls do
Not how they should behave
My head gets so confused
Hard to obey


I kissed a girl and I liked it
The taste of her cherry chap stick
I kissed a girl just to try it
I hope my boyfriend don't mind it
It felt so wrong
It felt so right
Don't mean I'm in love tonight
I kissed a girl and I liked it

I liked it,

Us girls we are so magical
Soft skin, red lips, so kissable
Hard to resist so touchable
Too good to deny it
Ain't no big deal, it's innocent

I kissed a girl and I liked it
The taste of her cherry chap stick

I kissed a girl just to try it
I hope my boyfriend don't mind it
It felt so wrong
It felt so right
Don't mean I'm in love tonight
I kissed a girl and I liked it
I liked it--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 19:40, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

a girl you say? now that surprises me. --Readem 19:41, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

As i'm currently beating off to this i'm not going to disagree.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 19:44, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
a girl you say? now that surprises me. --Readem 19:41, 10 August 2008 (EDT) LOL The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 19:46, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

Where are you?

You weren't even logged in on GW, so I cried a little bit. --Crow is PhatNThat 20:07, 10 August 2008 (EDT)

I am setting up my desktop. It might be a few days until I get my amazing internet and new mic =((. Then I will be like all the cool kids. --Readem 20:20, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Readem is fucking HxC.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 20:25, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Readem > All. I think we know this because of his braveness in AB as R/D. --Crow is PhatNThat 20:27, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Clearly he does not play well for you, as together we made the strongest AB build known to mankind. We could only run it once, incase other people realised its amazingness and just died. The preceding awesome-sauce comment was added by Rawr. 20:29, 10 August 2008 (EDT)
Lol, well he actually killed the SUXON base defender by just looking near it, so yeah! --Crow is PhatNThat 20:36, 10 August 2008 (EDT)


HAI READEM -- 19px The proceeding Cute McPiplup was added by Rawr. 19:02, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

auron is truly an asshat for lifting protection =(. --Readem 19:08, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

tbh if you actually went on msn, I would have no need for this place. -- 19px The proceeding Cute McPiplup was added by Rawr. 19:08, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
I am on MSN now, talking to grinch. --Readem 19:10, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
Oh, then I must of forgot to re-add you after I deleted everyone i knew from GW on msn. I'll get it off grinch to save you from posting to scrubs. -- 19px The proceeding Cute McPiplup was added by Rawr. 19:24, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

O Hai. —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 09:29, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Ohai

Hey readem bbz <3 - ᅳʍęɢgąʈɧıçĸ Mgrinshpon floating pig ʍąŋʂţǐçᶄ 19:11, 13 August 2008 (EDT)

Dear Readem

Want to teach me how to TA? HA is boring shittiness, izzy fucked over gvg, and HB is nothing but build wars and microing heroes. Plus a couple of glad ranks would be hawt.--GoldenGoldenstarStar 00:37, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

maybe. --Readem 19:09, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

How to TA: Poop on the other team with more hexes than they poop on you with. —SkaKidSkakidasaur 19:25, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
How to play Guild Wars: Don't be bad (use of hands is optional) --Readem 19:32, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
How to TA. Spam your friends list and alliance chat for people who dont come prepared with a well written essay on why their bar is better than the one you're fucking giving them. find vent server. get vent server. get asked by mattie why your on his vent server. lose to gay hexes. run gay hexes. lose to good balanced. masturbate. turn off guild wars halfway through the download because of the benefit to bandwidth.19px--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 19:57, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
lol that sounds like bad TA. --Readem 20:29, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
If you consider masturbation to be less fun than TA, i guess. But then you'd be some kind of freak zombienoid from the planet notinternet.19px--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 20:54, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
I have never played GW. I guess I should try this game. --Readem 21:06, 15 August 2008 (EDT)
Tab Piplup
Hey Readem/Archive 1, welcome to Guild Wars! Enjoy your brief stay.

If you are a member ofthe Nazi Party, submit your identification card on the main site for some cool weapons. Sieg Heil! ^-^
Alternatively, you can play PvE. We don't reccomend it.
Don't forget to learn about PvP from trolls, shitters or PvEer's.^-^

--Dark
19px--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 21:30, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

Hey bbz

Your computer done and stuff now? <3 --Crow is PhatNThat 20:12, 15 August 2008 (EDT)

I fell asleep

Need to adjust my sleeping habbits. Give me like, 3-4 days. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɭuƿƿɭɘş Mgrinshpon Piplup sprite ɱᶗƿıƿɭuƿ 06:58, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

OBABY

Just thought I'd say obaby tbh. --Crow is PhatNThat 18:03, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

I detect some sarcasm

Are you implying that FoW armor doesn't guarantee greatness? Gtfo you newb.19px--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 20:34, 16 August 2008 (EDT)


Come on my vent

I think you should, Fishy and Alex and some other people are on! --Crow is PhatNThat 20:52, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

I probably deleted your vent :/. I had about 90 or so, and got tired of scrolling through them (I only saved about 5)... --Readem 21:17, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

eternium.fusionvoice.com 3811 gogo. --Crow is PhatNThat 21:24, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

ISNT IT TIME FOR AN ARCHIVE?

????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? -- 19px The proceeding Cute McPiplup was added by Rawr. 21:33, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

yep --Readem 21:35, 16 August 2008 (EDT)

Triangle

Wuts a triangle m8? --Crow is PhatNThat 20:35, 17 August 2008 (EDT)

dunno. lol, I am banned for an inappropriate name. --Readem 20:37, 17 August 2008 (EDT)


ATTN

I'm fucking pro at pve yo. If you need FoW buddy i can come on an imbagon or a ms/db sin, both with sabway if needed.19px--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 15:02, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

I'm the fucking best HB monk in PvE ever, I actually kept a team of 15 Frenzying Warriors up for 2 hours straight and they were standing in 1000000 Savannah Heats. --19pxCrow McHumberbridge 21:26, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

mkay. Mahsa and grinch will probably come too. It will be strong. --Readem 21:48, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

When will the event take place good sir? --19pxCrow McHumberbridge 21:59, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
Also, are you unbanned yet, or didn't they unban the MIGHTY READEMMMMMMMMMMMMMM? --19pxCrow McHumberbridge 22:02, 18 August 2008 (EDT)
40 more hours =(. --Readem 22:34, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

hi

hi--ViYsig5(vĭk'tə-rē ĭz yôrz) 21:53, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

hello --Readem 21:53, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

dearest readem

SurskitSurskitSurskitSurskitSurskitSurskitSurskitSurskit

WHOS GAY NAO - ᅳʍęɢgąʈɧıçĸ Manstick Sig ʍąŋʂţǐçᶄ 22:34, 18 August 2008 (EDT)


olook

An orange box. Lord Belar 22:42, 18 August 2008 (EDT)

herro

if you've got a minute, since you know what you're doing, please drop by [26] and tell my why i fail so hard. i know i'm probably too bad to run MoC in the first place, but what the hell. Empty Orchestra 23:03, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

el oh el @ readum

... Misfate 23:26, 20 August 2008 (EDT)

smiter's boon

is dead. long live the queen. Empty Orchestra 17:04, 21 August 2008 (EDT)

Readem Ashamed of beeing user of the PvX community?

^ U didnt really want to admit ur the PvX Readem before i checked ur name oO Why so srsious? Massive Image-Massive Sig 18:52, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

yep. --Readem 18:54, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

Being a PvXian means you loose OVER NINE THOUSAND points in something or other. --FrostyFrosty Diglett 18:56, 22 August 2008 (EDT)

fow beat us

shit Reademisnotbrave and grinch is a rager-WaffleZ LOL-. 00:20, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

Your AoM bar is boring--GoldenGoldenstarStar 00:21, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
Doesn't matter, i didn't have enough energy to use it-WaffleZ LOL-. 01:13, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
we had 1 healer :/ --Readem 01:38, 23 August 2008 (EDT)

sorry

about today. i'll be entertaining company for the rest of tonight, i'll poke you tmm for TA/HA. till then, nn & gl farming glads, fame or w/e. peace. Empty Orchestra 01:27, 23 August 2008 (EDT)


My hat

File:Mgrinshpon sexy hat.jpg—ǥrɩɳsɧƴɭuƿƿɭɘş Mgrinshpon Piplup sprite ɱᶗƿıƿɭuƿ 21:38, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

The first girl that I fell for was a fair and faithful fighter —SkaKidSkakidasaur 21:48, 14 September 2008 (EDT)

Your interface

Isn't as manly as mine. The P button exist for a reason(yes, i'm monking without a party hud). —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 12:25, 19 September 2008 (EDT)

Unexist has a bspike interface. It's a party bar taking up 50% of the screen, a skill bar taking up 40% and the remaining 10% is health bar. Tab McPiplup 12:44, 19 September 2008 (EDT)

Soz

my computer shit on me and i culdnt sync ra wif u baby :< Biddlers19pxMcDiddlensmithyarrgh 21:17, 20 September 2008 (EDT)


pig rape

Now that i've read that i'll be giggling like I'm stoned for a good three days. Fuck you.--Dark0805(Rant/Contributions) 22:02, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

but you don't even get the meaning of pig rape :< Biddlers19pxMcDiddlensmithyarrgh 22:23, 20 September 2008 (EDT)

nigger talk

hey yo wutup Rawrawr Dinosaur 14:20, 21 September 2008 (EDT)


first Biddlers19pxMcDiddlensmithyarrgh 19:42, 21 September 2008 (EDT)

Biddy is sensual, and so is Readem. --ϲɽоω ɱϲɑɳǥɽƴɗɽɑɡоɳ 13:28, 24 September 2008 (EDT)

13 by Sunday

Difficult to recruit in a dead game. Please recruit as well, I spend 1-2 hours a day minimum recruiting. So uh, can't be a 1 sided effort. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 16:48, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

sure, when I have time. probably Wednesday or Thursday. --Readem 18:19, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

ITT Nova's age? -- Armond WarbladeArmond sig image 19:24, 29 September 2008 (EDT)

Eating guns

They lack good nutritional value and aren't easily digested. I don't think this is sound advice. Most nutritional experts, actually, would probably disagree with this advice you've given. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 07:11, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

I don't care about mutrition. --Readem 10:15, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

and yes, that is a word. --Readem 16:59, 2 October 2008 (EDT)

AB

Will it contain lots of flaming, Edge of Extinction and suxon stabbing? Brandnew. 17:16, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

Does it have to be 24/7 or could I play every once in a while? ViYsig5Victoryisyours (talk/pvxcontribs) 17:19, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Meh, it will be at max 2-3 hours. The rest I can get from FFF. I get banned when I AB. that is how much flaming there will be. In other news, grinch and myself will rape the PvE scrubs in our alliance for 10k. AND GREEN WEAPONS. OMG. --Readem 17:25, 8 October 2008 (EDT)

LOL BANNED FOR RACIAL SLURS. --Readem 10:05, 9 October 2008 (EDT)

srsly? :P Also what time this weekend. ----ﮎHædõ๘یíɳShadowsin sig 10:06, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
62 hrs? Brandnew. 10:07, 9 October 2008 (EDT)
I herd Reademway consists of Devhammer, Magebane, VoR Mesmer, and Fortress Monk for maximum flaming?--ShadowRelyk Sig 03:42, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
No, Erf Shaakur, Magebane, Soul Bind, and Fortress Monk for RA syncs. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 14:23, 11 October 2008 (EDT)
You can't spam erf shaakur as much though, takes longer to flame until you kd 3 guys. And Soul Bind isn't as gay.--ShadowRelyk Sig 20:37, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
Please learn to build wars before talking. Would be much appreciated. —ǥrɩɳsɧƴɖɩđđɭɘş Grinshpon blinky cake 22:36, 15 October 2008 (EDT)
Please learn to stop being elitist all the time tbh--ShadowRelyk Sig 17:06, 30 October 2008 (EDT)

Political

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/29-09-2008/106487-sarah_palin-0 Unequivocal Udai 19:14, 11 October 2008 (EDT)

Bbz

We haven't TAed or anything in aaaages! I say we do some soon ye? <3. --ϲɽоω ɱϲɑɳǥɽƴɗɽɑɡоɳ 17:36, 21 October 2008 (EDT)

mkay. --Readem 18:38, 22 October 2008 (EDT)

So...

I've read your GWW contribs, and I must say....wow. You're one elitist, opinionated prickface.... Will you marry me? Mr. Big 19px 00:11, 23 October 2008 (EDT)

Already my nigger, get the fuck off! —ǘŋƐxɩsƫ 16:18, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
Nah Unexist, you fail to recognize that both you and Readem are my niggers, so shh! :>. --ϲɽоω ɱϲɑɳǥɽƴɗɽɑɡоɳ 16:30, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
I find my comments to be quite insightful at times. --Readem 17:03, 23 October 2008 (EDT)
Everyone's always already spoken for.... :< Mr. Big 19px 17:09, 23 October 2008 (EDT)

Lol

Build talk:A/W Shadow Shove, i was talking about the build not the minibar if it matters >.> Don't rage at people just because there is bias against whatever anons say though. Jebus and Katamari were being bad anyways tbh. Just say "I am Readem, sit down and shut the fuck up"--ShadowRelyk Sig 21:37, 6 November 2008 (EST)

Btw go kill some builds, people are too lazy to argue good--ShadowRelyk Sig 11:07, 14 November 2008 (EST)

hi readem Rawrawr Dinosaur 14:39, 16 November 2008 (EST)

lolhai i iz alive?-WaffleZ LOL-. 16:38, 19 November 2008 (EST)

Community content is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 2.5 unless otherwise noted.